January 26, 2004
Things that are dangerous if forgotten
- Puppy teeth are the second sharpest thing in the world, next only to samurai swords.
- Puppies like to take a nip at anything and everything that grabs their attention, especially mobile things that will fit nicely in their mouths.
- Puppy noses can open any door that is not firmly latched.
- Human flesh is at its most sensitive directly after a hot shower.
It was toes people. Toes. Get your minds out of the gutter.
Posted by: Jim at
10:25 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 86 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We didn't really think the puppy could jump THAT high.
Posted by: LeeAnn at January 26, 2004 11:35 AM (HxCeX)
2
She could! She can jump right over the kid-proof gates.
Hey, wait a second...that was a dis, wasn't it?
Cheeky monkey!
Posted by: Jim at January 26, 2004 12:37 PM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bestofme Symphony, 8th Performance
The
8th Bestofme Symphony is up at Dodgeblogium and ready for your adoration. Start your week on the right foot with a tour of the best of the Blogosphere.
Hosting: Would you like to host the Symphony? Send me a note.
Submit to the Symphony: Want to be a part of next week's edition? Check out this post for submission help. Entries should always be sent to bestofme@jpeacock.net regardless of who the Symphony host is.
Spread the word: Webloggers, please give Jeannie some applause for her fine work and lend a hand with a little link magic.
Email Reminders: If you'd like to be sent a reminder about the Symphony, drop me a line at this address. It's not a mailing list, just me sending out friendly little reminders. There'll be one on Thursday or Friday to remind you to submit for the next Symphony and one on Monday with the location of the newly posted Symphony.
Posted by: Jim at
07:39 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 165 words, total size 1 kb.
1
8th already? Good grief. How time flies where you're frantically busy 16 hours a day...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 26, 2004 10:59 AM (jtW2s)
2
Just a thought: Why are the Symphonies posted on Mondays? There's so much good stuff to read, but Monday evenings -- for most of us -- don't supply enough time to peruse the large batch of bloggy goodness. I keep of the commercial where the gal says "Sunday was made for the New York Times." I think that if the Symphonies were posted at 7:00am on Sundays alot more readers would have the time to spend -- over coffee and english muffins -- relaxing and reading through the Best Of Us.
Granted, we have a week to get through it all, but I think most would like to meet it all in one sitting and then move on. Just a thought for what it's worth.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at January 26, 2004 11:03 PM (FMfz8)
3
The Blogosphere tends to slow to a crawl on the weekends so we went looking for the best weekday to post it on. Monday had the least conflict with other established multi-post memes so we went with that.
Posted by: Jim at January 27, 2004 08:02 AM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 25, 2004
January 23, 2004
Speaking of cheese...
...it's time for the
Cheddar X!
more...
Posted by: Jim at
02:28 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 345 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Well sure, #2 is the same but from two different angles. Just want to cover my bases, ya know?
And hey, as long as she's tearing clothes off you, its ALL good!
And I love your ridiculous thing saying!
Posted by: Johnny Huh? at January 23, 2004 03:16 PM (AyewP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Submit to me!
Well, technically I need you to submit to
Dodgeblogium. They're the hosts for the January 26 edition of the Bestofme Symphony. Send your submissions to
bestofme@jpeacock.net.
Remember, the only requirements are that you think the post is good and that it be at least 2 months old. Not a blogger? Send in a post from a favorite weblog.
Posted by: Jim at
12:57 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I suppose that posts from a hundred years in the future don't qualify?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 25, 2004 07:16 AM (jtW2s)
2
That's fine, so long as they're also from at least 2 months in the past. With time travel anything's possible, right?
Posted by: Jim at January 25, 2004 08:15 AM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
'Cause I'm the taxman, yeah, I'm the taxman
The taxman is now my bitch. I've got my W-2 in hand and it's high time that the gubmint gave me my damn money back. Boo-ya!
Posted by: Jim at
12:16 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And I personaly will tonight squeeze EVERY penny out of it!Uahahaha
Posted by: LW at January 23, 2004 01:42 PM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A word problem to wake your brain
Say that you've forgotten to turn off your email at work so it continues to pull your emails when you go home. It is set to poll for email every 20 minutes, starting at 5 after the hour. Your computer at home looks for email every 10 minutes for the same address, starting at the top of the hour. If there are 12 emails sent to you during the time both computers are pulling email, how many of these would you expect to find on the computer at work the next day?
Points: 2 points to the first person with the correct answer. No wild guesses, please - you have to explain your reasoning.
Posted by: Jim at
09:05 AM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Chicago! The trains meet in Chicago!
See: the reasoning is thus-if one train leaves D.C. at 5:00 pm travelling at the speed of sound, and one train leaves Seattle at 3:00 pm travelling at the sound of a train travelling, then they meet in Chicago.
Word problems-fun for the whole damn family.
Can I get half a point for originality?
Posted by: Helen at January 23, 2004 09:44 AM (RzA2l)
2
I'd give you a 1/2 point Helen, but your got it wrong. The trains meet in Philadelphia.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 09:50 AM (IOwam)
3
Its impossible to work out - we'd need to know at what times all the emails were sent, how long it takes you to get home, your shoe size, favourite flavour of ice cream and whether or not either computer is running outlook (in which case your work computer would be filled with 700,000 cleaned copies of the Booby Worm)
Now theoretically, there is only ever a five minute window of opportunity for the work computer so I'd have to say you'd only get 1 (or an equally low number) of the emails on that system but that is based on assumption rather than solid fact... and no I'd like to thank you for making me go cross eyed with your evil mathematical shenanigans ... bah.
Posted by: Robert at January 23, 2004 09:53 AM (kXZI6)
4
and according to my calculations, the trains would meet in Starbuck's for a quick cappuccino and danish before embarking on a serious shopping spree in the new Gucci Rail Yard. I think I need to check my working.
Posted by: Robert at January 23, 2004 09:55 AM (kXZI6)
5
Assume an even spread of emails over the time both computers are checking. Time to get home doesn't matter as the problem only deals with the 12 emails that were delivered while both computers were checking (I thought of that one too).
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 09:57 AM (IOwam)
6
I wouldn't know because my Outlook pulls email every minute.Screw math...I know how much 1 and 1 is (11),therefore I plead the 5th.
Posted by: LW at January 23, 2004 10:16 AM (fkewd)
7
assuming all of the above you'd get exactly 1/4 of any email sent to the address so - 3 (based on data over 1 hour with 5 minute message interval)
Posted by: rob at January 23, 2004 10:20 AM (kXZI6)
8
assuming all of the above you'd get exactly 1/4 of any email sent to the work address so - 3 (based on data over 1 hour with 5 minute message interval)
Posted by: rob at January 23, 2004 10:20 AM (kXZI6)
9
Exactly correct, Rob.
Bonus point for the incident portion control formula if you've got it.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 10:25 AM (IOwam)
10
I saw this too late and Rob beat me AGAIN!
I don't know about a formula, I just did it the hard way:
H = 00 - 05
W = 05 - 10 = 05
H = 10 - 25
W = 25 - 30 = 05
H = 30 - 45
W = 45 - 50 = 05
H = 50 - 00
Work had 15 minutes, leaving Home with 45. 1/4 to 3/4.
12 * 1/4 = 3
Posted by: Clancy at January 23, 2004 10:34 AM (EGVPL)
11
actually, it's a kind of gantt chart on the back of a Dilbert day to day calender - does that count? plus I don't know what the heck an incidentally controlled potion formula is or what it does. If you let me know I'll work one up for you.
Posted by: rob at January 23, 2004 10:35 AM (kXZI6)
12
Dude.
You guys so need to get a life. Gantt charts and algebra for this? Sheesh.
Although Rob's Starbucks and train bit made me laugh.
Posted by: Helen at January 23, 2004 10:44 AM (zDKJT)
13
hello - I work in IT! Gantt charts and algebra are my special friends and I talk to them every day ... then I go home to my real life. If this had been posted this evening I would have taken one look and thought "nah - can't be bothered" and gone to the pub instead...
righteous indignation*/
Posted by: rob at January 23, 2004 11:08 AM (kXZI6)
14
Clancy - That's how I did most word problems back in school. Formulas? We don't need no stinking formulas.
Rob - That's probably the wrong term for it. It's calculus and the formula shows the portion of control of competing factors assuming constant incidents of interaction. It's used somewhere for something important I imagine, though I can't for the life of me think of where it would be useful.
Helen - There's life beyond mathematics? The hell you say! Actually, this all stemmed from a freaky math dream I had a few weeks ago. Yes, I have the occasional freaky math dream. It lodged in my head and wouldn't leave so I decided to share in an effort to exorcise it.
And gantt charts kick ass.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 11:35 AM (IOwam)
15
Rob, Jim and Clancy-you know I love you guys. I am just speaking out of math envy. Like penis envy only...with math.
Posted by: Helen at January 23, 2004 12:57 PM (4QsPZ)
16
My computer at work is configured to leave mail for my home account on the server. It will all be there when I get home. I do not have VPN privileges, so I can't check work mail from home. No math required.
{
Now don't go and introduce reality into this. Ed.}
Posted by: triticale at January 24, 2004 07:49 AM (2cz5f)
17
The real question is how much of it was spam. I'd say the correct answer is 100%.
Posted by: Simon at January 24, 2004 07:58 AM (nNqbQ)
18
You only get 12 emails overnight?
I get more than 200. And only half of that is spam. (Not that I see the spam, thanks to SpamAssassin. But I count the dead bodies in the morning.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 25, 2004 07:15 AM (jtW2s)
19
It was a hypothetical situation and it was assumed that SpamBayes or SpamAssassin was in place.
Posted by: Jim at January 25, 2004 08:29 AM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
To the asshole in the Altima on the way in to work this morning:
The laws of physics still limit the number of vehicles occupying the same space to one single unit so perhaps the next time you swing over a solid white line into the non turning lane without the benefit of a turning signal because heaven forbid you would want to warn other drivers of your impending lunacy and you couldn't be bothered to switch lanes a quarter of a mile back before your lane became the home of left turning commuters you might wish to take a quick peek to be sure there are no other vehicles occupying the location you desire so you can avoid the tires screaching quick brake then foot to the floor acceleration move to cut in front of said space occupying vehicle while flipping the bird manuever that you decided to use today.
Have a nice day,
Jim
PS - I fucked your sister. She's nowhere near as good as your mom, no matter how much your dad disagrees.
Posted by: Jim at
08:53 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That's because she saves her best effort for me. She only did you cuz she's jealous of mom.
[/her brother, driver of the other car, not me]
Posted by: triticale at January 24, 2004 07:52 AM (2cz5f)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
You Want Pasteurized Processed American Cheese Flavored Product On That?
The Scene: Dopple-G and I are sitting down to lunch. He is eating naked burgers with cheese slices on top.
Background: Dopple-G actually enjoys American cheese singles and considers them to be actual cheese. I am a cheese snob where this pseudo-food is concerned.
Dopple-G: I've got "real cheese" today.
Me: That is not real cheese. It is "processed cheese food product".
Dopple-G: Why are you so anti-American?
Me: I'm not anti-American, I'm anti-cheese impersonation.
Dopple-G: American cheese is real cheese.
Me: Real cheese does not have partially dehydrogenated soy bean oil as an ingredient.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
06:04 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 540 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Velveeta.
Don't knock it till you go to a country where it's illegal.
Posted by: Helen at January 23, 2004 09:01 AM (I9OSd)
2
Oh, I must. I simply must. I abhor those plastic slices of near food. Now cheddar's a different story. I don't think I could live someplace without an ample supply of cheddar available.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 09:11 AM (IOwam)
3
Discusting,nasty,a humilliation to the word "cheese" and have I mentioned yet that people who eat that crap and actually call it "cheese" (including the makers) are INSANE?
The word KRAFT just gives me the creeps.
Yuck,yuck and MORE YUCK!
Posted by: LW at January 23, 2004 10:21 AM (fkewd)
4
I was going to say that, being the cheesefreak I am, I will eat any kind of cheese and that I would probably eat grass clippings if they were labeled "cheese" but then I realized this is just opening the door for the GM1 to rename Mr. Happy "The Big Cheese" and I don't need that kind of pressure. Nor the TMJ.
So I say nothing at all.
(Yay spray cheese!)
Posted by: LeeAnn at January 23, 2004 12:29 PM (HxCeX)
5
Dude, spray meat could bring BILLIONS! Not sure about the spray bread, though...although, I put spray "cheese" on crackers rather than bread, and spray crackers may be do-able...
Posted by: Susie at January 23, 2004 01:39 PM (0+cMc)
6
speaking about graas clippings..you know...I used to live in The Netherlands and there they have a cheese called "grass cheese".I think I might order some of off the ducth store now......
Posted by: LW at January 23, 2004 01:41 PM (fkewd)
7
Grass cheese? Oh, I hope you're joking. That's nothing like head cheese, is it? [spew]
I don't know if spray crackers could work. They're supposed to be crispy. Bread can be soft so I was thinking that would be possible. Spray it out into the desired shape and then the outside layer gets a firm film while the inside gets bubbly like spray insulation.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 01:46 PM (IOwam)
8
No,nothing like that at all.Its a typ of cheese that is seasonal.The cows eat special,fresh,new,young grass and that gives the cheese a special taste.Its very mild,smooth,soft...better then young Gouda.Its very yummy.:-)
Posted by: LW at January 23, 2004 01:58 PM (fkewd)
9
Phew! In that case, order away.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 02:06 PM (IOwam)
10
Dopple-G is a commie, right?
Posted by: Victor at January 24, 2004 12:24 PM (16A49)
11
Victor - Only as it pertains to dairy products.
Posted by: Jim at January 25, 2004 05:00 AM (fkewd)
12
i'm from england and we don't have spray cheese. sounds like we're missing out..
Posted by: lotty at December 02, 2004 11:34 AM (SgQqe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 22, 2004
Oh where oh where did Margi go?
She went
right here. Go see her new digs and update those blogrolls. I'm not sure what she's up to but it's sure to be devious and exciting.
Posted by: Jim at
07:38 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Aww. I'm touched. Really.
It's not really going to be about sharks with frickin' laser beams on their foreheads, but it's something I've been dealing with since about June of last year -- and I'm pretty stoked because I finally (FINALLY) have a solution.
You're a peach. Thanks, Jim.
Posted by: margi at January 22, 2004 08:03 PM (kpNlZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bad Sayings, Part 2
I've
mentioned before how the message board as you enter the building sprouts the occassional inane quote. It's getting uncomfortably frequent. Here's what we have now:
The most important thing that you can wear is your expression.
This is just starting to ring too close to those insufferably smug motivation posters. The most important thing you can wear is your expression? Give me a break. I've never been asked to leave a bar because of my expression. My expression has never been the defining factor in losing a job. I've never been arrested because of my expression. I'll tell you what the most important thing you can wear is: pants. Trust me on this, m'kay?
Posted by: Jim at
12:28 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 123 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I agree with you about the pants.
Your company needs a mysterious shipment of products from
these fine people.
Posted by: ilyka at January 22, 2004 02:34 PM (M0nlg)
2
Er,
these people, I mean.
I will preview comments first.
I will preview comments first.
I will preview comments first . . . .
Posted by: ilyka at January 22, 2004 02:35 PM (M0nlg)
3
Motivational posters... ugh. Go to Demotivators.com or Despair.com
My favorite:
MOTIVATION
If a pretty poster and a cute saying are all it takes to motivate you, you probably have a very easy job. The kind robots will be doing soon.
Posted by: Mike the Marine at January 22, 2004 08:28 PM (r8Ldc)
4
I think it all depends on who we're talking about, don't you? I mean, with some people the single MOST important thing they can wear is a condom.
Posted by: Venomous Kate at January 23, 2004 12:20 AM (kv7Fj)
5
Good point, Kate. And unfortunately a goodly number of them don't seem to realize that.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 04:42 AM (fkewd)
6
Or maybe that should be "the most important thing SINGLE people should wear is a condom." I haven't used one in so long I can't remember when.
Posted by: triticale at January 23, 2004 08:46 AM (2Uj24)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Are you looking at my bum? Cheeky monkey!
Have any of you not yet been to
Simon World? You really should check it out. Simon is well writen, attractive, and highly available for hetero or homosexual encounters. Looking for tall, dark and handsome? That's him. Short and built like a greco-roman wrestler? He's your guy. He's got humor, deep insightful commentary, and he opens windows for your mind. Unless you don't like that, in which case he's all about short and easy to understand humor. Or whatever else you're looking for.
[What's that? I can't say all that? Why not? Oh, yeah...right.]
It's been pointed out to me that as Simon is not in fact all things to all people, that I may be creating a false image in your head that he cannot possibly match, which will in turn cause you to not enjoy your experience when you go to his site and since that's pretty much 180 degrees off of the intent of this post it's not exactly the best way to pimp promote his site. Guess I've been following the Democratic Party hopefuls too closely and my worldview has been skewed. Here's the factual blurb:
Have any of you not yet been to Simon World? You really should check it out. Simon's an Aussie in Hong Kong with a lovely wife (not my Lovely Wife, of course) and kids (not my kids either) and another on the way. Humor, slice of life, a window into the world of Hong Kong; all of these and more are yours for the taking at his site. You can also help him name his baby and win fabulous prizes including a lear jet and your own private villa.
[You again? What now? Oh, okay.]
No lear jet.
Posted by: Jim at
09:57 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 287 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The cheque's in the mail and Cindy & Bambi are on their way. I think their hookers but there was a lot of barking in the background.
Posted by: Simon at January 22, 2004 10:24 AM (aPjRW)
2
did you just grab my ass?
Posted by: pylorns at January 22, 2004 10:31 AM (06ggV)
3
Sometimes Santa gotta get whacked.
Posted by: Jim at January 22, 2004 10:37 AM (IOwam)
4
Hahahahahaha...my evil plan and suggestion worked.
It's true. I am the Leader of Blogdom.
Er...Simon, what's this about being around for homosexual needs?
Posted by: Helen at January 22, 2004 10:40 AM (+untu)
5
Whatever it takes, Helen. Whatever it takes.
And not that there's anything wrong with that.
Posted by: Simon at January 23, 2004 02:52 AM (/qW+I)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 21, 2004
Happy Birthday, Burger!
The Burger (aka "Hamster", see the picture and you'll know why) is 2 years old today. Happy Birthday, short man!
The birthday boy
Posted by: Jim at
11:30 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Susie at January 21, 2004 03:19 PM (0+cMc)
2
Yeah, the lucky bugger takes after his mommy. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at January 21, 2004 07:32 PM (IOwam)
3
I'm glad you posted a photo. I thought this might be proof about the old McDonald's burgers myth.
Happy birthday to the little man.
Posted by: Simon at January 22, 2004 09:33 AM (aPjRW)
4
wow, he's the mac-daddy with those Nemo sandals!
Posted by: jim at January 22, 2004 09:34 AM (lN8eP)
5
Tell that adorable child that Aunt Margi says he can have all the ice cream and cake he wants.
Happy birthday!
How freakin' cute is HE?!
Awwww.
[/mom gushiness]
Posted by: margi at January 22, 2004 07:03 PM (kpNlZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"X" is for "X-treme Blogging"
The
Letter of the Day is was
"X".
"X" is for X-treme Blogging. That's when you turn your weblog over to your readers for open mike night, like Michele did.
Posted by: Jim at
05:55 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
January 20, 2004
I've got a thing for underage brunettes
Oh, like you don't?
Posted by: Jim at
03:11 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Cute puppie but for some reason the mental image of Natalie Portman in The Professional popped into my head. I'm a baaaad man!
Posted by: paul at January 20, 2004 05:14 PM (bWfDG)
Posted by: tommy at January 20, 2004 06:09 PM (Vdwm7)
3
She is so beautiful! Congrats on your new baby...
Posted by: Suz~ at January 20, 2004 09:03 PM (bYATc)
4
Awwww........soo adorable! I love doggies and puppies. Someday my life will not consist of 10 hour work days and I'll be able to have one.
Posted by: Anna at January 21, 2004 01:14 PM (igNWX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
First impressions can be oh so very wrong.
So, y'all know about our new puppy (Kota, short for Dakota) and how we took the calm, affectionate one instead of the hyperactive, psychotic one. By way of explaining our current situation I'll share with you the meaning of "Dakota", which I've just discovered after many hours of searching. The original Indian doesn't come over to English exactly but a loose translation is
"Oh, you thought I was the calm one? You are in such terrible shit that I would pity you if only I could sit still long enough to do so".
Apparently her original calm demeanor was the result of a heavy barbituate overdose. She has now self medicated with mescaline to compensate. I must, for the sake of the family's continued sanity (okay, the adults' continued sanity), find her stash.
It just came to me that the pet-style animals in the household now outnumber the humans. 2 dogs, 2 cats, 2 birds vs 5 bipeds. Thank god for opposable thumbs. Still, if they ever figure out basic mathematics we might be in for some trouble. If you ever come to the site and the entries are all "woof grrr woof" (and badly spelled) please send Snausages.
Posted by: Jim at
02:40 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 215 words, total size 1 kb.
1
quibble just for fun: wouldn't the birds be bipeds too?
Posted by: frances at January 20, 2004 05:17 PM (DrNMU)
2
Technically yes, but who can count on a bird? Last mistake you'll ever make.
Posted by: Jim at January 20, 2004 05:53 PM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 19, 2004
Don't piss on the electric fence!
This is most impressive. Click on the picture to see the video.
(Hat tip Dopple-G)
POINTS: 1 point for the first person to name the source of this post's title. No searching, y'all.
Posted by: Jim at
01:59 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Dunno if i can answer this, but there was a ren and stimpy show dealing wth it. though it was don't whiz on the electric fence.
Since i'm not a blogger, give my point to Helen as congrats for getting the job.
Posted by: tommy at January 19, 2004 02:06 PM (Vdwm7)
2
That's the one, Tommy. Yup, I misquoted. Ah well, all's fare in love and blogdom.
1 point for Helen in giftage from Tommy. Congrats, H!
Posted by: Jim at January 19, 2004 02:33 PM (IOwam)
Posted by: Helen at January 19, 2004 02:48 PM (ulwvb)
Posted by: tommy at January 19, 2004 10:49 PM (Vdwm7)
Posted by: pylorns at January 20, 2004 12:24 AM (fD1hc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
One for the PETAphiles
I almost feel guilty for how much time I've wasted on
this little game but how often do you get to fulfill a fantasy like this?
My top score was 320.5. Dopple-G got a 323 but that's probably only because he's a natural animal abuser.
(Hat tip Dopple-G)
UPDATE: Bad news, folks. It looks like it got pulled from the site. Too bad as it was a great one. You were a Yeti and these penguins jumped off a cliff toward you and you wacked 'em with a club to send them flying for distance. Oh, it was good.
UPDATE2: Bow down and worship at Helen's feet for she has given me another link to the game and this one still works!
Posted by: Jim at
01:58 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 130 words, total size 1 kb.
1
356!LO-OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOserrrrrrrrrrs!
Posted by: LW at January 19, 2004 02:15 PM (fkewd)
Posted by: Jim at January 19, 2004 02:18 PM (IOwam)
3
Ok I'm addicted (doesn't take much)
311 was my top score. With alot of zero's in between.
Posted by: Tiffani at January 19, 2004 03:16 PM (0i1dP)
4
Awwww shucks - I didn't get to beat any animals...
Posted by: Clancy at January 19, 2004 08:27 PM (pvWt0)
5
Y'all need to go back for batting practice! My high was 593.5!!! My average was around 400 feet. The more consistently you hit, the farther they fly. Line drives skip and slide and go longer. And holding the left click now seems to help (or maybe that was the consistency - I can't tell)
Posted by: Clancy at January 20, 2004 12:01 PM (EGVPL)
6
dammit....
I got 593 twice, but just can't seem to beat your 593.5. You must have been at it for a while.......
Posted by: Cpt.Dysentery at January 20, 2004 01:56 PM (Rr/GV)
7
Oh, this is different now. My very first shot was 587.1. Let's see how far I can wack that sucker...
Posted by: Jim at January 20, 2004 03:21 PM (IOwam)
8
I'm topped out at 593 too. What's worse, I think I'm starting to hear penguins crying.
Posted by: Jim at January 20, 2004 06:00 PM (fkewd)
9
I topped out at 498. I don't usually go for the evil animal beating things but THAT was funny!
Posted by: Suz~ at January 20, 2004 09:10 PM (bYATc)
10
492 first try... and I'm a girl and all that.
Posted by: LeeAnn at January 21, 2004 12:22 AM (HxCeX)
11
1224.1.
Assuming that
this is the same game.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 26, 2004 03:02 AM (jtW2s)
12
Nope - there are at least three different versions of the game. Version one maxes out at around 300 feet, version two at about 600, and version three around 1200.
Version three is much more fun
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 26, 2004 04:26 AM (jtW2s)
13
Oh, and I've snarfed copies of versions one and three, and I can put them up on mu.nu if anyone gets desperate.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 26, 2004 04:28 AM (jtW2s)
14
this is the worlds greatest game!!! 593.5
Posted by: Jared Gilpin at March 05, 2004 01:02 PM (PJm/L)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
77kb generated in CPU 0.0509, elapsed 0.1344 seconds.
102 queries taking 0.0989 seconds, 347 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
