December 03, 2003
Class is in session
Let us compare two popular female musical artists. One is a serious songstress who uses intensely personal lyrics and an entrancing voice with absolutely amazing vocal range to express herself through her music. The other does a peep show while mouthing pop ketch that somebody else wrote. Which of these artists would be classified as "sexy"?Sexy
Slutty
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Answers in the extended section.
Sexy

Slutty

For bonus credit, who is more likely to appear in a Playboy or Penthouse spread within the next year?
Posted by: Jim at
10:09 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 90 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Now, either britney has grown about three feet or that cover is more than a little retouched. Now, let me get this straight: She plays no instruments, lipsynchs(obviously, i mean, could you at least try?) in public, and has to photoshop her album cover. And she needs backup singers? I mean is there really a contest here? Oh Sarah, why oh why are you married.
Good call Jim.
Tommy
Posted by: Tommy at December 03, 2003 11:25 AM (hnRRG)
2
Before hitting the extended, I was guessing this was a Sarah-Twitney thing. :-)
Posted by: Jennifer at December 03, 2003 11:27 AM (shhDk)
3
Personnally, I don't listen to either one. I find that type of music (whiny, soulful sorrow or poppy, bubble-headed bullshit) an afront to all that is good and right in the world. Four letters: AC/DC. Remember - rock and roll ain't noise polution.
Now on the one hand Sarah can sing, but she doesn't make me feel, as Allah would say, "funny in the pants". Britney, on the other hand, can't sing without a computer completely regenerating her voice, but as far as I'm concerned the only thing her mouth should be used for it to..... well, you get the idea.
All that being said, lets boil this down to what it's actually about: which one would I do? And the answer, of course, is..........
BOTH! Any male who answers otherwise will immediately have his testosterone card revoked and his genitalia removed so he can be beaten with it.
BTW, I've pushed back my predicted Britney Playboy spread to spring of 2007. Christina Aguilara, however, has moved up to around summer of next year in either Penthouse or Hustler. Playboy is WAAAAAY too classy for that slut.
Posted by: Mike the Marine at December 03, 2003 03:12 PM (IOX+E)
4
"Me Against the Music"--hey, you can't say it's not an apt title. She certainly isn't doing anything with or for the music.
Posted by: ilyka at December 03, 2003 03:46 PM (EyevR)
5
Yes!
Thank you for saying it, Jim. I adore Sarah Mac!
Posted by: DeAnna at December 03, 2003 10:52 PM (n3+mt)
6
Score one for you on the cool Sarah reference. But the key here is-which one would you just like to have SEX with, and which one is cool enough to take home to mom?
Distinction, big time.
Don't tell me that if Britney weren't throwing herself at you, you'd say no. Just think of the points you would get just to be able to say you did her?
Posted by: Helen at December 04, 2003 04:34 AM (QV3iL)
7
Hey now! I never said that a guy wouldn't want to nail a slutty chick. I've had quite a bit of fun in my life with gals of that nature. Thing is, slutty chicks get less attractive the longer you're with them. Sexy ones tend to maintain or even increase their sexiness with greater familiarity.
Between these two I'd have to pick Sarah for both activities. Britney is elligible for bumping uglies as long as that doesn't preclude a Sarah romp. This isn't a fair comparison though - I've had a hankerin' for Ms McLachlan since the 80's.
Posted by: Jim at December 04, 2003 04:45 AM (fkewd)
18kb generated in CPU 0.0317, elapsed 0.0852 seconds.
86 queries taking 0.0718 seconds, 204 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
86 queries taking 0.0718 seconds, 204 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








