November 26, 2003
More toy reporting
These guys have their shit together a bit better than the ones I profiled yesterday. They evaluate toys for physical danger based on solid and static criteria instead of trying to quantify the "social" hazard of a gift. But they're a bit kooky too, as evidenced by these entries (emphasis mine):
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Rubber Ball
Manufacturer: Dollar Tree Distribution
Problem: Product labeled with CSPA choke hazard warning for products with small parts. Does not contain small parts or fail the small ball test.Disney Princess Super Ball
Manufacturer: Basic Fun
Problem: Product labeled with CSPA choke hazard warning for products with small parts. Does not contain small parts or fail the small ball test.
Yup, they have a problem with these toys because they are not dangerous enough! You can correct this deficiency by embedding shards of glass into the balls.
For a more practical method of selecting toys for purchase, try the tips at The Onion.
(Hat tips to Lovely Wife and Dopple-G)
Posted by: Jim at
10:11 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 168 words, total size 1 kb.
15kb generated in CPU 0.0235, elapsed 0.0787 seconds.
84 queries taking 0.0663 seconds, 193 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
84 queries taking 0.0663 seconds, 193 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








