January 29, 2004
The world's greatest key code writer is retiring
David Bradley spent five minutes writing the computer code that has bailed out the world's PC users for decades.
That's right. This is the fellow that wrote the code for the three finger salute (that's 'ctrl-alt-del' for the helmet wearers). He's retiring after 28 1/2 years at IBM and will be teaching at NC State University. Fare thee well oh handler of computers and bring some of that humor to the classroom.
At a 20-year celebration for the IBM PC, Bradley was on a panel with Microsoft founder Bill Gates and other tech icons. The discussion turned to the keys.
"I may have invented it, but Bill made it famous," Bradley said.
Gates didn't laugh. The key combination also is used when software, such as Microsoft's Windows operating system, fails.
You can use it for more than Windows crashes? Wow, the things you learn.
(Hat tip to Dopple-G)
Posted by: Jim at
09:41 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 164 words, total size 1 kb.
1
He subbed in my computer organization class last year. That man is an awesome teacher. Those students will be lucky devils to have him.
Posted by: tommy at January 29, 2004 11:08 AM (MhJXW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 28, 2004
Georgia House proudly passes meaningless legislation
Weakened Parental Leave Bill OK'd
That's "weakened" as in lacking strength, not "weekend" as in Saturday, Sunday. The Georgia House passed legislation yesterday to mandate diddly squat. The original proposal was to allow parents up to 8 hours each year to attend school functions for their children. Things like parent-teacher conferences, volunteer work, etc would have been covered. But in a move that would do Armin Meiwes proud the Senate emasculated it before passing it.
House members approved the bill 158-6, but first they approved an amendment to change the wording. Instead of telling employers they "shall" give the parental leave time, the bill says employers "may" give the leave time.
So legislation has been approved that legally allows businesses to let parents attend their childrens' school functions. Were businesses not allowed to do this before? Another pointless law with no teeth that serves no function except to further clutter up the books. What a joke.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
09:35 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 288 words, total size 2 kb.
January 19, 2004
Why not to shoot at an Apache
Can you say
holy shit?
(Hat tip to Jonny E)
Posted by: Jim at
10:16 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I saw that about a week ago, that was some great footage.
Posted by: Linda at January 19, 2004 11:02 AM (GChd/)
2
Yeah, some of the folks at the Agonist were up in arms about it. http://agonist.got.net/ I'd like to get a good copy of the WHOLE engagement showing the weapon these guys dumped before the apache shot em up. There's a longer one I downloaded but it didn't show video, just audio. There was a weapon, either a shoulder fired misile or an rpg type, that they dumped in a field. I'd like to see it for myself.
Someone at another site pointed out that they didn't waste much ammo, but with that ammo they don't need much. (30 mm?)
Posted by: StinKerr at January 19, 2004 02:47 PM (srmYe)
Posted by: Mike the Marine at January 20, 2004 01:46 PM (IOX+E)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 16, 2004
Another strike against capitalism
Gwinnett County, where I live, has passed a no-smoking ban. This will go into effect in April and is causing quite a bit of consternation with some local businesses.
Gwinnett Outlaws Indoor Smoking
Lawrenceville, Ga. (AP) -- Gwinnett County commissioners unanimously approved a broad indoor smoking ban on Tuesday.
The regulation covers virtually all buildings, public and private, except for smoke shops, private homes and designated smoking rooms in motels or inns.
The law, which makes no exemptions for restaurants or bars, will go into effect in two to three months.
It does not exempt restaurants and bars. Excuse me? Let me read that again. "makes no exemptions for restaurants or bars"
more...
Posted by: Jim at
11:50 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 810 words, total size 5 kb.
1
No offence to non-smokers but a bar where I will not be allowed to smoke,I will not go to.Just as much as a non-smoker has the right to a smoke free area,does a smoker have the right for a smoking area.Its rediculous to tell bar owners they can't allow smoking since it is a freaking privatly owned business and no public place.
Bill Gentry,who ownes Wild Bills here,is going against the no-smoking law.He spent THOUSANDS to install a superficial smoking filter just to hear now that he cannot permit smoking anymore.And honestly....Wild Bills filtration is so excellent that even on crowded days (the dance floor alone fits 5000 people) you do not even notice people smoking there!Go BILL GENTRY!
Screw those idiot laws!
Posted by: LW at January 16, 2004 02:37 PM (fkewd)
2
One of the loopholes that they tried to use in Delaware was to make the bars and restaurants "Private" clubs since the ban went against "Public" buildings. Long story short, it didn't fly.
But, looking over the articles links, they are exempting "Smoke Shops." Perhaps Wild Bill's answer (and others) is to add a smoke shop to his business.
That or get busy building outside decks...
Posted by: Clancy at January 16, 2004 03:14 PM (EGVPL)
3
How does an outside deck work in winter? It pretty much has to be enclosed at that point in order to retain heat and that makes it an enclosed public space, ergo no smoking.
Posted by: Jim at January 16, 2004 03:19 PM (IOwam)
4
Good point. One place downtown (which just went out of business) added an awning and outdoor heaters over the protected center courtyard of their building. Other places try to do a similar thing.
One restaurant/bar just down the block has their deck totally enclosed (I ate there yesterday - on the deck) with canvas and clear vinyl windows but I don't think they allow smoking (I've never seen anyone) so, yeah, it defeats the purpose.
For the most part, I know a lot of people who have quit or are trying to quit since the ban. I doubt that the ban had a DIRECT impact on their decision to quit, but it probably had some effect. Let's face it; you look pretty stupid outside a nightclub, shivering to feed your habit.
Posted by: Clancy at January 16, 2004 04:35 PM (EGVPL)
5
Gwinnett businesses will suffer because of this ordinance.
I see the authorities in Gwinnett have met Mayor Laura Miller of Dallas . . . except even Dallas' ordinance allows an exemption for bars that make less than 70% of their sales through food.
But those business WILL suffer. Mark and I used to hang out a couple nights a week at a TGIF in north central Dallas. That place was always packed to the gills. It attracted a lot of regulars.
We don't go there anymore, obviously. Now the bartenders from that store are all moving to other TGIF's, including the non-Dallas one we visit now. I've seen three of them from the Dallas store, and they all cite the same reason for bailing: it's a ghost town. No business.
I don't imagine it will be long before it's closed completely.
Here's what I want to know: If bans on smoking don't hurt the restaurant/bar business, and if nonsmoking facilities are in such demand by consumers, why don't more restaurants and bars ever choose to ban voluntarily?
Whenever the government has to use force like this, it's a sure sign that they are not, in fact, serving the will of the people.
But we knew that already. Sigh.
Posted by: ilyka at January 16, 2004 04:38 PM (EO/By)
6
Uh, "those businessES." Doh.
Posted by: ilyka at January 16, 2004 04:39 PM (EO/By)
7
My city passed a similar ban, although with the exception that restaurants with separate enclosed rooms for smoking could carry on. Still, quite a few restaurants who couldn't or wouldn't spring for the "separate but equal" law of the 90's have gone out of business...
Posted by: Susie at January 17, 2004 02:41 PM (0+cMc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 14, 2004
January 13, 2004
Hey Butthead! Pull my finger.
So whatever did happen to Beavis, that icon of wastrel youth, foil to Butthead and whacker off in tool sheds? He's
alive and well in Oregon.
(Hat tip to Dopple-G)
Posted by: Jim at
08:33 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
January 09, 2004
Newsflash! Fish and Chips not British!
Fish n chips' UK credentials under fire
LONDON (Reuters) - The reputation of fish and chips as Britain's national dish has taken a battering after a historian said the classic meal originated elsewhere.
Ye gads! If not from the fair island nation then where, pray tell, where? Please don't say France.
Panikos Panayi, history professor at Leicester's De Montfort University, said his studies had shown deep-fried battered fish and potatoes were a mixture of French "pommes frites"...
I said NOT to say France! Bloody nubber!
...and fried fish dishes brought by Jewish immigrants.
Ah ha! I am so going to hold this over everybody who ever told me they didn't like kosher food.
"Over time it has become anglicised," he told Reuters. "It has almost become part of Britain."
It's certainly become part of the blood vessels of Britain.
Panayi, who is studying how immigration and globalisation have affected the British diet, said food brought in by immigrants often evolved once it reached the country's shores.
So there you have it. Brit culture is really just a combination of Frog and Hebrew. Might as well put down that pint and grab up a bottle of wine, mates.
Posted by: Jim at
01:24 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 209 words, total size 2 kb.
1
TO make a long story short:
Brits-Fench...what the hell is the difference?
We don't need either one of them.:-)
Posted by: LW at January 09, 2004 03:13 PM (fkewd)
2
Awww LW, that's not quite fair... The Brits aren't nearly as spineless as the french. Despite the whiney voice perpetrated by the BBC of late, they will actually stand up like real men and face the world when the poop hits the fan (as evidenced by Iraq). And I've heard many stories of their soldiersÂ’ bravery.
Plus, they make a good pint of ale.
Posted by: Clancy at January 09, 2004 04:28 PM (EGVPL)
3
Guess you got a point there.Yes you are right in those areas.
MY excuse is,I am German.Growing up I was tought that noone needs those Island Monkeys (who never wanted to be part of Europe).
Is that a valid excuse?:-)
And at least...we are able to understand the Brits.I learned english and french in school and guess which of the two stuck with me?
Posted by: LW at January 09, 2004 07:14 PM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
33kb generated in CPU 0.7975, elapsed 1.0567 seconds.
89 queries taking 0.7199 seconds, 219 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.