June 30, 2004
NPR blows monkey chunks
I had the opportunity to listen to a bit over a minute of National
Peoples Public Radio yesterday morning. The story I caught was a blurb about gas prices. Now if you're like me and you use gasoline you might have noticed that the price of gas has plummeted over the past month and a half or so. Locally we're down a good 40 cents a gallon over that period and they're continuing to fall. NPR's take on this?
Gas prices are an average of 45 cents a gallon more expensive than this time last year.
I can't believe I used to think of them as an impartial news source. Bloody posers.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
09:03 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well, that looks like a factual statement without any qualifiers to me.
I don't listen to NPR, though.
Posted by: Jennifer at June 30, 2004 09:49 AM (DdBLw)
2
Yeah, it's factual. And anecdotal. And I'd have to be a fairly judgemental bastard to paint the whole program based on a minute of news briefs.
Then again I was in a pre-coffee state and if they're going to be broadcasting that early in the morning they're just going to have to take extra care not to piss me off when I tune in for a minute or two once or twice a year.
Seriously though, I think this struck a nerve with me because I haven't heard any news about the gas prices and they've been steadily and quickly falling. It was the coming of the apocalypse when the prices went up but when they go down you can hear crickets chirping. When I finally did hear a newscast on the gas prices the news was about how much more gas is now compared to a year ago. That irritated the hell out of me.
Posted by: Jim at June 30, 2004 10:02 AM (IOwam)
3
Unfortunately for me, one of my favorite stations uses npr news and I'm treated to it every day. When it doesn't piss me off, it makes me laugh. I just wish we weren't paying for it.
It is kinda ironic when you think about it - Our countries only "state controled" news source (OK, that might be a stretch - on both counts) is decidedly anti-administration. How many countries can boast that?
Posted by: Clancy at June 30, 2004 10:23 AM (EGVPL)
4
They've gone the way of the liberal...
Posted by: pylorns at June 30, 2004 12:32 PM (PB+b7)
5
Jim - I have to support you on this one. When prices were going up, they were comparing the numbers to the previous week or month. Now that doing so would no longer serve the agenda (which I've heard them claim in so many words that they "don't have"), they're making the comparison to last year.
Slimy bastards.
Posted by: Harvey at June 30, 2004 12:32 PM (tJfh1)
6
I am in total agreement regarding NPR. While you may not want to judge NPR based on a minute of news briefs, I have no problem doing it. I think it makes a healthy government for there to be some amount of anti-administration. However, I don't think it's healthy or helpful to just be Anti-Administration on every single issue. I have yet to hear NPR be objective to one of the Administration's policies, including the months right after Sept. 11th.
Posted by: Tif at June 30, 2004 01:12 PM (jCFyL)
7
Well, the newspeople don't get on the air and announce, "No one was killed today." News isn't supposed to be warm and fuzzy, is it?
Posted by: Jennifer at June 30, 2004 03:47 PM (DdBLw)
8
It's supposed to be just as warm and fuzzy as it is cold and prickly. The key should be newsworthiness. If the price of gas going up 45 cents in a year is newsworthy then the price of gas going down 40 cents in 6 weeks should be a headliner.
Posted by: Jim at June 30, 2004 09:40 PM (bmLWy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 23, 2004
Still more Muslim madness
The insane Arab fundamentalists have murdered South Korean citizen Kim Sun-il. Kim was one more foreign national working to make Iraq a better place.
Words have no wings but they can fly a thousand miles.
That's a very old Korean saying and it's very true but in this case I need these words to travel quite a few thousand miles as I wish peace of heart and deep sympathy for Kim Sun-il's family and loved ones.
The three thousand South Korean troops that were scheduled to ship to Iraq are still coming. Now they have one more reason to do so. Good hunting, gentlemen.
Posted by: Jim at
09:17 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 112 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm glad that they're still going. My only regret is that they didn't send more - that might have gotten the point across...
Posted by: Clancy at June 23, 2004 10:49 AM (EGVPL)
2
and Maupin maybe...just came up on my real messanger...
I hope not.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at June 29, 2004 12:54 PM (bmkcR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 18, 2004
And Silence
Terrorists in Saudi Arabia have carried through on their threats to kill their American hostage. I'm not going to hot link to anything because I honestly don't want that traffic. It's going to be everywhere you look in a few hours anyway so you don't need my links.
Paul M. Johnson Jr. was a contractor in Saudi Arabia, our "ally" in the fight on terrorism. His captors beheaded him as they previously murdered American Nick Berg.
Saudi Arabia is the birthplace of the majority of the 9/11 suicide mass murderers. Saudi Arabia is where Osama bin Laden was born and where he made the millions of dollars that started his criminal empire. It is the stronghold of Wahabiism, the ultra strict fundamentalist Islamic sect that makes all of this possible.
In the past several months, foreign (pronounced "American") facilities have been attacked by terrorist strike teams and bombings. In each instance the Saudi police have allowed terrorists to escape, either through negligence or by disengaging contact.
I won't be saying anything at the moment that I might have some slight chance of regretting later. Instead I will just take this space to express my deepest sympathies for Paul Johnson's friends and family.
Posted by: Jim at
02:32 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 206 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Exactly. I have no words.
Thank you for saying them for me.
Posted by: Emma at June 18, 2004 02:45 PM (NOZuy)
2
Instead I will just take this space to express my deepest sympathies for Paul Johnson's friends and family.
Echoed.
I thought they'd do it. I hoped they wouldn't. I'm sorry they did.
Posted by: ilyka at June 18, 2004 04:07 PM (gESMJ)
3
I am beyond anger with this latest Middle East horror show.
It makes me ill to think of what Paul Johnson suffered at the hands of these demons.
Rest in Peace, Paul
Posted by: Bob K. at June 19, 2004 11:14 PM (/kKz5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 14, 2004
"Under God" is AOK, for the moment
The
Supreme Court overturned a 9th Circuit Court ruling against saying the Pledge of Allegiance in schools because of the controversial word "God". Unfortunately they didn’t actually rule on the Constitutionality of “under God”. The lower court ruling was overturned because part-time dad Newdow didn’t have proper custody to sue in his daughter’s name.
Which means weÂ’ll be seeing this again sometime soon.
Incidentally, today is Flag Day and the 50th anniversary of the addition of "under God" to the Pledge.
(Hat tip to Lovely Wife)
Posted by: Jim at
01:42 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 100 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I am pretty sure that this gentleman spends United States currency!! "In God We Trust" is on every piece!
Posted by: Linda at June 15, 2004 07:33 AM (Lnk6Z)
2
As my cousin remarked to me yesterday it's highly unlikely that he works on Christmas either.
Posted by: Jim at June 15, 2004 07:39 AM (IOwam)
3
yeah i read that yesturday... hmm...
Posted by: pylorns at June 15, 2004 09:52 AM (FTYER)
4
I, for one, wholly support either the removal of "under God" or the addition of an "s" to "under Gods".
It is the height of arrogance to force Muslim children or Buddhist children to say the Pledge of Allegiance to a God that has absolutely zero to do with their belief system that they are being raised in.
Just because there's a codified practice of the Church impacting how the state runs doesn't make it acceptable or legal, it just makes it a habit.
Posted by: Johnny Huh? at June 15, 2004 05:45 PM (YkElu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 07, 2004
Way to go Mrs.Huxtable!
Phylicia Rashad made history yesterday as the first black woman to win a
Tony award for Best Actress. This begs two questions. The second is why hasn't a black actress won a Tony award before now? The first is what is Claire Huxtable doing in a play? We'll completely ignore the second question and concentrate on the first as there's more comedy potential there (trust me, this does pick up in a bit).
Broadway is Phylicia's first love and her notable successes in the silver screen were basically just placeholders in her career as a stage actress. A way to pay the bills you might say. That decade long stretch as the affluent lawyer mom of a gaggle of dark skinned and white souled children was but a diversion. How does one get 'diverted' from the love of their life for such a long time? A year here or there could be understood easily but a decade?
There's only one answer and that is cashola. Moola. Dough. Money. Greenbacks. Hey, you don't get to snort coke off a whore's ass by showing her your playbill, even if you are first billed. Well, not any classy whore anyway. I'm talking high class hookers where your people call somebody who knows somebody who sets things up. And she brings the coke too. That's right, I'm talking F-I-N-E fine.
Hell, you don't even get "people" without serious cash and clout. Yule Brenner WAS the freakin' King and he never had people. Guy danced around bald and half nude for twenty years and all it got him was an aneurysm. Couldn't even beat out Captain Picard for sexiest bald dude. You know why? Because Patrick Stewart was the star of a popular series and he has people. Successful show equals money equals people equals hookers with ass cocaine. It's simple math, folks.
How much was Kramer getting for working on Seinfeld? Something like a million per episode there at the end, right? You think he ever seriously contemplated leaving the show to pursue his dream of being a NASCAR driver? Of course not. You get way more tang as "that loser goof on Seinfeld" than you do as "another redneck wanna-be" in Daytona.
The only person who has ever successfully left a hit series to pursue other interests was Shelley Long. She abandoned Cheers after it became the number one show on television and managed to become a wildly successful screen actress. Oh, wait a second - no she didn't. She played a couple roles as an extra flighty Goldie Hawn impersonator opposite such worthies as Steve Gutenberg in second rate comedies that nobody remembers except the occasional desperate blogger reaching through the depths of the IMDB database. Shortly after noting her dismal failure as a B movie queen, Shelley Long's career shifted focus and she now makes a living by showing up at strange houses with several grams of coke and tear-off panties.
So to sum up, congratulations to Phylicia Rashad for her historical achievement. We're sure that she would have got it much earlier if she hadn't taken such a long sabbatical from the stage and if the assholes who give out the Tony's weren't such racist sons of bitches. Hey, there's a bonus - I answered the second question too.
Posted by: Jim at
08:07 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 557 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Night Shift. Shelley's best movie. Surprisingly, she played a hooker. Went downhill from there...
Posted by: Susie at June 07, 2004 03:27 PM (tEteH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 03, 2004
One out of four Americans are nuts
A study from
Journal of the American Medical Association says that 1 out of every 4 Americans have mental illnesses. Think of your three best friends. If they all seem normal then it's you.
(Hat tip to Electric Venom)
Posted by: Jim at
08:45 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
1
No, in my group it's me. Totally. But that's ok, I like being the one that stands out in my crowd.
Posted by: Helen at June 03, 2004 09:10 AM (D56g3)
2
Since everyone in my family is looney, that makes a couple other whole families safe....
Posted by: Susie at June 03, 2004 12:46 PM (c7TZ/)
3
[doing quick mental inventory]
Yup. Me.
Posted by: Harvey at June 03, 2004 01:24 PM (tJfh1)
4
The voices in my head tell me to let you know we're fine.

Guess who. . .
Posted by: Emma at June 04, 2004 03:46 AM (NOZuy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 01, 2004
Don't point that fish at me!
It's the last day of school in Rogers, Arkansas. The 1st-grade teacher wraps up the lesson on rainforest animals and rewards the students with fish that squirt water. A summery fun toy that's also apropriate to the material. Karen Young, mother of one of the students, was not happy with this choice of gifts. Not happy at all.
A Rogers mother says she's upset after her first grader came home with a toy gun. Karen Young says her 7 year old came home with what she called a water gun on the last day of school. Young asked her child where it came from. He told her that his teacher gave it to him. Young says she considers the teacher an excellent educator but says this was a really bad decision on the teacher' part.
Assistant school superintendent Dr. Louise Standridge says the package that the toy came in says the toy is called a water squirter. It's in the shape of a fish.
We know it's not a toy gun because if it was the police would have arrested all of the children to enforce the zero tolerance policy against toy weapons. It's a squirting fish. Hello? Ms.Young? What's the dealy-o? Perhaps it has something to do with her history with firearms.
Young says two of her brothers were shot in domestic disputes, her uncle committed suicide with a gun and she accidentally shot her ex boyfriend when the gun she hit him with went off.
She accidentally shot her boyfriend while beating him with a gun. Why was she hitting her boyfriend with a gun? Is it a tradition in Rogers to beat husbands/boyfriends with guns? There seems to be a log of firearms discharging during arguments in that family.
I think a fish that spits water might be exactly what's needed in that household. When mommy starts beating on her boyfriend with a gun, squirt her with water. Hey, it worked to train the cat from eating the ferns, right?
(Hat tip to The Thief)
Posted by: Jim at
02:51 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 350 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I prefer to take my lectures about the appropriate uses of guns from someone who doesn't use them as though they were rocks. ...or sticks. ...or frying pans.
["
I was only pistol-whipping him!"]
Posted by: Claire at June 01, 2004 04:36 PM (l1oyw)
2
Maybe she thought the "toy" gun was not right - she wanted a real gun.
Posted by: MojoMark at June 01, 2004 05:24 PM (E+LQu)
3
Maybe she was just afraid the fish would accidentally go off? I mean, who wouldn't be?
Posted by: SoldierGrrrl at June 01, 2004 10:07 PM (AaBEz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
38kb generated in CPU 0.0362, elapsed 0.0969 seconds.
91 queries taking 0.0701 seconds, 229 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.