March 10, 2005
Just what the hell gives Congress the power to investigate a private enterprise in this manner? Does steroids in baseball compromise national security? Is a drug free baseball league some sort of little known right of the American people?
Lemme check...
Nope. Nothing at all in the Constitution says that Congress is the regulatory body for private sports organizations. Understandably, the League has an opinion similar to my own.
Stanley Brand, a lawyer for the baseball commissioner's office, said the committee had no jurisdiction, was trying to violate baseball's first amendment privacy rights, and was attempting to "satisfy their prurient interest into who may and may not have engaged in this activity."
This isn't just any Congressional panel either. It's the "Government Reform Committee". What is the purpose of the Government Reform Committee? According to their website, they don't have one. There is no overall guiding focus noted for this committee anywhere in their literature. Isn't that wonderful?
The subcommittees are a bit more forthcoming. The subcommittee for Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources has this little "About us" blurb:
The Subcommittee is responsible for authorizing legislation for the Office of National Drug Control Policy and its programs as well as general oversight for all U.S. government drug control efforts (including international and interdiction programs, law enforcement, and prevention and treatment initiatives). It also has oversight jurisdiction for several cabinet departments, including the Department of Justice, certain activities of the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, the Department of Commerce, and other agencies including the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives and the federal court system. In addition to its ongoing work on drug policy matters, the Subcommittee has most recently completed an intensive review of U.S. border agencies and policies and the impact of enhanced homeland security requirements on federal law enforcement.
So it sets and authorizes legislation on drugs and has oversight power over a bunch of government departments. This would seem to give them the power to subpoena and question people in those departments. Where in this mass of gobbledygook do they invent an authorization to directly investigate a private enterprise? According to the Committee this sweeping power comes from "House Rules":
Reacting to Brand's comments, committee spokesman David Marin said: "Mr. Brand has his facts wrong. He failed to recognize that House rules give this committee the authority to investigate any matter at any time, and we are authorized to request or compel testimony and document production related to any investigation. It's a shame that Major League Baseball has resorted to hiding behind 'legalese' -- and inaccurate 'legalese' at that."
Hiding behind 'legalese'? How about improper use of unregulated and illegally appropriated power?
These people make me ill. I sincerely hope we see Major League Baseball v. Associated Congressional Fucktards in the courts soon.
Posted by: Jim at
08:26 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 495 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: shank at March 10, 2005 09:06 AM (+H1yK)
Posted by: Ed Flinn at March 10, 2005 10:28 AM (omfWu)
Posted by: Garret at March 11, 2005 08:34 AM (IOwam)
Posted by: Jim at March 11, 2005 08:45 AM (tyQ8y)
Posted by: The Precinct Chair at March 11, 2005 11:37 PM (Yp41U)
Posted by: 8ZERO8 at March 14, 2005 03:52 PM (p6ZOT)
87 queries taking 0.1827 seconds, 232 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








