August 05, 2004
F911 wins Academy Award for best documentary
There was a brief period when it was in doubt whether Moore's movie would be eligible for the award. It was broadcast in Cuba recently and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has a rule that a documentary cannot be broadcast on TV or Internet for 9 months after theatrical release. The Academy has decided that
F911 is still eligible.
Realistically that's the only decision they could have made. The Cuban government broadcast the movie illegally. You really can't disqualify a movie because a hostile foreign power pirated it. What you can do is ask why governments like Communist Cuba and terrorist organizations like Fatah are distributing the movie but that's neither here nor there.
This decision will, of course, guarantee that F911 will win the award for best documentary. The culture in Hollywood is such that it is a sure thing. They'll wait until the ceremony to make it official but Mikey can clear off some discarded KFC buckets from the shelf right now to get a spot ready, should he choose to be proactive.
I had always thought that documentaries were supposed to be truthful. Sadly, that's not the case. Although every dictionary in the world indicates that a documentary should be a collection of truths the Academy does not. Jen detailed this nicely a while back. Here's some excerpted bits (emphasis mine):
Encarta: giving facts and information rather than telling a fictional story
Dictionary.com: Presenting facts objectively without editorializing or inserting fictional matter, as in a book or film; A work, such as a film or television program, presenting political, social, or historical subject matter in a factual and informative manner and often consisting of actual news films or interviews accompanied by narration.
Miriam-Webster: of, relating to, or employing documentation in literature or art; broadly : FACTUAL, OBJECTIVE (a documentary film of the war)
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences: An eligible documentary film is defined as a theatrically released non-fiction motion picture dealing creatively with cultural, artistic, historical, social, scientific, economic or other subjects. It may be photographed in actual occurrence, or may employ partial re-enactment, stock footage, stills, animation, stop-motion or other techniques, as long as the emphasis is on fact and not on fiction.
Essentially the Academy redefines documentary to substitute "creative" for "objective" and "emphasis on fact" for "factual".
Factual? We can't do that! That would be boring! Just make sure that there are a couple of facts in there somewhere. For the rest, get creative.
If you want to find dictionary definitions for Moore's movie it isn't very hard. This one fits very well:
the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person; ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause; deceptive or distorted information that is systematically spread.
That's the definition of propaganda.
(News bit gleaned from Phillip Coons)
Posted by: Jim at
07:47 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 506 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Despite the fact that the Academy Awards have become meaningless, the thought of having to see Moore's face up on the screen on national tv as he waves an Oscar around makes me want to vomit.
Posted by: RP at August 05, 2004 08:35 AM (LlPKh)
2
Yep. I just like how O'Reily caught him and cornered him .
Posted by: pylorns at August 05, 2004 08:49 AM (FTYER)
3
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is irrelevant - they just don't know that yet since they all breathe the same rarified air. I've found that generally speaking I'm less likely to be interested in a film if it's won an Academy award (in the last 15 years or so - the Academy USED to mean something.)
It's interesting the parallels that could be drawn between the Academy and the UN...
Posted by: Clancy at August 05, 2004 09:07 AM (EGVPL)
4
Remember though that he was booed off the stage when he went into his tirade when he won the last one. I'm wondering if academy voters will remember, and will want to avoid such an outburst, denying him the award.
Just a contrarian view....
Posted by: MojoMark at August 05, 2004 12:39 PM (E+LQu)
5
Yes, calling F 9/11 a documentary is a misuse of the word. Personally I agree with Michael Moore himself when he says that his films are not documentaries but rather opinion pieces. As for the 3 people who booed at him for his last Academy Awards Speech, I'd be willing to bet if anything that woudl be reason for them to want Moore to win. Controversary means ratings and ratings mean money.
Posted by: dolphin at August 05, 2004 03:55 PM (g2MEq)
6
1. There is no such thing as a conflict of interest situation for a President and Vice President. There is no case where a President can recuse himself because a family member or friend is involved in a situation.
Are you implying that Bush and Cheney wanted the country to go to war so their former business associates could make money? I don't understand how any familiarity between Bush/Saud could be interpreted as a conflict of interest. Do you contend that Bush wanted to go to war in order to pursue the son of his ally? That makes no sense whatsoever.
2. There are no children serving in the American forces and the civilians of Iraq are in a hell of a better spot now than they were under Saddam. The 'human cost' of the invasion of Iraq was absolutely mandated, not simply justified.
3. How many Iraqi mass graves did Moore show in his movie? How many people being put through shredders? Having their hands cut off? Being gang raped? Did Moore show any single tiny bit of how things are better in Iraq now?
Winston, do you believe that the average Iraqi longs for the return of Saddam Hussein to power?
Posted by: Jim at August 09, 2004 05:33 AM (behRF)
7
1. The president or vice-president (or any other public official) most certainly CAN be in conflict. This is precisely why they are supposed to cut any ties that could be perceived as a conflict.
Are you implying that Bush & Cheney wanted to go to war so that their former business associates could make money?
No. The implication is that the plan to invade Iraq was begun before 9/11, and since they were going over anyway, they wanted to cut some buddies in on the action.
2. There are children serving in the armed forces. Legally, they may be adults, but they are still my children. When you hear people speaking of american kids, they mean young men & women. At my age, anyone under 25 is a kid.
The 'human cost' of the invasion of Iraq was absolutely mandated, not simply justified
What a disgusting concept. 'Human cost' means young people die. What could possibly mandate this?
3. No one has ever said that Saddam was a good guy, with the possible exception of Reagan back when we were helping Iraq fight Iran. If the barometer for us to invade another country is that their leader is a bad guy, then there are lots of countries that have worse leaders than Saddam. But then again, Africa has no oil.
Posted by: Easy at August 10, 2004 09:57 AM (iKH8O)
8
Sorry, Easy. There's no way I'm going to waste time explaining logical fallacies and moral equivalency. "No blood for oil", no matter how it's couched is an automatic flush for me.
Posted by: Jim at August 10, 2004 11:11 AM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 04, 2004
Atlas Flubbed
UPDATES:
More info from Photodude. Reid is the fellow who got resolution last month when this problem first surfaced. (Only Atlas happened to be lying out of their ass then, of course.)
Chief Wiggles has an update too. In brief, Operation Give (OG) is in contact with the Georgia State Attorney's office, they are getting legal counsel here (chances are good for pro bono), at this time only Atlas Line can actually prove where any money is and they aren't talking, the goods in the two containers stuck in Kuwait are going to be transhipped by the US military so the donated items will get to where they need to be and OG will stop incurring daily fees for the containers sitting in Kuwait.
Atlas Line is a shipping company headquartered here in Atlanta. Click on that link for one of the most painful websites I have seen since late 1997. They are not members of the Atlanta Better Business Bureau and appear to be in violation of Trademark against Atlas Van Line. They have only been in business since July 2002. They also appear to be thieves.
Brief history: Atlas Line was the shipper used by Chief Wiggles and Operation Give to ship three containers of donated goods to Iraq. The first container was delivered and was late coming back. The leery shipper on the other end then required a $10,000 deposit for the containers. Operation Give sent $10,000 to Atlas Line. It turned out that the amount needed was $10,000 per container. Operation Give sent an additional $20,000 to Atlas Line. The $30,000 was never received by the overseas shipper. Operation Give was not refunded.
I called Atlas Line today but was unable to speak to any of the principles. They're all out for the day. I did speak with Mary, who did not want to tell me her last name. She is an Operation Clerk there. She assured me that Atlas did not steal Operation Give's money, checks were sent overseas, they were in fact cashier's checks and Atlas does not now have any of Operation Give's money in their own bank account. According to Mary, they would not have been in business so long if they "ripped people off". I guess Mary thinks that two years is an exceptionally long time.
Like most people who read about this my bullshit detector is going off the scale. To that end I'm more than happy to have sent a missive similar to this post to every local news channel and paper.
Posted by: Jim at
09:14 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 427 words, total size 3 kb.
1
If they were cashier's checks, they would be able to show this from their bank statements.
Yes, it's bullshit.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at August 03, 2004 08:24 PM (+S1Ft)
2
To out my honest opinion:
how about smacking Operation Give in the head for using a phoney shipping company?
Not beeing listed with the BBB alone should have rang a bell there.
Now,that doesn't mean I am against kicking Atlas Line in the ass twice as hard.
Posted by: LW at August 03, 2004 11:37 PM (behRF)
3
LW is right, of course, but at the moment that's not the point. With enough pressure and exposure this can get sorted and everyone can learn the lesson.
Jim: there doesn't seem to have been any followup today on any of the blogs covering this situation. Can you keep us in the loop please?
Posted by: Simon at August 04, 2004 02:01 AM (GWTmv)
4
I'll sure be following up. I'm hoping at least one of the local news stations will be intrigued. Maybe I'll call Mary again today and see how she's doing.
Posted by: Jim at August 04, 2004 05:35 AM (behRF)
5
Operation Give has photos of the cashed checks.
This is such a great organization; the Iraqi children need something positive in their lives. I am just so irate about the whole thing. Good luck with the letters; Atlas deserves all the bad publicity they get.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at August 04, 2004 07:28 AM (IWm2D)
6
Good luck. Let me know if you'd like me to try to put you in touch with a litigator down there.
Posted by: RP at August 04, 2004 10:29 AM (LlPKh)
7
I thought all this stuff was taken care of already.. this is getting pretty stupid.
Posted by: pylorns at August 04, 2004 11:42 AM (FTYER)
8
Me, I'm getting impatient with everyone (uh, not you!) going, "Spread the word, tell everyone, invoke the power of BLOGGGG," when what is critical here is that OG
gets a fargin' lawyer and then removes everything pertaining to this case from the website. They don't need "more" publicity now, but less.
Posted by: ilyka at August 04, 2004 01:30 PM (s0k6U)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 03, 2004
My Lovely Wife is famous
She became a moderator for the local
Freecycle group. That's where we got our big-ass gas grill (say that five times fast), ping-pong table and magnolia trees (all for free). Anyway, the local paper interviewed her and another moderator about the group and
the article was published today.
Way to go, Baby!
Posted by: Jim at
10:16 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You had 2 swing sets?
Good job LW!
Posted by: Tiffani at August 03, 2004 10:34 AM (xpNFK)
2
We had one in the yard that was left by the previous owners.And we just bought the kids a new one last year.But they are never in the back yard and I didn't want that thin gin the front.Instead we'll put one on a tree branch.:-)
Posted by: LW at August 03, 2004 10:58 AM (behRF)
3
what a great idea! Wish we had something like that when we moved; we had a lot that didn't sell and could have benefited others.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at August 03, 2004 04:49 PM (IWm2D)
4
That is so f-ing weird. I found Freecycle yesterday through the City of Durham website. I've been looking to get rid of a ceiling fan that's taking up space in the garage where more dirt can go.
*Twilight Zone music plays in the background*
Posted by: Tiffany at August 03, 2004 05:18 PM (5Tm0V)
5
Tiffany:
Where you the one who posted the ceiling fan with "at least" one light?LOL
Posted by: LW at August 03, 2004 11:00 PM (behRF)
6
*sniff* and I knew her when she was just a blogger's wife.
Congrats on the article.
Posted by: Simon at August 04, 2004 02:04 AM (GWTmv)
7
Way to go LW!!! I just wish we had something like this in the UK.
Posted by: Rob at August 04, 2004 05:16 AM (kXZI6)
8
Thanks everyone!
Hey ROb...you DO have that in the UK.Its an international movement.check it out on www.freecycle.org
Posted by: LW at August 04, 2004 10:07 AM (behRF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 30, 2004
You're all wrong
A Perfectly Cromulent Blog
has odds posted for
which Simpsons character will be coming out of the closet. There's pretty good analysis there but there's one glaring problem - no Duff Man.
That's right, the hidden gay character in the Simpsons is none other than Duff Man himself. That's right. Duff Man. The symbol of drunken debauchery, high times and overconsumption is the closet gay. Hard to believe? Think Spudz McKenzie. The beer drinking world was shocked to the core when it was discovered that Spudz was a female dog. We'll be seeing Homer and the rest of the lushes questioning their own masculinity as Duff beer sales crash. Of course a certain segment of the population will gain an appreciation for the beverage but it won't quite make the transfer to trendy drink.
We'll see a suddenly effeminate Duff Man tossed out on his fabulous keister and befriended by Homer and family who, in typical fashion, will build him back up to the point where he challenges Duff corporate types and wins back his job. During the recovery watch for a scene at Moe's and interaction with many of Springfield's more "sensitive" characters. At least one (probably Smithers) will be drafted by Homer to provide a source of inspiration for DM.
I should be a comic writer. I really should.
Posted by: Jim at
10:39 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 227 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hate to burst your bubble, but this is what I have written at the end of the extended entry:
"Since I have a sneaking suspicion it's going to be something fairly obvious (Lenny and Carl are worrying me), I'll go with an essentially left field prediction: DuffMan - who I feel certain is hiding his true feelings behing that party hardy attitude, and Handsome Pete, who dances for nickels. Or maybe Poochie."
But hey, great minds think alike.
Posted by: Pete at July 30, 2004 11:04 AM (EKMxC)
2
Oh, damn! How'd I miss that?
Consider my bubble burst. We'll just go with that "great minds" part.
My second guess is Rainier "McBain" Wolfcastle cause what would be funnier than a gay Arnold Schwarzenegger?
Posted by: Jim at July 30, 2004 11:53 AM (IOwam)
3
I was thinking McBain but he's not regular enough to make it work. If we're going real left field what about the substitute teacher Lisa fell for, I think Dustin Hoffman did the voice...
I still like Comic Book Guy. For this, I mean. I don't
like him like that.
Posted by: Simon at August 02, 2004 04:26 AM (UKqGy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 21, 2004
The Tour de Frog
It's pretty exciting that Lance Armstrong has taken the lead and is poised to win his 6th race. I do have one comment though: Where else but France do they reward the leader by letting him wear a yellow shirt?*
* And does it come with a little white flag?
Posted by: Jim at
02:25 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That's a damned good point.
Posted by: Paul at July 21, 2004 02:34 PM (Prvsw)
2
I can't wait until Sunday. Making the frogs play our national anthem AGAIN right there in Paris is one of the greatest things in the world.
The commentators on OLN have been pronouncing the race Tour DEE France (with a long "a" in france) - it's some sort of joke. I don't understand the origins, but I get the joke...
Posted by: Clancy at July 21, 2004 03:03 PM (EGVPL)
3
Dude! He's dating Sheryl Crow!
Proof that dorks on bikes pull the cuties.
Posted by: Helen at July 22, 2004 06:30 AM (pS7+B)
4
Okay, let's put it to a vote. Lance Armstrong's greatest acheivement is:
a) banging Sheryl Crow
b) Winning the Tour DEEE France a record six times
c) Overcoming cancer
d)Wearing a yellow jersey for five years without looking like a complete panty waist.
I put it to you.
Posted by: shank at July 22, 2004 08:52 AM (+4mO/)
5
The yellow jersey was not only a way to ID the lead rider, it was a way to sell more newspapers. The Tour day France was originally sponsored by a now-defunct frog sports newspaper that was printed on yellow paper. Yellow paper, yellow jersey...get it?
As for Bob Roll pronouncing it Tour day France, when he first rode the Tour with 7-11, he noticed how snotty the Europeans in general, and the cheese-eaters in particular, were toward the American team (the only member of the team to get good press was their beautiful blond team masseuse, whose name escapes me). Everything bad was blamed on the Americans.
Crash in the rear, when 7-11 was up front?
Americain!
Dropped your water bottle?
Americain!
Your great aunt has gout?
Americain!
You get the idea,
non?
Bob said if you didn't pronounce everything just right, the Surrender Monkeys would pretend they didn't understand you. No water for you!
Mispronouncing the name of the race in interviews became their way of getting back at the the unbathed grape-stomping masses.
Of course, by now, even the douchebags are joking about it. Bobke tells how the Tour Director, Jean-Marie LeBlanc (what kind of person gives a guy
two girls names, anyway?) has gone up to him and asked, "How's your Tour day France, Bob?"
Posted by: Victor at July 22, 2004 09:07 AM (L3qPK)
6
Thanks for the insight & history Victor - I figured as much. It makes me like Bob Roll all that much more. At first I thought he was annoying - now I think he's hilarious.
Posted by: Clancy at July 22, 2004 03:48 PM (EGVPL)
7
Shank - It's (e), all of the above.
Posted by: Jim at July 22, 2004 04:30 PM (behRF)
8
Frogs Hock Loogies on Lance
From NewsJerks.com
During a time trial on some mountain in France, several Frogs spit on Lance Armstrong, who is now kicking the derrieres of their French heroes on his way to win a record sixth Tour de Frog bicycle race. "There were lots of aggressive fans surrounding the riders and I even saw two idiots spit at Lance Armstrong," said French bicycle jaunt director Jean Marie-Leblanc (pronounced Jan Mary doo-Blank - yeah, I know, it's a girls name, but he's French, so . . .). "Unfortunately I doubt you can put barriers on the 14 kilometers of the climb." The French ought to know. After World War I, the ingenious snailchewers built a 150-mile-long wall to keep the Germans out, only to watch them walk right around the end of it into Paris. Smooth. Anyway, Lance ignored the cowards' spit and won the time trial. According to reports, when the Frenchies saw Lance ride right through the lungers, they dropped to their knees and began waving white flags. "The crowds were animated, I should say," said Armstrong, who didn't pay any attention to the Frog loogers but was annoyed by Kraut fans, whose spit, NewsJerks has been told, smelled like dark beer, headcheese sausage and filthy hookers' skanky coochies. "Although I enjoyed my day, I still think it's a bad idea to have a time trial on this mountain." Next year, Tour planners may consider a gay jaunt over the Mont de Peuw-Peuw landfill, where only the the Spanish fans hang out, and they have to save their saliva for kissing al Qaeda's ass.
Posted by: mike barwick at July 23, 2004 10:19 PM (Z0E0X)
9
Wow!!! I'd heard americans were ignorant and yet pompus. After meeting a few that were intellegent, accepting individulas. I thought hey maybe its a sterotype that I should let go of. Then I came across this page and realised that the reason the other americans were such nice people was that they were intellegent enough to see america for what it is and get the hell out as soon as humanly possible.
Also if you want to make fun of the French you should at least get your jokes right. There is no language or dialect where " LE " is pronounced doo.
As well Jean is not pronounced Jan (as in Brady ) its pronounced more like John without an O. The female version of Jean is Jeanne which IS pronounced like Jan.
Last but not least the biggest terrorist group you should fear is not the Al Qaeda but the Carlyle group; a group that your own president is part of as well as Carlucci and Baker as is the bin Laden family.
Posted by: Jenn at August 13, 2004 06:12 PM (S5exM)
10
Better loosen the straps on your tin foil hat, Jenn. You keep that thing too tight and you'll restrict bloodflow to your brain.
Oops. Too late.
Posted by: Jim at August 13, 2004 07:37 PM (q6E0D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 20, 2004
He got the fever!
Wow! Is there anything that people won't do to impress
The Cheesmistres of Chaos? If there is, I certainly can't think of it:
Police Arrest Cheese-Covered Naked Man
Police found Monn's Jeep parked near the pool and then noticed his clothes and a bottle of vodka in the vehicle.
Then, they saw the naked man running toward the Jeep. Officials say he had cheese in his hair, on his face and on his shoulders.
(Hat tip to Phillip Coons)
Posted by: Jim at
07:42 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 87 words, total size 1 kb.
1
ha! bathed himself in cheese.
Posted by: pylorns at July 20, 2004 10:02 AM (FTYER)
2
I hear cheese is an effective lubricant, but only in the processed-tube form. He must have got it wrong and went for the fondue stuff.
Posted by: Helen at July 20, 2004 01:28 PM (pS7+B)
3
Just processed tube cheese? What about spray cheese? That has certain distinct advantages for lubricant application.
Posted by: Jim at July 20, 2004 01:34 PM (IOwam)
4
Anything that can be done with spray cheese, I know about it.
From... er, from reading about it. In disreputable magazines. And rumors.
Yeah. That's it.
Posted by: LeeAnn at July 20, 2004 04:32 PM (HxCeX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 15, 2004
But that's confidential!
Well, maybe not quite as confidential as you believe. Clancy reports on a
state mandated violation of doctor/patient confidentiality. The public perception of doctor/patient confidence comes from TV shows and movies. It is very wrong and is worlds away from actual legal standings.
Doctor/patient confidence is a professional courtesy, not a legal requirement or legally defined right. Its legal standing is based on precedence and not legislation. Unfortunately for those who want to use it to avoid testimony there is just as much precedence going the other way.
The news item that Clancy posted about involves a law requiring that Pennsylvania doctors notify the Department of Transportation when they believe a patient has a substance abuse problem. The DOT may then revoke the patient's license based on the medical testimony. A more common example would be the laws requiring medical and scholastic personnel to report suspected child abuse.
What you end up with is a strong professional courtesy supported by tradition and some legal precedence that is being legislated away as more and more professionals are being legally forced to violate it. Be careful what you tell your doctor and do it with the understanding that even though he might not want to repeat it, if push comes to shove he'll have no choice but to do so.
Question for the lawyers in the house: How strong is the client/attorney privilege?
Any priests around? I'm also interested in the legal standing of the "seal of the confessional".
Posted by: Jim at
07:51 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 253 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The attorney/client privilege remains quite strong, although that would vary from state to state. It is, however, limited and doesn't cover every single thing you tell your lawyer. I have just litigated this issue, and won, in a conflict situation where the law firm was representing joint clients. Let me quote from a case I have at hand:
"In New York, the attorney-client privilege is governed by CPLR § 4503, but it is also rooted in common law. CPLR § 4503:
protects from disclosure confidential communications made between the attorney ... and the client in the course of professional employment ... The party invoking the privilege must establish that the document in question reflects a communication between the attorney or his agents and the client or its agents [...], that the communication was made and retained in confidence, and that it was made principally to assist in obtaining or providing legal advice or services for the client. Since the privilege is intended to facilitate the rendition of legal representation, it does not cover communications with the attorney if intended to assist counsel in performing other services, such as the provision of business advice or the performance of such functions as negotiating purely commercial aspects of a business relationship. " Stenovich v. Wachtell, 195 Misc.2d 99, 756 N.Y.S.2d 367 (NY County 2003).
Mind you, the privilege can be waived and the privilege, which is a bar to discovery, is construed pretty closely so as to balance the discovery interests and the interests in keeping the information confidential.
Jim, if you are interested in seeing the whole case, let me know and I'll shoot you a copy. It will give you a sense of the state of the law in NY.
Posted by: Random Penseur at July 15, 2004 08:57 AM (LlPKh)
2
You're right about the doctors. The hospital I do most of my work for reports blood alcohol levels to the DMV in the event someone comes in status post motor vehicle accident and there appears to have been alcohol involved. They also report you to the DMV if you come in with a seizure. No more driving for you . . . .
(And yeah, Jim, like there's going to be any priests hanging around your site with the way you talk about 'em . . . ha!)
Posted by: ilyka at July 15, 2004 09:26 PM (sDw4/)
3
What? What am I saying about priests? I love priests! I only tease the ones that happen to be pederasts as well.
It shouldn't be just reserved for the Catholics though, right? I mean, I'm an ordained minister so do I get any special considerations?
Posted by: Jim at July 16, 2004 05:46 AM (bmLWy)
4
Postive drug tests (and I think syphilis too) are reported on woman having babies, at least here they are.
Posted by: Sherri at July 16, 2004 11:26 PM (Gn2SB)
5
As are Aids results. In New York state if a pregnant woman refuses the Aids test they will test the baby whether she agrees or not.
Posted by: Jim at July 17, 2004 09:26 AM (bmLWy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 11, 2004
The Religion of Peace Eradication
Arab Muslims in Sudan have displaced over a million blacks,
killed tens of thousands of them and destroyed hundreds of their communities. You know, because their peaceful religion demands it and all.
"They say they don't want to see black skin on this land again," said Issa Bushara, whose brother and cousin were gunned down in front of their horrified families during an attack by the Janjaweed militia.
The Arab Muslim militants are being assisted in their 17 month slaughter by the Arab Muslim government forces. Fortunately the UN has decided to take an active role in stopping the wholescale murderous regime almost issue an official condemnation. They decided not to at the last minute for the past year and a half because Sudan deserves another chance is an Arab Muslim country is only slaughtering blacks might be able to turn it around by themselves in another year and a half just as soon as all the blacks are dead or driven off.
At the Kounoungo refugee camp, 50 miles from the Sudan border, Zenaba Ismail sits on a dirt floor. In her arms, she cradles her sister's sleeping infant.
Janjaweed fighters burst into their home early one morning and shot the child's pregnant mother in the stomach. The shooting induced labor, and she died while giving birth.
"He cries all the time, but I have no milk to give him," said the tall woman with traditional scars etched on her hallowed cheeks. "Every time I look at this child, I see my sister, and I can't stop the tears."
Refugee camps in outlying areas and neighboring countries are now seeing massive deaths from starvation, malnutrition and epidemic. These are outnumbering the actual murders.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
10:37 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 591 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Well Jim,
see the problem is Israel is building a security fence. Now it all makes sense doesn't it? I mean the security fence will lead to the death of no one really, and it has helped prevent the death of Israeli citizens (and tourist)but still...they must condemn, so they haven't had the time to deal with the thousands of deaths in Sudan.
Really simple when you think about it.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at July 11, 2004 11:25 AM (XcgK/)
2
Yeah, it's those darned Israelis. They suck up all of the UN resolutions so there aren't any left for anybody else! I wouldn't be surprised if this was all a neocon conspiracy. Use Israel to distract the world with their inhumane fence building so we can disrupt the Sudan and prepare to steal their OOOOIIIILLLLLL.
Posted by: Jim at July 11, 2004 02:07 PM (bmLWy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 10, 2004
Phew! We got rid of another batch of 'em.
Update: Rachel Ann asked if there wasn't some sort of award that we could give these folk. Since they are unfortunately still alive they are disqualified from the Darwins. Enter the
Flaming Asshole, designed for just such a circumstance. Good call Rachel!

U.S. Humanitarian Group Arrives in Cuba
120 supporters of Pastors for Peace violated the US embargo on Cuba. They arrived in good spirits with their contraband goods and t-shirts calling for regime change in the USA.
Try that again - they went to Cuba and are calling for regime change in America.
Thank God they've moved to Cuba so we won't have to deal with them any longer. What? They aren't staying in the workers' utopia? They prefer the horrific boot of the oppressive Bush regime against the back of their collective neck to living in Cuba? Damn.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
09:25 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 391 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Okay,
They are still alive so don't quite qualify for the Darwin awards, but isn't there a lesser sort of award we could give them?
Posted by: Rachel Ann at July 11, 2004 12:03 AM (XcgK/)
2
Good idea, Rachel Ann! I've awarded them the uncoveted
Flaming Asshole award.
Posted by: Jim at July 11, 2004 02:22 PM (bmLWy)
3
Although they broke the travel embargo by going to Cuba themselves that particular law is so seldom enforced as to be laughable.
True. My cousin went last spring. My poor aunt couldn't figure out why I got mad when she sent me pictures from his trip there.
He'd be posing in front of buildings and the streets were devoid of the one thing you'd be certain to see in any other country: natives. No Cubans anywhere.
But I'm supposed to go "Yay, rah rah, Jimmy got past George 'Selected, Not Elected' Bush and went to Cuba!" Heh. I don't think so.
Definitely worthy of the Flaming Assholes award, these creeps. Definitely.
Posted by: ilyka at July 12, 2004 06:27 AM (j7mEU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 09, 2004
Yet another frivolous lawsuit from a California nut
This post is:

Why? Oh, why?
Why is it illegal to shoot these people?
McDonald's hit with lawsuit over fat in french fries
You see back in September 2002 McDonalds announced that it was planning to switch to a healthier fry oil by Feb '03. In Feb '03 they announced that the new oil wasn't happening yet because it made the fries taste like Burger King's as there were concerns over how it made the food taste.
Now a fucknut in California is suing because McDonalds didn't follow their original plan. A corporation in America made a plan, discovered it wasn't workable and changed it. This bitch thinks that entitles her to compensation? What the fucking fuck?
Listen up you fry sucking loser, McDonalds corporation is not personally beholden to you in any way whatsoever. Are you suing Ford because their concept car from 2002 isn't a production model today? Why not? They certainly planned on implementing it but they haven't. That should mean that your rights have somehow been trampled, right?
If you are so concerned about the fat content of McDonalds french fries that you take it as a violation of your personal rights of citizenship then what you need to do is put down the McBurger and McFries, push your fat ass away from the table and walk down to Salads-R-Us. Better yet, buy yourself a fucking pot and cook a meal for your damned self for a change.
And whatever lawyer or group of lawyers is representing this bullshit should die. Literally die you sons of bitches - you are less than worthless, you are an active drain. Your removal would make this country a better place.
(Hat tip to Phillip Coons)
Posted by: Jim at
08:55 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 302 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"Literally die you sons of bitches - you are less than worthless, you are an active drain."
-Looks like someone needs a time-out in the happy corner, with a constant movie re-run of "Pollyanna Meets the Care Bears".
Be honest, my dearie Jim-you're just angry you didn't think to sue Coke for inventing New Coke

(just teasing...in case you got angry...back away slowly from the keyboard...)
Posted by: Helen at July 09, 2004 09:05 AM (6ESZh)
2
Heck, I could still sue over THAT! Post traumatic stress disorder right here. Plus, I get a tiny tic next to my eye whenever I drive past the Coke factory here. I could probably sue to make them at least move the factory.
Posted by: Jim at July 09, 2004 09:18 AM (IOwam)
3
It can't be good for you to hold your feelings back like this.
Posted by: Jennifer at July 09, 2004 09:42 AM (9idqe)
4
Really, Jim, Jennifer is right. Don't hold back. It's not good for you to keep it all in. You're going to give yourself a ulcer. You have to learn to express your feelings. Emote, young man, emote!
Posted by: Jiminy at July 09, 2004 10:00 AM (8JYcU)
5
Jim, I mean this in the nicest possible way, ok? I just feel like I have to tell you: there are a lot of decaffeinated brands on the market that taste just as good as the real thing. (Bonus points if you recognize the movie I stole that line from).
As for the fries, I must ask: is your anger motivated by a distaste for the tort system in general or are you, like me, on a low-carb diet and missing ALL OF THOSE WONDERFUL FRENCH FRIES? And, damn it, whoever told McDonald's to stop frying those things in beef fat? The fries have not been the same since.
Posted by: Random Penseur at July 09, 2004 10:35 AM (LlPKh)
6
Dude, that movie was the fabulous and brilliant one with Val Kilmer, in which they popped the enormous Jiffy Pop. Can't remember the film, but I have used that line about one million times in my life.
Creepy that you use it, too.
Posted by: Helen at July 09, 2004 11:22 AM (rhmrH)
7
And the prize goes to Helen for her recollection of the underappreciated film: Real Genius.
Posted by: Random Penseur at July 09, 2004 11:50 AM (LlPKh)
8
I'm feeling much better, y'all. Prozac, it's what's for dinner. ;-)
Dang, I was just about to hit "post" with the Real Genius answer too. My favorite bit from that movie:
Val: So, if there's anything I can do for you, or, more to the point, to you, you just let me know.
Hot chick: Can you hammer a six-inch spike through a board with your penis?
Val: Not at the moment.
Hot chick: A girl's gotta have her standards.
Posted by: Jim at July 09, 2004 11:58 AM (IOwam)
9
Let's give medical science a quick round of applause!
I love that line from Real Genius. I also like the following question:
"Do you ever have that dream where you're standing on a pyramid, in sun god robes, surrounded by thousands of naked, screaming women, throwing little pickles at you? Why am I the only one who has that dream?"
and
"I am sitting here contemplating the last words of Socrates: 'I drank what?'"
I knew you and Helen were people with taste.
Posted by: Random Penseur at July 09, 2004 12:21 PM (LlPKh)
10
Almost forgot - yeah, I have a dislike of tort law. I know the vast majority of it is not like these bullfull high profile jokes but they sure are tainted by them.
And I luuuuuuurve McD's fries. Fortunately for me I can eat 'em as I'm not dieting or planning on suing anybody. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at July 09, 2004 12:39 PM (IOwam)
11
I love love love McDonald's fries. I think they're coated in some secret recipe foody crack substance.
Bugger those who file frivilous lawsuits, particularly against things that make me happy. Bugger them with a bushel of stale fries!
Man, I like that word.... bugger bugger bugger.
Posted by: LeeAnn at July 09, 2004 06:25 PM (HxCeX)
12
You want fries with that bugger, ma'm?
Posted by: Claire at July 12, 2004 07:04 PM (l1oyw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 02, 2004
Hey, did you hear about the 12.6 million people who marched on Washington yesterday?
Neither did I and this is a good thing because 12.6 million people didn't march on Washington yesterday and if you heard about it that would mean that the press was doing a worse job than usual at making stuff up. They did march in Hong Kong though and you probably didn't hear about that either.
Not 12.6 million of course - they don't have that many people there. But the number of Hong Kong residents that rallied are proportional to 12.6 million Americans, if our populations were equivalent. Simon has the scoop and an excellent commentary about it.
Posted by: Jim at
08:34 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 127 words, total size 1 kb.
July 01, 2004
Aging boy toy seeks youthful injection
Barbie dumped Ken and is now diddling
Blaine, an Aussie surfer. Now look at
this picture and tell me this doesn't look like a gal just a bit past her dance club days snagging some sweet teen meat.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
(Found at Jen's place)
Posted by: Jim at
03:49 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Blaine is totally going to dump her once she starts talking abotu commitment. Then, at least, she can go back to her gay ex Ken and have a baby via the turkey baster method.
Oh yeah. I've thought this all out.
Posted by: Helen at July 02, 2004 05:32 AM (/EEVQ)
2
Yeah, Botox Barbie can't be very far in the future.
Posted by: Jim at July 02, 2004 05:55 AM (bmLWy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 30, 2004
NPR blows monkey chunks
I had the opportunity to listen to a bit over a minute of National
Peoples Public Radio yesterday morning. The story I caught was a blurb about gas prices. Now if you're like me and you use gasoline you might have noticed that the price of gas has plummeted over the past month and a half or so. Locally we're down a good 40 cents a gallon over that period and they're continuing to fall. NPR's take on this?
Gas prices are an average of 45 cents a gallon more expensive than this time last year.
I can't believe I used to think of them as an impartial news source. Bloody posers.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
09:03 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well, that looks like a factual statement without any qualifiers to me.
I don't listen to NPR, though.
Posted by: Jennifer at June 30, 2004 09:49 AM (DdBLw)
2
Yeah, it's factual. And anecdotal. And I'd have to be a fairly judgemental bastard to paint the whole program based on a minute of news briefs.
Then again I was in a pre-coffee state and if they're going to be broadcasting that early in the morning they're just going to have to take extra care not to piss me off when I tune in for a minute or two once or twice a year.
Seriously though, I think this struck a nerve with me because I haven't heard any news about the gas prices and they've been steadily and quickly falling. It was the coming of the apocalypse when the prices went up but when they go down you can hear crickets chirping. When I finally did hear a newscast on the gas prices the news was about how much more gas is now compared to a year ago. That irritated the hell out of me.
Posted by: Jim at June 30, 2004 10:02 AM (IOwam)
3
Unfortunately for me, one of my favorite stations uses npr news and I'm treated to it every day. When it doesn't piss me off, it makes me laugh. I just wish we weren't paying for it.
It is kinda ironic when you think about it - Our countries only "state controled" news source (OK, that might be a stretch - on both counts) is decidedly anti-administration. How many countries can boast that?
Posted by: Clancy at June 30, 2004 10:23 AM (EGVPL)
4
They've gone the way of the liberal...
Posted by: pylorns at June 30, 2004 12:32 PM (PB+b7)
5
Jim - I have to support you on this one. When prices were going up, they were comparing the numbers to the previous week or month. Now that doing so would no longer serve the agenda (which I've heard them claim in so many words that they "don't have"), they're making the comparison to last year.
Slimy bastards.
Posted by: Harvey at June 30, 2004 12:32 PM (tJfh1)
6
I am in total agreement regarding NPR. While you may not want to judge NPR based on a minute of news briefs, I have no problem doing it. I think it makes a healthy government for there to be some amount of anti-administration. However, I don't think it's healthy or helpful to just be Anti-Administration on every single issue. I have yet to hear NPR be objective to one of the Administration's policies, including the months right after Sept. 11th.
Posted by: Tif at June 30, 2004 01:12 PM (jCFyL)
7
Well, the newspeople don't get on the air and announce, "No one was killed today." News isn't supposed to be warm and fuzzy, is it?
Posted by: Jennifer at June 30, 2004 03:47 PM (DdBLw)
8
It's supposed to be just as warm and fuzzy as it is cold and prickly. The key should be newsworthiness. If the price of gas going up 45 cents in a year is newsworthy then the price of gas going down 40 cents in 6 weeks should be a headliner.
Posted by: Jim at June 30, 2004 09:40 PM (bmLWy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 23, 2004
Still more Muslim madness
The insane Arab fundamentalists have murdered South Korean citizen Kim Sun-il. Kim was one more foreign national working to make Iraq a better place.
Words have no wings but they can fly a thousand miles.
That's a very old Korean saying and it's very true but in this case I need these words to travel quite a few thousand miles as I wish peace of heart and deep sympathy for Kim Sun-il's family and loved ones.
The three thousand South Korean troops that were scheduled to ship to Iraq are still coming. Now they have one more reason to do so. Good hunting, gentlemen.
Posted by: Jim at
09:17 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 112 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm glad that they're still going. My only regret is that they didn't send more - that might have gotten the point across...
Posted by: Clancy at June 23, 2004 10:49 AM (EGVPL)
2
and Maupin maybe...just came up on my real messanger...
I hope not.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at June 29, 2004 12:54 PM (bmkcR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 18, 2004
And Silence
Terrorists in Saudi Arabia have carried through on their threats to kill their American hostage. I'm not going to hot link to anything because I honestly don't want that traffic. It's going to be everywhere you look in a few hours anyway so you don't need my links.
Paul M. Johnson Jr. was a contractor in Saudi Arabia, our "ally" in the fight on terrorism. His captors beheaded him as they previously murdered American Nick Berg.
Saudi Arabia is the birthplace of the majority of the 9/11 suicide mass murderers. Saudi Arabia is where Osama bin Laden was born and where he made the millions of dollars that started his criminal empire. It is the stronghold of Wahabiism, the ultra strict fundamentalist Islamic sect that makes all of this possible.
In the past several months, foreign (pronounced "American") facilities have been attacked by terrorist strike teams and bombings. In each instance the Saudi police have allowed terrorists to escape, either through negligence or by disengaging contact.
I won't be saying anything at the moment that I might have some slight chance of regretting later. Instead I will just take this space to express my deepest sympathies for Paul Johnson's friends and family.
Posted by: Jim at
02:32 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 206 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Exactly. I have no words.
Thank you for saying them for me.
Posted by: Emma at June 18, 2004 02:45 PM (NOZuy)
2
Instead I will just take this space to express my deepest sympathies for Paul Johnson's friends and family.
Echoed.
I thought they'd do it. I hoped they wouldn't. I'm sorry they did.
Posted by: ilyka at June 18, 2004 04:07 PM (gESMJ)
3
I am beyond anger with this latest Middle East horror show.
It makes me ill to think of what Paul Johnson suffered at the hands of these demons.
Rest in Peace, Paul
Posted by: Bob K. at June 19, 2004 11:14 PM (/kKz5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 14, 2004
"Under God" is AOK, for the moment
The
Supreme Court overturned a 9th Circuit Court ruling against saying the Pledge of Allegiance in schools because of the controversial word "God". Unfortunately they didn’t actually rule on the Constitutionality of “under God”. The lower court ruling was overturned because part-time dad Newdow didn’t have proper custody to sue in his daughter’s name.
Which means weÂ’ll be seeing this again sometime soon.
Incidentally, today is Flag Day and the 50th anniversary of the addition of "under God" to the Pledge.
(Hat tip to Lovely Wife)
Posted by: Jim at
01:42 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 100 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I am pretty sure that this gentleman spends United States currency!! "In God We Trust" is on every piece!
Posted by: Linda at June 15, 2004 07:33 AM (Lnk6Z)
2
As my cousin remarked to me yesterday it's highly unlikely that he works on Christmas either.
Posted by: Jim at June 15, 2004 07:39 AM (IOwam)
3
yeah i read that yesturday... hmm...
Posted by: pylorns at June 15, 2004 09:52 AM (FTYER)
4
I, for one, wholly support either the removal of "under God" or the addition of an "s" to "under Gods".
It is the height of arrogance to force Muslim children or Buddhist children to say the Pledge of Allegiance to a God that has absolutely zero to do with their belief system that they are being raised in.
Just because there's a codified practice of the Church impacting how the state runs doesn't make it acceptable or legal, it just makes it a habit.
Posted by: Johnny Huh? at June 15, 2004 05:45 PM (YkElu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 07, 2004
Way to go Mrs.Huxtable!
Phylicia Rashad made history yesterday as the first black woman to win a
Tony award for Best Actress. This begs two questions. The second is why hasn't a black actress won a Tony award before now? The first is what is Claire Huxtable doing in a play? We'll completely ignore the second question and concentrate on the first as there's more comedy potential there (trust me, this does pick up in a bit).
Broadway is Phylicia's first love and her notable successes in the silver screen were basically just placeholders in her career as a stage actress. A way to pay the bills you might say. That decade long stretch as the affluent lawyer mom of a gaggle of dark skinned and white souled children was but a diversion. How does one get 'diverted' from the love of their life for such a long time? A year here or there could be understood easily but a decade?
There's only one answer and that is cashola. Moola. Dough. Money. Greenbacks. Hey, you don't get to snort coke off a whore's ass by showing her your playbill, even if you are first billed. Well, not any classy whore anyway. I'm talking high class hookers where your people call somebody who knows somebody who sets things up. And she brings the coke too. That's right, I'm talking F-I-N-E fine.
Hell, you don't even get "people" without serious cash and clout. Yule Brenner WAS the freakin' King and he never had people. Guy danced around bald and half nude for twenty years and all it got him was an aneurysm. Couldn't even beat out Captain Picard for sexiest bald dude. You know why? Because Patrick Stewart was the star of a popular series and he has people. Successful show equals money equals people equals hookers with ass cocaine. It's simple math, folks.
How much was Kramer getting for working on Seinfeld? Something like a million per episode there at the end, right? You think he ever seriously contemplated leaving the show to pursue his dream of being a NASCAR driver? Of course not. You get way more tang as "that loser goof on Seinfeld" than you do as "another redneck wanna-be" in Daytona.
The only person who has ever successfully left a hit series to pursue other interests was Shelley Long. She abandoned Cheers after it became the number one show on television and managed to become a wildly successful screen actress. Oh, wait a second - no she didn't. She played a couple roles as an extra flighty Goldie Hawn impersonator opposite such worthies as Steve Gutenberg in second rate comedies that nobody remembers except the occasional desperate blogger reaching through the depths of the IMDB database. Shortly after noting her dismal failure as a B movie queen, Shelley Long's career shifted focus and she now makes a living by showing up at strange houses with several grams of coke and tear-off panties.
So to sum up, congratulations to Phylicia Rashad for her historical achievement. We're sure that she would have got it much earlier if she hadn't taken such a long sabbatical from the stage and if the assholes who give out the Tony's weren't such racist sons of bitches. Hey, there's a bonus - I answered the second question too.
Posted by: Jim at
08:07 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 557 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Night Shift. Shelley's best movie. Surprisingly, she played a hooker. Went downhill from there...
Posted by: Susie at June 07, 2004 03:27 PM (tEteH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 03, 2004
One out of four Americans are nuts
A study from
Journal of the American Medical Association says that 1 out of every 4 Americans have mental illnesses. Think of your three best friends. If they all seem normal then it's you.
(Hat tip to Electric Venom)
Posted by: Jim at
08:45 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
1
No, in my group it's me. Totally. But that's ok, I like being the one that stands out in my crowd.
Posted by: Helen at June 03, 2004 09:10 AM (D56g3)
2
Since everyone in my family is looney, that makes a couple other whole families safe....
Posted by: Susie at June 03, 2004 12:46 PM (c7TZ/)
3
[doing quick mental inventory]
Yup. Me.
Posted by: Harvey at June 03, 2004 01:24 PM (tJfh1)
4
The voices in my head tell me to let you know we're fine.

Guess who. . .
Posted by: Emma at June 04, 2004 03:46 AM (NOZuy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 01, 2004
Don't point that fish at me!
It's the last day of school in Rogers, Arkansas. The 1st-grade teacher wraps up the lesson on rainforest animals and rewards the students with fish that squirt water. A summery fun toy that's also apropriate to the material. Karen Young, mother of one of the students, was not happy with this choice of gifts. Not happy at all.
A Rogers mother says she's upset after her first grader came home with a toy gun. Karen Young says her 7 year old came home with what she called a water gun on the last day of school. Young asked her child where it came from. He told her that his teacher gave it to him. Young says she considers the teacher an excellent educator but says this was a really bad decision on the teacher' part.
Assistant school superintendent Dr. Louise Standridge says the package that the toy came in says the toy is called a water squirter. It's in the shape of a fish.
We know it's not a toy gun because if it was the police would have arrested all of the children to enforce the zero tolerance policy against toy weapons. It's a squirting fish. Hello? Ms.Young? What's the dealy-o? Perhaps it has something to do with her history with firearms.
Young says two of her brothers were shot in domestic disputes, her uncle committed suicide with a gun and she accidentally shot her ex boyfriend when the gun she hit him with went off.
She accidentally shot her boyfriend while beating him with a gun. Why was she hitting her boyfriend with a gun? Is it a tradition in Rogers to beat husbands/boyfriends with guns? There seems to be a log of firearms discharging during arguments in that family.
I think a fish that spits water might be exactly what's needed in that household. When mommy starts beating on her boyfriend with a gun, squirt her with water. Hey, it worked to train the cat from eating the ferns, right?
(Hat tip to The Thief)
Posted by: Jim at
02:51 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 350 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I prefer to take my lectures about the appropriate uses of guns from someone who doesn't use them as though they were rocks. ...or sticks. ...or frying pans.
["
I was only pistol-whipping him!"]
Posted by: Claire at June 01, 2004 04:36 PM (l1oyw)
2
Maybe she thought the "toy" gun was not right - she wanted a real gun.
Posted by: MojoMark at June 01, 2004 05:24 PM (E+LQu)
3
Maybe she was just afraid the fish would accidentally go off? I mean, who wouldn't be?
Posted by: SoldierGrrrl at June 01, 2004 10:07 PM (AaBEz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
104kb generated in CPU 0.1284, elapsed 0.3047 seconds.
102 queries taking 0.2605 seconds, 322 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.