June 21, 2004
Smokin' hot latino women
Or should that be "wimmin"? I guess it should really be "woman" seeing as there's only one.
Got a reply back from Melissa with a photo.
From: Melissa
sorry about that so here is a picture of me its old but still me
Go ahead and click that link up there. She's posing with a cute teddy. Here's Xibit's answer:
u lookin fine, baby. F-I-N-E. fine.
i gots all yo shots togetha an u made the cut on friday. u headin toards a pimp ride fo sure!
we gots one problem tho. unfortunately we been having some fools signin up from anonymous mail hosts (like hotmail). seems people like to just send shit in to us and they tryin to punk us. shit aint even real and shit. now i believe youse real but that donÂ’t fly wit the whole crew (and the dam blood suckin lawyas).
so anyway, me and funk mastah flex worked out a way to make sure people was real. heres what you need to do so we knows you is real. take a picture of you and you mens car. now that donÂ’t tell us that u real. what tell us u real is you need to be holdin a sign that say something specific that we didnÂ’t tell nobody else to use. yo sign needs to be:
“High on SBD”
that donÂ’t mean drugs, yo. sbd the hydraulic lifts we use wit ground effects.
the person in the pic can be u, yo boy or your kids (cause they so cute – the kids are cute that is, not yo boy. he good looking but Xibit doan float that drection). just reply to this mail with that pic and we get you set straight baby.
keep on watchin Pimp My Ride, baby!
Xibit
Also got a new hit from "Kyle" and sent him standard photo request #1 (modified not to ask for a bikini shot). And of course everybody's got the disclaimer too.
So, will I ever get a picture with an SBD sign?
Posted by: Jim at
03:48 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 348 words, total size 2 kb.
1
You. Are. So. Cruel.
I can't believe how long you've run with this. And yes, I am betting you get the photo.
Posted by: ilyka at June 22, 2004 08:36 PM (Vrz+t)
2
Am I cruel or am I the kindest person you ever met? Yeah, that's what I thought. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at June 23, 2004 05:56 AM (saeHM)
3
"Ya gotta be cruel to be kind."
Not sure which you are, but this is damn funny.
Posted by: The Commissar at June 23, 2004 08:58 PM (k+ZOU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Getting closer...stay on target...
The closing won't be tomorrow but it will be on our original planned date of the 23rd. That's Wednesday. I'm going to be a homeowner.
Holy shit, y'all!
Our broker is just fan-freakin-tastic. Not only has he bought down our rate (this is banker talk for "I'll give you money now instead of later), he's finagled the closing numbers so well that our out of pocket expense for buying this house is hovering at or below zero dollars. Yeah - at or below zero dollars to get into this house.
As in, pay no money and get into the house. Have a month on us and just pay your mortgage starting in August.
The appraisal also came in at just a hair under $135,000. Our mortgage is for $130,000.
We're putting zero dollars down to get into a house that we'll have almost five grand of equity in as soon as the ink dries.
I love the Navy. I love the VA. I love my broker.
Posted by: Jim at
03:26 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 174 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sounds great!!! We had a similar situation. After we walked away from closing we had spent perhaps $1500 dollars (out of our pocket) to buy the house, and that included the first years Homeowners insurance.
We worked our butts off this weekend, but made more progress than I expected this soon. Hoem ownership is awesome...
Posted by: Clancy at June 21, 2004 04:04 PM (EGVPL)
2
That's a whole lotta lovin'. Maybe it's time to do a Donald Trump, take the $5,000 profit, turn it into billions and host your own reality TV show.
I can say I knew when you were just a blogger...
Posted by: Simon at June 21, 2004 11:30 PM (FUPxT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Must...control...fist...of...death...
We had our team meeting this morning. This was a bit odd since our Product Architect and temporary team director (did I mention that there's STILL no executive in charge of Development yet?) is in Hawaii. The reason became clear when Project Manager Girl ran out of things to say and admitted she was dragging it out because President Guy had said he wanted to stop in on the meeting. For all y'all who aren't in a corporate setting this was the equivalent of Project Manager Girl standing on the conference table and screaming out
"This is a set up! This meeting was only held because President Guy wanted y'all for a captive audience while Product Architect is away!"
Except she's stubbornly clinging to her Pennsylvania speech patterns so she wouldn't have said "y'all".
He wanted us to know how proud he is of our product and how important it is to the company. He went on and on about how the quality of the product is so fantastic that we are in a position to leverage our synergies to extemporate our marginalizations, or something like that. The vast difference in product quality since release X.0 was mentioned a couple of times. How life was horrible at X.0 and earlier but that now we've only got legacy issues left from the bad old days. Everybody who's using X.1 through X.4 loves us to tears and wants us to have babies with them.
Know what the big addition was after X.0? The big change that was made to address the massive quality problems? The one constant that has been in place during the increasing reliability and decreasing incident versions of X.1 through X.4? A dedicated Quality Assurance Analyst. Me. I came in to a product that had devastating quality problems. Now we have a product that is so reliable they don't even need to think about quality any more. So they're getting rid of the QA Analyst position.
Stupid mother fuckers.
I'd like to say that I don't hope the product tanks when I leave but that would be mostly a lie. It doesn't really matter what I hope for anyway. Programmers working as part time quality people are not going to put out a reliable product. They already proved this in the pre-Jim versions.
History will repeat itself and by version X.6 this product is going to be a dog again.
Posted by: Jim at
01:07 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 403 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I hope their stupidity bites them in the butt.
Posted by: Susie at June 21, 2004 02:46 PM (KCcUy)
2
Thanks, Susie. The rest of my team seems to feel the same way. They sure clammed up when President Guy came into the meeting. He kept trying to get them to ask questions or show some interest but they were silent to the point of rudeness.
I love those guys.
Posted by: Jim at June 21, 2004 03:07 PM (IOwam)
3
Well, someone pointing out the obvious would have been more helpful than clamming up, no?
Posted by: Jennifer at June 21, 2004 03:13 PM (DdBLw)
4
No, it was a set up and everybody recognized it. He wanted somebody to broach the subject so he could give his compassionate response that would slowly morph into a motivational speech about how great things were going to be with the new organization (though it's so painful to let go of me).
That's the real reason he was laying on the "Quality is fantastic" rap. He wanted somebody to ask why we are eliminating the Quality position if Quality is why the product is so successful now.
Nobody gave him the slow pitch he was waiting for so eventually he stopped talking and the meeting was over.
Posted by: Jim at June 21, 2004 03:19 PM (IOwam)
5
Gotcha. I hate corporate politics. I'm too straightforward or naive or something, I guess.
Posted by: Jennifer at June 21, 2004 04:51 PM (DdBLw)
6
Hardest lesson I've had to learn, Suzie, is that in a corporate environment, being straight-forward and honest is not well-rewarded. Actually, if you DO speak your mind you can expect to, at best, be labled a trouble-maker and, at worst, be terminated, but usually somewhere in between.
Everyone else will be highly-amused and happy you did it, but it still sucks to be you.
hmmm... I wonder if I could be an executive in charge of development.
Wait, for a second, I forgot about my technology allergy. Never mind.
Posted by: Trey Givens at June 21, 2004 08:11 PM (fNkhz)
7
It's no comfort but at least you know you were the difference and your co-workers recognise it. I agree with Jen - it'll all come and bite them in the backside one day soon.
Posted by: Simon at June 21, 2004 11:34 PM (FUPxT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bestofme Symphony, 29th Edition
The
29th Bestofme Symphony is up at The Smallest Minority. Join our host Kevin for a tour of the very best in the Blogosphere.
Next week's post extravaganza will be hosted by Xset.
Hosting: Would you like to host the Symphony? Send me a note and I'll get you on the schedule.
Submit to the Symphony: Want to be a part of next week's edition? Check out this post for submission help. Entries should always be sent to bestofme@jpeacock.net regardless of who the Symphony host is.
Spread the word: Webloggers, how about some linky love? Just think of how happy your readers would be if you gave them a path to such a wonderful reading selection.
Email Reminders: If you'd like to be sent a reminder about the Symphony, join the mailing list. There's one email sent on Thursday or Friday to remind you to submit for the next Symphony and one on Monday with the location of the newly posted Symphony.
Posted by: Jim at
09:16 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
It's about time!
President Announces Controversial New Educational Initiative
Standing in front of the Los Angeles Times building on Spring Street and surrounded by aides, President Bush put forth a new and long-overdue proposal today, to the cheers of thousands of long-suffering readers of that paper, to start to repair the tragic situation with the American journalism system. He called it "No Reporter Left Behind."
"For too many years have we seen the sad evidence accumulating that our nation's media outlets and journalism schools simply aren't achieving what they must for our nation to maintain its first-place ranking in freedom of speech and a properly informed public," he declared. "Compared to journalists of a few decades ago, today's reporters show an increasing inability to comprehend simple English or basic statistics, to exercise logic, or to even recognize that they're Americans."
Thank goodness and about damn time!
(Hat tip to No.2 Pencil)
more...
Posted by: Jim at
07:29 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 159 words, total size 1 kb.
Killer Movies
These are movies that are so bad you killed them (had to turn them off or leave the theater because you could not stand to watch them any more). I'm pretty tolerant and have a high pain threshold. I can generally watch even really bad movies (like Lifetime channel ones). Either I'll mentally ridicule it and amuse myself that way or I'll just use it as a two hour brain nap. But even with my inhuman resistance there are movies that I simply could not finish watching.
I want to work up a list of these killer movies, sort of a "worst of" list. I'll start it off with one of mine and then y'all pile in on the comments and I'll update the list periodically. No rules except you must literally have walked out on it or turned it off, never to return to it again. Let's keep it limited to first run movies too. If it was direct to video even the distributors knew it was lousy. Give some sort of clue why it was so bad, too.
The List of Killer Movies:
About Schmidt (Trey): I hate him for peeing on the floor. I hate him for making me see those huge, gross boobies. I hate this movie because like Eyes Wide Shut it is boring, except instead of being about walking, this movie is about driving, which is just as boring. At least it's day time.
Ace Ventura: Pet Detective (Mark): As if watching Jim Carrey talk through his butt wasn't enough, there's a truly excreble love scene with "In The Jungle" in the background. My brother and I, though only having paid a dollar to witness this cinematic treat, raced each other to the car after that.
Battlefield Earth (Ilyka): My boyfriend rented it as an exercise in masochism. Turns out he's a much bigger masochist than I am, because he made it all the way through and I had to quit at about 45 minutes.
Blood Work (Trey): This is a movie about how some women really just want to have sex with really old, gross, wrinkly men. That's their business, but it should have been on the poster so that I would know to avoid it. Also, there is some boring talking. I swear I saw a boom mike come into the frame a couple of times. Oh, and there's a kid that stands as a good argument for abortion.
Cabin Fever (Trey): Ok. I take it back about there being an exciting movie about flesh-eating bacteria. This movie has that and it's just dumb. Dumb + about 75 million gallons of fake blood. It's a movie about how movies sometimes don't have any relationship at all with reality. The only good thing about this movie is that it's the movie TGD and I watched on our first date.
Eyes Wide Shut (Trey): This is a movie about walking. Tom Cruise is a good walker especially after dark. It was almost a movie about Nicole Kidman's Heiney, but it doesn't show up enough to make it worth watching. There are some other naked people, too, but they also do not outwiegh the apparent vast importance this movie places on walking. And also some talking about boring things. [ED - This one's on my list too. It's a terribly serious movie too. I turned it off when I realized I was waiting for a crying clown to appear.]
Farewell my Concubine (Simon): Had me wishing I was in a room with someone actually draggin their fingernails down a blackboard. Not only did my girlfriend at the time and I walk out, it was so bad it put paid to any chance of sex that night. Damn that movie.
The Good, The Bad and The Ugly (Me): Yeah, the definitive 'guy' movie was so bad I turned it off. It was shortly after Lee VanCleef's character beat some information out of a whore that I realized that this movie just flat out sucked. The dialog is too over the top to survive even the suspension of disbelief rule. The characters are so universally reprehensible that I was hoping for a three way shootout with no survivors. The dubbing and sound effects were unbelievably bad. There was at least a half-second difference between the video track and sound tracks and that gave it the feel of a Japanese monster flick. There were no sounds except dialog and guns and an occasional door. Just a horrific train wreck of a movie overall.
Insomnia (Trey): Insomnia is not an exciting affliction. Name a movie "Flesh-eating bacteria" and then you can talk excitement, of course, the movie would be much shorter than Insomnia, which if the movie IS insomnia wouldn't be a bad thing. Robin Williams isn't scary like Hannibal Lector. He's scary like Chester the Molester and that's also not good. I don't think there's a likable person in the whole movie. I want them all to die.
It's Pat (Emma): Proof that Hollywood hasn't had an original idea since 1940 and that not all SNL skit rip-offs are a good idea. Horrific.
Johnny English (Me): It was so trite, juvenile, predictable and plain not funny that even the promise of Natalie Imbruglia in tight cleavage-revealing outfits could not entice me to endure it.
Lost in Space (LeeAnn): Such horrendously "written by the sappy woman at the end of the assembly line" Hallmark dialogue that even Gary Oldman couldn't save it. One of the few movies I've walked out on.
Lost in Translation (Trey): This is movie about an old and not very funny man who fancies himself to be either not as old as he is or way older than he is and definitely more funny than he is. And he stays up late at night. This movie should be stopped after the "Lip my stocking, Mr. Hallis" scene. Again, boring.
Meet Joe Black (Harvey): Beloved Wife & I figured it ought to be good, what with Anthony Hopkins. Bleah! Bad dialogue, turtle-paced-plot, a lot of blank expressions, and conversations that did nothing to advance the plot or story. I think we lasted half an hour.
Naked Lunch (Me): I only rented this because it starred Peter Weller. If Robocop was the star it had to be good, right? Oh man was I shocked when I discovered it was actually a porn/snuff flick featuring a lunatic fucking a typewriter. This one got turned off the first time Gizmak the Typer licked itself clean with its twelve inch tongue.
Passion of the Christ, The (Helen): I had thought it would be inspired, but instead it was like watching defrost meat get whipped on a kitchen counter. Dude, can you say "gratuitous"?
Punchdrunk Love (Trey): This is a movie about what if Adam Sandler were just a smidge more retarded than he already is and is still able to convince a pretty lady to put up with him for more than five seconds. If I were Adam Sandler in this movie, I wouldn't be retarded, but I just might kill everyone I know with a tire iron or a steak knife.
Scream (Mark): I also made my friends get up and leave the theater after the beginning of Scream (when the girl gets her throat slashed and can't scream to her parents) because I realized I could no longer stomache slasher films. We saw Beavis and Butthead Do America and had (at least I did, and I'm not much of a fan of Beavis and Butthead) a grand ole time.
Seabiscuit (Ilyka): I probably could have stayed with it if I'd tried harder. As it was I was mocking the condescending narration a lot: "Now y'see, back in the 1930s was a time known as the Great Depression, because it was very depressing not being able to find 'nuff to eat. But it was Great if you were rich." But I cracked and we walked out of the theater halfway through.
Starsky & Hutch (Susie): I think it was the first movie I literally walked out of the theater on since The Man Who Fell to Earth. Thank God it was playing at my theater and I hadn't paid anything to get in. The absolute bottom-scraping of "let's turn old tv shows into movies between making remakes and sequels because thinking is hard" school of film making.
Touch of Evil (Ilyka): One of mine is one which repeatedly makes the "best" lists by people who know far, far more about the art of filmmaking than I do: Touch of Evil. Couldn't watch the damn thing. Couldn't take Orson Welles' mumbling. Couldn't buy Charlton Heston (yes, Charlton Heston) as a Mexican. Couldn't stand the female lead. Couldn't even follow what was going on because, oh my God, did I mention the mumbling? So I guess I have no taste in cinema.
Toxic Avenger, The (Clancy): I remember being in the video store with my (then) girlfriend and looking at the (then) old campy movie section. A guy stranding next to me said, “Hey Pal, watch this one. I just say it and it was good.” So we took it home. And had to kill it about 30 minutes in. I still wonder about that stranger. Did he really think it was good, or is he still laughing?
Truth or Dare (Dopple-G): It was all about girlfriend secrets and stuff like that. I was really looking for tits and ass - you know, spank material - and this was targetted for girls and homosexual guys.
Posted by: Jim at
05:33 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1568 words, total size 10 kb.
1
"Lost in Space". Such horrendously "written by the sappy woman at the end of the assembly line" Hallmark dialogue that even Gary Oldman couldn't save it. One of the few movies I've walked out on.
Posted by: LeeAnn at June 18, 2004 10:50 AM (HxCeX)
2
"Meet Joe Black"
Beloved Wife & I figured it ought to be good, what with Anthony Hopkins.
Bleah! Bad dialogue, turtle-paced-plot, a lot of blank expressions, and conversations that did nothing to advance the plot or story.
I think we lasted half an hour.
Posted by: Harvey at June 18, 2004 12:59 PM (tJfh1)
3
"It's Pat."
Proof that Hollywood hasn't had an original idea since 1940 and that not all SNL skit rip-offs are a good idea.
Horrific.
Posted by: Emma at June 18, 2004 02:55 PM (NOZuy)
4
One of mine is one which repeatedly makes the "best" lists by people who know far, far more about the art of filmmaking than I do:
Touch of Evil.
Couldn't watch the damn thing. Couldn't take Orson Welles' mumbling. Couldn't buy Charlton Heston (yes, Charlton Heston) as a Mexican. Couldn't stand the female lead. Couldn't even follow what was going on because, oh my God, did I mention the mumbling?
So I guess I have no taste in cinema.
Oh, and
Battlefield Earth. My boyfriend rented it as an exercise in masochism. Turns out he's a much bigger masochist than I am, because he made it all the way through and I had to quit at about 45 minutes.
And
Seabiscuit, but I probably could have stayed with it if I'd tried harder. As it was I was mocking the condescending narration a lot:
"Now y'see, back in the 1930s was a time known as the
Great Depression, because it was very depressing not being able to find 'nuff to eat. But it was Great if you were rich."
But I cracked and we walked out of the theater halfway through.
Posted by: ilyka at June 18, 2004 04:15 PM (gESMJ)
5
As an afficienado (I hope I spelled that right) of bad movies, I have sat through some real awful ones: Battlefied Earth, Caligula (apparently the edited version, but it was disgusting enough), and Lord of the Rings (not the Peter Jackson version, of course, but the crappy 70's cartoon). But for movies I have walked out of, I can only think of one (and this is from someone who sat through 3 Strikes):
Ace Ventura: Pet Detective
As if watching Jim Carrey talk through his butt wasn't enough, there's a truly excreble love scene with "In The Jungle" in the background. My brother and I, though only having paid a dollar to witness this cinematic treat, raced each other to the car after that.
I also made my friends get up and leave the theater after the beginning of Scream (when the girl gets her throat slashed and can't scream to her parents) because I realized I could no longer stomache slasher films. We saw Beavis and Butthead Do America and had (at least I did, and I'm not much of a fan of Beavis and Butthead) a grand ole time.
Posted by: Mark at June 19, 2004 12:36 AM (WC3O7)
6
Eyes Wide Shut - This is a movie about walking. Tom Cruise is a good walker especially after dark. It was almost a movie about Nicole Kidman's Heiney, but it doesn't show up enough to make it worth watching. There are some other naked people, too, but they also do not outwiegh the apparent vast importance this movie places on walking. And also some talking about boring things.
Lost in Translation - This is movie about an old and not very funny man who fancies himself to be either not as old as he is or way older than he is and definitely more funny than he is. And he stays up late at night. This movie should be stopped after the "Lip my stocking, Mr. Hallis" scene. Again, boring.
Insomnia - Insomnia is not an exciting affliction. Name a movie "Flesh-eating bacteria" and then you can talk excitement, of course, the movie would be much shorter than Insomnia, which if the movie IS insomnia wouldn't be a bad thing. Robin Williams isn't scary like Hannibal Lector. He's scary like Chester the Molester and that's also not good. I don't think there's a likable person in the whole movie. I want them all to die.
About Schmidt - I hate him for peeing on the floor. I hate him for making me see those huge, gorss boobies. I hate this movie because like Eyes Wide Shut it is boring, except instead of being about walking, this movie is about driving, which is just as boring. At least it's day time.
Punchdrunk Love - This is a movie about what if Adam Sandler were just a smidge more retarded than he already is and is still able to convince a pretty lady to put up with him for more than five seconds. If I were Adam Sandler in this movie, I wouldn't be retarded, but I just might kill everyone I know with a tire iron or a steak knife.
Blood Work - This is a movie about how some women really just want to have sex with really old, gross, wrinkly men. That's their business, but it should have been on the poster so that I would know to avoid it. Also, there is some boring talking. I swear I saw a boom mike come into the frame a couple of times. Oh, and there's a kid that stands as a good argument for abortion.
Cabin Fever - Ok. I take it back about there being an exciting movie about flesh-eating bacteria. This movie has that and it's just dumb. Dumb + about 75 million gallons of fake blood. It's a movie about how movies sometimes don't have any relationship at all with reality. The only good thing about this movie is that it's the movie TGD and I watched on our first date.
***
I could keep going but I think I'll stop there.
Posted by: Trey Givens at June 19, 2004 07:17 PM (Tz+GJ)
7
Totally disagree with Trey about Lost in Translation. That's about the best film ever made.
I have to nominate "The Passion of the Christ". I had thought it would be inspired, but instead it was like watching defrost meat get whipped on a kitchen counter. Dude, can you say "gratuitous"?
Posted by: Helen at June 21, 2004 04:37 AM (pKvux)
8
Let me give you an Oriental one: Farewell my Concubine had me wishing I was in a room with someone actually draggin their fingernails down a blackboard. Not only did my girlfriend at the time and I walk out, it was so bad it put paid to any chance of sex that night.
Damn that movie.
Posted by: Simon at June 21, 2004 05:02 AM (FUPxT)
9
Yeah... lots of people really loved Lost in Translation. Some people really loved Eyes Wide Shut, too.
Roger Ebert (That's the live one, right?) actually asserted that people who say they hate the LIT movie are saying more about themselves than the movie.
Suffice it to say that I 'get it' on both movies, but I still don't like it. *shrug*
Who is John Galt?
Posted by: Trey Givens at June 21, 2004 12:48 PM (Fo1B/)
10
GF has made me more discerning so I don’t watch as much trash as I used too, but that said I have only ever killed one movie. Ever. And I’ve seen a lot of those mentioned above. I wanted to kill Pulp Fiction the first time I saw it, but I kept watching out of bemused bewilderment and in the end I liked it. Now I love it. And as a result I’ll give almost ever movie a chance – you just never know when you’re killing a good one (like I almost did with Pulp Fiction).
I remember being in the video store with my (then) girlfriend and looking at the (then) old campy movie section. A guy stranding next to me said, “Hey Pal, watch this one. I just say it and it was good.” So we took it home. And had to kill it about 30 minutes in. I still wonder about that stranger. Did he really think it was good, or is he still laughing? Anyway, the movie was; The Toxic Avenger.
Posted by: Clancy at June 21, 2004 01:40 PM (EGVPL)
11
Starsky & Hutch. I think it was the first movie I literally walked out of the theater on since The Man Who Fell to Earth. Thank God it was playing at
my theater and I hadn't paid anything to get in. The absolute bottom-scraping of "let's turn old tv shows into movies between making remakes and sequels because thinking is hard" school of film making.
Posted by: Susie at June 21, 2004 02:57 PM (KCcUy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 19, 2004
June 18, 2004
And Silence
Terrorists in Saudi Arabia have carried through on their threats to kill their American hostage. I'm not going to hot link to anything because I honestly don't want that traffic. It's going to be everywhere you look in a few hours anyway so you don't need my links.
Paul M. Johnson Jr. was a contractor in Saudi Arabia, our "ally" in the fight on terrorism. His captors beheaded him as they previously murdered American Nick Berg.
Saudi Arabia is the birthplace of the majority of the 9/11 suicide mass murderers. Saudi Arabia is where Osama bin Laden was born and where he made the millions of dollars that started his criminal empire. It is the stronghold of Wahabiism, the ultra strict fundamentalist Islamic sect that makes all of this possible.
In the past several months, foreign (pronounced "American") facilities have been attacked by terrorist strike teams and bombings. In each instance the Saudi police have allowed terrorists to escape, either through negligence or by disengaging contact.
I won't be saying anything at the moment that I might have some slight chance of regretting later. Instead I will just take this space to express my deepest sympathies for Paul Johnson's friends and family.
Posted by: Jim at
02:32 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 206 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Exactly. I have no words.
Thank you for saying them for me.
Posted by: Emma at June 18, 2004 02:45 PM (NOZuy)
2
Instead I will just take this space to express my deepest sympathies for Paul Johnson's friends and family.
Echoed.
I thought they'd do it. I hoped they wouldn't. I'm sorry they did.
Posted by: ilyka at June 18, 2004 04:07 PM (gESMJ)
3
I am beyond anger with this latest Middle East horror show.
It makes me ill to think of what Paul Johnson suffered at the hands of these demons.
Rest in Peace, Paul
Posted by: Bob K. at June 19, 2004 11:14 PM (/kKz5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I'm sort of a "Kyle LeBlanc"
The
Analogia Star Estimator compares me to these guys:

Kyle MacLachlan and Matt LeBlanc. Yeah, I guess they could hang with me.
Hey, wait a sec. Would that make me Chandler or Ross?
(Filched from the exceptionally lovely Sandra McDowell)
Posted by: Jim at
02:11 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Only fair, considering I think you're Sexiest Male Blogger, anyway.
Posted by: Emma at June 18, 2004 02:31 PM (NOZuy)
2
Not a bad combo....although a little confusing...a cross between Agent Cooper and Joey...hmmmm
Posted by: Tif at June 18, 2004 05:56 PM (jCFyL)
3
Why, thankee ladies. >:-)
(That's supposed to be a naughty grin. Is there an emoticon for that?)
Posted by: Jim at June 18, 2004 06:30 PM (IOwam)
4
Happy Father's Day, Jim.
Posted by: Ted at June 20, 2004 07:38 AM (ZjSa7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Is there an electrician in the audience?
Possible problem with the new house
(which is still going pretty smoothly and still scheduled for closing on the 22nd but our broker said don't count that day as gospel cause it could be a day or two later and why did we bother specifying an exact date on the legal documents if it's subject to change based on stuff we have no control over anyway but that's not what this post is about so I'll drop it for now). The current air conditioner isn't the original air conditioner. That's not a problem at all. Newer is generally better and in this case it's a very nice air conditioner. The problem is that the original fuse and breaker are 40 amps and they weren't changed when this new unit was put in. This unit is rated at 30 amps. More modern, more efficient, pulls less juice.
Is this a problem? We made changing out the breaker for a 30 amp breaker one of our requirements but the sellers have been advised that it's a no-use change (no reason to do it, in other words) so they don't want to do it.
Is there a real problem if the cutouts are rated at 40 amps and the unit is rated at 30 amps?
Posted by: Jim at
11:51 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 226 words, total size 1 kb.
1
In my non-professional non-electrician opinion, yeah, that's a problem. If, for some reason, the current should surge to 35+ amps, or stay above 30 amps for an extended period, the breaker won't open and the air conditioner could be damaged.
What did your inspector say? Are you willing to split the cost with them, as a way of meeting them halfway?
Posted by: Victor at June 20, 2004 11:11 AM (16A49)
2
Turns out there's another reason for the difference between service amps and appliance rating. The wiring is aluminum. Can't legally install aluminum service components here in Georgia so if the breaker or fuse are brought down to 30amp it will be with copper service components. Copper and aluminum mix poorly - dissimilar metal corrosion, component movement, increased heat. Rewiring the service is right out. He's got no problem with putting in a 30amp breaker but recommends not doing so because of the aluminum/copper problem.
The plan now is to look for an old but serviceable 30 amp aluminum breaker and install it on the sly.
Posted by: Jim at June 20, 2004 04:41 PM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Last night I had an epiphany
It was a bit too sweet and the hot fudge was too runny.
Actually I really did have one. I'll clue y'all in later after I flesh it out and talk to Lovely Wife about it.
Posted by: Jim at
07:19 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And what would that be????
Posted by: LW at June 18, 2004 09:15 AM (saeHM)
2
You're just going to have to wait like everybody else. Patience my Lovely one.
Posted by: Jim at June 18, 2004 09:20 AM (IOwam)
3
Well,one reason you certainly are NOT married for to me is PATIENCE!
Posted by: LW at June 18, 2004 09:42 AM (saeHM)
Posted by: Jim at June 18, 2004 09:45 AM (IOwam)
5
Isn't this great - you and LW don't even need to talk to each other anymore, coz you've got the blog.
I'm looking forward to the "Honey, we need milk and bread" comment.
Posted by: Simon at June 21, 2004 05:04 AM (FUPxT)
6
Comments are entirely innapropriate for milk/bread messages. That's what IM is for!
Silly Simon.
Posted by: Jim at June 21, 2004 05:41 AM (saeHM)
7
Ok, my impatioence has gotten the better of me ... what's the deal?
(By all means requested that I bog off and mind my own business as I am obviously just being wholly nosey)
Posted by: Rob at June 22, 2004 11:31 AM (kXZI6)
8
Sorry to tease. I'm easily distract...hey, look! Something shiny!
I'll post on it today.
Posted by: Jim at June 22, 2004 11:41 AM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 17, 2004
They just don't stop! Two more ladies want some pimpin:
From: cheryl
I would love to have a new car, but unfortunately I cannot afford one, but if you can pimp my escort, I would be forever grateful!!
Give a girl from Arkansas a break and pimp my ride.
and
From: Ashley
I would love it if you would put my brother Johnathon Norris on your show because he always says i wanna pimp my ride.
Thank You
Ashley Norris
The mail I'm sending both is fantastically similar, differing only in the details that they've provided. I've decided to go for specific graphical targets. The pictures I'm getting now are useless and it's too much work to keep building up the scam waiting for these brain challenged folk to figure out that this is fake. Instead of that, I want a collection of pictures of people holding up Snooze Button Dreams signs. Now is that a noble goal or what?
more...
Posted by: Jim at
01:43 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 389 words, total size 2 kb.
1
High on SBD - oh you're very very naughty ... but this is turning out to be one of the comedy highlights of my summer - carry on
Posted by: Rob at June 18, 2004 06:59 AM (kXZI6)
2
Yo bro aint that be DISfortunitly?
Find de fools an' make em *dance* know what I'm sayin. yo
Posted by: c-rapper Claire at June 18, 2004 11:13 AM (l1oyw)
3
PIMP my ride PLEASE. I am a mom with 4 kids i drive a 1999 baby blue ford winstar with a busted out tail lights and i giant dent in the bumper.Im imberassed for my kids when they have to ride in this piece of crap!!!
I live in Arkansas and i am in hick town usa please MTV PIMP MY RIDE!!!!!!!
Posted by: Michele Garrison at September 15, 2004 07:28 PM (VXHid)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Survivor News
Jimmie of
Suburban Sundries Shack has
won immunity this week. Congrats Jimmie! Now we wait for tomorrow when we hear who gets voted off of Blogtiki.
The contestants are behaving far too much like a 12 step support group in the comments over there. We want blood and braggadocio. Go poke them with a stick.
Posted by: Jim at
09:07 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Go ahead and poke me...I like it!
Posted by: Lynn at June 17, 2004 04:11 PM (GN3Xe)
Posted by: Jim at June 17, 2004 07:42 PM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
One of the sucky parts of job hunting
There are a lot of sucky things about job hunting. One of the suckiest is that you have to give at least a cursory examination to all of your email. Even the ones that SpamBayes absolutely guarantees are spam. I know that SpamBayes is 99%+ efficient but if I miss a chance at Ultimajob because their HR guy uses too much marketspeak and SpamBayes equates his missive with a cia|is mailing and I didn't catch it before deleting it I would be seriously pissed. No, wait a sec. I wouldn't be pissed because I wouldn't actually know about it if I didn't catch it.
Ah, hell. You know what I mean - I don't want to miss anything and as a person looking at a lack of employment I'm motivated enough to do something that I haven't done in months - read the Subjects of a hundred or so porn and drug spams on a daily basis.
On the plus side I got a genuine giggle out of this one from Grover Oneill (no apostrophe please, thank you very much): The Beeeeeest Lubeeeee For Your Johnsooooooon.
Hehehehe. Now I can't stop thinking about my Johnsoooooooon and what the Beeeeeest Lubeeeee for it might be.
Hehehe - Lubeeeeeee. That's a winner.
Posted by: Jim at
07:15 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 226 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yay elongated spammy goodness. I don't know if you saw
this post over at IP ut it seems to be a new trend!
Posted by: Rob at June 17, 2004 08:03 AM (kXZI6)
2
I wonder if that kind of thing should go on a resume. You know: Creator of beeeest lubbbeeee for your johhhhnson. That might perk up interest.
Not sure if you're already ahead of the game, but I did get hits on my resume (CV over here) when I posted it on Monster.com and Jobsite.com and allowed recruiters to search it (i.e. I made it "published"). It worked-I did get calls and hits on it. Maybe something to think about?
Posted by: Helen at June 17, 2004 08:53 AM (y6U94)
3
I got a good one this morning: "So effective you'll need new underwear!"
Posted by: Jennifer at June 17, 2004 11:55 AM (DdBLw)
4
I added that to my resume Helen but I think I'm going to go with Jen's contribution instead. I mean - how can you beat "So effective you'll need new underwear" as a bullet point?
Posted by: Jim at June 17, 2004 03:29 PM (IOwam)
5
If you do find ultimajob, will you also save me a spot in the cube next to you?
Oh, and please don't tell anyone I asked. I think my general attitude these days is enough of a hint.
Posted by: Trey Givens at June 17, 2004 07:28 PM (J7mIn)
6
You betcha, Trey. It'll make campaign coordination much easier too.
Posted by: Jim at June 17, 2004 07:55 PM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 16, 2004
Melissa still wants some pimpin
Melissa wrote back too. Dey jess caint get enuff o this ride pimpin, yo!!
From: Melissa
it taking me a little longer because i can't send u a picture of my mens ride it's not working i'll keep on trying
She would have gotten back to me sooner but she's having some email problems. Damn those Hotmail addresses! She sent me two very large pictures (over 900 KB each). This wouldn't have been too bad except she sent one of them six times. Damn, girl! Lay off my inbox! But in Melissa's defense, I did already determine that she's clueless and I instructed her to send pictures. It doesn't take the Oracle to figure out that this is a recipe for disaster.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
02:11 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 820 words, total size 6 kb.
1
I'm not sure how long I can keep this up. I'm actually in physical pain from writing two of those in one day.
Posted by: Jim at June 16, 2004 02:25 PM (IOwam)
2
The sad thing is that she's probably super stoked to be doing this with you and not even having the faintest clue that she's being Jim Punk'd (or should that be Snooze Punk'd?).
And yeah, I'm hoping that the dishrag bandana thing DOESN'T catch on.
Posted by: Johnny Huh? at June 16, 2004 04:09 PM (YkElu)
3
What have you got yourself into?
Posted by: Simon at June 16, 2004 10:45 PM (OyeEA)
4
Dayum, J-Snooze...
Youz gots me huk'd!
Posted by: DeAnna at June 17, 2004 01:28 PM (IdVP4)
5
You're evil. Funny as hell. But evil.
Did Melissa get the small print too?
Posted by: Jiminy at June 17, 2004 02:31 PM (56t8C)
6
Yeah, Johnny, I had that thought too. It's sort of like fishing with a howitzer.
Melissa got the new small print too. That's going out on every email now.
Posted by: Jim at June 17, 2004 02:45 PM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Who you callin eejitous!?
I'm
an irredeemably eejitous, liberal, tight as fuck, pathetically simple-minded, dribbling child!
How rude. Calling me a liberal*...why I aughta...
See how compatible you are with me!
(Snaked off Robert's beal post, and if that doesn't sound naughty then I don't know what does.)
* I kid. Being one of those folks mostly in the middle a lower case "L" liberal label fits as well as a lower case "C" conservative label. Which is to say, not tolerably well at all.
Posted by: Jim at
10:39 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The Flying Pig ticket is the ticket of diversity!
I am "an apparently intelligent, liberal, tight as fuck, relatively well adjusted human being."
We're only 85% compatible. 85% This party encourages free thought!
Posted by: Trey Givens at June 16, 2004 08:10 PM (Y6G/V)
2
I am "an irredeemably eejitous, conservative, tight as fuck, pathetically simple-minded, dribbling child." And for some reason that means we're only 78% compatible...
Posted by: Clancy at June 16, 2004 10:28 PM (vwcB4)
3
Now how did you get conservative when Trey and I got liberal? It's not fair I tell ya. Not fair at all.
Posted by: Jim at June 17, 2004 05:09 AM (saeHM)
4
Lookie here -- "a generally unfuckwitted, liberal, tight as fuck, relatively well adjusted human being."
*blushes*
Jim -- 88% compatibility. [should I worry?]
Posted by: Claire at June 18, 2004 12:01 PM (l1oyw)
5
Claire got liberal AND relatively well adjusted? That survey's broken! ;-)
Posted by: Jim at June 18, 2004 12:44 PM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Pimpin for Heathony
Heathony wrote back again. I think I scared the little guy a bit.
From: Heath
Hey Xibit its my dad (anthony) just that im usein my friends heath e-mail address cause i don't have one k dogg srry for da confusin but ill try gather some hunnies up n send em to ya k
peace out
Now hold on a second here. His dad is Anthony and his friend is Heath. So who the hell is he? I guess he'll remain Heathony for now. What's up with using a friend's Hotmail addy? Did they start charging for these things and nobody told me? Ah, screw it. I'm having fun here.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
08:04 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 612 words, total size 3 kb.
1
can
bahahahaha This is the bestest disclaimer I've seen -- the ad companies oughta pick up this style.
Though for this target market it might as well be written in Sanskrit. ahhh, the benefits of a state education.
Posted by: Claire at June 18, 2004 01:10 PM (l1oyw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 14, 2004
"Under God" is AOK, for the moment
The
Supreme Court overturned a 9th Circuit Court ruling against saying the Pledge of Allegiance in schools because of the controversial word "God". Unfortunately they didn’t actually rule on the Constitutionality of “under God”. The lower court ruling was overturned because part-time dad Newdow didn’t have proper custody to sue in his daughter’s name.
Which means weÂ’ll be seeing this again sometime soon.
Incidentally, today is Flag Day and the 50th anniversary of the addition of "under God" to the Pledge.
(Hat tip to Lovely Wife)
Posted by: Jim at
01:42 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 100 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I am pretty sure that this gentleman spends United States currency!! "In God We Trust" is on every piece!
Posted by: Linda at June 15, 2004 07:33 AM (Lnk6Z)
2
As my cousin remarked to me yesterday it's highly unlikely that he works on Christmas either.
Posted by: Jim at June 15, 2004 07:39 AM (IOwam)
3
yeah i read that yesturday... hmm...
Posted by: pylorns at June 15, 2004 09:52 AM (FTYER)
4
I, for one, wholly support either the removal of "under God" or the addition of an "s" to "under Gods".
It is the height of arrogance to force Muslim children or Buddhist children to say the Pledge of Allegiance to a God that has absolutely zero to do with their belief system that they are being raised in.
Just because there's a codified practice of the Church impacting how the state runs doesn't make it acceptable or legal, it just makes it a habit.
Posted by: Johnny Huh? at June 15, 2004 05:45 PM (YkElu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
For the ladies - it's Karate Man!
Due to popular demand I present
Heathony's dad!
What do we know about this fella? Well girls we can be reasonably sure that he's employed. These photos were taken behind Radio Shack and he's wearing a Radio Shack shirt! Either he works there or Heathony got Pops entered into a shirt giveaway at the Shack.
We know that Heathony is very fond of him. That's cool and says good things about his character.
We know that Heathony isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. That doesn't necessarily reflect on Karate Man himself but you know the old saying about fruit not falling far from the tree and all. Take it under advisement.
He was in the Air Force and that really doesn't tell us a whole lot except he couldn't get into the Navy and that he is very, very lazy.
Ha! I kid. I'm such a kidder. So he's a veteran and that's also very cool.
He has a lot of tattoos. This could indicate gang affiliation or show a predisposition for hepatitis or Aids. Then again he's a veteran so there's every chance in the world that he was never off on a drunken bender getting inked. We'd give mad props for the tats themselves but we can't really see any good looking ones. We'll reserve judgment on this one.
He's a kick boxer and looks to be in pretty decent shape. A bit of the Steven Seagal paunch showing up but otherwise quite solid looking.
From that last picture we see that he keeps his truck very tidy. A clean truck is a sign of an orderly mind (or a disturbed one). Speaking of the truck, he's driving and maintaining a 20 year old vehicle so we know he's frugal (or cheap). Okay, this one's a wash too.
One thing we know for sure is that Karate Man wants you. Yes, you. And he's going to get you too because he is indeed Karate Man. Just look into his eyes. Oh yea, baby. Oh yeah.
Posted by: Jim at
01:24 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 352 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Mr. July! Be still my heart! Thanks, Jim!
Posted by: Susie at June 14, 2004 05:33 PM (oJbri)
2
My pleasure, Susie. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at June 15, 2004 06:04 AM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
96kb generated in CPU 0.2114, elapsed 0.2756 seconds.
103 queries taking 0.2399 seconds, 334 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.