January 30, 2004
Who should I vote for?
Apparently I'm a shoe in for Bush, which is pretty much what I figured already. Some of the other results were surprising though.
Bush: 100%
Leiberman: 93%
Edwards: 86%
Not unexpectedly, Kucinich was number last.
Find your perfect match.
Posted by: Jim at
06:36 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I had Bush 100%, Leiberman 96%, Kerry 94%, Edawards 84%. Dean and Kusinich were 70% and 64% respectively. Where're Clark and Sharpton?!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at January 30, 2004 11:49 PM (1kcjy)
2
Sharpton is somewhere near Saturn. Clark is clear out past Pluto.
Posted by: Jim at January 31, 2004 08:50 AM (fkewd)
3
100% Lieberman, 96% Bush, then a bunch of other guys.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 02, 2004 07:00 PM (jtW2s)
4
It's unfortunate that Lieberman doesn't have a stone's chance of getting the Dem nomination. He's the most common sense, rational candidate of the bunch and could actually provide a viable challenger to Bush.
Posted by: Jim at February 03, 2004 10:25 AM (IOwam)
5
Yep. I disagree with a lot - possibly even most - of Bush's policies, but he
is rational and has some idea of what's going on in the world and what needs doing.
Same goes for Lieberman.
The others - pfft.
But for some reason I'm not allowed to vote in this one...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 03, 2004 10:39 AM (jtW2s)
6
I'm already splitting my vote with Lovely Wife but we could bring you in and give you a third. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at February 03, 2004 10:51 AM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 29, 2004
I've lived around the States, from Trenton to The Bay
I guess I've been around a bit. This map shows the states that I've actually lived in. It's supposed to be a "visited" map but that just turns most of it red for me. If you're curious about what states I've visited just figure every state that touches one of these and that'll be pretty close.

create your own visited states map
or write about it on the open travel guide
(Hat tip to Susie)
POINTS: 2 points for the first person to name the inspiration for this post title. No searching please, you naughty little monkeys.
UPDATE: Lovely Wife's visited states and visited countries are in the extended entry. Wow, she really gets around, doesn't she?
more...
Posted by: Jim at
08:27 AM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 137 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Babe, you need to get out more. I mean-you haven't even been to Texas! I thought EVERYONE had been to Texas!
Posted by: Helen at January 29, 2004 08:59 AM (TZJXp)
2
No, that's "Everyone had a Texan". ;-)
Texas is too big. I like smaller states where I can touch the walls for that comfy secure feeling.
Posted by: Jim at January 29, 2004 09:25 AM (IOwam)
3
I got the answer, but I was a dirty monkey. (and I'm honest about it!) I seriously doubt that anyone's gonna get that...
"It's Peter, Go Peter, I'm so Peter, Yo Peter, Let's see Regis rap this way"
Posted by: Clancy at January 29, 2004 09:29 AM (EGVPL)
4
All "Family Guy" references aside, didn't MC Hammer bust that rhyme in "U Can't Touch This"?
Posted by: Mike the Marine at January 29, 2004 11:03 AM (Zw7Hl)
5
Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding!
That's the one, Mike.
I've been around the world, from London to the Bay
See, Clancy? I had faith that there were other old farts out there that rocked out to Hammer back in the day. Not that we're proud of that fact now, of course.
Posted by: Jim at January 29, 2004 11:10 AM (IOwam)
6
Now why are there points for this "inspiration" but not points for the Peter Finch one? Huh? Huh? That's the whole point, isn't it? You change the words a little but still have a recognizable source?
Posted by: Susie at January 29, 2004 12:47 PM (0+cMc)
7
Susie, Susie, Susie...dear, sweet Susie...
It was my fault. Totally and completely. I just totally dropped the ball on that one. I don't know why, but it just didn't click as a point source when I was writing that post. It happens sometimes, what with the state of the free world in my hands and all I just get so busy sometimes.
I can't contaminate the Snooze Points by awarding them without having offered. Therein lies chaos! But I can try to put that smile back on your face. I'll give you all of the Cheesy points that I've accumulated from
LeeAnn. There are
three over here and a couple others somewhere else that I can't find 'cause the search isn't working. All for you.
(I wonder if I just established relative value between Snooze Points and Cheesy Points. Hmmm... 2 to 5 isn't so bad.)
Posted by: Jim at January 29, 2004 01:10 PM (IOwam)
8
Hmmm..does LeeAnn know about this? cuz the last thing we want to do is tick off The Cheese...that would be a Bad Thing™
Posted by: Susie at January 29, 2004 01:24 PM (0+cMc)
9
I'll check on that, Susie. If not, I'll have to try to smuggle them to you through the cheese underground.
Posted by: Jim at January 29, 2004 02:18 PM (IOwam)
10
It's official. I just got confirmation from LeeAnn. The Cheesy Points are yours, Susie.
And there was much rejoicing.
(And no, you don't get points for sourcing that one.)
Posted by: Jim at January 29, 2004 03:16 PM (IOwam)
11
I learned two things from mapping out states and countries I've visited.
One, I've been to almost all the US (76%) and not very much of the rest of the world (a measly six countries from the list but two of my countries weren't listed under anything I knew them as).
Posted by: Johnny Huh at January 29, 2004 06:11 PM (AyewP)
12
I learned two things from mapping out states and countries I've visited.
One, I've been to almost all the US (76%) and
Two, I've not seen very much of the rest of the world (a measly six countries from the list but two of my countries weren't listed under anything I knew them as).
Posted by: Johnny Huh at January 29, 2004 06:11 PM (AyewP)
13
He's right, Susie, he cleared Cheesy Transference with me first.

I should be freer with the Cheesy points. This is probably why I wasn't that popular in high school.
Posted by: LeeAnn at January 29, 2004 07:37 PM (HxCeX)
14
Not popular, LeeAnn? The mens' room wall disagrees.
[duck] [SMACK!]
Posted by: Jim at January 29, 2004 07:40 PM (IOwam)
15
Well, as long as LeeAnn approves: Thanks, Jim!
Posted by: Susie at January 29, 2004 08:44 PM (0+cMc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 26, 2004
I'm pissed off and I'm not going to take it any more!
If you've been reading me a while you've probably figured out that one of the things that most irritates me in this world is intentional stupidity. Come to think of it, that might be the only thing that really irritates me. Anyway, the height of this stupidity in recent years has been the preponderence of zero tolerance policies. These are the rules made up by school systems out of fear or knee-jerk reaction that forcibly compel school administrators from using common sense or whatever intelligence they might normally posess.
Gone are the days of leniency for honest mistakes, compassion for lack of understanding and any concept of letting the punishment fit the crime. Taking an Advil at school is now the same as pushing crack. Leaving the tools from your lawn care side job in your locked trunk will get you arrested. Having the wrong pencil sharpener or wallet earns expulsion. This lunacy has got to stop.
To that end I have started a new website called Zero Intelligence that will collect stories of the harmful effects of these policies as well as showcase the abuses caused by them. We will explore the reasons that they are adopted and point out the errors that lead to these very poor solutions. Although there is a great amount of indignation about zero tolerance policies there doesn't seem to be any organized discussion or action against them. I hope that Zero Intelligence will provide this greatly needed forum.
I would like to send humongous mountains of thanks to Matt Drachenberg (of Overtaken by Events). Matt volunteered to help with the site before it was even set up and there is absolutely no way it would be ready for use now without him. He did all of the plug-in stuff and the widgets and doodads and made it all actually work. Matt is serving as the site admin to handle all of the boring and frustrating technical problems that will pop up while I get to relax and handle the human element. He'll also be contributing content of course.
Speaking of content, it's light at the moment as we're just starting out. You can help in this regard by sending tips, commenting on the posts, or even becoming a contributing poster.
Posted by: Jim at
10:52 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 401 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Howard Beal in Network. Do I get points?
Posted by: Susie at January 26, 2004 01:18 PM (0+cMc)
2
Played by Peter Finch who won a postumous Oscar. Do I get bonus points?
Posted by: Susie at January 26, 2004 01:19 PM (0+cMc)
3
Wow, that's good Susie. But he was mad as hell, not pissed.
Posted by: Jim at January 26, 2004 01:24 PM (IOwam)
4
I'll let you judge whether it's worthy of inclusion, but I found
this editorial urging a school board near Albuquerque to rethink 'zero tolerance' policies worth a read. I mean, look at the nonsense:
In previous "zero tolerance" cases in Rio Rancho, school officials suspended: a high school freshman girl for having a tiny pocket knife in her backpack; a student who drove a car to school, saying he was unaware it contained a hunting knife and a loaded gun; a ninth-grade girl for sporting pink hair; a student for manipulating a soda machine to dispense two sodas for the price of one; and a high school sophomore for possession of "a sharpened object" - an altered plastic spoon-fork, or "spork."
Sporks. Freakin' sporks.
Posted by: ilyka at January 26, 2004 03:49 PM (cZPnU)
5
My gawd! What in the world could anyone have against a well-honed spork?
Posted by: Tuning Spork at January 26, 2004 10:51 PM (FMfz8)
6
If they'd made it today instead of in the 70's he'd 've been "pissed"....
Posted by: Susie at January 26, 2004 11:27 PM (0+cMc)
7
I'm sure they will, Susie. At least half of the stuff coming out of Hollywood seems to be remakes of classics or cartoons done in live action.
Posted by: Jim at January 27, 2004 06:18 AM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Things that are dangerous if forgotten
- Puppy teeth are the second sharpest thing in the world, next only to samurai swords.
- Puppies like to take a nip at anything and everything that grabs their attention, especially mobile things that will fit nicely in their mouths.
- Puppy noses can open any door that is not firmly latched.
- Human flesh is at its most sensitive directly after a hot shower.
It was toes people. Toes. Get your minds out of the gutter.
Posted by: Jim at
10:25 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 86 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We didn't really think the puppy could jump THAT high.
Posted by: LeeAnn at January 26, 2004 11:35 AM (HxCeX)
2
She could! She can jump right over the kid-proof gates.
Hey, wait a second...that was a dis, wasn't it?
Cheeky monkey!
Posted by: Jim at January 26, 2004 12:37 PM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 23, 2004
'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah, I'm the taxman
The taxman is now my bitch. I've got my W-2 in hand and it's high time that the gubmint gave me my damn money back. Boo-ya!
Posted by: Jim at
12:16 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And I personaly will tonight squeeze EVERY penny out of it!Uahahaha
Posted by: LW at January 23, 2004 01:42 PM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A word problem to wake your brain
Say that you've forgotten to turn off your email at work so it continues to pull your emails when you go home. It is set to poll for email every 20 minutes, starting at 5 after the hour. Your computer at home looks for email every 10 minutes for the same address, starting at the top of the hour. If there are 12 emails sent to you during the time both computers are pulling email, how many of these would you expect to find on the computer at work the next day?
Points: 2 points to the first person with the correct answer. No wild guesses, please - you have to explain your reasoning.
Posted by: Jim at
09:05 AM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Chicago! The trains meet in Chicago!
See: the reasoning is thus-if one train leaves D.C. at 5:00 pm travelling at the speed of sound, and one train leaves Seattle at 3:00 pm travelling at the sound of a train travelling, then they meet in Chicago.
Word problems-fun for the whole damn family.
Can I get half a point for originality?
Posted by: Helen at January 23, 2004 09:44 AM (RzA2l)
2
I'd give you a 1/2 point Helen, but your got it wrong. The trains meet in Philadelphia.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 09:50 AM (IOwam)
3
Its impossible to work out - we'd need to know at what times all the emails were sent, how long it takes you to get home, your shoe size, favourite flavour of ice cream and whether or not either computer is running outlook (in which case your work computer would be filled with 700,000 cleaned copies of the Booby Worm)
Now theoretically, there is only ever a five minute window of opportunity for the work computer so I'd have to say you'd only get 1 (or an equally low number) of the emails on that system but that is based on assumption rather than solid fact... and no I'd like to thank you for making me go cross eyed with your evil mathematical shenanigans ... bah.
Posted by: Robert at January 23, 2004 09:53 AM (kXZI6)
4
and according to my calculations, the trains would meet in Starbuck's for a quick cappuccino and danish before embarking on a serious shopping spree in the new Gucci Rail Yard. I think I need to check my working.
Posted by: Robert at January 23, 2004 09:55 AM (kXZI6)
5
Assume an even spread of emails over the time both computers are checking. Time to get home doesn't matter as the problem only deals with the 12 emails that were delivered while both computers were checking (I thought of that one too).
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 09:57 AM (IOwam)
6
I wouldn't know because my Outlook pulls email every minute.Screw math...I know how much 1 and 1 is (11),therefore I plead the 5th.
Posted by: LW at January 23, 2004 10:16 AM (fkewd)
7
assuming all of the above you'd get exactly 1/4 of any email sent to the address so - 3 (based on data over 1 hour with 5 minute message interval)
Posted by: rob at January 23, 2004 10:20 AM (kXZI6)
8
assuming all of the above you'd get exactly 1/4 of any email sent to the work address so - 3 (based on data over 1 hour with 5 minute message interval)
Posted by: rob at January 23, 2004 10:20 AM (kXZI6)
9
Exactly correct, Rob.
Bonus point for the incident portion control formula if you've got it.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 10:25 AM (IOwam)
10
I saw this too late and Rob beat me AGAIN!
I don't know about a formula, I just did it the hard way:
H = 00 - 05
W = 05 - 10 = 05
H = 10 - 25
W = 25 - 30 = 05
H = 30 - 45
W = 45 - 50 = 05
H = 50 - 00
Work had 15 minutes, leaving Home with 45. 1/4 to 3/4.
12 * 1/4 = 3
Posted by: Clancy at January 23, 2004 10:34 AM (EGVPL)
11
actually, it's a kind of gantt chart on the back of a Dilbert day to day calender - does that count? plus I don't know what the heck an incidentally controlled potion formula is or what it does. If you let me know I'll work one up for you.
Posted by: rob at January 23, 2004 10:35 AM (kXZI6)
12
Dude.
You guys so need to get a life. Gantt charts and algebra for this? Sheesh.
Although Rob's Starbucks and train bit made me laugh.
Posted by: Helen at January 23, 2004 10:44 AM (zDKJT)
13
hello - I work in IT! Gantt charts and algebra are my special friends and I talk to them every day ... then I go home to my real life. If this had been posted this evening I would have taken one look and thought "nah - can't be bothered" and gone to the pub instead...
righteous indignation*/
Posted by: rob at January 23, 2004 11:08 AM (kXZI6)
14
Clancy - That's how I did most word problems back in school. Formulas? We don't need no stinking formulas.
Rob - That's probably the wrong term for it. It's calculus and the formula shows the portion of control of competing factors assuming constant incidents of interaction. It's used somewhere for something important I imagine, though I can't for the life of me think of where it would be useful.
Helen - There's life beyond mathematics? The hell you say! Actually, this all stemmed from a freaky math dream I had a few weeks ago. Yes, I have the occasional freaky math dream. It lodged in my head and wouldn't leave so I decided to share in an effort to exorcise it.
And gantt charts kick ass.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 11:35 AM (IOwam)
15
Rob, Jim and Clancy-you know I love you guys. I am just speaking out of math envy. Like penis envy only...with math.
Posted by: Helen at January 23, 2004 12:57 PM (4QsPZ)
16
My computer at work is configured to leave mail for my home account on the server. It will all be there when I get home. I do not have VPN privileges, so I can't check work mail from home. No math required.
{
Now don't go and introduce reality into this. Ed.}
Posted by: triticale at January 24, 2004 07:49 AM (2cz5f)
17
The real question is how much of it was spam. I'd say the correct answer is 100%.
Posted by: Simon at January 24, 2004 07:58 AM (nNqbQ)
18
You only get 12 emails overnight?
I get more than 200. And only half of that is spam. (Not that I see the spam, thanks to SpamAssassin. But I count the dead bodies in the morning.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 25, 2004 07:15 AM (jtW2s)
19
It was a hypothetical situation and it was assumed that SpamBayes or SpamAssassin was in place.
Posted by: Jim at January 25, 2004 08:29 AM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
To the asshole in the Altima on the way in to work this morning:
The laws of physics still limit the number of vehicles occupying the same space to one single unit so perhaps the next time you swing over a solid white line into the non turning lane without the benefit of a turning signal because heaven forbid you would want to warn other drivers of your impending lunacy and you couldn't be bothered to switch lanes a quarter of a mile back before your lane became the home of left turning commuters you might wish to take a quick peek to be sure there are no other vehicles occupying the location you desire so you can avoid the tires screaching quick brake then foot to the floor acceleration move to cut in front of said space occupying vehicle while flipping the bird manuever that you decided to use today.
Have a nice day,
Jim
PS - I fucked your sister. She's nowhere near as good as your mom, no matter how much your dad disagrees.
Posted by: Jim at
08:53 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That's because she saves her best effort for me. She only did you cuz she's jealous of mom.
[/her brother, driver of the other car, not me]
Posted by: triticale at January 24, 2004 07:52 AM (2cz5f)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 22, 2004
Bad Sayings, Part 2
I've
mentioned before how the message board as you enter the building sprouts the occassional inane quote. It's getting uncomfortably frequent. Here's what we have now:
The most important thing that you can wear is your expression.
This is just starting to ring too close to those insufferably smug motivation posters. The most important thing you can wear is your expression? Give me a break. I've never been asked to leave a bar because of my expression. My expression has never been the defining factor in losing a job. I've never been arrested because of my expression. I'll tell you what the most important thing you can wear is: pants. Trust me on this, m'kay?
Posted by: Jim at
12:28 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 123 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I agree with you about the pants.
Your company needs a mysterious shipment of products from
these fine people.
Posted by: ilyka at January 22, 2004 02:34 PM (M0nlg)
2
Er,
these people, I mean.
I will preview comments first.
I will preview comments first.
I will preview comments first . . . .
Posted by: ilyka at January 22, 2004 02:35 PM (M0nlg)
3
Motivational posters... ugh. Go to Demotivators.com or Despair.com
My favorite:
MOTIVATION
If a pretty poster and a cute saying are all it takes to motivate you, you probably have a very easy job. The kind robots will be doing soon.
Posted by: Mike the Marine at January 22, 2004 08:28 PM (r8Ldc)
4
I think it all depends on who we're talking about, don't you? I mean, with some people the single MOST important thing they can wear is a condom.
Posted by: Venomous Kate at January 23, 2004 12:20 AM (kv7Fj)
5
Good point, Kate. And unfortunately a goodly number of them don't seem to realize that.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 04:42 AM (fkewd)
6
Or maybe that should be "the most important thing SINGLE people should wear is a condom." I haven't used one in so long I can't remember when.
Posted by: triticale at January 23, 2004 08:46 AM (2Uj24)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 21, 2004
Happy Birthday, Burger!
The Burger (aka "Hamster", see the picture and you'll know why) is 2 years old today. Happy Birthday, short man!
The birthday boy
Posted by: Jim at
11:30 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Susie at January 21, 2004 03:19 PM (0+cMc)
2
Yeah, the lucky bugger takes after his mommy. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at January 21, 2004 07:32 PM (IOwam)
3
I'm glad you posted a photo. I thought this might be proof about the old McDonald's burgers myth.
Happy birthday to the little man.
Posted by: Simon at January 22, 2004 09:33 AM (aPjRW)
4
wow, he's the mac-daddy with those Nemo sandals!
Posted by: jim at January 22, 2004 09:34 AM (lN8eP)
5
Tell that adorable child that Aunt Margi says he can have all the ice cream and cake he wants.
Happy birthday!
How freakin' cute is HE?!
Awwww.
[/mom gushiness]
Posted by: margi at January 22, 2004 07:03 PM (kpNlZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 19, 2004
If puppy's what Baby wants, puppy is what baby gets.
Baby being Lovely Wife, of course. And puppy being...well...a puppy.
Lovely Wife loves dogs. And cats. And birds. And fish. And hamsters. And turtles. And just about any other pet type creature excepting ferrets. So what better gift could I give her than a puppy? Well, yes, a diamond ring would probably be a better gift but I can't get her the one I want at the moment so that's out. Okay, a new car would indeed be better but you're not thinking of the right class of gift here. Should I rephrase the question? Okay - What better gift could I give her than a puppy, said gift causing little to no strain upon my barren wallet? Nuthin', that's what. Glad you agree.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
08:08 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 655 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: LW at January 19, 2004 09:10 AM (fkewd)
2
Nope, that's Red Fish, Blue Fish you're thinking of.
Posted by: Jim at January 19, 2004 09:23 AM (IOwam)
3
Yellow Dog comes from that Chevy Chase movie where he wanted to be a writer, but whose name escapes me.
The dog is so cute I think I heard my ovaries thump. Welcome to dog ownership! I named mine after the bowling alley lawyer "Ed", however he is commonly known by his nickname-"The Evil One".
Posted by: Helen at January 19, 2004 09:40 AM (QV3iL)
4
That's the one, H. Funny Farm starring Chevy Chase. Red Dog was the high spirited one that ran away as soon as they let it out of the car. Yellow Dog was the one that was so calm he had to use tongs to remove its tail from the fire.
1 point for Helen!
This is actually dog number 2 for us. Well, dog number 3 overall but the second that we have right now as dog number 1 remained in the Great White North when we moved down here. Nicky, the other canine we have currently, is also an uber-calm doggy and these two will be able to have competitions on who can lay down the longest.
Posted by: Jim at January 19, 2004 09:47 AM (IOwam)
5
Damn Yakees? Whatever Lola wants, Lola gets?
Posted by: Susie at January 19, 2004 11:50 AM (0+cMc)
6
Sorry, Susie. No Yankees. By the way, do you know the difference between a Yankee and a Damn Yankee? A Yankee comes down south to visit. A Damn Yankee comes down south and stays.
Posted by: Jim at January 19, 2004 01:15 PM (IOwam)
7
LOL! Well, if it's not from the song "Whatever Lola wants, Lola gets" it's a takeoff of that song....
Posted by: Susie at January 19, 2004 04:32 PM (0+cMc)
8
It's not from a song at all. Much older than the Damn Yankees and from TV.
Posted by: Jim at January 19, 2004 05:08 PM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 17, 2004
Tease Time
The household has grown by one. Info will come when I can put it out. Gotta go, the new baby is crying.
Posted by: Jim at
07:06 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Please tell me that's a dog...
Posted by: Rob at January 17, 2004 08:23 PM (NWr79)
2
WHAT? You are reproducing without prior written approval from the blog community?
It had better be a chia pet, a family of Weeble-Wobbles, or an electronic dog, otherwise you are busted, mate.
Posted by: Helen at January 18, 2004 09:50 AM (i2v+t)
3
What were you thinking??LOL
Posted by: LW at January 18, 2004 09:51 AM (fkewd)
Posted by: Tuning Spork at January 18, 2004 08:13 PM (gvAsX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 15, 2004
Am I the widower of a woman or the husband of a fish?
Yesterday my Lovely Wife, she of normally impeccable style and grace, perpetrated a horror upon my household. An unmitigated affront to all that is good and holy was brought into my castle, shattering the previous sanctity of the household. While at the dollar store
[break for diatribe on the dollar store]
Isn't the dollar store the bomb? Damn! What a feeling to be able to go into an establishment with the certain knowledge that you can have anything, anything, that your eyes alight upon. Even the certain knowledge that the base concept of the dollar store is either to get people to pay money for landfill items or that it's a complicated plot by the Vast Rightwing Conspiracy to lull the working class into a dull statis of conformity and acceptance of our lot can affect the pure joy rush feeling of financial power that us po' folks get when we walk into such an establishment.
[/break]
she happened upon bags of M&M candies. These are the ultimate favorite universal candy of our household. Any trip to a store that has checkout aisles will elicit joyous and demanding cries of "MMMMSSSS! MMMMSSSS!" in three part harmony. Lovely Wife quite quickly took advantage of the presence of large M&M bags for a dollar and stuffed several in the shopping cart. Without. Looking. At. The. Bags.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
10:43 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 615 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I'm guessing "Splash"...?
FWIW, You're taken the right approach to the M&M's. Look at it as an ancient tribal thing, like consuming your enemies or something. Eating the Colors will give you their strength...
Posted by: Kelley at January 15, 2004 11:50 AM (81rmv)
2
I'm guessing "Splash"...?
FWIW, You've taken the right approach to the M&M's. Look at it as an ancient tribal thing, like consuming your enemies or something. Eating the Colors will give you their strength...
Posted by: Kelley at January 15, 2004 11:50 AM (81rmv)
3
I barely survived the wrath of my husband when I brought home a GA Tech ornament.
Yes, I am a Dawg to the grave, but COULD HE LET ME 'SPLAIN??
It was for my daughter's teacher. SHE's the Tech fan. The GA ornaments were gone. Sorry, honey, we're just more popular.
Probably the same deal with the M&Ms.
You know when life gives you discolored M&Ms, they make wonderful cookies.
Posted by: Key at January 15, 2004 01:05 PM (EOpw8)
4
Guessing, but is it from "Mr. Peabody and the Mermaid"?
Posted by: MojoMark at January 15, 2004 03:24 PM (E+LQu)
5
Nope, it's not Mr Peabody.
Posted by: Jim at January 15, 2004 03:58 PM (fkewd)
6
The Little Mermaid?
(total guess, no google)
Posted by: Clancy at January 15, 2004 04:56 PM (EGVPL)
7
Whooo Hooo IMDB to the rescue!!!
The answer is:
The Incredible Mr. Limpet
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058230/quotes
Posted by: Clancy at January 15, 2004 05:09 PM (EGVPL)
8
Oops - missed Kelley's guess. Even though she submitted it twice!
It's not Splash or Little Mermaid. No mermaids at all.
Posted by: Jim at January 15, 2004 05:13 PM (fkewd)
9
Mr Limpet's the one. Points for Clancy!
Posted by: Jim at January 15, 2004 05:43 PM (fkewd)
10
...she bought DOLPHIN M$Ms???
Let me tell you what happened when my wife tried to dress my 2 little Buffalo Bills in NY Jets pajamas...
1) I disposed of the offending garments, in the only way appropriate.
2) I yelled to my wife.."honey they really were flammable"
3) I made my wife sing 14 verses the Bills fight song...."they make ya wanna shout, git ya hands up and shout.."
4) She had to go out and buy a proper pair of Bills jammies.
5) Finally, I made her drop and give me 20, just because.
Considering your wife was trying to stick the emeny down your precious children's throats, as opposed to just ON their body, she should be put right next to Mrs. Fastow and do some serious jail time!
Posted by: jim at January 15, 2004 06:01 PM (lN8eP)
11
I was after a quote that matched the title. Instead it was "inspired" by? damn semantics.
RTF Post Mojo...grrrrrr.
Posted by: MojoMark at January 16, 2004 01:17 AM (FXawF)
12
Semantics is all that separates us from the French.
Posted by: Jim at January 16, 2004 04:09 AM (fkewd)
13
Hey....if ya'all done ratting then...
I DIDN'T KNOW THEY WERE DOLPHIN M&MS UNTIL I CAME HOME!!And to my defence....the dollar store doesn't exchange things or take them back.:-P
I can proove that I don't like the Dolphins.I have about 20 of G's "Fuck Miami" shirts hidden in the house.:-)
Posted by: LW at January 16, 2004 07:22 AM (fkewd)
14
Hmmm...those would make a pretty decent prize...
Posted by: Jim at January 16, 2004 07:32 AM (IOwam)
15
I guess if I was a "diehard Buffalo Bills fan" I would grow to hate the "Orange, white and that green/blue/aqua/seafoam color that proves that homosexuals do have a place in the NFL" Miami Dolphins if they savagely beat the bills like they have the past couple years. The days of Jim Kelly are over. Buffalo starts a QB that lost his postion to a Rookie that had never seen the field before. Now I too understand the hate of a team because I myself hate the Patriots. But to poke fun at a team that has been victorious at home and on the road is no show of sportsmanship. Not to mention the Dolphin is one of the most feared mammals in the Ocean having no natural predators except humans and the buffalo being as dosile and endangered as it is poses no threat to anything besides grass and maybe a tree or two. I guess we have only until next season seeing that neither team has made the journey into the postseason. Then we can again make our assumtions or poke fun at each others pride.
Posted by: Josh at January 18, 2004 05:22 PM (gPeyE)
16
Josh, I wish you'd left your email address as I would have replied to you there. As it is, I'll just write here in the hopes that you come back to check for a response.
I'm a bit torn. On the one hand I have a diabolical urge to yell out any of the huge number of anti-Dolphin slogans in my repertoire. On the other hand I've got another diabolical urge to say that Joe Theismann is the biggest Dolphin fan and let that speak for itself. On the third hand it appears that you were genuinely upset so it would be pretty mean of me to push any more buttons.
Let me just recommend that you read a couple of the other posts on this site that were written in the style that this one was. On the sidebar of the main page is a "Best of" section. Anything under the "Snooze Button Dream" category should fit the bill. You'll find that I use a grand amount of hyperbole to generate a humorous over the top type of diatribe. If I was seriously as hyper agressive as my writing indicates I would be in a straight jacket, not a nice duplex in the suburbs of Atlanta.
I'm sorry if you took this post personally as it wasn't meant that way.
Sincerely,
Jim
PS:
SQUISH THE FISH!!
Posted by: Jim at January 18, 2004 06:57 PM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 14, 2004
The Dog Needs A Dentist
Our mutt is in need of a doggy dentist. He's got some bad tartar build up as well as gingivitis. As a result, his gums are sensitive. He's come up with a solution to the hard dog chow problem until we take His Dogginess to the cleaners. He picks up the dry food and drops it in his water dish. He leaves it and comes back to it a while later when it is soft and mushy so it's easy to eat.
Is he overly clever or am I anthropomorphizing?
Posted by: Jim at
01:41 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 100 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My cat used to do that when he was teething as a kitten. He'd knock pawfuls of food into the other side of his food/water dish and then push them around in the water before he'd eat them. He probably didn't eat his food dry for about 3 months. He still does that occasionally, but now I think it's just because he likes to play in the water (yeah, a cat that likes watersports - he's weird like that).
Posted by: Mike the Marine at January 14, 2004 03:45 PM (Zw7Hl)
2
No, that's a clever one. If only my kitty with bad teeth would show some brains like that.
Posted by: ilyka at January 14, 2004 07:50 PM (O3xNO)
3
I wish the dentist work for the dog wouldn't be so freaking expensive.Between 200-300 bucks.They are SOOOO out of their freaking minds!!!!
He doesn't apear to be in pain with it at all,but they told me that the nasty teeth and gingivitis can kill him in the long run????
Great...I should ask the previous owner for money to pay for it!Right....
Posted by: LW at January 15, 2004 08:36 AM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Another two bite the dust
We lost another couple of people here. We have three software products, each with their own teams. The one that was affected was the very old static product that was purchased whole from Big Blue years back. They were re-organized to fall under Customer Service instead of Development and one full timer and one part timer (both tech support) got pink slips.
It really was a reorganization though, not a cost cutting manuever. I talked with the full time fellow and he said he's been expecting it for a while. It's an aged product that has not been able to replace customer attrition with new sales and there simply wasn't enough work to justify the number of support personnel. He's not overly concerned about the job loss either. This will give him the chance to join a professional bass tour. I work with unique individuals here.
We also had a company meeting where the Pres explained the changes, why they were made, and told us that this was the extent of organizational changes that are planned. He meant, of course, to tell us that no more positions are being cut but I wish he'd just come out and said that point blank. The way he couched it sounds like there are no more changes planned at all and I know of at least one position that is being added. I hope that doesn't come back to bite him with a loss of credibility.
Am I in danger? No. There's no realistic way that my position could be org'd out and I am a virtual wizard at my job so there are no performance reasons that I'd be sent off. What bothers me the most about the recent terminations is that I didn't know about them before they happened. You see, in my last job I knew about such things well in advance of them happening. I knew about them in the discussion phase and was a part of the decision process for some of them. In this job I'm totally out of the loop and that's a big change that didn't really come to my attention until now.
And I don't like it. I love surprises when they are of the gift wrapped variety but I do not like them at the company that I get my rent payments from. I guess I'm going to have to see about growing into a management position.
Posted by: Jim at
01:32 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 414 words, total size 2 kb.
January 12, 2004
How Do I Hate Thee? Let Me Count The Ways
"Thee" being Howard Dean, of course. Don't worry, this blog is not in danger of becoming a political soap box. I just had a conversation with a Dean supporter that made me actually think of why I don't like him, both as a person and as a candidate for the presidency. Don't worry, it's a short list.
- I'm still pissed that he called me a gun lovin', fag hatin', racist, religious fanatic.
- I don't like the fact that he wants to triple my personal federal tax burden.
- He's a class-A hypocrite. I'm talking Hillary level.
- He's a socialist.
I could forgive any of these (especially the last one, since it's totally made up) except #2. Stay away from my money, you stinkin' blighter.
Posted by: Jim at
09:48 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 143 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Dean would have been considered a Communist and would have been rounded up during the Red Scare.
Posted by: pylorns at January 12, 2004 11:42 AM (fD1hc)
2
What's up with making me hit the 'continue reading' link when there were only like 2 more lines to read. I was ready for some hard core Dean bashing and was left unfulfilled. Just include the last sentence in the main post dude.
Posted by: Diego at January 12, 2004 04:57 PM (CSc+D)
3
Sorry about that, Diego. It's due to my inate evil nature. >;-]
Actually what happened was that I added that to the post after it was published, I was in a rush, and it just got stuck in a handy place. Now I'm far too lazy to go fix it.
Posted by: Jim at January 12, 2004 07:03 PM (fkewd)
4
I had a fit of productive activity and went ahead and fixed this.
Posted by: Jim at January 13, 2004 11:23 AM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bad Sayings
There's a message board as you come into the office. They'll put up things like "Welcome Company X" when we have visitors coming in or "Product Y Classes Are Being Held In The Training Room" and stuff like that. When there's nobody due to visit and no other message to be displayed they put up quotations. Some are good, some aren't. I have a problem with the one that is up right now:
The biggest room in the world is the room for improvement.
Isn't this comparable to saying "Our product blows monkey chunks. We have a shit load to do before we can pass this crap off as worthwhile"?
Posted by: Jim at
07:49 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 114 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I used to have a job that included "message board" duties. That task got old rather quick so I would try and pick quotes that poked a finger at either one of the employees or at the company. Maybe your message board person is doing the same thing?
Posted by: Ann at January 12, 2004 09:16 AM (Ylg5j)
2
Hmmm...sabotage? Could be. Could very well be...
Posted by: Jim at January 12, 2004 09:18 AM (IOwam)
3
In my old company we had one of those felt boards on a mic stand with the plastic letters. I'd rearrange the letters when I could get away with it to make something funny instead of lame. Can you get to the letters? There's plenty to work with in that message. Just hide the ones you don't use, I'm sure they have more.
Posted by: rick at January 13, 2004 01:30 PM (oA/Vb)
4
Neat idea, Rick. Unfortunately it's in a locked case.
Posted by: Jim at January 13, 2004 01:50 PM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 08, 2004
Where did Mr. K go?
We lost a vice president and the alarm and door lock codes have been changed. The alarm code changes when somebody who has it leaves the company. The door code changes when somebody is "evicted from service". This brings us to one of the company maxims here:
The door code is only changed when somebody is fired. If you get here in the morning and the door code doesn't work, it was you.
Anybody have an amusing company maxim to share?
Posted by: Jim at
10:49 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"No fishing off the company wharf."
Doesn't stop people, though.
Posted by: Simon at January 09, 2004 12:27 AM (UKqGy)
2
Believe it or not, in Company X's Sweden office, it was completely ok-and in fact encouraged-to have a "flirty" environment. This was relayed to me by one of my bosses once I moved over there and wondered about the complete lack of sexual harrassment worries. She said that men and women work better in a flirtatious and charged environment.
which may account for the MASSES of married couples working together at Company X...
Posted by: Helen at January 09, 2004 03:41 AM (lmJQ/)
3
Pretty much the same. We have key fobs that are disabled upon termination. They eventually fail and you end up standing in front of the door with it going beep...beep. Inevitably, some asshole comes by. "Been fired? Har, har, har". Inevitably, said asshole gets the finger.
Posted by: Mike at January 09, 2004 11:52 AM (ZxGjp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Gun Control is Important...
...and rather difficult when firing on full auto.
A few weeks before the holidays I had the pleasure of going to one of the local gun ranges with Dopple-G and The Godfather. That's The Godfather of child #1, as opposed to the Godfather of child #2, who would be Dopple-G himself.
It was a blast. I haven't done a lot of weapon firing in my life. In fact I believe there were a total of 3 occurences before this trip to the range. The first was as a youngster, maybe 9 or 10, while down at Uncle Namesake's farm. One day everybody loaded up into the Suburban and went to the firing range. I had a fun time with the .22 rifle and then a very painful time with the .30-06 rifle (which I fired exactly once and nursed a sore shoulder for the next couple of days).
more...
Posted by: Jim at
08:21 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 633 words, total size 4 kb.
1
A Tale of Two Godfathers....
Posted by: Susie at January 08, 2004 08:45 AM (0+cMc)
2
I'm a Godfather too so it's actually a tale of three. Woah.
Posted by: Jim at January 08, 2004 10:59 AM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 07, 2004
Using Protection
Well, I'm "protected" now. Lovely Wife went out last night and bought me a 12 pack of the little plasticine things. It's not that I didn't want to use them earlier, honest. It was more a question of price than anything else. I mean, you don't "need" them so it's really just wasted money, right? And why are they so bloody expensive anyway?
I put the first one on as soon as she got home last night. That was a bit wierd, let me tell you. Fortunately the fit wasn't off by as much as I'd feared. Almost a perfect fit, actually. They make these things in a bunch of sizes but Lovely Wife has a good eye and matched them up very well.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
07:07 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 540 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I've got one of the orginals - it even say's US Robotics on top and I use it almost every day and it has never once been protected...
Posted by: Clancy at January 07, 2004 08:06 AM (EGVPL)
2
You men oughta stop passin' arround your 'quipment so much.
I wonder if something like this should be bought for G's car?It has been passed arround the past year like a.....lets say...."cheap women".But other then the already messed up mirror on the passanger side....so far,so good....
Posted by: LW at January 07, 2004 08:18 AM (fkewd)
3
I have an industrial strength sheath on mine as it gets banged about a bit over the course of a day and this kind has the added advantage of being 100% watertight. Of course you do lose some of the sensation but it even streches when it exapands to it's full size. And the best bit is, it's totally reusable. I just take it off, give it a rinse and slip it back on again...
I'm now going to go and hang my head in shame at having partaken in the PDA related perversion ... ugh ... so dirty...
Posted by: Robert at January 07, 2004 08:25 AM (kXZI6)
4
There's an art to putting these things on, too. I mean if you're in a hurry and you get a couple wrinkles in there...yeesh, talk about unpleasant. Fun time is pretty much over at that point. If your partner is more experienced I'd advise handing the sucker over and letting the more experienced person handle it.
Posted by: Jim at January 07, 2004 08:36 AM (IOwam)
5
Clancy,
I got you beat. I still have my Sharp Expert Pad (Apple Newton with a hard cover). I haven't backed it up on a couple of years, but it still works great. I don't use it much because it's a power hog and I can't afford feeding it batteries.
Posted by: Mark at January 07, 2004 09:55 PM (brIVG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 01, 2004
Happy New Year, Y'all
Hope you had a wonderful celebration and that your noggins are in one piece this morning.
Posted by: Jim at
09:59 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
95kb generated in CPU 0.039, elapsed 0.0913 seconds.
103 queries taking 0.068 seconds, 345 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.