May 24, 2004
I despise judicial activism and Congressional idiocy
Judges are supposed to have absolutely no place in creating laws. The way its supposed to work is that the Legislature makes laws, the Executive (Pres) enforces laws and the Judiciary makes sure that the laws are legal. That's worked really well for a very long time.
Judicial activism is what happens when rulings from the bench create de facto laws. By blatant abuse of their powers, judges take on the properties of the Executive and the Legislature. This is bad. What you have here is the body that is supposed to be a check against the creation of bad laws acting AS a body creating laws. You also get the beginnings of an oligarchy as the 9 unelected members of the Supreme Court (appointed for life, remember) become the first word on laws as well as the last word.
So judicial activism is a very bad thing and it must be stopped. The Legislature has a plan that nominally addresses the problem on the way to doubling it. The Congressional Accountability for Judicial Activism Act of 2004 would let them overturn Judicial decisions.
Let's review - the problem is that the Judiciary is using assumed powers to create laws. Congress' answer is to grant themselves veto power over the Judiciary. Put another way, in order to stop the Judiciary from creating as well as judging laws, Congress wants to give themselves the exact same set of powers.
Fucking morons.
(Hat tip to Dopple-G)
Posted by: Jim at
01:40 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 258 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: pylorns at May 24, 2004 01:45 PM (FTYER)
2
Article 1, Section 1 of the US Constitution states:
All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
Article 3, Section 2 of the US Constitution states:
The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority.
It doesn't get much simpler than that. Yet somehow we have a bunch of idiots in power who think we're a bunch of idiots.
Posted by: Clancy at May 25, 2004 12:59 PM (EGVPL)
3
Wait. We're NOT idiots?
Who put this on my forehead? I want names!
Posted by: Trey Givens at May 26, 2004 10:45 PM (yqaQ9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bestofme Symphony, 25th Edition
The
25th Bestofme Symphony is up at WOLves. Join our host Trudy for a tour of the best in the Blogosphere.
Hosting: Would you like to host the Symphony? Send me a note and I'll get you on the schedule.
Submit to the Symphony: Want to be a part of next week's edition? Check out this post for submission help. Entries should always be sent to bestofme@jpeacock.net regardless of who the Symphony host is.
Spread the word: Webloggers, how about some linky love? Trudy would appreciate it and just think of how happy your readers would be if you gave them such a treat. Plus, there's a nice leg shot in the post just prior to the Symphony - you know your readers are going to be mad if they miss that.
Email Reminders: If you'd like to be sent a reminder about the Symphony, join the mailing list. There's one email sent on Thursday or Friday to remind you to submit for the next Symphony and one on Monday with the location of the newly posted Symphony.
Posted by: Jim at
01:15 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 186 words, total size 1 kb.
The weekend was a veritable bounty of delectable posts!
I came across a bumper crop of excellent posts this weekend. Normally I appreciate these and then get distracted by something shiny but this time I maintained focus long enough to note down the links. Woo hoo!
So here are my favorites from the weekend:
Trey gives us a rule to live by:
There are a few occasions when I strongly recommend following the crowd, going with the flow, doing what everyone else does and this is one of those times. If you follow a guy in a silver Passat on the interstate and heÂ’s going 90+ miles an hour, singing and dancing to Latin pop music, and then suddenly he slows to a frustrating pace of 60ish, you should guess that something is afoot, especially if you look around and everyone else is doing the same thing. (Slowing down, I mean. Not the dancing part.)
more...
Posted by: Jim at
01:07 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 625 words, total size 4 kb.
Words to live by
Ilyka says:
If you leave me an insulting comment and don't have the balls to post your real email address, obviously I'm going to edit it to amuse myself.
Obviously.
Same here.
Posted by: Jim at
05:19 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You're too tightfisted to gimme a link now?
Posted by: ilyka at May 24, 2004 09:37 AM (xNLFN)
2
Dang, how'd that happen? All fixed now!
Posted by: Jim at May 24, 2004 10:16 AM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 22, 2004
Bestofme Symphony Reminder
Get your submissions in for the next
Bestofme Symphony. Send them to
bestofme@jpeacock.net and they'll be in Monday's edition at
WOLves.
Please note that the autoresponse you are used to receiving isnÂ’t working. The emails themselves are getting through, itÂ’s just not sending out the confirmations.
The only requirements are that you think the post is good and that it be at least 2 months old. It doesn't even have to be from your own blog. It just can't get any simpler!
The basics of the Bestofme Symphony.
Want to host a Symphony?
Get reminder emails.
Posted by: Jim at
11:56 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
May 21, 2004
It's fuck spooge on* Michael Moore Friday!
Warning: This post is

It wasn't intentional but every post so far today has held a dig on France's favorite so I might as well go with the flow.
Here's one from Rachel Lucas that tickles me. She's designed the Orca (tm) Michael Moore range target (full size version available at her place).
What Moorisms do you have? Trackback or link it in the comments here. Or just spout off in the comments here. Openly vitriolic comments encouraged. I'll start you off with some humor:
Q: How many Michael Moores does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: None. That fat fuck wouldn't have a clue how to do something constructive that would actually reveal things that are in darkness. And what's with suggesting that there could be more than one Michael Moore? You sick bastard.
UPDATE: Claire has the scoop on Mikey's eveningwear. Monitor/liquids warning for this one.
* Title corrected. As LeeAnn notes in the comments, nobody in their right mind would fuck Michael Moore.
Posted by: Jim at
08:18 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 181 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Regarding the title of this post, as the GM1 so delicately puts it, I wouldn't fuck Michael Moore unless I had a stage-three-syphlitic camel's dick handy.
Posted by: LeeAnn at May 21, 2004 12:44 PM (HxCeX)
2
Agreed. I've edited the title accordingly.
Posted by: Jim at May 21, 2004 12:52 PM (IOwam)
3
I love it when I use my powers for good instead of evil.
Posted by: LeeAnn at May 23, 2004 05:28 PM (HxCeX)
4
Um, attacking the man for his documentaries by attacking his weight problem is a pretty lame straw man, Jim.
Yes, he's in awful shape and will likely die soon but so what. America is the nation of the obese.
Posted by: Johnny Huh? at May 25, 2004 06:41 PM (YkElu)
5
Just channeling my inner Franklin. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at May 25, 2004 10:38 PM (saeHM)
6
we uns aint got no nede fer no fancy pants big werds colleage boys like mikal more an jon kery, all we uns nede is a good ol boy like bush what kin teach us kids how ta put a x on our welfare checks and are gun permits so we kin hep fite them there long haird terriers
Posted by: greg stomberg at June 17, 2004 11:15 AM (9WPFy)
7
No, no, no! How many times do I have to tell you? It's
rag head terriers. The long hairs are the hippies and we're not allowed to shoot them.
Posted by: Jim at June 17, 2004 11:16 AM (IOwam)
8
dat be write, we uns aint got no ejecajion cause a dem dere irakis stealing all our jobs, bush don did gude on my etitcatjion in tecksas and his no chile lef behine program dat ate all the real edjicajion funds up, his jobz pergam hepped me get on the welfaarre an all aor kidz nede to know iz ta sign a x to inlest in miltary were dey belonz, moore is a big wordz no it all who aint got no buzzinezz trying to tach aour kidz a what fer
Posted by: greg stomberg at July 19, 2004 01:33 PM (0LzT2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Michael Moore ate my computer
My PC died right after opening the day for Michael Moore bashing. That greaseball somehow sabotaged me.
Anyway, I'm going to be generally incommunicado as far as email goes as the computer I'm on now is (besides being in the middle of the training room as part of the class that I am currently attending) lacking in any communications capabilities. On the plus side I can now fake a phone outage and completely ignore everybody in the building when I get back to my desk.
Can anybody explain to me why it is that you can get a warning from SmartDisk that your drive is failing but Dell still won't replace it until it actually dies? And why is it that corporate admins refuse to just buy another damned hard drive when the customer service contract that they have with Dell proves to be foolishly lacking in common sense? I just happen to be in class today but I can guarantee that Dell won't have a replacement hard drive in my machine by Monday morning. Maybe sometime on Monday it'll get here and the machine will be loaded with software by the end of business. I'll spend the entirety of Tuesday setting it up for me.
That's two days of lost me. How much does a new hard drive cost compared to two days of my salary? How about losing two days from an already compressed production schedule? I really hate stupidity.
Posted by: Jim at
10:41 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 252 words, total size 1 kb.
1
SmartDisk that your drive is failing but Dell still won't replace it until it actually dies?
call back provide them with the warning and ask them to replace it. They have to. I used to work there.
Posted by: pylorns at May 21, 2004 03:54 PM (PB+b7)
2
Or maybe my Sys Admin is just inept. Too late in any case as it is already dead.
Posted by: Jim at May 21, 2004 03:57 PM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I felt a great disturbance in the Force...
...as if tens of voices suddenly cried out in stupidity.
Oh, right! Trey's home and he's cutting through the inanity like Michael Moore through an Ewok buffet line.
Posted by: Jim at
09:36 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
Michael Moore is back on my Christmas list!
I've finally found the
perfect gift for him. And under $20 too!
The “Mind Molester” produces a one-second electronic chirp about once every 4 minutes. Due to the chirp’s duration, frequency, and sound characteristics, it’s a very, very difficult, time-consuming, frustrating and maddening task to locate the unit. And even if they find it, they’ll have no idea what it is. The number of effective locations to plant the “Mind Molester” is limited only by your imagination. Of course, this device is for use on deserving subjects only.
I wonder if there's a discount for bulk purchases...
(Hat tip to Dopple-G)
Posted by: Jim at
07:59 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 117 words, total size 1 kb.
May 20, 2004
What does it take...
...to get Jim to clench the flow mid-stream and abandon the urinal?
One guy shuffling to the crapper like Eddie Murphy doing his tight-assed white guy impersonation followed by two explosive gaseous anal exhalations. You know the ones with that curiously soft echo that you can only get while seated on the throne. Poof! Poof!. The ones that always precede a torrent of semi-liquid gelatinous feces spraying forth from a burning anus like a garden hose when you hold your thumb over the end that will remain stuck to the back of the bowl regardless of how many times you try to flush.
Yeah, that's what it takes.
Posted by: Jim at
02:35 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 116 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Damn! That was you?!
Posted by: dave at May 20, 2004 10:23 PM (EXbsn)
Posted by: Simon at May 21, 2004 12:55 AM (UKqGy)
3
Too much sharing.
Simon, I think you just came up with the ultimate subtitle for this blog.
Posted by: ilyka at May 21, 2004 04:42 AM (CjcOh)
4
Jim, you promised you would issue a Poo alert when you would discuss...ahem...bodily functions.
Some of us are delicate flowers, after all.
Posted by: Helen at May 21, 2004 07:11 AM (+Qiat)
5
Sorry, Helen. When you gotta go, you gotta go. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at May 21, 2004 07:51 AM (IOwam)
6
Have you ever eaten at Bertha's? I did and that dude couldhave been me...
("Eat Bertha's Mussel's" bumperstickers are common around Baltimore.)
Posted by: Clancy at May 21, 2004 08:08 AM (EGVPL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Jeremy - Please a little less drama!
El Nino is spanish. It is the spanish word for child. Like all things spanish, it is dangerous. It kills people and burns down trees. This child is more than a child. It really isn't a child at all. It is a storm. A deadly storm that kills people and burns down trees.
That's just an exceprt from one of four essays that should do more for homeschooling than a dozen abusive principals.
(Tip credit to Dopple-G)
Posted by: Jim at
01:44 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Learn something new everyday. I had always thought that "El Nino" was Spanish for "The Nino". Who knew?
Brass.
Posted by: Brass at May 20, 2004 02:14 PM (SrRJG)
2
Can't read a single one of them.:-((
Posted by: LW at May 20, 2004 03:29 PM (saeHM)
3
Jeremy Lavine [author of the above quote] has
got to get his own blog!! He's brilliant!
So is Pete - the other author! *snork*
"Walt Whitman and his blue ox Emily Dickensen..."
bahahahahha
Posted by: Claire at May 20, 2004 11:24 PM (l1oyw)
4
Those essays totally made my day. I sent email to FrankJ to ask him how old he was in 2000, because that Walt Whitman one sure does sound like something from IMAO.
Posted by: Deus ex Macrame at May 21, 2004 12:25 AM (lzBvv)
5
Was googling for these essays, hadn't seen them in AGES.
I was in Jeremy's class, actually a pretty bright guy, just a great sense of humor. He took extremely basic homework questions and decided to have fun with them while still answering them correctly.
Definitely not a case for homeschooling. But kickass.
Posted by: AlexisdeKere at December 09, 2004 12:02 AM (PhmgE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
That's MUCH better!
Thanks to
new FTC rules, porno spam now has to have "SEXUALLY EXPLICIT" in the subject line.
Now instead of "Hungry teen wants your hot cock in her cornhole"
you'll get "Hungry teen wants your hot cock in her cornhole (SEXUALLY EXPLICIT)".
(Hat tip to Lovely Wife)
Posted by: Jim at
01:17 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
Cracks found on military helicopter
This image is of cracks found during routine inspections of the Kaman Aerospace SH-2 Seasprite helicopter. Pilots and crew of these helicopters were seriously alarmed (and rightly so) when this information was released.
They were especially concerned because the cracks weren't found in just one location - they were all over the craft. There was no real uniformity to it. Click on the hyperlink to view:
Cracks on military aircraft.
(Hat tip to Steve)
Posted by: Jim at
01:04 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
Out of the mouths of feebs...
Homer gets the 411 on the media and Iraq over at
Ryan's place. And if that doesn't float your boat you can always fall back on
the dirty mushroom.
Damn, I can't believe I linked that. The second one that is. The first one is good - go read that. Stay away from that second one.
Posted by: Jim at
12:28 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 68 words, total size 1 kb.
Are Rall's 15 minutes of lame over yet?
I subscribe to a lot of news alerts in order to keep up on scholastic lunacy for my
Zero Intelligence site. Imagine my surprise when
this Ted Rall screed arrived under a "zero tolerance" flag. I read the piece and was incensed by it but I knew that I wasn't the right person to rip Rall's ass open for it.
The correct person was Michele and she knocked this one out of the ballpark*:
...I see Ted in a whole new light now. He's the kid in the back of the class, the one with snot stains on his sleeve and a crust of saliva around his mouth, the one who talks to himself on the playground and whose personality is a guaranteed friend repellant.
Is there anyone who wants to touch this guy now? Even most lefties I talk to - and I mean leaning towards moonbat lefties - hold up garlic cloves and crosses when I mention his name.
* Note that the ballpark will no longer be serving Cracker Jack.
Posted by: Jim at
08:43 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 189 words, total size 1 kb.
I call bullshit on Mrs. du Toit
What do you call it when a blogger leads off a series with a targeted attack on another blogger and then closes the comments on the post? I call it bullshit. This particular pile of bullshit was birthed by
Mrs. du Toit. She leads off a multi-post essay with this gem:
In a comment thread regarding domestic violence I was taken to task for referring to myself as "Mrs du Toit" by (what I would refer to as) a Femi-Nazi. She made some comment that she had a name and was proud to use it, and she'd never refer to herself the way I do.
The comment thread in question was at my place. Mrs. du Toit had commented that there is no such thing as Stockholm Syndrome and that women in abusive relationships are there solely because they want to be. Helen took her to task, this being the "some comment" referred to above:
And Dean? Yeah, I don't read you, and I really don't feel the need to, either. You've been there on the man's side? Well, I've been there on the woman's side. And you and Mrs. Du Toit (again, let me state thus: I find it revolting to be referred to by my spouse's name. I have my own name, thank you) should understand this: if you haven't walked the woman's side, then you just don't understand.
So what is it, Mrs. du Toit? Any woman who has been abused is a feminazi? Any woman who disagrees with you? Any woman who wants to be known by her own name instead of her husband's? What exactly is your label of "feminazi" a result of? One thing we can be sure of is that it is in no way related to any knowledge of Helen that you might have because if you had taken even a few moments to get to know her before spitting out your vitriol you would know that she's quite the opposite.
Frankly the moral equivalence necessary to use a term like "feminazi" in the first place is disgusting. Your casual attack on somebody you know nothing about simply because they disagree with you is reprehensible.
Bullshit, Connie. Absolute bullshit.
Incidentally, this is for you:
Posted by: Jim at
06:52 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 386 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I am absolutely thrilled to bits.
She calls me a Femi-Nazi...well, I could really give a shit what she calls me, but she clearly doesn't do her homework if she wants to call me that.
I was going to say that I can't be bothered to check out her site, since I like my temper intact and my intelligence to not be insulted, but that would make me guilty of doing precisely what I am accusing her of-not checking out the details.
And you know what? She should be ashamed. She should be ashamed that she is lecturing ME about attacking HER without checking HER out, when that's exactly what she just did.
You know, Mrs. DuToit-we are more alike than you know. Despite your desire to be known as "Mrs" and your conservatism, we're not that far apart. I posted just yesterday that people are not what they seem, that I hide parts of me. I too have had an extremely fucked-up childhood (and adulthood!) But if you want to just put your head in the sand, let my comment upset you so badly, and then act like a martyr, that's ok with me.
It's sad-I think that women need to stick together. I think there's enough support and sympathy to go around, enough understanding and commonality to accept people-but you just go ahead and blindly label me a Femi-nazi.
I've been called worse, and likely will be again by your legions that feel that in order to defend you, they need to swing blindly in the night.
Posted by: Helen at May 20, 2004 08:33 AM (+Qiat)
2
i stayed in a verbally abusive marriage because i had no where to go & lacked the confidence to go out on my own.
and i haven't taken my new husband's name, either. i'm very proud of MY family's name.
i'm with you, helen. we need to stick together, not fight about these things.
Posted by: becky at May 20, 2004 09:39 AM (uAnQV)
3
It's too bad, really. Both Helen and Mrs. DuToit are great writers who, unfortunately, tend to react a bit strongly when challenged, veering into overreaction at times. Not that reacting strongly to challenge is exactly rare in the blogosphere. But still.
I respect both women, both for their experiences and their writing. The topic is serious, and reasonable people can disagree about some aspects of it.
Mrs. DuToit...there's no need for name-calling. I've gotten to know Helen, and she's no femi-nazi. She's a strong, vibrant, women who has overcome tremendous challenges in life to become a special person. Helen...there are femi-nazis around, even though you aren't one. And Mrs. DuToit takes rightful pride in taking on her husband's name. She's proud of who she is, and who her husband is, and that's a worthy thing to be proud of. It's not right to mock her, or to denigrate her choices. And it's especially inappropriate to insult someone's self-identification when the person doing the insulting is someone who won't use her real name on the blog.
Posted by: Jiminy at May 20, 2004 10:12 AM (3jhuZ)
4
Uh...yeah.
If that was intended to get me to use my real name on my blog, it's not going to happen. I use a pseudonym since I write a personal blog, and as such, I don't want colleagues to find it. If I wrote a political or current events blog, then I wouldn't care and so would be myself.
I really appreciate your support and your very lovely words above.
But shame on you, Jiminy. You know why I use a pseudonym.
Especially since I have been honest with you and you know my real name.
Posted by: Helen at May 20, 2004 10:27 AM (+Qiat)
5
And for the record, for the final fucking time: I wasn't insulting anyone. I wasn't flaming anyone (what a ridiculous word), and I wasn't having a go. I WILL NOT EVER go by my husband's name as "Mrs. Helen Johnson" or "Mrs. Helen Adams" or whatever the man's last name is. I may take it as my last name, but I will not call myself Mrs. Helen X. I just won't do it. I am not property.
I currently have a taken name that I am very happy with. I went to the courts. I petitioned for it.
It's mine, and I have no intention of ever changing it, even if I ever do get married again.
I haven't insulted anyone. I have just been stating my opinion. But I am beginning to get hot under the collar and can see I am going to start to do so very soon, so I am stepping out now to go to the gym and become Zen.
Posted by: Helen at May 20, 2004 10:30 AM (+Qiat)
6
Helen,
No, I was not trying to get you to use your real name on the blog. And yes, I know why you don't. And I respect that. In fact, that's the point. I respect your choice to identify yourself however you want. You came across -- and because you are such a good writer it's hard to believe it was inadvertent -- as saying that the way Mrs. DuToit identifies herself is wrong, or...weak. It's not.
That's all I was saying.
Posted by: Jiminy at May 21, 2004 10:29 AM (3jhuZ)
7
After being called a FemiNazi I made this Yahoo Profile http://profiles.yahoo.com/boobzillaoffeminazia as a parody. As to why women would stay in abusive relationships, oh, sometimes they don't have a lot of choice. Leave, get killed. It happens. Lots. Sometimes the bullet isn't quite lethal and they end up in a coma. Not a viable alternative. And if the woman lacks job skills and has a lot of kids, it's a little harder to leave. Names, oh people can call themselves anything they want, doesn't bother me.
Posted by: mog at May 23, 2004 06:39 PM (Dqis0)
8
I just have to butt in, against all better knowledge...
Helen, you may not have wanted to insult anyone, hell, I'm sure you didn't want to. But the fact is that your opinion about going by your husband's name had absolutely no bearing on the debate, which means that due to the way it was phrased in that context, it more or less amounted to an ad hominem attack on Mrs DuToit. Her calling you a feminazi was uncalled for and base, but let's keep in mind that for all practical purposes, it was you who started the name calling here.
And no, I'm not trying to defend her, just trying to get some perspective into this.
Posted by: Gudy at May 25, 2004 03:24 PM (NWx9Y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 19, 2004
GuestMap spam?
drew at
logic2@hotmail.com (though that's probably a fake address) is the latest person to sign my guest map. He's a Brit but is for some ungodly reason living in France. After reading the comment that he left I wonder if that is such a coincidence. Here's what drew (that's the french spelling, using no capitals - less chance of giving offense using only lower case letters you know) said:
Jim is so clever that he has invented a new word to replace "causation" - "causality"! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL ps get a clue moron.
If I'm reading this correctly drew is upset because I used the word "causality". He apparently doesn't know that it is a real word so he is trying to make fun of me for using it. He even gives me credit for creating the word itself! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
ps get a dictionary fucknob.
Posted by: Jim at
08:03 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 147 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wow.
WOW.
How bored does one have to be to drop an insult via the guest map?
Posted by: ilyka at May 19, 2004 08:17 PM (3vxSr)
2
Sweetheart...there are folks outthere who spend their DAYS looking to insult one in any way possible.
I used to do that...LOLLOLLLOLLLOLLLOLLLOL
Posted by: LW at May 19, 2004 08:52 PM (saeHM)
3
LOLOLOLOL! Jim is so clever, he left one of the "k" 's out of the word "fuckknob!
No - wait- that doesn't look right. Huh. One k? Two k's? Space in between?
Posted by: rick at May 20, 2004 08:46 AM (oA/Vb)
4
I'm pretty sure that's one of those words that you can spell either way. Oddly, neither version was in my spellchecker. Hey, maybe I invented it!
Posted by: Jim at May 20, 2004 08:50 AM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A meme, a meme. My kingdom for a meme!
Look no further for
Memeblog has arrived. Memeblog strives to serve as a central clearing house for meme info (memeinfo?). Want to remind the world to submit a post for Meme X? Want to let people know that Meme Y just got posted? Want to introduce Meme Z to the Blogosphere? Memeblog is the place to go.
The secret of Memeblog's success (we hope) is its simplicity. Meme hosts just need to send an email to the submission address at submit-at-memeblog.mu.nu and the crack Memeblog staff will add it to the daily summary post. With both Simon and I hosting we've got pretty decent coverage around the clock (he's in Hong Kong and I'm in the USA).
It's lean and mean at the moment. It'll be getting a facelift in the next little bit and we'll add additional options as time warrants (mailing list, perhaps a tagboard for submits, etc).
How can you help? Well, send in your memes for one. For another, get the word out that Memeblog is here and what it's here for.
Note that if your meme has a dedicated site or page you can get a permalink for it. Submit that through the same email address.
Posted by: Jim at
09:28 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 219 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Are you planning to give submission info for upcoming carnivals & linkfests, or just reporting them after the fact?
Posted by: Harvey at May 19, 2004 11:50 AM (tJfh1)
2
Submit info is more than welcome too. For example, when I put up my Symphony reminder post here on Friday, a reminder with submission link will be put up there too.
Posted by: Jim at May 19, 2004 11:59 AM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Googol vs. Google
A googol is a number followed by one hundred zeros. The word was created by Professor Edward Kasner in the 1930s and used in a book of his in 1940. Kasner's descendants are getting
set to battle Google, saying that the US-based company profited at their expense.
Personally I think that Google does incorporate the theory of googol in their site. When you get a search return you get a "Gooooooooooogle" at the bottom of the page where each "o" is a link to a results page. It seems pretty obvious that these are in tribute to the many zeros in a googol. But does this constitute financial gain at the expense of the family? Intellectual property experts don't seem to think so.
"It would be an uphill struggle to try to assert any legitimate claim," said David Gourlay, a senior associate at the Dundas and Wilson Technology Group.
Gillian Cameron, a partner in the intellectual property and technology department at Maclay, Murray & Spens, said: "They would have to show the family had used the word as a trademark and it had somehow been misappropriated, which doesnÂ’t appear to be the case.
"Or they could argue that Google were piggy-backing on the goodwill of the mathematician, and somehow people associated googol with Mr Kasner," he added. "Again, this would be doubtful.
Kasner was an intelligent and middlingly successful mathematician who's single claim to fame is the description of a number that is never used except as an example of a really big number. The only problem being, of course, that he didn't get famous for it. Could anybody have named Kasner as the creator of "googol" before reading this?
I think the Kasner clan needs to sit down and stifle.
Posted by: Jim at
06:16 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 297 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Ooh Ooh, that company over there is very succesful and has loads of money. We have a tenuous basis for a law suit ... can we sue them please, can we, can we huh?
I'm almost considering encouraging the lawsuit. When Google's lawyers have finished savaging the Kasner family they should just have enough money left to get the bus home.
Posted by: Rob at May 19, 2004 06:57 AM (kXZI6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 18, 2004
My new favorite lightbulb joke.
It may be found (where I found it)
at LeeAnn's place. Whoo boyo! I'm still recovering from it.
Posted by: Jim at
04:56 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.
74kb generated in CPU 0.0541, elapsed 0.1541 seconds.
97 queries taking 0.1151 seconds, 307 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.