May 18, 2004
Follow the leader: Israel knows how to handle things.
You know that fence that Israel is building? The one that a certain [*cough* Arab *cough*] segment of the world population keeps crying about? The one that Israel says will save the lives of its civilians from Palestinian explodikazis but its detractors [*cough* United Nations *cough*] say is some sort of land grab? Yeah, that one.
Turns out it's working really well.
Which begs the question - would Israel be willing to help us to engineer a fence for Falluja?
(Hat tip to Meryl Yourish)
Posted by: Jim at
02:03 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 96 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ah, but YOU have "show comments", which pop up on the same page! You get a dispensation for that....

(Though I STILL hate having to go back again after I've commented....)
Posted by: Susie at May 18, 2004 03:05 PM (SmnTx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Survivor News
The
Survivor site got a new facelift. Hell, it got whole-body cosmetic surgery including liposuction and all the botox that would fit.
The prize list is growing. Currently the winner will receive:
- ($250) Hosting and design package from Amscray Hosting
- ($70) Site design/redesign from pixelscripts.net
- ($15) Gift certificate to Amazon from Wetwired
- ($15) One month Blogads advertisement at ZeroIntelligence.net
$350 in prizes, and counting. If you want to be a player you need to email Pylorns to let him know. The only qualification is that you have an existing weblog.
Posted by: Jim at
12:24 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
Questioning Nick Berg
UPDATED: 18 May 2004
UPDATED: 17 May 2004
UPDATED: 16 May 2004
Comments have been closed.
My point has been made and I have no desire to keep dwelling on this particular horror. All of the crap being bandied about can be explained in reasonable terms without any conspiracy theory foolishness necessary.
If you have something that you believe proves something weird or odd or whatever other euphemism you choose to use then apply Occam's Razor to your supposition. If you cannot come up with a simple reason for whatever it is then contact the New York Times or a therapist. One or the other will be able to help you.
Sorry if this offends but I'm finding the continued curiosity to be somewhat macabre and disturbing and I want no part of it.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
10:35 AM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 2085 words, total size 13 kb.
1
I have a question!
Who is that Paul guy over at Wizbang!, and how can I persuade Kevin to drop him as a contributor?
Reading that comment thread turned my stomach.
Regarding the contractor thing: I've known a couple guys like Nick Berg. They were the kinds of guys who went to Alaska without jobs after the Valdez and figured they'd make a killing either helping to clean it up, or providing services to the cleaner-uppers . . . the kinds of guys who just carpe diem on stuff like that, who dive right in. The guys everyone else thinks are crazy.
But there was more about his day-to-day habits and work stuff in the Telegraph piece Meryl linked last night (second post, link reads "news you're not getting"). If you haven't already, you may want to check it out.
Posted by: ilyka at May 14, 2004 11:40 AM (T8/Db)
2
Fantastic article. Can't believe I missed that one. I've got to slow down a little bit.
Posted by: Jim at May 14, 2004 01:07 PM (IOwam)
3
He was released after his family filed a lawsuit in the US saying he was being held illegally by American forces.
Is it not equally "moon bat" to believe the implications of this paragraph, taken from The Telegraph story?
Posted by: Venomous Kate at May 14, 2004 02:41 PM (YvEJI)
4
Yup. Answered it in the post, Kate.
Posted by: Jim at May 14, 2004 02:56 PM (IOwam)
5
Interesting comments. Only thing I would quibble with is "He was a Jew and his passport reflected that."
Yes, indeed, he was Jewish, but American passports don't indicate the bearer's religion. And lots of American Christians would have Israeli stamps on their passports (even ones who don't support Israel only because they think it will bring about the End of Days).
Posted by: adamg at May 14, 2004 03:06 PM (rGKuR)
6
Hey, to throw another link at you (but for pity's sake don't feel obligated to update this! I'm not trying to be a pest, it just comes naturally!), I noticed Judith Weiss has a whole collection of them in this post:
http://www.hfienberg.com/kesher/2004_05_09_kesher_archive.html#108437293586794858
Contrary to the "and he was carrying anti-Semitic literature" line, one of the links claims he was actually becoming a more observant Jew.
I haven't finished reading them all yet myself. Just FYI for you and anyone else who may be interested.
Posted by: ilyka at May 14, 2004 05:07 PM (BSlpz)
7
Why do you think the video was edited exactly at the point where the figure in the middle was about to slash Nick Berg's throat?
Why do we hear what appeared to be a woman's scream several seconds before this gruesome act took place?
Did you notice the body language of the figure on the right of the screen? At one point, he has his finger "off" the trigger, which reminded me of the picture of Elian Gonzalez when the feds came in to get him. (just observing... not attempting to form a "moonbat" theory)
Nick claimed that he could build a computer from cardboard and wires. He also stated in emails that he had setup an email account for a relative by marriage in Iraq during his time there. Why would he not setup a free account for Moussaoui? Why would he allowed unfettered access by a person he has just met?
If the government had cleared Berg of any involvement (excepting a chance meeting) with Moussouai, why did they visit the Berg family residence 3 times during his confinement in Mosul?
Posted by: More Questions at May 15, 2004 07:34 PM (5VL9k)
8
I've answered
More Questions in a post update.
Posted by: Jim at May 16, 2004 08:30 AM (saeHM)
9
"I can very easily see letting somebody borrow my laptop if they asked to check their Hotmail account"
Agreed, but would you give that person the password to your own account? Or as you've stated, you would allow them access to check their *own* account. (or set one up for them)
If you recall, it was the password that was the important key element here.
Re: the video editing... Jim, if you can stomach it, watch it again. At the precise moment after they pushed Nick to the floor, the video is edited and the clock on the right side of the screen changes time. There may be an explanation for this, but it seems that the video was at the same location, running continously until this point. (4 plus minutes)
Sidenote: This was a horrific act of barbarity. My own personal feelings are that Nick had no idea what he had gotten himself into until the absolute last moments of his life. As we've read from news accounts, friends and family members, he was an adventurer and looked at forward to experiencing life to the fullest.
Posted by: More Questions at May 16, 2004 12:01 PM (5VL9k)
10
I explain the video clock (and "11 hour gap") questions
here, and make a good case that there were 2 cameras used during the filming.
Posted by: dorkafork at May 16, 2004 12:25 PM (d8Baf)
11
Sorry to be a pest Jim, but your explanation of Nick's scream is a stretch...
The scream begins as the hooded figure removes the knife. Nick was looking towards the camera and did not move until he was kneed to the ground. Unless there was a mirror that he was looking in, he had no way to realize the actions behind him.
Watch the video again. Until then, any comments on your part is purely conjecture and speculation. (with all due respect)
Posted by: More Questions at May 17, 2004 11:58 AM (5VL9k)
12
dorkafork... I appreciate the explanation, but the main problem I have with the video is the timing of the edit. The alleged first camera runs continuously for 4 plus minutes and then when it appears they are about to behead, the camera switches.
I just find it curious about the timing.
Again, this is a horrific act which Nick Berg did not deserve.
Posted by: More Questions at May 17, 2004 12:05 PM (5VL9k)
13
Who is going to bitch slap Michael Berg for whining and blaming everyone else for his son's misfortune. He's pathetic or maybe he is too intellectually challenged to realize that Iraq is a WAR ZONE!!!!!!
It really rubs me wrong to hear idiots complain about what everyone else is doing to them. Grow some balls Michael Berg....or just shut up. Your kid made a fatal decision.....deal with it.
Posted by: Kevin at May 17, 2004 12:38 PM (EhHfi)
14
Regarding the computer password, we just don't have the information on what happened during that meeting. Maybe Nick was overconfident with his security. Maybe he had a text file called "passwords" on his desktop (don't laugh - I was a network admin and I've seen it more than once). The only real inferential data we have is that the pros who investigate this stuff for a living cleared him of suspicion.
More Questions - The sound is ahead of the video so it could certainly be Nick's scream on audio before Nick reacts on the video. If it wasn't Nick then it could have been one of the murderers. They take quite a bit of pride in screaming.
About the last thing that it could be would be a woman screaming. These are Wahabi Islamites. Women are not permitted to see a goat get sacrificed; there's no way in the world they would let one see a beheading.
Posted by: Jim at May 17, 2004 12:43 PM (IOwam)
15
please someone bitch slap micheal berg...
Posted by: pylorns at May 17, 2004 01:44 PM (FTYER)
16
Man...let go of it.I have already enough nightmares about this shit WITHOUT that I EVER saw the video,read the whole news about it or know any of the juicy details everyone apears to be so proud about knowing them.I don't need to see this HERE where I generally go to get a good laugh about some kind of idiocy!!
Not nice JIM!
But besides all this....who gives a shit about whats all arround his death?I mean honestly,the way he got mocked is BAD.Period.No matter what else is behind it,fact it,he got butchered in DELIGHT.But now....everyone seems to enjoy watching this shit and bragging about it.Why the fuck would one volutairly turture himself and watch this??????
Man...thats just as SICK!
Sorry but....I am not going to take another look on Snoozebutton untill this crap has diapeared way,way,way into the archive!
Sorry.
Posted by: LW at May 17, 2004 04:51 PM (saeHM)
17
How can this be explained?
http://hellenes.iwarp.com/whats_new.files/image002.jpg
The following text is borrowed from hellenes.iwarp.com)
Look at the photograph above, which exists in the video of Nick Berg's
beheading. By mistake, in the right side you can see a person sitting with
his hands in the pockets (and an apparent belly) of a beige pair of pants,
wearing a khaki colored blouse, watching.
Posted by: sara at May 18, 2004 09:16 AM (fA0Uy)
18
First, I don't see anybody sitting with a belly and their hands in their pockets. Second, so what if there was somebody there? Does it really shock anybody that these animals would have spectators present?
Posted by: Jim at May 18, 2004 10:25 AM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 17, 2004
Do you love the sauce?
If alcohol is your passion, then clearly you are underage. Alcohol should be like an old friendly woman that you fuck. You know just how far you can go, just how much you can take, and sometimes, after spending too much time with her, you never want to see her again, but you always come back because it turns out you donÂ’t have anything else to do that night. ThereÂ’s no passion, just a nice mutual comfort. ThatÂ’s true commitment to alcohol, folks, so donÂ’t act like you love it unless you really do.
(Hat tip to Dopple-G)
Posted by: Jim at
04:29 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
Dusty is funnier than me
I couldn't believe it either but just
look at this stuff:
Last night I decided to have some signs printed up to hang above the urinals in public restrooms. They would read “What would you do if someone stole your wallet right now? Something to think about.”
I mean, it’s not like you’re going to turn around and give chase. Yeah, running full speed through a crowded bar with your wrinklebeast hanging out, spraying urine haphazardly on unsuspecting patrons while you yell “Someone grab that guy!”
ThatÂ’ll work.
Wrinklebeast. I could have thought of that! Damn, I feel so small now.
Posted by: Jim at
02:58 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
Bestofme Symphony, 24th Edition
The
24th Bestofme Symphony is up at Blown Fuse. Our host Tiffany takes us on a tour of the best in the Blogosphere and gets the cleaning up done too.
Hosting: Would you like to host the Symphony? Send me a note and I'll get you on the schedule.
Submit to the Symphony: Want to be a part of next week's edition? Check out this post for submission help. Entries should always be sent to bestofme@jpeacock.net regardless of who the Symphony host is.
Spread the word: Webloggers, how about some linky love? Tiffany would appreciate it and just think of how happy your readers would be if you gave them such a treat. Plus, there's a nice leg shot in the post just prior to the Symphony - you know your readers are going to be mad if they miss that.
Email Reminders: If you'd like to be sent a reminder about the Symphony, join the mailing list. There's one email sent on Thursday or Friday to remind you to submit for the next Symphony and one on Monday with the location of the newly posted Symphony.
Posted by: Jim at
08:34 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 195 words, total size 1 kb.
If it happened over the weekend I am totally clueless
Charter sucks. That's our cable company. If you're in the market for video on demand that cuts out constantly or high speed access that's as reliable as AOL was in the olden days then Charter is the company for you.
We lost our internet access on Friday. A call to tech support could not fix the problem - a service call to replace the cable modem was to be made on Saturday. Saturday came and went with no call from the friendly Charter technicians. We were at a graduation party for the latter half of the day so did not contact Charter about it again until Sunday.
Yesterday morning (bright and early riser that I am) I called Charter again. Where the hell was my new modem? Well sir, that service call was changed because when the trouble ticket was reviewed they noted a couple more things to try. But nobody called us to try them. Wankers.
Completely erasing the modem's configuration file and downloading a new one actually got the modem working again. I was happy.
Until noon. That's when the modem failed again. No more service. A call to Charter determined that a new modem really was needed but not to worry, it would be there before the end of the day. Do I really need to say what (didn't) happen next?
Okay, for the record then...no new cable modem arrived. Another call to Charter let me know that the service call bringing the new modem on Sunday was rescheduled to first thing Monday morning. Again nobody had called the customer. They rescheduled an appointment without telling one half of the people involved in said appointment.
This now qualifies them as fucknuts.
They are supposed to contact my Lovely Wife first thing this morning to arrange a time to bring the new modem. I am not holding my breath.
Fucking monopolies fucking suck.
Posted by: Jim at
08:26 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 335 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The local monopoly in cable modem here is a sham disguised as a trick. They look like they're giving you "options" by allowing you to maintain the same brand of internet you had before upgrading (Earthlink, etc.) but there's only one carrier. Time Warner.
My modem goes out promptly every day at around 1 and refuses to come back on until Scott gets home--thereby making me look like I'm a liar. I squeeze myself online in tiny pockets of connectivity.
You're right. Monopolies do suck.
Posted by: Tiffany at May 17, 2004 09:34 AM (rDyup)
2
Cable may be faster, but my dsl seems to be more reliable...maybe because there's a little competition in the phone business....(knocking on wood-look computer desk)...
Posted by: Susie at May 17, 2004 12:04 PM (cNkjH)
3
1) Good boy-calling them fucknuts. I love that term.
2) It SUCKS to be without internet access. It's a serious case of withdrawal.
3) Go broadband. Seriously. It's like finding religion.
4) Please repeat number 2 as often as possible.
Posted by: Helen at May 17, 2004 01:09 PM (WGc8u)
4
Tiffany - Put a towel over the modem. The problem is it can see when Scott's not in the house. Blind it and it'll function normally out of fear that its intransigence will be discovered.
Cable is fast, Susie. We're at 2 mbps (when it's working) but I would have taken dsl in a heartbeat. Problem is that it's not available for our area. Bastiches.
Repeat #2, Helen? Getting a bit scatological there? Hehehe.
Posted by: Jim at May 17, 2004 01:30 PM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 14, 2004
Bestofme Symphony Reminders
Get your submissions in for the next
Bestofme Symphony. Send them to
bestofme@jpeacock.net and they'll be in Monday's edition at
Blown Fuse.
Please note that the autoresponse you are used to receiving isnÂ’t working. The emails themselves are getting through, itÂ’s just not sending out the confirmations.
The only requirements are that you think the post is good and that it be at least 2 months old. It doesn't even have to be from your own blog. It just can't get any simpler!
The basics of the Bestofme Symphony.
Want to host a Symphony?
Get reminder emails.
Posted by: Jim at
02:28 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 103 words, total size 1 kb.
People look for the strangest things
Every once in a while I'll get curious about what people who find this site were looking for. I'll put on my rubber gloves and my thickest apron and check in the referral logs. Here, for your amusement, are some of the most recent search phrases that have brought people to Snooze Button Dreams. As always, my smarmy comments follow.
do you bite your thumb
No. And I stopped sucking on it months ago.
there's a party in my pants
Am I invited?
rape stories written by authors
I think that if it's written it sort of has to be by an author. Can you have a rape story written by a non-author?
more...
Posted by: Jim at
11:39 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 322 words, total size 2 kb.
Caveat emptor!
So, is £115.00 a lot to pay for an empty
X-Box box? The winner of that auction seems to think so:
never buy anything from this f**king w**ker £120 for a box
The seller has little sympathy for the careless bidder and, strangely enough, neither do I. May the buyer beware!
Posted by: Jim at
08:46 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 55 words, total size 1 kb.
May 13, 2004
Operation Smile
Bill over at Bloviating Inanities has a
sweet story about a teen who is getting her facial deformity corrected with the help of
Operation Smile. Go read Bill's post. You'll be glad you did.
Posted by: Jim at
03:37 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
This is why I love Georgia so much
Even our racist assholes have some redeeming qualities.
Six Men Sentenced in Cross Burning
ROME, Ga. (AP) -- A federal judge sentenced six men to prison terms ranging from six months to 46 months Friday for burning a cross in the yard of a woman whose daughter was romantically involved with a black man.
Jerrell Timothy Garner, Stacy Paul Jones, Steven Garland Jones, Jeremy Ray Sims, Eric Shane Sullivan and Billy Richards Wells -- all of Trenton -- pleaded guilty Feb. 23 to conspiracy to deprive civil rights.
They still burn crosses? What's up with that? I never understood how a supposedly militant christian could rationalize torching the symbol of their church. Anyway, the redeeming part is here:
Sims and the Jones brothers made the cross and placed it at the foot of Eva Hurst's driveway in Sand Mountain on Nov. 5. They lit the cross and left, then worried that the flames might spread to a nearby tinder-dry forest, so Sullivan called 911.
I'm not sure if the redeemable part is that they were concerned enough about the possibility of a fire to turn themselves in to prevent it or that they were so stupid that they turned themselves in when they had gotten away scott free. Given that they lit up the cross next to the tinder dry forest in the first place I'm going to go with the "stupid" option for now.
(Hat tip to Lovely Wife)
Posted by: Jim at
03:28 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 256 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Awww, that is so SWEET! Those loveable, tree-hugging Nazi bastards.
Thanks for the touching story! Wow, they may have saved some endangered animals or something.
Posted by: rick at May 13, 2004 04:20 PM (oA/Vb)
2
Tree-hugger skinheads! I never cease to be amazed by the eclectic mix that is America.
Posted by: Velociman at May 13, 2004 10:21 PM (CzA79)
3
More discussion here: http://www.treygivens.com/2003/12/31/1617/
My favorite part is the transmission fluid, though
Posted by: Trey Givens at May 14, 2004 01:07 PM (JmLrk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Need a smile?
I did. Fortunately for me, I've got Dopple-G here to send me a smile maker when needed. Fortunately for you, you've got me to do the same.
Click here if you need a smile.
Posted by: Jim at
03:02 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
1
http://www.bloviatinginanities.com/archives/002890.php
(Speaking of smiles)
Posted by: Jennifer at May 13, 2004 03:21 PM (DdBLw)
2
Oh, my. From my part of the world, even. I love how he nearly finishes a highly bleepable sentence there, too.
Posted by: ilyka at May 13, 2004 05:54 PM (+Kfai)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bad Sayings, Part 7
The latest in a long line of inanity:
Vision is the art of seeing things not visible.
I could be kind and say that I understand what the author was going for here. He wants to say that being able to recognize possibilities is what being a visionary is all about. But I'm not kind to people who obscure their meanings behind foolish pedantry so I'm calling "bullshit" here.
The premise itself is bunk. These sayings are supposed to be supportive or indicative of successful business culture. In business you do have true visionaries - they are the guys in the white coats down in the lab who tinker with doodads, gizmos and whatsits. They are markedly different from the people with corporate vision who assign budgets, verify cost and yield figures and do market analysis for the new product lines.
The real success of a business is not in seeing possibilities but in recognizing probabilities. In other words it is much more important to see what's directly in front of your face. Steve Wozniak was a visionary. Bill Gates had corporate vision.
Posted by: Jim at
11:24 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"Vision is the art of seeing things not visible"
It was written by someone who is an indirect person.
Posted by: pylorns at May 13, 2004 11:55 AM (FTYER)
2
Seeing things not visible is, I believe, called hallucinating...
Posted by: Susie at May 13, 2004 03:28 PM (xxMEB)
3
Bill Gates had corporate vision...
and an inate abilty to pinch the ideas of visionarys!
Posted by: Rob at May 13, 2004 06:01 PM (BWDMP)
4
See? Rob understands the difference!
Posted by: Jim at May 13, 2004 07:07 PM (saeHM)
Posted by: Trey Givens at May 14, 2004 01:10 PM (JmLrk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Things I learned in school
For all y'all that missed it, I was participating in corporate scholastics this Monday and Tuesday. Specifically, I was getting training on distribution replenishment from a lady who knows more about it than everybody else. This might not sound all that exciting until you remember that replenishment efficiency equals profit and profit equals money. Money is always interesting.
- There are lots of little things wrong with our product that we don't see because we aren't using it and people aren't telling us, probably because they're the little niggling things that aren't really "wrong", they're just irritating or not as good as they could be. We need a way to discover these things. They are generally very easy to change and can make a great difference in the usage experience of our customers. User Interface really is important, y'all.
- Our demo data is pooched. It's usable, technically, sort of. You just can't actually simulate the workings of an actual business with it. We need somebody to fix this. Somebody who isn't me of course.
- If you go to a class at a corporation and you don't really know the subject that is being discussed, don't wear bright orange nail polish. In fact, just as a general theory for life, don't wear bright orange nail polish. Thanks.
- Supplier efficiency is what kills distributors. WalMart really does kick ass. They are bigger because they really are better.
- Scan the bathroom before the students/customers have the opportunity to go potty. If one of the Morning Crew has left reading material on the back of the shitter, go ahead and toss it in the garbage. Reading material in the john says things about your company that you really want to have kept in the family.
- Especially when that reading material is a paperback copy of The Exorcist.
- eBay really is the new sales paradigm. Of the three distributors in my class, two were using eBay heavily to reduce overstock as well as clear inventory and make it economically feasible to order special items that come in standard packs. eBay is letting them give better supply service and helping them to run a leaner ship. eBay rocks like WalMart.
- In a customer-centric situation like this training class all company titles are swapped for "Salesperson" as you pass through the door. I think I sold three upgrades just by talking about the items in the latest product version. Do I get commission on that?
Posted by: Jim at
10:41 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 417 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Now, now -- WalMart is the spawn of satan, and you know it, corporate reprogramming ...er, *education* week or not.
Posted by: Claire at May 14, 2004 10:09 PM (l1oyw)
2
It was only two days so my soul is still intact.
Posted by: Jim at May 15, 2004 07:42 AM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Strengthen the Good
Are you pissed about the murder of Nick Berg? Me too. So is everybody I know (and yes, I mean everybody). So what do we do when we see evil of such a primal barbarian nature? What can you and I, common everyday people, possibly do? Alan at Command Post
has the answer. Fight evil by strengthening the good.
Well, IÂ’ve decided what to make of it all, and what IÂ’m going to make is some good. Susan Tom is a hero Â… one of millions Â… waking each day with a commitment to make the lives of others better through love. Hers is an example to which humanity should aspire. So my response to the murder of Nick Berg and the inhumanity it represents is to use it as motivation to give to Susan Tom and the humanity she represents.
...
For the next three days, between the time stamp of this post and Midnight EDT Friday night, Michele and I will contribute all donations made to The Command Post PayPal account (the buttonÂ’s below this post and also over in the right-hand column) to the Tom Family Education Trust.
So far they've raised over $5,000 toward their goal of $10,000. Now THAT is a statement!
(Alan has a nice brief on Susan Tom at the post linked up top, as well as a collection of links about her and the Tom Family Education Trust.)
Posted by: Jim at
08:26 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 242 words, total size 1 kb.
Where the hell are you?
You jerk off for two days and make your readers work the site for you and then on the day everybody is expecting you back (perhaps with some sort of entertaining anecdote from two days of corporate scholastics?) you play the bastiche again and go AWOL. What gives?
I received the email above (in slightly altered form) and would like to take this time to say "bite me" "sorry y'all". I took the day off yesterday to attend Bear's graduation from Pre-K and had an awesome family day. I didn't take time on the PC to do anything except scan emails and the news aggregator occasionally. I'm back now so keep your panties on. (Or don't. I'm good either way.)
more...
Posted by: Jim at
07:26 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 178 words, total size 1 kb.
1
So, you run a panties optional blog? Good to know....
Posted by: Susie at May 13, 2004 03:32 PM (xxMEB)
2
Absolutely. In fact, the only mandatory clothing item is socks and that's really for your own protection.
Posted by: Jim at May 13, 2004 03:45 PM (IOwam)
3
thank God, people wonder when i wear panties. They ask uncomfy questions like "is he off the meds? He was on meds? sure he must have been on, right?" And i don't wear socks, against my religion, so can i get an exemption?
Posted by: tommy at May 14, 2004 12:07 AM (a/FcM)
Posted by: Simon at May 14, 2004 01:26 AM (UKqGy)
5
Tommy, you can go sockless but I cannot be held responsible for the repercussions.
Simon, :-P
Posted by: Jim at May 14, 2004 06:27 AM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 12, 2004
Post open posting post
All has been settled. Copious points have been handed out and freebie codes sent to Rob and Simon.
This was pretty neat but I think that next time it'll be just a day long. With two days in a row the second day didn't seem to get much attention. Also, I'll see about getting the word out ahead of time so people will know what's coming up.
What do y'all think? Better than crappy post day? Worse? Would you rather have a pencil shoved in your ear than read just about anything on this site? You tell me. I want to know.
Posted by: Jim at
08:12 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What kind of pencil we talking about?
Seriously it was a good idea but I'd be wary of overusing it. Once in a while is good, but people are coming here to see what you have to say. Readers have comments if they want to add to it.
Absolutely give some notice next time so the geographically challenged can play.
Posted by: Simon at May 12, 2004 09:48 AM (/FMoi)
2
You could always leave an open thread or similar.
Posted by: Jennifer at May 12, 2004 10:00 AM (DdBLw)
Posted by: pylorns at May 12, 2004 03:00 PM (FTYER)
4
Completely off-topic question: Did you receive any email from me today?
Posted by: ilyka at May 12, 2004 09:37 PM (GbnV+)
Posted by: rob at May 12, 2004 10:58 PM (m5MiW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 11, 2004
Survivor returns!
You thought it was over after whatsisname proposed to whatsername, won the girl and lost the prize, right? Wrong! That was just the (continuously ironically termed) reality TV show. We don't need no stinkin' TV show!
Blogosphere Survivor is back! June first will be the official start date for Game 2. Pylorns is running it from the start this time and he's looking for some help. Specifically, he needs players, ideas for challenges and game improvements, promotion from fans and some prizes. If you can provide any of the above, comment at the post I linked above or email pylorns-at-wetwired-dot-org.
See you on the island!
Posted by: Jim at
08:07 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 109 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: pylorns at May 11, 2004 09:56 PM (PB+b7)
2
Yay! I was thinking about that poor little link tucked away under the temporarily closed banner... It's time to bring it ON!!!
Posted by: Rob at May 12, 2004 06:01 AM (kXZI6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
74kb generated in CPU 0.0988, elapsed 0.1578 seconds.
99 queries taking 0.1306 seconds, 314 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.