February 11, 2004

What's the difference between art and porn?

The other night things got a bit frisky at home and Lovely Wife and I got a bit happy with the old digital camera. Hey, it's a free country, it was the privacy of our own home and the kids were all asleep. While reviewing the resulting incriminating evidence it became apparent that we had a difference of opinion. I thought that they were very beautiful and considered them artistic photos. Lovely Wife thought they were basically porn and that I better not even think of posting them.

Since I'm naturally contrary and I've got a good 8 hours or so before she can physically harm me I've decided to post a select couple of pics. I'm not trying to showcase the Peacock Family nudity here, I'm genuinely interested in whether you think these are artistic or pornographic.

If a female spreads her legs is it automatically porn? View image

If it's tastefully done can a penis be artistic? View image

Let me know what you think.

Posted by: Jim at 10:22 AM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 181 words, total size 2 kb.

1 I didn't even have to look and I knew what was in those pics. (You're getting predictable, Jim!) The only way I can see this backfiring is that people may be afraid to open them for fear that they are not work safe.

Posted by: Clancy at February 11, 2004 12:20 PM (EGVPL)

2 Also - it appears that you've played the p0rnolanche game again too! Heck you might be up to 200,000 hits by March 2nd...

Posted by: Clancy at February 11, 2004 12:24 PM (EGVPL)

3 Nah - I was careful this time. It's all inferred stuff avoiding the naughty key words so should avoid a pornolanche.

Posted by: Jim at February 11, 2004 12:34 PM (IOwam)

4 Porn

Posted by: Harvey at February 11, 2004 12:47 PM (tJfh1)

5 Best laugh I've had all day !

Posted by: Sandcrab at February 11, 2004 02:51 PM (AkUpj)

6 My God, my eyes! My eyes! Put a XXX warning on those next time, will ya'? Some of us have delicate sensitivities! Geez. Bordering on the perverse.

Posted by: Helen at February 11, 2004 02:55 PM (QNq2h)

7 Definitely porn.

Posted by: Susie at February 11, 2004 04:54 PM (0+cMc)

8 Glad there are some that agree with me.;-) PORN!!

Posted by: LW at February 11, 2004 05:00 PM (saeHM)

9 Y'all just have no artistic sense.

Posted by: Jim at February 11, 2004 05:04 PM (IOwam)

10 Oh, the exquisite lighting, the subtle tonalities, the delicate juxtaposition of.... Who am I kidding? Puppy Porn!

Posted by: Light & Dark at February 11, 2004 10:15 PM (Hrm9v)

11 Well, I'm sorry to say that while I wouldn't call them porn, I think those photos are looonnngggggg way away from "beautiful and artistic". But they are pretty funny . . .

Posted by: Anita Pomerantz at September 22, 2004 05:34 PM (Iadgk)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
21kb generated in CPU 0.019, elapsed 0.0866 seconds.
87 queries taking 0.0747 seconds, 237 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.