March 31, 2004
Happy Birthday, Stranger!

Happy Birthday, Helen! It's not quite your birthday here but it is where you are so there you go!
Godspeed and safe travels on your vacation. Have fun (but not too much fun) and don't do anybody anything I wouldn't do.
Posted by: Jim at
08:49 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm jealous...today (here) was MY birthday, and you didn't put a cake up for ME!!!! LOL
Posted by: mitzi at March 31, 2004 11:11 PM (C/xW6)
2
Well sure I did, Mitzi! I was just waiting 'til it got down to the wire. You know, to let the excitement build up.
Happy Birthday Mitzi!!
Posted by: Jim at March 31, 2004 11:26 PM (saeHM)
3
Thanks, my dear Jim!
PS-enjoying Prague like mad!
Posted by: Helen at April 02, 2004 02:28 AM (u33fP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 30, 2004
It was horrifical
I had my first memorable nightmare in quite some time on Saturday night. It was one of those genuinely distressing heartwrenching real-emotion emoting dreams.
Most of the dream was fuzzy and I don't remember it. The scene that so affected me was in a garage with a generic androgynous friend (does anybody else have generic androgynous people in generic roles in their dreams?). He/she was smoking and offered me a smoke when he/she realized I didn't have any. I said no but took a drag of his/hers.
Then it hit me. I had just had a damned cigarette in my mouth and I smoked on it. Immediately following that realization was crushing guilt and extreme anger at myself. Then I was pissed and basically said fuck it. If I had a puff I might as well have a whole cigarette so I took one from generic friend's pack (generic friend wasn't there anymore - can't blame him/her as I was quite irate and most likely not fun to be around).
I smoked that thing in an absolute rage. I was so unbelievably mad and feeling like crap because there are a whole bunch of people pulling for me to quit smoking successfully. There's also a $100 price tag on the first puff of nicotine and I was mad as hell that I screwed up that bet too.
The dream sort of faded out (at least out of memory) after that. I woke up angry, which is never good. When I realized that I had dreamed it and that I had actually not smoked a cigarette I felt blessed release and a great calming.
I'm going to make it, y'all, but this psychological warfare that my subconcious is playing on me is totally unfair. Damned id.
Been off the Welbutrin for over a week. Occasional cravings but otherwise doing quite well.
One month, three days, 5 hours and 6 minutes. 644 cigarettes not smoked, saving $101.47. Life saved: 2 days, 5 hours, 40 minutes.
Posted by: Jim at
04:39 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 339 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I had a dream like that a couple of weeks ago. I woke up sweating thinking about that $100.
Posted by: Tiffany at March 30, 2004 05:23 PM (rDyup)
2
Hey, this stress barrage that has hounded me for over a week now has been a tough road, but I am still suckin' mint juice and:
Two months, four weeks, one day, 17 hours, 39 minutes and 25 seconds has elapsed since I last took a puff off of a nasty cigarette and that now means 3140 cigarettes not smoked, allowin' me to save $628.15 in cash as well as possibly extendin' my life an additional 1 week, 3 days, 21 hours, 40 minutes.
I am really gonna savor that extra 40 minutes I get right at the end, ya know!
Posted by: Tiger at March 30, 2004 06:40 PM (G5PGV)
3
generic androgynous friend
That's a pretty good description. I just call 'em dreampeople, myself.
Posted by: Victor at March 31, 2004 01:37 PM (L3qPK)
4
I hadn't thought of cigarette dreams but recovering alcoholics have drunk dreams, recovering addicts have drug dreams so why not? If it works the same way as drunk dreams you're just about right on schedule.
You'll be pleased to know that in a couple-three months those dreams will be very infrequent.
Drug and drunk dreams are a normal and predictable part of recovery, They're a little scarey but harmless. I would suspect that the cigarette dreams are the same.
Posted by: Peter at April 01, 2004 01:41 AM (rZmE1)
5
That's good news. So far it's only been the one. At least that I remember. Now that I think of it though, I do remember having smoking dreams during other times that I've quit.
Posted by: Jim at April 01, 2004 05:47 AM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Here's why
A lot of people just don't quite understand what the big deal is. I mean, if you break the law you go to jail, right? Well, here's the best way I've found to explain it:
WEEEE-OOOOOOO WEEEEE-OOOOOO (that's a siren, y'all)
A State trooper with the lights on and siren blaring is in your rear view, letting you know that you're screwed now. You pull over to the side, heart a bit a-flutter and sharing confused and slightly frightened glances with your passenger. The trooper walks up to your window with one hand on his gun and the other holding his shoulder mike. He leans in menacingly, never taking his hand off of his weapon.
Trooper: Do you have any idea how fast you were going?
You: I'm sorry, officer. I thought I was going the speed limit.
Trooper: And just where did you get the idea of what the speed limit was?
You: Um, from the road signs?
Trooper: ARE YOU SURE?! I think that your passenger there told you what the speed limit was. I don't think you saw the sign at all!
You: Please, officer. I really saw the sign. It said "Speed" on top and then it had a big "55" in the middle and it said "Limit" on the bottom. I swear!
Trooper: You're under arrest.
You: For what? I wasn't speeding!
Trooper: Because you lied about seeing the speed limit sign.
You were cruising along, not breaking any laws. The cops stopped you without cause and started interrogating you as if you had broken a law. You really were told about the speed limit from your friend but you panicked or were intimidated or freaked by the situation or whatever and you said you saw the speed limit sign. Even though you didn't speed and there was no reason for you to be pulled over you are now going to prison for lying about where you got the information that you used while not breaking the law in the first place. The kicker is that you were allowed to get the information from the sign or your friend so there was no reason to get flustered over it in the first place.
That is why the whole Martha Stewart thing irks me. There was no crime until the feds germinated one.
Posted by: Jim at
10:49 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 391 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I totally agree, but I haven't even been able to get my diehard conservative mother to understand this 'cause she's too busy hating Martha for, you know, being Martha. It's frustrating.
Reason magazine "on dead tree" had a good article about eight months ago on this. I couldn't find that online, but I notice today they have
this one.
Posted by: ilyka at March 30, 2004 01:10 PM (Rkj9M)
2
Well I just dont like her. Thats my reason.
Posted by: pylorns at March 30, 2004 01:28 PM (FTYER)
3
Hell, I don't like her either. Doesn't make it any easier to swallow.
Posted by: Jim at March 30, 2004 01:46 PM (IOwam)
4
Well said, Jim. Too many people are blinded by the "joke factor" of Martha going to jail, without seeming to realize what a horrible precedent is being set.
Posted by: dave at March 30, 2004 02:04 PM (a16BY)
5
I love her. But I wholly understand why a lot of people don't. Seems like the anti-Martha sentiment more than anything is what was driving the prosecutor and jury.
Posted by: Venomous Kate at March 30, 2004 03:19 PM (YvEJI)
6
Quite right, Kate. Read that link that Ilyka posted. It's all about how the jury convicted based on how they felt about Martha.
Posted by: Jim at March 30, 2004 03:24 PM (IOwam)
7
From what I've read on the matter, I agree. If you want to send her to jail for being Martha Stewart, then at least that's what it should say on the charge sheet.
Of course, then it would get kicked out on appeal, probably with damages awarded. Which is fine by me.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at March 31, 2004 03:46 AM (kOqZ6)
8
In full disclosure, I think Martha Stewart is the Anti-Christ.
Jim, keep in mind the serious charge against her (securities fraud, that is, insider trading) was dropped. She was convicted for conspiracy, obstruction of justice and two counts of making false statements. The obstruction of justice stems from her modifying her call records--which was testified to by an eyewitness.
I suppose your next argument would be if she hadn't been arrested on (what you feel are) trumped-up charges, she wouldn't have had to obstruct justice. Of course, I'll just claim she must've had a guilty conscience about *something* otherwise...it'll turn into an endless loop, and I'll not touch on that. I'll talk about why the charges were brought, even tho I'm not a lawyer.
I confess insider trading, like art, is difficult to define, but you kinda know it when you see it. When your stockbroker is involved, though, it can get a little grey, but sometimes it can't. It gets grey because you pay him to advise you on when to buy and when to sell, and that's supposed to come from research you don't have time to do yourself. Fair enough.
But there are rules on how you can conduct that research, and acting on information that is supposed to be privy to only a few (it doesn't matter how you got that information) is against the rules...and the law. I don't know what the rules are concerning the FDA releasing the info to Imclone, so I can't comment on the legality of that, but the CEO of Imclone certainly knew that information would cause his stock to drop. When he started calling up people (doesn't matter who) and letting them know the drug was not approved *before* the official announcement was when insider trading laws were broken. The broker should not have passed on that info (neither to Martha nor to anyone else) and he probably should have contacted the SEC, under the law.
I think had Martha not done the things she was convicted of doing (changing her story, changing her phone logs), she would have been home free, and I suspect a jury would have seen that--I certainly would have. The article ilkya linked tries to sway my opinion, and it fails. Martha's own actions only convince me further she did something wrong.
Posted by: Victor at March 31, 2004 11:16 AM (L3qPK)
9
I think you missed my major point. Martha was not and could not have been guilty of selling her stock based on any information no matter how she got it so long as she herself did not break a law in order to get the information. This is why all of the serious crimes she was originally accused of were either not pursued or were thrown out. There simply was no wrongdoing on her part in selling the stock.
What that means is she was convicted of conspiracy to commit a lawful act, obstruction of justice in pursuit of a non-crime and two counts of making false statements about a legal act.
Posted by: Jim at March 31, 2004 11:28 AM (IOwam)
10
Jim, I concede any charges about insider-trading migh have been difficult to prove. Maybe Martha knew, maybe she didn't--but her actions afterward certainly imply she knew something was fishy. Otherwise, why would she have done them?
Panic? Maybe. Stupidity? Certainly. But if she had not done anything other than confess her innocence (and I mean
only that) I think she would have been scott-free.
Obstruction of justice is obstruction of justice,
whether or not a crime was committed in the first place. Start acting in a suspicious manner during an investigation (like, change your story), and a prosecutor will be on that like a pit bull on a steak. Had she just played dumb from day one, I doubt the case would have gone to trial. Instead, she played stupid.
Talk to any cop or judge. More people convict themselves than any prosecutor.
Posted by: Victor at March 31, 2004 12:04 PM (L3qPK)
11
Wrong word in there: But if she had not done anything other than
profess her innocence ...
Posted by: Victor at March 31, 2004 01:31 PM (L3qPK)
12
Not
difficult to prove.
Impossible to prove. Impossible to have been commited. Martha did not occupy a position to which that offense can be attributed. The only way she could possibly have been guilty of improperly benefiting from insider information would have been if she herself went out and acquired the information illegally. It is not illegal for an investor to act on information that is given to them, no matter who gives it to them or what their relationship is.
But how many people know that? The "street definition" that everybody knows is that using information that isn't in the public sphere makes you an inside trader. I'd put dollars to donuts that Martha didn't have any better grasp on it than that. So when the SEC came in accusing her of insider trading she panicked, just like anybody else would have. It's the freaking SEC! They know what they're doing, right? They wouldn't be coming after somebody who hadn't committed any crime, right?
Well in this case they definitely knew what they were doing and they came after somebody
until she committed a crime.
Posted by: Jim at March 31, 2004 02:07 PM (IOwam)
13
Jim, I can see we're not going to convince each other, so on your last word let's agree to disagree, eh?
: extends hand and offers to buy the next round :
Posted by: Victor at March 31, 2004 02:15 PM (L3qPK)
14
I can always go for a beer. I'll even give you that all would have been pie and apple cider for Martha if she'd just kept her yap shut.
How's that for magnanimous? ;-)
Posted by: Jim at March 31, 2004 02:34 PM (IOwam)
15
Thanks, Jim. That was basically my entire point.
That is
so magnanimous I feel I should give you my first-born male child in return. I am not worthy of your magnanimosity.
Posted by: Victor at March 31, 2004 02:42 PM (L3qPK)
16
I appreciate the offer but I'll have to decline. I just went over this with
Ryan yesterday...you see, the upkeep on firstborns is way higher than the sales literature leads you to believe. Even if I got one for free it would be cost prohibitive to maintain. Since I've already got one the novelty factor wouldn't be there to compensate for the excessive costs. But thanks for the offer!
Posted by: Jim at March 31, 2004 02:54 PM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 26, 2004
Playing hooky
Expect nuthin' today, y'all. The weather is gorgeous and I've got serious Spring Fever. I'm playing hooky and will be spending the bulk of the day in relaxation at various outdoor locations.
Ahhhhhh...Spring...
Posted by: Jim at
09:25 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah, don't tell anyone but I'm cutting work as soon as possible too. Enjoy.
Posted by: Brian Jones at March 26, 2004 11:14 AM (E4NcZ)
2
Jim,
I'm mad at you...how could you leave me on a day where I had nada to do. PLUS you have points to give away! Don't you know I live for the points? I mean come onnnnnn I'm in third place - I know I know I have absolutley no life.
Posted by: Tiffani at March 26, 2004 07:31 PM (rZmE1)
3
Oh, but I had such a blast! Gorgeous weather, dogs and kids splashing in lakes, balls flying, car batteries dying...what a day!
Posted by: Jim at March 26, 2004 11:17 PM (saeHM)
4
Car batteries dying, huh?
That's karma getting you back for the hooky thing...
Posted by: Clancy at March 27, 2004 09:45 PM (X8MtX)
5
That wasn't karma, it was
carma.
Posted by: Jim at March 28, 2004 11:32 AM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 23, 2004
My Precocious Tot
Every parent thinks their kid is special. Well, unless the kid has to wear a helmet or something. In that case they think their kid is
special, meaning
retarded. What I'm talking about is pre-politically correct special, as in actually special.
Yesterday I was helping the Bear fill out his Murphy Journal. Damn, need background here. Murphy is a mouse (stuffed) that goes home with the kids of Bear's class on the weekends. One kid per weekend, that is. The kid who's hosted Murphy takes pictures of the rodent and writes about the things that Murphy did in their Murphy Journal. Seeing as these are pre-schoolers they're obviously not actually writing the stuff in the journal - they dictate to us secretaries parents. So anyway...
Yesterday I was helping the Bear fill out his Murphy Journal. Crap, need a bit more background. Bear learned lower case letters in preschool and also how to sign his name. They haven't learned any upper case letters in school but he's picked them up all by himself through a combination of observation and questioning us. The point is, I already knew that he knew his printed alphabet in both cases. So...
Yesterday I was helping the Bear fill out his Murphy Journal. As intimated above this means I was writing in the journal as he dictated to me. (Hah! Bet you half thought I was going for more background in this paragraph, didn't you? Joke's on you 'cause the story's on, Baby!) Lovely Wife had done the previous entry and that was in script. Being the toady follower type person that I am I was also writing in script. After a rather longish bit of dictation Bear looked over my arm at what i was writing, rather in the stern aspect of a strict and micromanaging employer. He began reciting the letters as I wrote them down.
He knows letters in script. We did not teach him letters in script. His school most certainly did not teach him letters in script. I don't think he's picked this up from SpongeBob or the Power Rangers either.
Is my boy precocious? How will I ever know, seeing as my proximity in affection and location makes me a hopelessly compromised judge?
And more importantly, if he is a child genius, do my genes kick ass or what?
Posted by: Jim at
01:37 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 396 words, total size 2 kb.
1
YOUR genes?!?!?!?
On the bright site here....since he picks these things up,god-knows-where,I am looking forward to the home(un)school part this year.I'll just sit here and wait for him to come up with the next thing he got god-knows-where.By the times he's 10 he should be in HARVARD....thats right...FU-CK-ING HARVARD!
If anyone now dares to bring up that old joke about Germans born with a helmeg on....I am ready to kick ass!
;-)
Posted by: LW at March 23, 2004 02:33 PM (saeHM)
2
Helmet I ment....but I am still ready to kick ass.
;-o
Posted by: LW at March 23, 2004 02:35 PM (saeHM)
3
Very bright kid. On an utterly tasteless note : Wasn't he also the one who knew what a "bagina" was? What else could he pick up just by watching?
Posted by: tommy at March 23, 2004 03:20 PM (v0EoW)
4
Yeah, that's our boy. Frighteningly observant.
Posted by: Jim at March 23, 2004 03:50 PM (IOwam)
5
Murphy kind of sounds like Luuka. Are we reverting back to our preschool days.
Posted by: Tiffani at March 23, 2004 04:44 PM (xpNFK)
6
Yup, same concept. That's ...er... sorta where I thought up the traveling bear idea from that I floated to Helen.
Damn, I'm busted. My best idea of the year was copied off of my kid's preschool class. I'm so ashamed.
Posted by: Jim at March 23, 2004 10:13 PM (saeHM)
7
Ashamed?At least for the almost 300 bux a month we ALL learn something here.;-O
Posted by: LW at March 24, 2004 07:31 AM (saeHM)
8
Good point! I am a student of life, after all.
Heh.
Posted by: Jim at March 24, 2004 07:36 AM (IOwam)
9
Sounds like he's got you wrapped around his little finger!
Posted by: Denny at May 24, 2004 09:31 PM (d0X5o)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Substitute your lies for fact
Just came across this book excerpt. This looks frighteningly accurate, doesn't it?
Islam and the Palestinian Problem
Published by: Dar al-Salam, Cairo, Egypt
Year Published: 2001
The author: Dr. Abdallah Nasih Alwan
No other nation in ancient and modern times has carried the banner of fraud, evil and treachery as has the Arab nation. No other human race throughout history or from anywhere in the world has acted in such a cruel and corrupt manner and provoked such conflicts between nations as has the Arab race. (pp. 23-24)
... [in] their [the Arabs'] machinations in present times, at the beginning of the 14th century after hijrah [the "Prophet's" journey from Mecca to Madinah], the Arabs (may Yahweh's curse rest upon them) have been using devious ways of conspiracy and deceit in order to achieve their aspirations and carry out their plans of establishing their rule over the world, and take control of the world's core powers. They are targeting three main objectives:
- The first objective: spreading dissent among the nations
- The second objective: corrupting the faiths of the nations
- The third objective: founding the State of Palestine, with Israel as its center, and stretching from the Euphrates to the Nile. (p. 36).
Isn't that amazing, coming from an Egyptian publisher and by an anti-Israel radical? Well, I have one little confession. I altered the excerpt according to The Radical Islamic Cypher of Truth ™. It's really pretty easy. Take anything written by any Murder Bombing supporter and switch "Jew" for "Arab" and vice versa and "Yahweh" for "Allah" and vice versa. You will transform tripe to truth faster than Jesus changed water to wine.
Pretty cool, eh?
POINTS: Where does the title of this post come from? 3 points to the first person to tell me. No searching, y'all!
Posted by: Jim at
11:53 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 300 words, total size 2 kb.
1
It's from The Who song, "Substitute."
Posted by: Victor at March 23, 2004 01:01 PM (L3qPK)
2
That's the one. 3 points for Victor!
Posted by: Jim at March 23, 2004 01:21 PM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 22, 2004
F!Bomb you, you fcuking f*ck!
As you can likely tell by the title to this post, it is Tactlessly Correct essay time. The subject of today's conversation is profanity and the misperception that camouflaging profanity allows us to discuss it in a non-profane manner.
Take the title for example. When you read it you did not interpret it as F!Bomb you, you fcuking f*ck!. You interpreted it as Fuck you, you fucking fuck! That is of course what my intent was. So what did I accomplish by obscuring the actual words? Well, I made it a bit clunky for the reader. It adds another level of forced interpretation so it takes a short bit longer to read. If the reader is not familiar with F!Bomb then I've added a confusing element where the message will not be understood until yet another level of interpretation is completed.
Look, language is all about interpretation. If i say F-word what I mean is fuck and what you understand is fuck so why would I say F-word at all? Because it's more polite? Whatever we're discussing it has something to do with fucking so it's not going to be targetted towards delicate sensibilities, right?
more...
Posted by: Jim at
02:38 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 551 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Hmmmm.
I still haven't figured out my position on these words. I consciously try to keep my writing about one level below something I would use in a business setting with the occasion rant that really crosses the line (like today's). In fact, today is the first time I've used "fuck" and it was in a quote. I've implied it numerous times, I've used freaking in substitute, but I do that in normal conversation anyway. I guess the long story made longer is that I just don't feel comfortable dropping the f-bomb in writing. And if you have a problem with that, then fuck you!
:-)
Posted by: Clancy at March 22, 2004 03:34 PM (EGVPL)
2
Jim,
You are so uncouth.
Sincerely,
A Delicate and Fragile Flower of Moral High Groundedness
Posted by: Christine at March 23, 2004 06:40 AM (Q/NXM)
3
"Uncouthlessly Correct"...
Nice beat but you can't dance to it.
Posted by: Jim at March 23, 2004 08:12 AM (IOwam)
4
Hey...I use those words and you are still married to me.:-P
And a nice touch would be a picture of my wonderfull New Orleans shirt.
Fuck you you fucking fuck!
Which also bringsme....in some weird way...to the political correctness (I know one who doesn't agree) of:
Jesus loves you,everyone else thinks you are an asshole!
Wohooo.....my tuesday brain works overtime.
Fuck it again.
I don't uses substitute.The title of my,now 6 years in the making,book is:
Fuck,Fuck it some more and just Fuck it!
I love the F word!
Rated R?
;-)
Posted by: LW at March 23, 2004 08:44 AM (saeHM)
5
Well, you don't use those phenomenally bad words crassly or inappropriately. Heck, even if you did you'd get a bye for it since you let me touch your naughty bits.
Posted by: Jim at March 23, 2004 08:50 AM (IOwam)
Posted by: LW at March 23, 2004 10:23 AM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 19, 2004
Lords of Light! Ariel, Ookla, Riiiiide!
Dopple-G loves MUD games. That's Multi-User-Dungeon, like the famed Everquest and others. You buy the game and then buy time on their servers to play at the same time thousands of other people are playing. They're not called MUDs any longer but I don't know what the current term is. They aren't my cup of tea.
Anyway, Dopple-G is all excited over an upcoming MUD game called City of Heroes. You get to make up and play a super hero. What could be cooler than that? Who hasn't dreampt of having a superpower? Hell, in my imagination I've had dozens of them. Still, I'm not into the playing nicely with others gaming concept so I doubt I'll play City of Heroes.
Besides, I doubt they have the superpower that I'd want.
POINTS: 3 points to the first person who can name the hero who yelled out the title to this post. No searching, y'all!
Posted by: Jim at
08:30 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
1
HA!I know that one!
DEMON DOGS
Oh yeah...you may call me AL!
Posted by: LW at March 19, 2004 08:48 AM (saeHM)
2
Actuall name is Thundarr.Forgot that part.
But where the hell is he a superhero???
Posted by: LW at March 19, 2004 08:53 AM (saeHM)
3
He was a mighty hero! He didn't have superpowers but he was brave and strong, carried the Sword of Light and hung around with a hot partially naked chick (royalty, no less!) and a Mexican Hairless Wookie. Now THAT's a hero!
3 points for Lovely Wife!
Posted by: Jim at March 19, 2004 09:01 AM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 18, 2004
So the other night...
...I had this wierd drunken rambling incoherent thought. It rattled around in my skull for the better part of a couplefew hours without getting much farther than the initial concept stage. Basically, it's this: Political Correctness sucks.
Yeah, that's about as far as I got. Join with me as I mentally expound without actually organizing my thoughts prior to writing them down (this should be interesting or horrific, not sure which).
Political correctness sucks. Big time. I mean, I got ragged on the other day for saying "Oriental". You can't say "Oriental", you have to say "Asian" now. Well, I didn't mean "from Asia" I meant "from the Orient", therefore I used "Oriental" which was a perfect description for what I was talking about. Doesn't matter. You have to use "Asian" because persons of Oriental origin might be offended if you use the word "Oriental". So does that mean I should go shopping for "Asian" rugs now? No, apparently it's still okay to call rugs "Oriental". So now how do we call a person who is of formerly known as Oriental heritage so as not to confuse said person with somebody of Russian or Indian heritage? Well, you just use "Asian" and then everybody knows that you really mean "Oriental".
more...
Posted by: Jim at
04:06 PM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 578 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I'm in....I'll go ahead and say fuck it, too.
It's funny because I just got yelled at by a coworker last week. I also, said oriental. I thought it was ok to say that. I wasn't being mean. Honest. When did they change the rules on me?
Posted by: Tiffani at March 18, 2004 04:38 PM (xpNFK)
2
I've been supporting this movement for quite awhile now, and I'm quite excited that it's finally a movement. Prophetic support meant I had to put up with a whole lot of name calling and some Asian rugs.
I say fuck it too. We need a button or a sticker or something though.
Posted by: Meg at March 18, 2004 08:51 PM (NNWSz)
3
The problem I have with political correctness isn't the political correctness itself. If you tell me, "Actually, I'd prefer to be termed 'Asian' rather than 'Oriental,'" I'll apologize and call you a chink. Woops! I mean I'll apologize and call you Asian. It's no skin off my ass and if it makes you feel better . . . .
You prefer African-American to black? You prefer Hispanic to Chicano or Latino? Okey-dokey. I'll even label you a "person of color" if that's what it takes to soothe your ruffled feathers. Using terms people prefer is just being mannerly.
No, the only problem I have with political correctness is the awful backlash it's caused, so that now you have ignorant rednecks thinking it's a real badge of courage to let loose with the n-word and other terms of hate speech. I don't want any laws against hate speech--I like being able to know who the fuckwits are, so by all means, let 'em get busy with the hateration--but that doesn't mean I'm overjoyed to hear it, if you know what I'm saying.
I know you're not in that bunch, but more than a few folks are, and someone needs to tell them, "Son, I'm afraid it turns out you're actually
not an irrepressible maverick for busting out with '[insert slur here]' all the time. You're just an asshole."
Posted by: ilyka at March 18, 2004 09:33 PM (7zvET)
4
The real problem is if I'm not PC in the workplace I'll get fired. No questions. Just straight out the door. At first I was p!ssed about it, but Ilyka's right. Unfortunately there's a lot of people out there who use various words deliberately to degrade and it has a powerful effect. It's a case where the minority such as yourself end up suffering for a greater good.
In my workplace what would have previously passed as legitimate comment was sexist or racist, but considered part of the rough and tumble. Now it's gone and you know what, we're all still able to converse and live our lives.
Posted by: Simon at March 19, 2004 02:53 AM (OyeEA)
5
Let me clarify a bit. I in no way support the use of derogatory terms, racial epithets, etc. Also, like Ilyka, I'm more than happy to use a particular spun term to make an individual comfortable and happy. That's not what Political Correctness is about though.
Political Correctness: conformity to a belief that language and practices which could offend political sensibilities should be eliminated
The "could offend" is the key there. It does not matter if a term offends or not. If there's the possibility that it could offend then it must not be used. That is ridiculous.
Posted by: Jim at March 19, 2004 06:19 AM (saeHM)
6
Exactly. It's the Chicken Little of linguistic terms: "
what if someone is offended" *run scurrying in circles* How codependent.
I say, *if* someone is offended, let them speak. The rest of us [with manners] will adjust --when talking to that individual. Other individuals might not agree, even though they're a member of the same "group."
It's this group-think implication that *all* blacks/Asians/Polish/whatevers think alike that gets me. Wasn't that one of the original defining characteristics of racism -- assuming all people of a particular group are "all alike -- can't tell 'em apart..."
Posted by: Claire at March 20, 2004 03:13 PM (l1oyw)
7
Claire says it VERY well. TWO problems have emerged:
1) self-established 'elite' have determined to correct everyone else who are not as aware and concerned about what is offensive. This has created an environment of people LOOKING for offensive expressions / language / omissions / etc.
2) As a result, we have DISENGAGED from honest interaction (risky to ask a ____ person what their experience as a ____ has been. [the hair on my neck tingles as I write THIS for fear I have offended someone out there...even though THEY would have had to fill-in the blanks to take said offense!]). I am comfortably PC - trained to add my hum to the collective hum - never risking saying anything that might offend and so never saying anything at all.
Posted by: matt at March 31, 2004 10:52 AM (H+xYI)
8
I always say "Ornamental" instead. I also refuse to use "X-American" in any context. For example, you are either Chinese or American, not Chinese-American. How many self-described "African-Americans" have ever even set foot on the African continent? They are as much African as I am European.
Posted by: Paul at April 29, 2004 01:53 PM (JzocN)
9
There is another problem with PC besides what you call people* (see below on that) - certain moral judgements are included.
For example, to say that you believe homosexuality is wrong is non-PC. It doesn't matter how you treat people, and it doesn't matter if your statement was truthful or not (what you BELIEVE). All that matters is that it might offend people... other than Christians, of course. Christians are to be offended whenever possible (or at least are considered only after everyone else).
Don't believe me? Try saying you are muslim and that you believe homosexuality is wrong. Then try saying you are Christian and that you believe homosexuality is wrong. You see, you can't offend people... well, unless they're a group that it's OK to offend.
* as to what to call people, I'm strongly in the "whatever" camp, too. Yes, x-American is stupid, but, hey, I don't care what you want me to call you. What I DO care about is when I call you WHAT YOU TOLD ME to call you, and then you get offended, because you've changed you mind in the last five minutes, and that old moniker is totally offensive now. And that is someohow MY fault?!?
Posted by: Deoxy at April 30, 2004 05:57 PM (THlKl)
10
THIS IS SO FUNNY. Just this morning I was telling my girlfriend the same fucking thing!!! The conversation started with the use of Oriental and how Asian, I think, encompasses all of...shit, I'm not going to reiterate everything you just said, but THANK YOU FOR PUTTING IT DOWN SOMEWHERE WHERE OTHERS CAN BE EDUCATED IN HOW "PC" IS BULLSHIT!!!!!
Posted by: Forest at July 29, 2004 05:33 PM (zoBvI)
11
Also... I don't know the races of anyone else on this forum, and it may just be my perception, but has anyone noticed that "Politically Correctness" is a white thing? I have friends of all races, American and foreign, so I'm not trying to put out that I feel any...prejudice, but no one but white people, as far as I've seen, has ever gotten shit for anything not "PC", except politicians, corporate whatevers, musicians, etc. I don't know, maybe it's just me. Anyone, let me know of any other cases so I may be educated.
Posted by: Forest at July 29, 2004 05:41 PM (zoBvI)
12
It has always been offensive to people of Asian descent to be called Oriental, Oriental applies to items (that's why you would still call a rug made in the Orient an Oriental rug) not people. It is fine to be a "dash American" if you have only one ancestral heritage, everyone is entitled to hold onto their ancestral background.
Posted by: Carrie at August 14, 2004 12:20 AM (gnBOr)
13
I have found several websites now that use the term "Asian" for rugs. It seems that the word "oriental" has become stigmatized, and no one really knows why, so they think it's safer to say "Asian."
Posted by: Jeff at November 13, 2004 11:45 PM (G0XX4)
14
Jeff,
I am not wrong, Asian people all hate to be called Oriental.You need to stop getting bent of shape about definitions and literal meanings. The point here is that Asian people do not like
to be called Orientals, that's all you need to
know. Stop wasting your time looking up all of this information and listen to what Asian people are saying.
Posted by: Carrie at November 14, 2004 01:09 PM (vn0ho)
15
Sure, Carrie. "ALL" Asian people hate being called Oriental? That's simply untrue, just like your other statements. I married an Oriental, you moron. And you still haven't given any good reason why anyone from the Orient should object to being described as someone from the Orient. Would you please explain how this makes any sense? Of course, you can't. You've simply decided to whine about it because you like whining.
On the other hand, some Asians are caucasian. They must hate the perversion of the word "Asian" to mean "Oriental," which is what Carrie would like us all to do.
The fact is, there are times when we need to describe what someone looks like. "Oriental" means, generally, straight black hair, almond-shaped eyes, and teeth with a shovel-shaped cross-section. If people like Carrie lose their delicate equilibrium when "Oriental" is used to describe people, they should suggest something else instead of "Asian," which is already taken! It has a meaning very different from "Oriental," as I mentioned in my above postings.
Carrie, if you want to complain about something, then grow up and find something that's worth complaining about. The word "Oriental" isn't one of them.
Posted by: Jeff at December 03, 2004 11:24 PM (N6oar)
16
Do me a favor and stop commenting, the number of comments you have left shows us who needs to grow up.
Posted by: Carrie at December 05, 2004 05:24 PM (fLQkA)
17
Unfortunately, Jeff has angered me enough with his ignorance that I finally have to explain why I don't want to be called Oriental.
The term reflects European and American colonialistic attitudes of the past and present. A term used to exotify people and products i.e. teas/women/attitudes/customs/foods/etc. Nonone uses the term "occidental" to describe white people. Additionally, oriental is a term which desribes location in respect to Europe(Engand specifically)
Posted by: Carrie at December 05, 2004 05:40 PM (fLQkA)
18
Carrie, get to a phone and call the police immediately. Let them know that someone has spiked your grain alcohol with LSD and you're freaking out on a bad trip, having a serious break with reality.
To answer your points:
1) "...reflects European and American colonialistic attitudes..." Attitudes? Saying that someone is from the Orient, the far east, reflects an attitude? So then saying that John Wayne lived out West is some kind of insult too?
2) "A term used to exotify people and products..." Exotify? There's no need to "exotify," because the fact is that they're already exotic, which simply means they (or their roots) are from somewhere else! If you really believe your own bullcrap, then you won't use the word "European," because it "exotifies" people from Europe. Well face it - everyone's not from your neighborhood. Some people are from exotic locations, places strange to us occidentals.
3) "Oriental is a term which describes location in respect to Europe..." So what? In Asia, they refer to us as the West. And they refer to us as "Westerners." Big deal!!! Who cares? People out West (oops! I did it again!) would call me an Easterner. OUCH, THAT HURTS!!! Bottom line: you're just making up things to whine about, and youÂ’re trying to take the rest of the world with you into your hypochondriatic neurosis.
By the way, if you want to call me "occidental," be my guest! Of course, you'll have the same problem with vagueness that you have with "Asian," because "occidentals" come in all colors, hair types, eye types, etc. Therefore, the term is as useless as "Asian." The purpose of using the word "Oriental" is to describe a person's appearance or background. "Asian" doesn't do this, and therefore it is not a substitute. As I said, if you want everyone to bow to your imaginary pain and stop using the word "oriental," you must provide a substitute that has the same meaning. Do you have one? No, you don't. Get it through your politically correct skull: "Asian" doesn't work, because - say it with me - all Asians are not orientals. If nothing else, I would at least like you to address that one point.
Posted by: Jeff at December 08, 2004 12:25 PM (eriZf)
19
Looks like Carrie has no answer to my question. On behalf of Carrie, I would like to interpret her silence for the group. Her silence means, "Wow, was I ever wrong. It turns out that 'oriental' isn't a dirty word after all! I wish I could take back all the times I've 'corrected' people about why they shouldn't refer to orientals as orientals. I see now that the word 'Asian' is not a good substitute for 'oriental,' and here I was, all this time, ordering people to use it. I'm so ashamed of jumping on the P.C. bandwagon without thinking. Thank you, Jeff, for making me into a more critical thinker! Iwish there were some way to repay you! Can I have your phone number?"
Well, heh, you're making me blush, Carrie. But you're welcome. Sorry I can't give you my phone number, but if I did that every time I imparted wisdom, my phone wouldn't stop ringing!
And now, my job here is done. There is someone else out there in this crazy world that needs me. But dry your tears, O petulant one. I'll be back someday. (Cue sunset.)
Carrie: "There goes one hell of an occidental."
Posted by: Jeff at December 14, 2004 05:36 PM (eriZf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Dane-geld
It's been known for a long time that appeasement doesn't work. Kipling put it very eloquently a century ago.
It is always a temptation to an armed and agile nation,
To call upon a neighbour and to say:
“We invaded you last night—we are quite prepared to fight,
Unless you pay us cash to go away.”
And that is called asking for Dane-geld,
And the people who ask it explain
That youÂ’ve only to pay Â’em the Dane-geld
And then youÂ’ll get rid of the Dane!
It is always a temptation to a rich and lazy nation,
To puff and look important and to say:
“Though we know we should defeat you, we have not the time to meet you.
We will therefore pay you cash to go away.”
And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
But weÂ’ve proved it again and again,
That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
You never get rid of the Dane.
It is wrong to put temptation in the path of any nation,
For fear they should succumb and go astray,
So when you are requested to pay up or be molested,
You will find it better policy to say:
“We never pay any one Dane-geld,
No matter how trifling the cost,
For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
And the nation that plays it is lost!”
Rudyard Kipling
(1865-1936)
(Hat tip to Dopple-G)
Posted by: Jim at
11:33 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 1 kb.
I'll trade you two forklifts for one cherry picker.
[Click to biggerize]
What's your job like? Mine is a whole lot like that picture above. I take tools (in my case they are computer programs) and use them in ways that the designers never contemplated having them used. Anything that I can do is fair game. The designer never intended me to use my forklift to pick up another forklift that was picking up industrial tanks and lifting them way, wayway higher than allowed in any of the specs? Well, if the designer doesn't prevent me from doing that I'm going to do it 'cause you can be sure as hell that eventually a user is going to try to do it (the proof is in the picture).
Of course there is one big difference between how I abuse product and the way it's being done in that picture. They're stretching the limits in an attempt to get something constructive and necessary done. If it was me doing QA testing I'd be rocking that thing back and forth until something broke or crashed.
The moral of the story: I love my job.
Another moral of the story: It's probably a good thing that I work in software and not at a forklift manufacturer.
Posted by: Jim at
08:15 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 219 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I was always kind of jealous of QA. Especially when they'd find something that just made my head explode. I mean like, "How in Sam Hill did you even think of that?" I had a bug once where the tester complained that there was no limit on your ability to resize the app window--it could be sized down to a 1 x 1 pixel area. And good luck getting it back to a useful size at that point.
I read that bug report and I thought, "but who would ever do such a damn stupid thing?" and then immediately, the answer came to me: my own mother would do such a thing. And then she'd call tech support and complain that her application had "vanished."
Programmers bitch about QA because it pains them to admit they need QA . . . most of them more than they think.
Posted by: ilyka at March 18, 2004 09:40 PM (7zvET)
2
I get a lot of "How the hell did you come up with that?" exclamations. They give me warm fuzzies. :-)
Posted by: Jim at March 18, 2004 10:11 PM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 17, 2004
Mini Movie Night
Lovely Wife went out with her galpal last night to get nails done and do some kbitzing. That gave me just enough time for an abbreviated Guy's Movie Night. I decided to watch
Underworld. I'd heard mixed reviews on it but since Susie recommended it I knew it had to be good (five points for
Susie, by the way).
As far as vampire movies go it wasn't very good. As far as werewolf movies go it wasn't very good. As far as action movies go it was awesome. The vampire/werewolf thing was really just used as a story device and to add flavor and I thought it did really well as such. The action was excellent with lots of nifty Matrix-like effects.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
10:22 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 428 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I gotta agree with you on the Kate Beckinsale thing. The movie wouldn't be half as good without her. :-D
Posted by: tommy at March 17, 2004 12:37 PM (v0EoW)
2
Very interesting point on how certain movies raise the bar on f/x from time to time. There's a good post topic in here somewhere. Unfortunately, I'm not enough of a movie buff to list all the bar raisers.
I'm thinking "2001" was probably in there somewhere, though.
Posted by: Harvey at March 17, 2004 01:21 PM (tJfh1)
3
Yes - Kate Beckinsale is BY FAR the top Brit hottie. I'd only recommend "Pearl Harbor" as a vehicle to see her and some well done air to air combat scenes. If you watch it, turn your brain off completely, and then rinse yourself clean with a viewing of "Tora Tora Tora" immediately afterwards.
Posted by: Mike the Marine at March 17, 2004 01:47 PM (Zw7Hl)
4
It WAS good action, wasn't it? Glad you enjoyed it!! I also agree there are MUCH better vampire and werewolf movies out there--have you seen Dog Soldiers?
Posted by: Susie at March 17, 2004 10:37 PM (ni0vr)
5
I thought it was a great flick too, an excellent action movie that just happened to be about vampires and werewolves.
Posted by: Sue at March 18, 2004 01:42 AM (rZmE1)
6
Dog Soldiers, eh? I might have to look into that one for this Friday.
Posted by: Jim at March 18, 2004 05:55 AM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 16, 2004
Hasta la vista, Espania
I was really sad that Spain elected a
communist socialist government. I mean, hasn't the failure of the socialist system been more than amply proven? Seriously, name a socialist country that isn't bankrupt or rife with monetary problems.
Perhaps more apropos to America's interests, it also means that Spain will be pulling out from the Coalition of the Willing unless we turn over control of Iraq to the UN. As that's remarkably akin to turning over a gas pump to a pyromaniac I seriously doubt that Dubya is going to go that route.
Spain pulling out of the only organized anti-terrorist coalition in the world really struck me as bad. I mean, the terrorists are definitely going to be looking at this as a win. They blew up some trains, murdered a whole bunch of people and scared the Spaniards enough that they elected the Appeasement Party. Al Qaeda and the rest of those scum are going to look at this as proof that their terror tactics work.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
09:26 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 750 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I agree completely, but imagine the outcry if Dubya were to suggest we pull out of the UN...
Posted by: Clancy at March 16, 2004 11:18 AM (EGVPL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 15, 2004
And.....they're off!
The
2004 Peacock Invitational is now in progress. Our contestants are:
Me
Tiffany
Joey
Jeremy
Tiger
The five of us are now on our honor to not smoke until March 15 of 2005. That's no smoking, period. No taking a single puff off of a buddy's cig. No pipe or stogie in the champagne room. No chaw or other sneaky ways to get nicotine either*.
The penalty if anybody fails is to pay each of the other betters $25 each. That means that for all of us the next cigarette we smoke in the next year would cost us $100. If that's not an incentive not to suck on a butt then I don't know what is.
Good luck my compatriots. I sincerely hope I don't see a dime from any of you.
* Exceptions are valid quit-smoking aids like Nicorette Gum or the Patch.
Posted by: Jim at
04:05 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Jennifer at March 15, 2004 04:21 PM (DdBLw)
2
Yeah - good luck! And like Jim said - no butt sucking!
Posted by: Clancy at March 15, 2004 04:59 PM (EGVPL)
3
I'm torn. I'm really broke and would love making you all pay up, but being a quitter myself and knowing how hard it is, I'll just say "Good luck" and go stare at my empty billfold.
Posted by: Tiffany at March 15, 2004 05:26 PM (rDyup)
4
*whistles her support*
I understand people who are quitting get grumpy. So I will keep the cheerleading irritation to a minimum.
Posted by: Helen at March 16, 2004 06:04 AM (6dPV0)
5
Thanks for the support, y'all!
And Helen, you can go wild with the cheerleading. One of the primary reasons for grumpitude while quitting is the sudden realization that our lives have a dearth of cheerleading.
Posted by: Jim at March 16, 2004 06:21 AM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 14, 2004
At the movies
As
mentioned previously tonight was Guy's Movie Night. The festivities began with
Die Unendliche Geschichte, more commonly known as "The Neverending Story" (and just what the hell is up with IMDB putting up a title like that as the primary one? Sheesh!). The boys loved it (the two older ones that is, the little guy didn't make it to movie time) and I appear to have been spared from anybody screaming over scary wolf nightmares (knock on wood).
Helen gets the points for this one. She didn't just recommend it, she bought it for us. Helen, you're awesome beyond words' poor description.
Once the lads were abed the grownup fare came out. I watched Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines. I'd been putting this one off for a long, long time. You see, Terminator is one of my all time favorite absolutely most loved and cherished movies in the universe. Terminator 2 is quite likely the first sequel I've ever seen that didn't totally piss me the fuck off. On the contrary, it rocked as much as the first one (although in a different way). So I've been terrified of watching #3. I mean, Cameron wasn't even involved in this one! What if it totally sucked? Or didn't totally suck but went all eXtreme and shit and pissed me off in those more subtle suckass ways? Well, it didn't. It wasn't the movie that 1 or 2 were but it wasn't that far behind and it most definitely didn't tarnish its predecessors. Once I started to relax (when I acknowledged that it wasn't sucking ass) I really started to enjoy it. Very excellent ending, too! So long as they keep Jerry Bruckheimer very very far away from it, I'll watch #4 too (you just know that there's going to be a #4 after an ending like that). Points for this recommendation go to Christine.
Honorable mention go to Underworld and Intolerable Cruelty (Susie and MojoMark, respectively). Those were my next choices and will probably fill my slate on the next Guy's Movie Night.
Posted by: Jim at
01:40 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 349 words, total size 2 kb.
1
My pleasure
Posted by: Helen at March 15, 2004 08:10 AM (6dPV0)
2
I just wanted to mention that I SAW that you also "rented" some kind of "erotic" type of movie on our beloved VOD.
When will you EVER learn that the FREE ones SUCK!?!
Hell,what am I saying?THANK GOD THEY ARE FREE!
I just hope the boys didn't get to see it...I rather pay for them to see a GOOD one!
:-)
Posted by: LW at March 15, 2004 11:00 PM (saeHM)
3
VOD kicks ass!
Okay, so the free erotic movies don't have a plot or any decently graphic sex. They have boobs and asses and those are still fun to watch.
Posted by: Jim at March 16, 2004 05:09 AM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 11, 2004
So what should I see?
Lovely Wife will be going on hens' night this Saturday, leaving me all alone and at the mercy of the three
spawn boys. This is cool for a couple of reasons.
First, she gets out and away from the kids to bleed off some of that accumulated kid rearin' pressure. Sure our kids are an unbearable trial great but she's got at least one of them 24 x 7 except for the rare occasions when she runs out to the store when I'm home. This lets her relax so the chance that she'll snap and just de-skin one of the buggers is dramatically reduced.
Second, she comes back with cool stories. Like the older lady that was trying to pick up The Godfather (part 1) when he was visiting from The Netherlands. Or the time she got touched by Bill Gentry (while she was wearing her galpal's shirt so she can't possibly give that shirt back now). Or even the infamous Purple Velvet Cowboy. Yes, an actual human type person went to a night club in a metropolitan area dressed in a purple velvet cowboy outfit. You just can't get stuff like this from a night at home.
Third, and most importantly, I get to watch movies. Don't get me wrong, we do watch movies together as well. It's just that those movies are ones that only she likes we both like. Ones from the Lifetime Network or Oxygen or The Oprah Channel or like The Usual Suspects or From Dusk Til Dawn. Pretty much anything that makes a temporary vagina grow on male viewers or ones that are mob, true crime or vampire related but not a lot else. Specifically, no sci-fi or fantasy or general horror.
Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to suggest movies for me to watch this Saturday evening. They should be very good ones that are available now on DVD and for the love of GOD, no chick flicks. They don't have to be recent ones - I sure haven't seen everything.
POINTS: Why the heck not? Five points if I end up watching the movie you suggest. Points awarded to the first suggester only.
Posted by: Jim at
01:46 PM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
Post contains 374 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'd suggest Intolerable Cruelty. It is a Cohen brothers movie so the humor is a little ... quirky, but Clooney is funny, and Catherine Zeta-Jones is HOT-HOT-HOT. My eyes were drawn to her in every scene.
Posted by: MojoMark at March 11, 2004 02:03 PM (E+LQu)
2
My suggestion is Very Bad Things. With Christian Slater, Cameron Diaz and a bunch of other great actors but I don't know their names. Great movie.
Warning: Not for kids
Posted by: Tiffani at March 11, 2004 02:11 PM (xpNFK)
3
It may seem really shallow but both P and I really enjoyed Bulletproof Monk. Sure, its goofy but the action is good and any movie with Stifler in it is going to be funny.
Or Rabbitproof Fence (though Lovely Wife might also enjoy that as well).
I've heard good things about Intolerable Cruelty and I can wholeheartedly NOT recommend DareDevil which should have been named SuckDevil. Without Jennifer Garner, the movie had nothing. With her, it was barely watchable.
Posted by: Johnny Huh? at March 11, 2004 02:35 PM (AyewP)
4
Daredevil is on my list of movies to never watch. In fact let's go ahead and put a "No Affleck" rule into effect here.
Posted by: Jim at March 11, 2004 02:50 PM (IOwam)
5
I enjoyed "Identity" very much despite the occasional gore, and for a mindless boys-have-all-the-fun low-budgetish not-very-good-but-a-great-time-waster, "SWAT". If you're into vampire flicks, "Underworld" was great.
If you'd rather stick to the classics, "What About Bob?" "Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the Eighth Dimension" and the original of "The In-Laws."
Posted by: Susie at March 11, 2004 02:58 PM (8giUV)
6
Oh, and there's a really old but great sci-fi/horror/vampire pic called "Lifeforce" if your video store has it...
Posted by: Susie at March 11, 2004 03:02 PM (8giUV)
7
Thanks Jim. Thanks for helping point out that IÂ’ve become so completely
pussified sensitized that I canÂ’t suggest one good DVD movie. Thanks.
I think IÂ’m missing Oprah right now...
On second thought... If you liked the LOTR series, and you think Peter Jackson is/was an awesome movies maker, you HAVE to see “Meet The Feebles.” After 45 minutes or so it looses all of its attraction and actually making it to the end requires a concerted effort that you’ll question later. But you have to see it - If only to understand how far he’s come. And to wonder why anyone would have trusted him to make LOTR.
Please – If you do find/get this, also pick up something you want to see as this is purely a novelty movie and you will hate me if this is all you bring home.
Posted by: Clancy at March 11, 2004 03:09 PM (EGVPL)
8
Ooh...
Lifeforce. That's one of my favorites. That and
The Keep. Both were books that I had read that were made into movies and the movies didn't totally muck it up.
I was thinking
Underworld would be a good one but I think Lovely Wife will want to watch that it too. She's got a thing for the vampire movies.
Posted by: Jim at March 11, 2004 03:10 PM (IOwam)
9
Hey, no problem Clancy. I'm always happy to oblige! Hehe
Posted by: Jim at March 11, 2004 03:12 PM (IOwam)
10
I haven't seen "Meet The Feebles," but if you haven't seen Peter Jackson's "Heavenly Creatures" or "The Frighteners," heck you should grab them both and make it a double-feature.
(His "Brain Dead" is also wonderful but not as good as those two.)
Posted by: Brian Jones at March 11, 2004 03:37 PM (E4NcZ)
11
The Bourne Identity
Flash Gordon
The Fifth Element
"The One" with Jet Li (The MAN!!!!!) has some of the best fight scenes ever and groovy scifi as well.
Me, Myself,and Irene...in my top ten funniest ever list
Reign of Fire- yeah lots of inconsistencies and writer had NO CLUE about dragon mythology...but DAYAMMN is Matthew McConaughey fine with all them muscles just a-bulging (wiping drool)
Anything directed by Terry Gilliam
Terminator 3 was actually pretty good
The man who would be King (Sean Connery and Michael Caine)
Minority Report
Posted by: Christine at March 11, 2004 03:51 PM (Q/NXM)
12
What if Icome home early?So lets not get carried away here,huh?
:-))
Posted by: LW at March 11, 2004 04:47 PM (saeHM)
13
Also...I wouldn't mind seeing a picture of Billy boy here.Copyright's on me,I stole them all anyways.
:-)))
ANY woman that hangs out in the ATL area....you MUST go and SEE (and listen,too).
I know a movie....Beloved....hahaha
Posted by: LW at March 11, 2004 04:50 PM (saeHM)
14
I second Christine's suggestions of the Fifth Element and Minority Report.
Posted by: Beth Donovan at March 11, 2004 05:51 PM (igCu1)
15
Yowsa. Going to take a while to get through Christine's...
Bulging McConaughey? Strangely enough I'm not moved. Flash and 5th Element both done. Same feelings for Me, Myself & Irene. Minority Report was decent...hmmm...T3...that's a definite possibility. Never did get around to catching that one.
Don't worry, Lovely Wife. It'll just be one or two movies and if you get home too early you can watch something in the bedroom.
Posted by: Jim at March 11, 2004 07:09 PM (saeHM)
16
Funnily enough I have exactly the same experience when Mrs M is out for a night or weekend. Except pizza tends to creep in there too.
Lost in Translation is good - Bill Murray doing funny in a good way for change.
Master and Commander
21 Grams
Electric Blue #47 - an oldie but a goodie and a fav from...oops. Suppose I'd better scratch Night Moves and the Emmanuelle collection too.
Posted by: Simon at March 12, 2004 12:55 AM (UKqGy)
17
Beloved - there's a movie for you!!!
I mountain bike a lot where that movie was filmed. For the longest time, the prop farm house and outbuildings still stood, but they were torn down in the last year or so. I have never seen the movie. Honest.
I sorta saw Master & Commander on an airplane (I watched most of it, but didn't listen). It was OK...
Posted by: Clancy at March 12, 2004 10:55 AM (EGVPL)
18
I mentioned Beloved already,no response.
It SUX...btw.
Posted by: LW at March 12, 2004 01:43 PM (saeHM)
19
I'm still astounded that we didn't shut that movie off. Beloved is one of the lousiest movies I've ever seen.
Posted by: Jim at March 12, 2004 01:46 PM (IOwam)
20
lousiest ever? That would have to be 'The Toxic Avenger." "Meet the Feebles" might be considered extremely lousy if not for some weird quality that actually makes it cool (though still really bad)...
Posted by: Clancy at March 12, 2004 04:56 PM (EGVPL)
21
Eraserhead... but you'll have to smoke about a half a bag of pot first or it won't make any sense.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at March 12, 2004 09:51 PM (nr5xk)
22
Movie night was a blast. Thanks to Helen and Christine, the lovely ladies who provided and/or suggested the entertainment for the evening. Something like a movie review / follow-up is
here.
Posted by: Jim at March 14, 2004 01:46 AM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Runners take your mark...
We're getting close. The
2004 Peacock Invitational starts this Sunday night (at midnight). We've got 5 people who are willing to pony up $100 if they smoke at any time for the year of the bet. Care to join us?
I started a bit early, having had my last smoke on Feb 27. That puts my quittin' stats at: One week, five days, 22 hours and 5 minutes. 258 cigarettes not smoked, saving $40.70. Life saved: 21 hours, 30 minutes. (Stats courtesy of this nifty little proggie I heard about from Tiger.)
Posted by: Jim at
09:38 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 100 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I had one yesterday. First one in more than 8 weeks...
Posted by: Clancy at March 11, 2004 11:30 AM (EGVPL)
Posted by: Jim at March 11, 2004 01:14 PM (IOwam)
3
I want a donut! *
cries* I'm so friggin' hungry!
Posted by: Tiffany at March 11, 2004 04:42 PM (rDyup)
4
You can have a donut, Tiffany. But no taco then.
Posted by: Jim at March 11, 2004 04:48 PM (IOwam)
5
Don't I count AT ALL here?I am already a freaggin week aheadayou!
Posted by: LW at March 11, 2004 04:52 PM (saeHM)
6
Of course you count, Sweetie. You are my inspiration. You are my shining star. Don't you go away girl.
Posted by: Jim at March 11, 2004 07:11 PM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 10, 2004
Those Crazy Japanese
Most arcade game manufacturers go for racing, fighting or some sort of shooting galery concept. As far as I know the
repeatedly ram a giant plastic finger into a virtual rectum milieu is virgin territory. Or it was until recently anyway.
The Boon-Ga Boon-Ga game allows the intrepid player to sodomize one of eight characters including ex-girlfriend, mother-in-law, prostitute and child molester. As you spank and invade the nether regions of your selected victim they scream in agony on the game screen. At the end of your session you get a card that gives you your sexual proficiency rating.
Although the game might seem a bit gratuitously violent (and otherwise disturbing) at least it is promoted by big soft cuddly characters. One is a giant version of the probing fist of doom and the other is a six foot tall shit monster.
I don't have anything else for this one. It's well beyond any satirical skills I may have previously possessed. I'm pretty much just stunned and running on at this point. Let me leave you with a portion of the game review from SeanBaby:
This game does more than threaten the future with an army of highly trained madmen proctologists, it shames America's industrial complex. First we lose the space race to the Commies, and now Japan and Korea have beaten us in the great Virtual Digital Rectal Stimulation Simulation race. And if you're anything like me, you've already asked yourself about the dangers of this ass technology being in the hands of two foreign powers known for giant radioactive monsters and nuclear weapons, respectively. And again, if you're like me, this train of thought quickly hits a wall when you realize that you're not an accredited expert on foreign colon-probing policies. So until one of us is, let's just assume that we're all going to die, but not quite as quickly if we stay far away from Boong-Ga Boong-Ga.
Amen, brother.
(Hat tip to Dopple-G, may he burn eternally for exposing me to this)
Posted by: Jim at
03:57 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 342 words, total size 2 kb.
1
You know one doesn't normally equate Japan with repressed feelings but any country that needs to vent its pent up anger at its mother-in-law or ex-spouse in this way, really needs to consider therapy. I am sensing a lot of mass anger, possibly related to the fact that they got their asses handed to them about 60 years ago.
Posted by: Christine at March 11, 2004 08:49 AM (Q/NXM)
2
I dunno...between this and the used schoolgirl panty vending machines I'm just thinking they're overall fubar.
Posted by: Jim at March 11, 2004 09:04 AM (IOwam)
3
Christine,
"asses handed to them" is not what happened, they lost sure but in no way was it a reasonable victory. If the americans employed the same method to gain said "victory" today, the whole government would be put up for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Therefore, the only thing you seem to be sensing is your own ignorance.
Posted by: Steve at December 19, 2004 05:12 AM (RBUeX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
How lazy do you have to be?
A
powered dish scrubber? I couldn't believe my eyes when i saw a commercial for this one. It's a powered screwdriver with a scrubber at the end! The commercial showed the happy housewife getting a bunch of fresh food residue off of otherwise squeeky clean plates, just like any other dishwashing commercial. The difference was she did it with this extrememly slowly rotating two and a half pound appliance.
There is no poor-man's dremel that is going to make dishwashing fun and easy and this seven dollar toy isn't going to do anything that some hot water and a sponge can't do faster and better.
It's a shame that Wal-Mart is going to sell a bajillion of these things and encourage some other dumbass to give birth to the next useless helper appliance.
Posted by: Jim at
12:50 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 147 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Heh, I won't waste my money on it. My "power dish scrubber" is named "Scott" and he only scrubs once a week.
That disposable toilet brush? That I may invest in. I have coupons
Posted by: Tiffany at March 10, 2004 02:27 PM (rDyup)
2
haha.. I'm surprised they didn't call it the"kraft-matic power dish scrubber"!
Posted by: jim at March 10, 2004 03:42 PM (lN8eP)
3
You obviously didn't read how Bacchus over at Erosblog employed it. Apparently, it never came near a dish.
Posted by: Christine at March 11, 2004 08:52 AM (Q/NXM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Cat scratch fever
I've got this love/hate thing with cats. Some are ultra cool. The cats living in my house are this type. Henk is a sexy black beast who thinks he's a dog. He comes when you call, wants to play and be petted constantly and gets along well with the canines in the house. Apple is a fat lazy thing and the only doglike quality she has is that she's a bitch. In other words, she's more of your typical cat. She's still cool though since she likes me and comes out specifically for a Jim petting when the mood strikes her.
I've lived with cats that I thoroughly hated as well. When I was in high school my sister had an evil black monster named Misty (which was also the name of one of my cousins and boy did I get a couple laughs out of that). She hated men. No matter how nice my dad and I tried to be with that cat it would hiss and run away and get its fur in a bunch just like those Halloween stereotype cats. I still kept making the overtures until one day when I got home from school and noticed a nasty smell in my bedroom. Specifically from my dresser. Because that spawn from hell had pissed on my clothes. It was open warfare after that and I took extreme glee in waging a guerilla campaign against that beast that made the last years of its life a frightening glimpse into the hell in which it would spend eternity.
So what has got me thinking about evil cats all of a sudden? The feral beasties that live around my house. I am sick of finding dead bird pieces in my yard. I'm sick of cat prints on my car. I am sick of cats shitting where my kids play. I have had enough of these half wild, half starved, vile, disease carrying felines. I am declaring war.
I am buying a pellet gun and any time I see any of the 8 or 9 miscreants anywhere near my property I am going to shoot the fucker. I'm going to shoot it as many times as I can before it gets out of my range. I'm going to teach Lovely Wife how to fire the gun so she can defend the castle when I'm at work.
And if that doesn't do the trick I'm going to escalate the conflict and get a paint ball gun. I'll put out cat traps. I'll go Carl Freakin' Spackler on their asses!
This is your notice, cats. I'm coming for you and there's not a damn thing your friends at PETA or in France can do about it.
POINTS: 2 points for the first person to source Carl Spackler. No searches, y'all.
Posted by: Jim at
12:22 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 473 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Bill Murray's character in Caddyshack
easy.
Posted by: MojoMark at March 10, 2004 12:50 PM (E+LQu)
2
I'm down with you here Jim.
Some cats can be cool, most are just annoying.
I did however shot a cat with something a little bit bigger than a pellet gun, but I had to. I wanted to shoot the big dumb dofus German Sheppard that created the problem, but I didn't.
Posted by: Clancy at March 10, 2004 01:30 PM (EGVPL)
3
I smell varmint poontang, and the only good varmint poontang is dead varmint poontang, I think.
MojoMark got it. Carl Spackler was the psycho gopher hunting groundskeeper from Caddyshack. 2 points!
Posted by: Jim at March 10, 2004 01:35 PM (IOwam)
4
damn , I knew that one!
Posted by: jim at March 10, 2004 03:43 PM (lN8eP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
121kb generated in CPU 0.0793, elapsed 0.1384 seconds.
39 queries taking 0.0399 seconds, 191 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.