May 10, 2006
And check this out, Tom Cruise's new movie isn't doing so hot. People are saying it's because he's been so openly wingnutting his way through press appearances. I caught this article off Drudge from FoxNews that throws the numbers out on how bad the movie's doing, and how Paramount is pissing its pants over the cash losses. Then I hit this sentance:
And that's the irony here: "M: I3" is a terrific action film. Director J.J. Abrams did a great job, and the entire cast from Cruise right through to the team and various supporting players do a convincing job.
Cruise has several fantastic stunts that will take your breath away. It would be a shame if everyone waited to watch it at home on small screens.
For some reason, after the article had spent some time discussing the suckitude of the film at the box office; this portion just felt odd. Then it dawned on me. Who owns Fox? Hmm...yeah, wait for it; Paramount. Nice ad placement, but I think I'll wait for the DVD. There are just too many reasons to avoid theaters anyways.
The wife and I just bought this digital video camera, and it's one bad mofo too. I'm thinking of rigging up an in-car mount for the camera to record track days from the cockpit perspective. Which is another hobby I think I might start back up with again. I ran a full season of SOLO-II events and won 1st in my class for the region. Haven't hit the track in the past year or so since then though. Maybe I'll start back up. It would give me an excuse to use the cam.
Posted by: shank at
02:52 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 418 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Nit Picker at May 10, 2006 03:13 PM (HbP5o)
Posted by: shank at May 11, 2006 07:03 AM (+H1yK)
Posted by: shank at May 11, 2006 09:55 AM (+H1yK)
Posted by: Victor at May 18, 2006 03:52 AM (K4DW2)
86 queries taking 0.0702 seconds, 200 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








