January 30, 2004
Who should I vote for?
Apparently I'm a shoe in for Bush, which is pretty much what I figured already. Some of the other results were surprising though.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Bush: 100%
Leiberman: 93%
Edwards: 86%
Not unexpectedly, Kucinich was number last.
Find your perfect match.
Posted by: Jim at
06:36 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I had Bush 100%, Leiberman 96%, Kerry 94%, Edawards 84%. Dean and Kusinich were 70% and 64% respectively. Where're Clark and Sharpton?!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at January 30, 2004 11:49 PM (1kcjy)
2
Sharpton is somewhere near Saturn. Clark is clear out past Pluto.
Posted by: Jim at January 31, 2004 08:50 AM (fkewd)
3
100% Lieberman, 96% Bush, then a bunch of other guys.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 02, 2004 07:00 PM (jtW2s)
4
It's unfortunate that Lieberman doesn't have a stone's chance of getting the Dem nomination. He's the most common sense, rational candidate of the bunch and could actually provide a viable challenger to Bush.
Posted by: Jim at February 03, 2004 10:25 AM (IOwam)
5
Yep. I disagree with a lot - possibly even most - of Bush's policies, but he is rational and has some idea of what's going on in the world and what needs doing.
Same goes for Lieberman.
The others - pfft.
But for some reason I'm not allowed to vote in this one...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 03, 2004 10:39 AM (jtW2s)
6
I'm already splitting my vote with Lovely Wife but we could bring you in and give you a third. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at February 03, 2004 10:51 AM (IOwam)
16kb generated in CPU 0.1029, elapsed 0.1445 seconds.
86 queries taking 0.1279 seconds, 203 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
86 queries taking 0.1279 seconds, 203 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
