January 25, 2005
Virtual school
This is pretty neat:
Private, home school students added to Perdue's virtual school bill.
Home schoolers and private school students would be allowed to take online public school courses under changes a Senate committee made Monday to a bill backed by Gov. Sonny Perdue.
The Senate Education committee approved a plan to create the Georgia Virtual School - giving students in small school systems computer access to advanced placement classes and other courses that may not be available to them locally.
Students not enrolled in public schools would be allowed to take up to 6 courses. I don't like the limit there but this is better than the original proposal that was limited to enrolled students only. Of course not everybody is happy with providing educational opportunities outside of the classroom.
The amendment was opposed by Democrats on the Republican-controlled committee and by representatives of teacher's groups, who said the change would effectively take money away from school systems.
"This is one more step in weakening public schools," said Sen. Vincent Fort, D-Atlanta, a committee member who voted against the amendment. "Public school students should not have to wait in line."
In the words of the great Arlo Guthrie, "Have a nice steaming cup of shut the fuck up". Teachers, teachers' unions and the people who depend on those unions for their kickbacks payola bribe money support will always be against anything that takes away their money. In this case they are working not only against homeschoolers but also against progress. The web is a fantastic tool and the more it is developed for scholastic opportunity the less we will need schools and teachers. You can't fault somebody for working in their own self interests but you surely can call them fucknuts when that puts them directly at odds with our kids.
Posted by: Jim at
08:14 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 306 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Now That is an awesome program. I can speak for the efficacy of the Web based teaching, because all of my clases here are web based. I like them because a) you have to be able to READ, b) you have to take extreme personal responsibility to pass, not to mention succeed in the class, and if you wnt somethng that can buid good interpersonal relationship skils that can be used in the workplace, having to do all yor communication by e-mail is a great way to learn it. If they could hook it into a standard school room so the kids could actualy ask questons, life would be good there too, but that is infeasible for primary and secondary schools.
All in all, i say a step in the right direction.
...
Besides, now the kids can say "I'm doing my schoolwork, Mom" while surfing for porn. A win-win scenario.
:-D
Posted by: tommy at January 25, 2005 11:11 AM (VCRgB)
2
Damn,you suck!How come I have to sit down,take the slowness of high speed internet to browse here to get GOOD NEWS for once???Cool stuff like THIS should have been served to me for breakfast.
:-P
Posted by: LW at January 25, 2005 12:45 PM (GCA5m)
3
It all comes down to my insatiable hunger for traffic.
Posted by: Jim at January 25, 2005 12:49 PM (tyQ8y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 19, 2005
How to change the world
Defeating Nazi Germany
Do: Invade Germany.
Don't bother: Turning off Hitler's speech with a very forceful twist of the radio's knob.
Ending segregated busing
Do: Sit in the front of the bus.
Don't bother: Sending a 'strongly worded letter' to the CEO of the bus company.
Getting your own holiday
Do: Dedicate your life to a worthy goal, motivate and move your people toward it, live as an example of it, die in the pursuit of it.
Don't bother: Bitching at the TV set.
Send a man to the moon
Do: Put a guy in a big ass rocket and launch it.
Don't bother: Blasting loud music at the neighborhood Luddite.
Change the world for the better
Do: Put on your Birkenstocks and your best hemp shirt, get out of your house and actually fucking do something constructive that works toward the goals you profess to have.
Don't bother: Protesting against a welcome back party.
Bitching and whining will never change a thing. Jesse Jackson will never make the world a better place because he doesn't actually DO. Bill Gates made the world a better place because he does things in the real physical world to support and promote his ideals.
These protesters are the worst sort of hypocrite. They want only to scream their disillusionment in the hopes that somebody else will do something about their problems.
(Tip credit to DCeit)
Posted by: Jim at
10:30 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 242 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"There are two superpowers in the world. One is the U.S. and the other is world opinion."
1...2...3... DRAW!
[world opinion falls dead in dusty street]
What REALLY chaps my ass about this is how much free publicity these jags are getting in the unbiased media.
At least Protest Warrior will be there.
Posted by: Harvey at January 19, 2005 10:50 AM (tJfh1)
2
Ever notice that Republicans don't bother to protest? Anything?
If a group of Republicans has a problem, rather than bitching in the street about it, they form a congressional lobby and get the ears of the people who can actually make change happen.
Another note: Protesting the inauguration is illogical. Protesting a policy like Social Security change makes logical sense in that you have a goal and a desired effect (change of policy). What is the goal of protesting the inaguration? No more inaugurations? Should Bush be Dictator for Life? Are you protesting Democracy (or a Republic)? No, my friends... you are only showing sour grapes and a desire for attention. What a bunch of losers.
Posted by: Garret at January 19, 2005 11:57 AM (IOwam)
3
Unrelated, but, Jim, do you know anything about a large digital fly featuring my head that's apparently buzzing around my blog?
http://ramblingrhodes.mu.nu/archives/063869.html
I personally don't see it, at work or at home, but some people are seeing it.
Posted by: Ryan at January 19, 2005 12:49 PM (Sc71i)
4
The first steps to a cleaner,safer USA should include the elimination of idiots and morons.
After that we should get rif of extremists and feminists.Safe the wales if you have time left...BUT PLEASE get rid of the WHINERS!
Posted by: LW at January 20, 2005 10:06 AM (GCA5m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 13, 2005
I wonder how long it will be...
...before the Islamic terrorists start killing relief workers in Indonesia?
Relief and aid workers are a favorite target of Muslim extremists and there are shitloads of Muslim extremists in Indonesia. Right now the whole country is a target rich environment for these murderers. Chaos, unknown people everywhere, lots and lots of westerners with limited security.
In fact the Indonesian government is now setting up American forces for murder by these monsters. In an effort to remain in country to continue providing assistance our Marines will now be unarmed.
In a major compromise, the Marines agreed not to carry guns while on Indonesian soil and for the vast majority of troops to return to ships stationed off the coast after each day's operations.
I do not see good things coming out of this compromise.
(Hat tip to e-claire)
Posted by: Jim at
09:02 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 151 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I started writing a post about this yesterday, but I was interuppted and never made it back. I don't quite understand the compromise. Surely we don't want to turn our backs on these poor people, but, dammit, when you get American Soldiers on the ground helping you, you get American Soldiers. And an American Soldier is an Armed Soldier!
here's the article I found - it had some more interesting tidbits about the corruption that exists in these areas...
http://abcnews.go.com/International/Tsunami/wireStory?id=405767
Posted by: Clancy at January 13, 2005 10:00 AM (JxYJc)
2
Its like........yes,we want your help,but on OUR terms and only if WE can shoot YOU in the back,anytime we want to.
Personally,yes,we should not turn our backs on them,but then again,if you are getting greeted by ungreatfull,political bastards,I would say.....sorry,I am NOT going to help you.Not without security and safety for my own gut!
Unfortunatly its the poor people who suffer from what politicians do.Its not the vicims who mess up and thats where peoples heart goes,despite cricket politics.
Posted by: LW at January 13, 2005 11:30 AM (GCA5m)
3
Sorry, Jim.
I on't agree with you on this one.
The UN is sending in un-armed troops as well. England is talking about sending in their own un-armed troops. The Tamil Tigers have laid down their weapons and formed a tentative peace agreement in Sri Lanka for the good of the nation. Indonesia will/is doing the same.
I think this has to be done in goodwill and as a gesture of rebuilding. This is not about a war. This is about cleaning up after a natural disaster. Malaysia, Thailand, Sri Lanka and Indonesia are crippled by the lack of tourists in their areas. This will help bring them back, and regardless of the religion, people do want the toursits back (I have been to Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia. Tourists are needed, wanted, and the only "no travel" areas are in the other islands of Indonesia. The island area of Indonesia affected, particularly Banda Aceh, are "no risk" areas without the threats of kidnapping you get if you go east of Jakarta. Jakarta is one whole island away from where the reconstruction needs to take place).
It's like Marines taking their guns into Thailand. Would that be neccessary? Really?
If the U.S. is unwilling to accept this compromise, then I think the U.S. Marines should not go over. If I had anything remotely helpful to contribute in terms of rebuilding, I'd be on a plane in no time, not armed with anything but my mobile phone.
Sorry. Blitz me if you want, but that's honestly the way I feel.
Posted by: Helen at January 13, 2005 12:01 PM (uFX1z)
4
No blitz from me. I very much hope you're correct.
Posted by: Jim at January 13, 2005 12:40 PM (tyQ8y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 11, 2005
Live from the "So what?" files
There's some controversy about perennial favorite band Nickelback. Mikey Smith noticed a disturbing similarity between their older hit
How You Remind Me and a newer hit
Someday. He synched the songs up to play together and found that they do indeed share a baseline. That really pissed him off.
Nickelback, you lazy, talentless bunch of wankers. What, did you think nobody would notice that you're recycling your hideous dirge and selling it all over again to your deluded fan base? You bastards, you're taking advantage of those tone deaf MTV brainwashed twats who are too thick to notice you're releasing songs that are EXACTLY THE SAME as ones you recorded earlier. And here's the proof, people. Listen to their first godawful hit, played through the left speaker. At the same time, an equally shite single (released two years later) will be played through the right speaker. Can you spot the difference?
He maintains that this is effectively theft by deception. While I agree with some of his points ("deluded fan base" and "tone deaf MTV brainwashed twats" to be precise) my overall impression of his argument is "So what?".
In order to be popular a group must produce an identifiable sound. Think of any band that has had more than a single hit and you should have no trouble finding similarities in their songs. In this particular case they are recycling a base line. In three chord rock. How do you not recycle a baseline when you've only got a handful of them to work with?
They aren't talentless wankers, they are wankers of limited talent. Successful wankers of limited talent. Rich successful wankers of limited talent. Rich successful wankers of limited talent that get a whole lot more pussy than Mikey Smith.
And they deserve it. They made a sound that people like. They're smart enough to keep making the sound that people like. Eventually people will get bored with that sound and they will either come up with a new sound that people like or they will descend into obscurity like almost every other band in the history of music to resurface only as guests on Hollywood Squares or the occasional Trivial Pursuit question.
Posted by: Jim at
08:21 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 378 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I agree.
Who cares...all that shit sounds the same to me anyway.
Posted by: Paul at January 11, 2005 09:24 AM (vbP6L)
2
I couldn't agree more.
AC/DC comes to mind. I'm sure you could do the same thing with most of their songs, but that doesn't diminish what they've created. To me AC/DC is fundamental 100% pure rock & roll.
Heck - you could even go farther... 50% or more of all rock and roll tunes use G, C & D chord paterns. Tis must mean they're all stealing from each other!!! (The percentage quoted above comes directly from my butt - but any musician will agree.)
Anyhoo... If it works (and judging by album sales it's working) then more power to them.
Posted by: Clancy at January 11, 2005 09:40 AM (JxYJc)
3
Question: I'm no music expert so what is the difference between a bass line and a baseline?
Posted by: Jim at January 11, 2005 10:14 AM (IOwam)
4
One smells a bit fishy.
Posted by: Jim at January 11, 2005 10:24 AM (tyQ8y)
5
The other is made out of chalk and connects the bases.
Posted by: Harvey at January 11, 2005 11:37 AM (tJfh1)
6
You make very good points, Jim. But regardless of what bass line is recycled to achieve a signature sound, the least a band can do is try to change the harmony a little.
I don't listen to much of this stuff myself, but I've caught it enough on the radio. In the back of my head, I thought both of those pieces were the same song. Are they cheating anybody? Hard to say. Both songs are moderate hits and people are obviously into them. Still, in the whole scheme of things, who gives a damn. Nobody is any worse for it.
Posted by: Mick at January 12, 2005 08:40 AM (VhRca)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 06, 2005
I call shenanigans on the UN
Koffi Annan:
"Our response to this unprecedented catastrophe must be equally unprecedented."
Tsunami: 150,000 dead. 390,000 displaced.
Sudan: 1,500,000 dead. 4,000,000 displaced.
Since the tsunami deaths and displacement are more than assuredly precedented in numbers he must mean that the genocide in Sudan does not qualify as a catastrophe. Doesn't the systematic murder and forced displacement of the black populace of Sudan by the ruling Islamic power seem catastrophic to you?
There are some serious differences between these two catastrophes though. One was an unpredictable natural disaster, the other is an ongoing disaster perpetrated by man against man. One has garnered massive international aid, the other has been largely ignored. One has Koffi Annan calling for a billion dollars for assistance, the other is a UN budget item. One has the full backing of the UN, the other is a footnote to partisan byblows.
Most importantly, one has absolutely nothing to do with the UN charter while the other is precisely what the UN was formed to deal with.
The UN is dead in all but name. They function adequately as a substitute and support mechanism for international humanitarian aid but this is not their purpose. For the crises they were created to deal with they have the same success and authority as a crackpot in the woods writing letters to the editor.
Posted by: Jim at
11:55 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The UN has been dead for a long time. I wish they would get the hell out of my country as all they do is create harm. But look who is controlling the UN...there's your answer.
It is unfortunate that an organization that started with such good intentions has fallen to such a low level.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at January 07, 2005 12:57 AM (VgWBQ)
2
They function adequately as a substitute and support mechanism for international humanitarian aid but this is not their purpose.
No they don't.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 07, 2005 06:13 AM (+S1Ft)
3
Quite an interesting comparison. Add to that equation what it took for President Bush to circumnavigate the UN and commit American forces plus $200 billion tax dollars for a pre-emptive invasion of Iraq.
Posted by: @rt at January 12, 2005 10:32 PM (uHv00)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 05, 2005
When is a kid a kid?
When they need life-saving prescription medication they are a kid, therefore not permitted to carry prescription medication.
When they want a tan they are a kid, therefore not permitted to use a tanning bed.
When they want an abortion they are not a kid. They can leave class with the school's blessing, escorted by a non-guardian and unrelated adult, and go get an abortion.
In California (and too many other states), a kid is a kid when a special interest group has bullied or bargained their narrow focus into law.
Stop legislating morality. Let kids be kids and let their parents raise them.
(Inspired by an excellent post at Different River. Go there for links to all of those news items.)
Posted by: Jim at
12:52 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 133 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Luckily there are states (I believe NY and NJ are part)where it is ILLEGAL for a non-guardian to take a monior for abortion in state as well as out of state.
Not that it has much to do with it.....but my opinion about this whole abortion shit is short:
you f***,know what it can come to,now take resposibillity.Abortion is just an easy way out of resposibillity.
Anyone who would have my child have an abortion without me knowing about it,is a criminal and belongs in jail.
Speaking about non-guardians...isn't it the case for years that we are only guardians when the kids are at home?You send them to public school and temporaly loose you guardianship.As you see in the case of license removal if they act up in school here.
Its a screwed up system we live in!
Posted by: LW at January 05, 2005 01:13 PM (GCA5m)
2
Posted on this the other day.
Here.
Very important distinctions are being made every day be people everywhere.
Posted by: tre at January 07, 2005 02:06 PM (F2On3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 04, 2005
Principles and practices
I just finished an excellent article on
Evil SQA Practices that would bore the vast majority of you into a stupor the envy of major drug manufacturers. But one bit of it rang a big ol' bell in my noggin:
There was a small Polynesian island in a remote part of the Pacific Rim where the inhabitants lived in grass huts and raised pigs for their skins. One night, during an intense tropical storm, lightening struck a hut with a pig inside. The hut burned to the ground, and the next day, as the locals were sifting through the charred remains of the hut, they came across the burned up and still smoldering pig. It smelled pretty good, so a young boy broke off a piece and tasted it. It tasted good. This is how the islanders discovered roasted pig. A week or so went by and the islanders got hungry for roast pig. So they put a pig inside another hut and burnt that hut to the ground.
So the practice was to burn down huts. The principle was wanting to satisfy their hunger, specifically for roasted pig. If the islanders would have continued to focus on practices, they would eventually become homeless. To, instead, focus on principles could have lead the islanders to the invention of the barbeque and have spared their huts.
So terrorism is a practice. Do they even remember their principles?
Posted by: Jim at
09:51 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 242 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I was going to leave a comment, then I realized that I couldn't fathom terrorists having principles at all.
So I yield the floor to anyone with a better imagination.
Posted by: Harvey at January 04, 2005 02:41 PM (tJfh1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
43kb generated in CPU 0.0244, elapsed 0.0911 seconds.
91 queries taking 0.0754 seconds, 227 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.