November 19, 2003
Immuniticity
Time to vote for the
second immunity challenge in Blogosphere Survivor. Can you guess which one is mine this time?
Posted by: Jim at
11:11 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Jeff at November 19, 2003 07:16 PM (2h/My)
2
Care to guess aloud? You're allowed to, I'm just not allowed to confirm/deny.
Posted by: Jim at November 19, 2003 09:16 PM (fkewd)
3
I think yours is Number 2. But I'm not sure.
Posted by: Anonyme at November 19, 2003 09:46 PM (2h/My)
4
Excellent guess! You are either very clever or you are not. I'll let you know around 9:00.
Posted by: Jim at November 20, 2003 04:06 AM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Hunting Todd
Terry repositioned himself, angling for a clear view of the doorway. It wouldn't be long before his target walked through it. He checked the position of the setting sun. Yes, just a few minutes. About fifteen, to be precise.
Terry knew his target, Todd McCallum, almost better than he knew himself and he knew that tonight McCallum would be coming through that door alone. Months of study and preparation would be paid off tonight. The countless hours invested in studying his prey during the dark hours of the night would soon be redeemed. Tonight would be the night, he was sure of it. He settled down as flat as he could make himself and stared at the doorway through eager eyes.
Terry could have taken McCallum long ago if he had been free to act according to his own designs but there were so many rules that he had to follow. No witnesses. No evidence. It had to be done in this location. He had to strike from this position. So many damned rules but what was the use in complaining? It wasn't always easy being an M.U.B. but it would certainly be rewarding tonight, now that everything was coming together. He turned his head and checked the sun again. Ten minutes, give or take. He grinned ferally and ran his tongue over his lips. Oh, this was going to be sweet.
McCallum had established a pattern, something very dangerous for someone in his position. He had an escort every other night but for the past three weeks he'd been alone when he came through that door on Saturday evenings. Terry couldn't do anything at all when one of McCallum's bodyguards was present. That's why tonight's strike was so important. It wasn't like he'd be able to continue this hunt indefinitely. Eventually somebody was going to cop to his hiding place (the one mandated by the damned M.U.B. rules!) and then he would be up Shit Creek. He glanced at the sunset again. Any minute now. Any minute.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
10:19 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 2269 words, total size 12 kb.
Posted by: ilyka at November 19, 2003 12:49 PM (ylgwU)
2
I think that "Yummy Todd" is my favorite ending. But I'm a sicko so you have to take that into consideration.
Posted by: Jim at November 19, 2003 01:04 PM (IOwam)
3
I'm partial to #3 myself
Posted by: Susie at November 19, 2003 03:17 PM (0+cMc)
4
Bravo! That was excellent!! (And I like #3 - but then again I'm a sucker for stories with a moral)
Posted by: Clancy at November 19, 2003 03:48 PM (EGVPL)
5
Monster Under Bed... Outstanding... I like the multiple endings.
Posted by: The Bartender at November 20, 2003 12:09 PM (elANl)
6
Okay, so now I'm really scared of monsters. My preference is ending # 3...of course if it was anyone else's name # 2 is much more fun!
Posted by: Todd McCallum at March 11, 2004 04:35 PM (yAje4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
In the tradition of Calvin...
Piss on 'em, Helen.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
08:29 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sorry my graphics skills are so piss poor (pun intended).
Posted by: Jim at November 19, 2003 08:33 AM (IOwam)
Posted by: Helen at November 19, 2003 08:52 AM (4tEWI)
3
You go, Luuk. I'll do the same, but I'm not going to post it.
Posted by: Simon at November 19, 2003 09:01 PM (FUPxT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Company X Blows Fat Monkeys
The news is in and it's not of the happy variety. Our Everyday Stranger
has been cut in a round of layoffs by Company X. Go visit Helen and leave some love.
Makes me glad that I don't have a phone from a certain large Swedish telecomunications company.
Posted by: Jim at
07:24 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I thought they were Finnish?
Posted by: Rob at November 19, 2003 07:37 AM (kXZI6)
2
oh ... the other one ... doh!
*hangs head and goes and sits in the corner for "special" bloggers*
Posted by: Rob at November 19, 2003 07:40 AM (kXZI6)
3
I just had a visit to my site from someone at Company X and realizing that it was probably Helen cleaning out her desk, that I'd never see that domain name in the logs again, made me bawl like a baby.
Do you suppose there is something we could do for her?
Posted by: ilyka at November 19, 2003 07:42 AM (ylgwU)
4
They'll be Finnish soon if they keep running things the way they are now. I swear this was the most unholy layoff scheme I've ever seen used by a company. Talk about morale destruction. Even Kodak handled things better and they're notorious for how badly they handle layoffs.
I don't know that there's much we can do at the moment. Try to get her to smile if you can. I'm working on something right now (Luuk related) that I was hoping to have already finished but can't seem to get the time to get done, dammit.
Posted by: Jim at November 19, 2003 07:47 AM (IOwam)
5
It was Helen stopping by, and loving you guys for noting down the correct Company X and for giving me support.
I am still using the corporate dial-in for the next week, and will until I get my own internet stuff set up at home. I am going in late tonight to clean out my desk-I can't handle doing it with anyone around.
In the meantime, I am searching on line like mad for jobs, and am a flood of tears. I am sorry to be such a downer, but that's the way it is.
Gotta' go. Tears again.
Posted by: Helen at November 19, 2003 08:20 AM (4tEWI)
6
The boycott has begun. Jim, you got it 100% right - I've never seen such a poorly handled layoff, and I've been through 3 rounds.
I will make sure everytime I see a Hong Konger with said Viking company's phone, I will explain why they must immediately change it.
Posted by: Simon at November 19, 2003 08:59 PM (FUPxT)
7
So, it's something called Viking and not Nextel?
Good.
I guess I don't have to smash my cell phone then, do I?
I was gonna....
Posted by: Stevie at November 20, 2003 05:38 PM (pm3Vg)
8
Nay. Neither Viking nor Nextel. He meant "Viking company" as in company from where the Vikings lived.
Posted by: Jim at November 20, 2003 06:53 PM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Fisking Fithian
Ilyka has a
fantastic post that uncovers the grubs and worms crawling behind the protests of the international trade talks in Miami. Fithian? She's a worm. The New York Times? Definitely a grub.
Posted by: Jim at
04:35 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hey, thank you!
You know, I did not mean to fisk. I
never set out to fisk. It's been done a thousand times, and better . . . but that one just sort of happened.
I'm still cracking up at Helen's comment about Fithian still having to "find time to get that bikini wax," particularly as, if the picture's anything to go by, the woman's probably never had one of those in her life.
Yeah, that was a cheap shot. Oh well.
Posted by: ilyka at November 19, 2003 05:02 AM (ylgwU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thatsa lotta Carnie
The 61st edition of the
Carnival of the Vanities is waiting for you over at Peaktalk. It's big. Spooky big.
I wonder how large this thing is going to be by the time I'm hosting it...
Posted by: Jim at
03:45 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
1
See, that's why I'm not ever gonna host it. I'd lose my mind trying to organize all that and it'd never fit into one post on journalspace (my Fithian post needed serious pruning to escape becoming a two-parter as it was).
But I like the way Peaktalk's organized this one. No one category is overstuffed. Very nice!
Posted by: ilyka at November 19, 2003 05:15 AM (ylgwU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 18, 2003
Sick of Survivor Yet?
Then shame on you! We're just getting into the good stuff now. But still, there are other worthies out there that can complement our battle to the death.
Nick Queen over at Patriot Paradox is organizing a Blog Tournament. Currently the tourney needs both contestants and judges. This contest runs in a two week cycle so even if you don't get into the first edition it shouldn't be long before you're playing.
I wouldn't recommend playing in two contests at the same time, which is why I've volunteered to help with judging but won't be competing until after Dec 03. The rest of my island friends will have relatively shorter times to wait before being able to join the Patriot Paradox tournament without conflicts. Jeff, you can go ahead and sign up now.
Posted by: Jim at
07:04 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 141 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Dreams are nice, aren't they?
Posted by: LeeAnn at November 18, 2003 07:50 PM (HxCeX)
2
Well, what happens when I win immunity?
Posted by: Jeff at November 19, 2003 01:25 AM (eZyB3)
3
You won't have to worry about that, Jeff. Even the cabal of demi-lizardoid minions will be voting for my entry this week. It's that good.
Posted by: Jim at November 19, 2003 03:37 AM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A Short Hot Love Letter
I shall seek and find you...
I shall take you to bed and control you...
I will make you ache, shake and sweat until you grunt and groan...
I will make you beg for mercy...
I will exhaust you to the point that you will be relieved when I leave you...
You will be weak for days after I am gone.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
01:53 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I was getting so worked up too.....damn.....
Posted by: MiMo at November 18, 2003 10:05 PM (JIgXp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Luuk has left the building
I've just received word that Luuk, the
Everyday Bear, has left the Peacock household and is on his way to his next
Angry destination. Lovely Wife saw him off after giving him a quick Scotchguard treatment. (Hey, Don is his next stop. Safety first.)
We got a bunch more pictures of Luuk in the past couple days and I'll get those up as soon as I can.
Posted by: Jim at
11:16 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Can't wait to see the pics. I get Luuk after a while (after his visit with JimiLove), and I need to start planning and rule out any cool Atlanta places you may have covered.
Posted by: Joey at November 18, 2003 08:42 PM (Jq6q/)
2
Shouldn't be too hard, Joey. After all, we've got more cool places than you can shake a stick at.
Posted by: Jim at November 19, 2003 03:49 AM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Jim Gets Offensive
I'm going to offend some people with this post. I'll probably get some hate mail and some harsh comments and may even lose some regular readers. That sucks but it's also the way of the world. If you have an opinion there are going to be people who disagree with it. If you can state it in an obsequious manner you'll probably do okay. People will line up to defend a timid speaker. Be nice, they'll say. He's wrong but it's because he's confused. Explain it to him in simple terms and you'll see that he's not truly evil. If, however, you happen to be the sort of person who states his opinion in a raw and coldhearted fashion then you'll piss off many folks. Even some who might ordinarily support your position. Can you guess which one I am? Let's begin:
Midgets Need To Get Their Heads Out of Their Asses
I saw a special presentation about an operation that little people(TM) can undergo in order to get taller. It involves implanting an external metal brace into the long bones of the legs. The bones are broken and separated. The bracing is then continuously lengthened. The healing process of the broken bones causes them to grow towards each other. As the gap of the break is consistently maintained the effect is a gradual lengthening of the legs.
It's painful. It takes a long time. It's good for only a couple of inches. There are many post-procedure problems including weakened bones, arthritis, bone and muscle pain. Sense of balance is seriously compromised and the patient is clumsy and awkward for quite some time.
One of the patients who was interviewed told of all of these problems but dismissed them as negligible. You see, he can now do things like drive an unmodified car. He can ride on a roller coaster. He uses the cupboards at his apartment. In fact his only regret about having the procedure is that he is now an outcast from his community. You see, those jokes on Seinfeld about little people(tm) "heightening" weren't jokes. It really is viewed as a serious breach of etiquette to wear tall shoes or otherwise compensate for (lack of) height. Having this operation makes a little person an outcast from the little person community.
This leads to an obvious question which I will direct to the little community at large:
How do you get such an oversized head so firmly implanted in your anal sphincter? Come the fuck on! It's a birth defect. It is not normal to be a midget/dwarf/little fellow. It is neither amoral or foolish for somebody with a birth defect to use devices and procedures to overcome that defect. Should somebody born with one arm forgo a prosthetic one? If I had a procedure that cured Downs Syndrome do you think that all of the Downs' afflicted out there would rally to attack a person who went through that procedure because they wanted to be normal?
YOU ARE NOT NORMAL. Get it through your skulls. I'm not saying that you should be ashamed of being small. I'm saying that you shouldn't be carrying around a chip on your vertically challenged shoulder because of it. It's a birth defect, a freak happening of nature, one of the more common of literally thousands of documented and understood genetic mishaps. It should not be either a badge of honor or a Sysephean burden.
If you have a chance to correct it then do so! And if you are so wrapped up in a communal pity party that you can't bear the thought of fixing what's wrong with you then at least have the fucking courtesy to support somebody with the courage to do so himself. The way that guy was treated, the exposure of the intollerance and antagonism in the little community, was sickening. He showed bravery and courage, going through a painful procedure in order to make his life better, already knowing that his friends would turn on him. He didn't deserve the way he was treated and to be quite frank those "friends" certainly didn't deserve him.
Fire away.
UPDATE: I wrote this quite a while ago and never posted it. Generally I try not to post things when I'm pissed about the subject. A decent rant is fine but when I'm very irritated I tend to get more insulting than descriptive so a "Jim is pissed" post generally won't do anything constructive. I figured that I would let it sit and revisit it, edit it in a calm voice and then post it. It ended up getting lost and forgotten until yesterday. I looked it over with the intent of editing out the more inflammatory insults and profanity but have decided to present it as-is instead. It's not as overwhelmingly antagonistic as I thought when I first wrote it and the anger the subject raised in me back then has been fairly well rekindled by rereading it.
Posted by: Jim at
10:09 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 836 words, total size 5 kb.
1
The way that guy was treated, the exposure of the intollerance and antagonism in the little community, was sickening.
You probably don't want to hear this from me, as I'm known for being, ah, comfortably reconciled to my own anger levels, but just personally, it's those things that sicken you that are truly worth becoming angry about.
I have read that a similar phenomenon exists among some deaf people, and that they can be just as vicious to those among them who seek treatments that may help them to hear.
That's just wrong.
I say be angry, be insulting. But I realize that'd probably mean more to you if a more sweet-natured person like Helen said it, so I'll shut up--we could all pretty much bank on my support, right?
Posted by: ilyka at November 18, 2003 10:32 AM (wYiIK)
2
Oh, Ilyka. You're a sweetheart and we all know it. ;-)
And it's good having your support no matter what people expect.
I had heard something about the deaf rejection of hearing aids as well but it was just an isolated thing or two (a court case of a child suing his parents who had forbidden cochlear implants comes to mind). I've no idea how widespread such behavior might be with the hearing impaired.
Posted by: Jim at November 18, 2003 10:47 AM (IOwam)
3
Me? I'm sweet-natured? Really?
Damn. I had no idea. And all this time I thought I was a shoo-in for "Meanest Female Blogger" (at http://bloggerpolls.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_bloggerpolls_archive.html#106884865105801529)
Posted by: Helen at November 18, 2003 10:49 AM (tdh2z)
4
I can comment on the hearing impaired thing (because I am, actually, hearing impaired). Cochlear implants are rejected by most deaf communities, but hearing aids are ok. By the way, there is a massive debate on if people are "deaf" or "hearing impaired". Say it to the wrong group, and you are toast. Personally, I don't care which term you use. I think there are more important things in life to get wound up about.
Posted by: Helen at November 18, 2003 10:50 AM (tdh2z)
5
I don't have enough knowledge of the subject to comment intelligently but that's never stopped me before, so:
Aren't cochlear implants basically for people with such hearing problems that more conventional aids can't really help them? So that particular stigma would prevent corrective action only on the people who need it the most. That seems pretty coldblooded and even hypocritical - sort of an
"I've got some hearing loss and can use an aid. You're deaf but if you get an implanted aid then I'll be pissed at you." Unless I'm wrong. Which happens more frequently that you probably imagine.
And yes, Helen, you're a sweetie too.
Posted by: Jim at November 18, 2003 11:10 AM (IOwam)
6
Hmm, I work with a midget, I should ask him. Incidently, he and his midget wife just had a kid.. wonder if thier kid will be a midget kid? And also, I should find out if he likes to be tossed. I could use a good bout of midget tossing(in the picking them up and throwing sense, not the sexual sense).
Posted by: pylorns at November 18, 2003 12:17 PM (mkbJL)
7
Here I was all set to say something serious and then pylorns starts babbling about tossing midgets.
Oh well. Re: deaf people being against treatment, yeah,
there are some. Excerpt from the main page:
The culturally Deaf person does not want to be able to hear normally, by medical intervention or other means.
Personally, I think that's wack, but it's ultimately fine with me--or would be, did I not suspect that at least a few of the culturally deaf are belittling the traitors who DO want to be able to hear normally.
Say it to the wrong group, and you are toast.
I hate things like that. People make mistakes. It's not always easy to tell what the preferred terminology is for a given subculture.
Posted by: ilyka at November 18, 2003 12:33 PM (wYiIK)
8
Say it to the wrong group, and you are toast.
But it really doesn't matter, because they can't hear you anyway.....
.
.
.
.
Oh, come on... you know that was funny.
I'm going to hell.....
Posted by: Mike the Marine at November 18, 2003 12:37 PM (IOX+E)
9
The culturally Deaf person does not want to be able to hear normally, by medical intervention or other means.
Sounds sort of like the Angry Left.
Wait for me, Mike!
Posted by: Jim at November 18, 2003 12:44 PM (IOwam)
10
I keep coming back to the "Culturally Deaf". I can understand a desire to be comfortable as you are. I really cannot comprehend a desire to intentionally restrict your growth though.
I can picture weighing benefits against possible problems (any surgery has possible complications) and determining that something like an implant is not worth the danger. I can't imagine a weighing factor in that decision being the desire to retain a debilitating physical defect.
Posted by: Jim at November 18, 2003 12:58 PM (IOwam)
11
Mike, I always honk when I drive through a "deaf" area, you know those signs that say "slow deaf child at play"
Posted by: pylorns at November 18, 2003 01:39 PM (mkbJL)
12
Being castigated for attempting to overcome a birth defect is, as Jim so rantingly wrote, stupid. Do dyslexics harp on their buddies who get help to overcome their issues? Do speech impaired people (of which I was one for a few years, who knew there were other letters besides R?) lisp angrily at those that seek help?
Some may consider it a badge of honor or whatever but there's no way they can justifiably set their norms on other little people, just like I can't hold others to my own morals, the game just doesn't work that way.
And if it did then I'd be blind because I wouldn't be able to wear contacts or glasses, and I'd have likely broken my nose a few times by now from walking into things (which reminds me of a bad joke that I'll pass on for now).
Good rant, Jim! Keep 'em coming!
Posted by: Johnny Huh at November 18, 2003 02:44 PM (YkElu)
13
Oh, come on... you know that was funny.
So much so that I'm pissed I didn't think of it first.
Posted by: ilyka at November 19, 2003 05:18 AM (ylgwU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
What should Anger Management's new slogan be?
The
second challenge for Blog Survivor is to come up with a slogan that will appear on forthcoming
Anger Management T-shirts. This is a delicious opportunity for a warped and evil person such as myself. Here's a couple I came up with off the top of my head:
- Sucking up to Frank J since January, 2003.
- Adventures with my objectionist mangina.
- Almost but not quite completely unlike a weblog.
Actually, that last one can go a lot of different ways. Sub out "a weblog" and insert "humor" or "entertainment". You see where I'm going here.
Oh, I feel like a kid in a candy store.
Posted by: Jim at
07:41 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.
1
DAMN YOU!
you come up with three giveaway slogans, and I have sweet F.A. so far. Seriously, not a single idea. I cannot think of a damn thing (truthfully, all I can think about is Judgment Day).
I'll get you, Peacock!
Posted by: Helen at November 18, 2003 07:49 AM (tdh2z)
2
Just let your inner evil come to the surface. Think of Don, think of what makes him the warped guy we all know and tolerate and just give it a twist. Something like:
Donism: Don's got a problem getting laid.
Twisted: Anger Management: A Celebration of Involuntary Celibacy
Posted by: Jim at November 18, 2003 08:14 AM (IOwam)
3
Damn again!
That celibacy one would've been perfect.
My brain hurts.
Posted by: Helen at November 18, 2003 09:46 AM (tdh2z)
4
Ok time for some bad ones...
Angermanagement: God created the Earth in 6 days, on the 7th he rested, on the 151st, he realized he made a mistake when he came across this blog...
Anger Management: Hey Sailor!
Posted by: pylorns at November 18, 2003 10:04 AM (mkbJL)
5
Pylorns, you made me spit Fanta all over my screen.
"Hey Sailor" kicked a clown's ass. And that's a good thing.
Thanks, I needed a laugh.
Posted by: Helen at November 18, 2003 10:27 AM (tdh2z)
6
lol... damn, i should try to NOT be funny more often...
Posted by: pylorns at November 18, 2003 12:01 PM (mkbJL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
If I only knew then what I don't know now...
Kelley is wondering
what stuff you believed as a kid that you can laugh about now.
I had a particularly voracious monster under the bed. It wasn't good enough to keep hands and feet away from the edge. All body parts had to be protected by the Blanket of Monster Repelling or it was all over. You had approximately 5 seconds to get covered (after jumping the last 3 feet into the bed) before he would attack. I didn't have a closet monster though. The bed monster probably ate him.
I had a stair monster too. The steps to the basement were open (no backs on the steps). If you were too slow getting up the stairs he would grab your ankles. One of the most terrifying moments of my childhood was when I was tearing ass up these stairs and slipped. I smashed my shin on the wooden step so hard that I couldn't even scream, it hurt so badly. I was stuck, unable to move, just waiting for the monster to grab me. Eventually I was able to crawl up to the landing where I sat huddled in a fetal position until I could stand up again. To this day I don't know what saved me back then. Either he was asleep on his watch or just assumed I'd trucked all the way up like I usually did. I'm sure that if I'd actually been able to cry at the pain he would have been alerted and then he would have got me.
Posted by: Jim at
06:47 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 275 words, total size 1 kb.
1
When I was 12 I was reading King's "It" in bed, with a flashlight, when I was supposed to be asleep. At one point, I had to pee, but couldn't turn on the light lest my parents cotton on to the fact I was awake. So I ran to the toilet and came back, lights off.
Now, the walk to the bed is a scary walk. You had to take a running jump and fly onto the bed, lest some hand reach out from beneath the bed and get your ankle. I was seriously freaked out about "It" (story of an evil alien clown living in the sewers), but I decided to be brave. I walked to the bed...walked...
...and just as I got to the bed, a hand reached out and grabbed my ankle. I screamed (and luckily narrowly avoided wetting my pants, since I had just been to the toilet) as my Dad crawled out from under the bed, laughing his ass off at teaching me a lesson.
Yup. I will be discussing his behaviour on Oprah someday when I am rich and famous, dabbing at my eyes and using the term "scarred for life."
Posted by: Helen at November 18, 2003 07:53 AM (tdh2z)
2
Oh Lordy! I'm almost wetting my pants right now, Helen. Oh, man, that's delicious.
Posted by: Jim at November 18, 2003 08:09 AM (IOwam)
3
I had the typical monster fears, but I also had the misfortune of beng extremely gullible and technologically challenged.
My mother was very creative and very bored with watching kids. She told my sister and me we could dig through the earth and end up in China and gave us both spoons. We dug for three days, taking turns sticking our heads in the hole to see if we could see any Chinese feet yet walking on the other side of the world. She didn't stop us until we were inches from getting under the house foundation.
I also thought that the tall radio towers with red lights going up them at intervals had cars on them driving up one side and down the other. I lived in fear that my Dad would take that exit!
Posted by: Oda Mae at November 19, 2003 12:58 AM (/g+U8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Buy Nothing Day?
What the hell is
Buy Nothing Day? Apparently it's supposed to be some sort of statement against American consumerism. This is a participatory project (which strangely enough started in the Pacific Northwest, who woulda thunk it) for people who think that capitalism will be the doom of America.
Ummm...
Right.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
05:12 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 391 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Yeah, you know what, the Two Towers extended version comes out today, so they can take their hippie "capitalism is wrong" bent and stuff it. That news makes me feel great, that not only have I a great movie, but I stuck it to a communistic ideal as well. Thanks Jim.
Posted by: tommy at November 18, 2003 02:46 PM (swr9s)
2
Bollocks, i should have read the day. Ahhh well, i will go out and buy something on the 28th then. Maybe i'll get that Reagan biography i've been looking at.
Tommy
"We begin bombing in five minutes."
Posted by: tommy at November 18, 2003 02:49 PM (swr9s)
3
Underestimation is a two-way street.
Posted by: Shimura Haru
at February 27, 2004 05:27 PM (hjEJO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Hypothetically speaking...
Say that you're in a meeting with your team (programmers, production guy, product manager and boss). Further, say that you are sitting across from and just a bit over from the boss. Let's also say that she has one too many buttons undone on her blouse. And it's obvious she does not have a clue that said button is open. She's also got a lacy black little half bra thing going on and depending on which way she is facing and how she is sitting you can see nipple.
Do you stare? How openly? Is it bad if you do a jaw dropped open full-on ogle for several minutes, during which time you are aparently brain dead and slowly, one by one, the people in the meeting each realize that you are occularly linked to the boss's boobages? How bad is it when the boss herself realizes that you are visually molesting her and calls your name several times before you respond?
Finally, if at the completion of the meeting the boss stands up and it turns out that she was wearing some black leotard thing under her blouse and anything else that you thought you saw was just your own very overactive imagination, should that cancel out any asshole points that you've accumulated or does it simply mean that you are pathetic?
This is all just hypothetically speaking of course...
Posted by: Jim at
04:25 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 1 kb.
1
See?--This is why it's such a good thing we don't all stay home, barefoot, and pregnant. A workplace without accidental boobage is a sad, sad place.
Posted by: ilyka at November 18, 2003 07:29 AM (wYiIK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 17, 2003
The Sound of Silence
Nothing much coming from here today. I'm busier than a Bangkok whore with the 6th fleet in port. I'll give you a teaser though. Another short story is percolating through my gray matter. What will it be? Horror, Sci-Fi, Fantasy? Maybe some more porn? Find out tomorrow, or whenever it's finished brewing. The biggest problem with it right now is there are 3 endings and I can't pick which one I like best. Maybe I'll give you all three.
Oh, wait. I do have something quick to share. Captain Corelli's Mandolin was a decent movie destroyed by two things. The first was Nicolas Cage. Sorry, but he can never ever play a romantic lead. No matter what the character is supposed to portray you will never escape the image of Cage in Raising Arizona. And what was with that accent? He either got it from an intense one week session with a voice coach in the Bronx or from watching too many Olive Garden commercials. The second problem was the normally spectacular John Hurt who was almost but not quite completely unlike Roddy McDowell a Greek provincial doctor.
Posted by: Jim at
07:50 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 196 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ruined by 3 things: Penelope Cruz's armpit hair in their love-making scene. Gag.
Posted by: Helen at November 17, 2003 08:06 AM (tdh2z)
2
Hello darkness, my old friend,
I've come to talk with you again,
Because a vision softly creeping,
Left its seeds while I was sleeping,
And the vision that was planted in my brain
Still remains
Within the sound of silence. ....
Posted by: pylorns at November 17, 2003 10:47 AM (06ggV)
3
Did I give you an earbug, Pylorns? hehe
The armpit hair was outweighed by her nipples. Finest nipples in modern cinema, I tell you what.
Posted by: Jim at November 17, 2003 12:33 PM (IOwam)
4
To be technically correct that would be a "Bangkok whore with the
7th fleet in port.
Posted by: phillip at November 18, 2003 07:02 AM (1hRqD)
Posted by: Jim at November 18, 2003 07:46 AM (IOwam)
6
There are no weird people - some just require more understanding.
Posted by: Olsky Charles
at January 20, 2004 03:54 AM (4jehc)
7
the armpit hair was the best thing in the film.
Posted by: milou at February 09, 2004 07:42 PM (S1nA7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 16, 2003
"H" is for Happy Medium
The
Letter of the Day is was
"H"
"H" is for Happy Medium. Not the "pleasant muse" type, we're talking the state you need to attain before you can successfully spend 3 hours in a car with somebody who has radically different musical taste.
Posted by: Jim at
08:23 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
Color me Snarky
Wander over to Venomous Kate's
Snarkfest for the best of all things snarkish.
Oh what savage delight grips these unworthy bones at perusal of such delicious vitriol.
Posted by: Jim at
08:06 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
November 14, 2003
76kb generated in CPU 0.1393, elapsed 0.2445 seconds.
101 queries taking 0.202 seconds, 326 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.