January 30, 2004
Open Letter To Everybody At The Office
Dear Y'all:
The group mailing address that sends email to everybody in the company is a feature that should be used sparringly. Its purpose is to allow a simple way for people like the President, CFO, and Bob to tell us when people are fired, when our W-2 forms will be ready, and when the gas leak is fixed, respectively. Occassional use by other people is okay, but only when they have an actual message imparting information that applies to the entire company. For example, it's okay when the receptionist sends out an email that the car wash guy is here. It's okay for someone to send an email when they put homemade cookies in the break room.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
03:54 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 935 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Well, at least you are not a state agency. When my mom worked for the state of NC (and you havent been here, btw, oh what you are missing). Their "reply all" or "send all" went to every e-mail address in the state. For the first year after the system was established they would get a mass personal e-mail every couple of weeks or so, and boy you always knew who the new guy in the office was. Any office. Anywhere in the state. We all just thought that was funny, ot anoying, though, and it taught the offender a lesson.
Tommy.
Posted by: tommy at January 30, 2004 04:39 PM (MhJXW)
2
It's worse in the military. Trust me.
The problem is: the nozzles who NEED to read and heed this missive will scan it and forward it to everyone in their distribution list.
*sigh*
You did your best, Jim.
Posted by: margi at February 02, 2004 07:22 PM (kpNlZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The most amazing thing
The most absolutely amazing thing about
this picture of Lovely Wife with Nicki (pup #1) is not the teasing swell of hip, so rounded and shapely that even the big droopy shirt can't hide it. It isn't the seductive "come hither" look in her eye. It isn't that she's lying down with a dog who's exposing his genitals. It's not even the gargantuan size of the graphic due to me not realizing how big it was as I uploaded it and being far too lazy to edit and upload another picture.
No, my friends. The most amazing thing is that Lovely Wife gave me verbal permission to take the photo. That's right. Actual permission. "You can take a picture if you want" will forever be scored upon my forebrain. She even told me where the camera was when i couldn't find it.
This is big, y'all. Is Lovely Wife losing her abject hatred of being photographed? Is she coming to appreciate the camera's lecherous stare?
Or perhaps I should be off to the shed to look for empty pods.
Posted by: Jim at
06:23 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 187 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ahum.....Now I hate it even more because you EXPOSED me!!:-P
Posted by: LW at January 30, 2004 08:21 AM (fkewd)
2
Hey, at least I didn't put up any of the nudies. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at January 30, 2004 08:46 AM (IOwam)
3
Well, I think both photograph subjects look cute and well-rested!
Posted by: Helen at January 30, 2004 09:50 AM (mjzOu)
4
Cute picture....Love the sock in the background!
Posted by: Tiffani at January 30, 2004 09:53 AM (0i1dP)
5
Tiffani, I don't think that's a sock. Looks like a waistband, and you can kinda make out the letters...
A-I-N-E-S.... Haines. oh shit.
Jim didn't have any underwear on while he was taking the photograph!
No wonder LW looks half asleep.
Posted by: MojoMark at January 30, 2004 12:30 PM (E+LQu)
6
H-A-N-E-S. No "I". :-P
Everybody in my household takes their socks off at any random time throughout the day. You can find them on the couches, the floor, the fireplace, the dog food bowl...you name it. I don't even have a visual recognition factor for them any longer. They are effectively invisible to me.
Regarding underwear, it's far easier to pick out the times that I
am wearing a ball control device that the times that I'm not.
Do your balls hang low?
Do they wiggle to and fro?
Can you tie 'em in a knot?
Can you tie 'em in a bow?
Do you wear 'em on your shoulder,
Like a continental soldier?
Do your balls hang low?
Posted by: Jim at January 30, 2004 01:22 PM (IOwam)
7
2 things..
1. IF and that's a big if - Jim was naked where's the cow? I thought she was major part of his sex life.
2. Please God tell me you don't wear tighty whitey's. Jim say it aint so....
Posted by: Tiffani at January 30, 2004 01:26 PM (0i1dP)
8
Tiffani figured it out. As there's no cow in the picture I am obviously clothed.
I have both tighty-whiteys as well as boxers in the drawer. Depending on the pants worn I'll favor one style over the other. With shorts I'll generally wear whiteys to prevent peek-a-boo effect. Right now I'm in boxers.
Posted by: Jim at January 30, 2004 02:05 PM (IOwam)
Posted by: annika at January 30, 2004 02:09 PM (zAOEU)
10
If the spousal unit is authorizing photos in this new fashion, I suggest you call Mulder & Skully... She's been switched!
Posted by: Nate at January 30, 2004 05:00 PM (l/r8N)
11
Rule number 1 of dog photos is any human in a dog photo looks fine as said dog is the focus of the photo.
Now you have to count the days until someone stops LW in the street and starts with "I was on this website the other day..."
Posted by: Simon at February 02, 2004 05:09 AM (FUPxT)
12
She is beautiful (LW, not the dog), but I notice no ring on her finger.....????
Posted by: me at February 07, 2004 11:26 AM (ulInj)
13
That's correct, me. And no, I'm not telling you where it is.
Posted by: Jim at February 07, 2004 05:08 PM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 29, 2004
It's too quiet in here
This morning in the shower I was accosted by an unnatural sensation. No kids yelling. No dog barking. No cat attempting to dig to China via the litter box. Just the delicate sound of the water sluicing off my naked body. The silence was unnerving.
I did the only thing a rational person with absolutely no singing ability could do in this situation. I made sound effects.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
10:05 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 408 words, total size 2 kb.
January 28, 2004
And they call it puppy love
The other day, Bacon walked by the puppy and gave her a kick. Not a mean kick, just a little "Hey there, I'm kicking you, what are you going to do about it?" type of kick.
Lovely Wife was the first to react as she yelled out ''Why did you do that!?" and he replied with only a look, head cocked just so and a facial expression that clearly said ''I haven't the foggiest idea what you are talking about". She rephrased her query ''Why did you kick the puppy?" He shrugged his shoulders and uttered the classic ''I dunno" that all parents are infinitely familiar with but his look clearly still indicated that he was clueless as to the subject under discussion.
So yesterday I was reading a story to little Burger. Kota was laying next to me, hoping for some petting action. The other two were sitting around having their brains sucked out by the evil glowing box in the corner. Kota got bored waiting for me to pay her attention and got up to find our other dog, Nicki. As she passed by Bacon, she calmly and casually turned her head to bite him as she passed. Not a mean bite, just a playful puppy bite. A bite that said "I bit you. Do something about it."
I yelled out "Kota! No! Why did you do that?" (animals can understand complex questions as long as you are angry when you ask them.) She sat down and looked at me, head cocked just a little bit and wearing an expression that said ''I haven't the foggiest idea what you are talking about." I didn't bother rephrasing the question.
We're in trouble.
Posted by: Jim at
06:30 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 295 words, total size 2 kb.
1
No, you are definitely not in trouble; you've just taken a giant step in learning about parenting! The raising of young of almost all mammals has striking similarities, regardless of specie.
Posted by: MommaBear at January 28, 2004 09:25 AM (TDtey)
2
So again and in short:
We ARE in trouble!
Posted by: LW at January 28, 2004 09:57 AM (fkewd)
3
Take heart, all is not lost. Just keep thinking on those cute little baby animals in the "cutesy-poo" documentaries about how the "Animal Kingdom" raises its young, including the ocassional swipe of a maternal paw to the head or rump of a young-un, and then the licks of caring given afterwards. Just stay two steps ahead of them and all will end well.
Yeah, it's work, but worth the effort, all the same!!
Posted by: MommaBear at January 28, 2004 01:33 PM (TDtey)
4
Two steps
ahead? I've got to catch up first! ;-)
Posted by: Jim at January 28, 2004 01:41 PM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 27, 2004
Basic Economics
The Scene: Lovely Wife is in the supermarket with the spawn children. They spy an unnecessary but not out of bounds pricewise item that they covet.
Bear: Momma, can we get that unnecessary but not out of bounds pricewise item that I covet?
Lovely Wife: No, Bear. I don't have the money for it right now.
Bear: You can use your card!
more...
Posted by: Jim at
09:59 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 326 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I didn't think you'd remember.You seemed asleep when I told you!!
Posted by: LW at January 27, 2004 10:08 AM (fkewd)
2
I remember everything! ;-)
Posted by: Jim at January 27, 2004 10:11 AM (IOwam)
3
Kind of makes you wonder what kind of commercials they are playing on Nickelodean these days...
Posted by: Susie at January 27, 2004 01:51 PM (0+cMc)
4
Actually this one they probably saw on another station (those ocations mother gets to see the news for once).Nickelodeon however has alot of irritating,sugar containing commercials.LOL
Posted by: LW at January 27, 2004 02:37 PM (fkewd)
5
That's funny and slightly disturbing all at the same time.
Of course the solution is to give the kids their own credit cards. They can experience the joy of purchasing, the dread of the bill, the horror of repaying and crippling interest payments before the repo men appear. A good life lesson and better than what they'll learn from Nemo, which seems to teach that fish escaping fish tanks is a good idea.
Posted by: Simon at January 27, 2004 08:57 PM (UKqGy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 23, 2004
You Want Pasteurized Processed American Cheese Flavored Product On That?
The Scene: Dopple-G and I are sitting down to lunch. He is eating naked burgers with cheese slices on top.
Background: Dopple-G actually enjoys American cheese singles and considers them to be actual cheese. I am a cheese snob where this pseudo-food is concerned.
Dopple-G: I've got "real cheese" today.
Me: That is not real cheese. It is "processed cheese food product".
Dopple-G: Why are you so anti-American?
Me: I'm not anti-American, I'm anti-cheese impersonation.
Dopple-G: American cheese is real cheese.
Me: Real cheese does not have partially dehydrogenated soy bean oil as an ingredient.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
06:04 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 540 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Velveeta.
Don't knock it till you go to a country where it's illegal.
Posted by: Helen at January 23, 2004 09:01 AM (I9OSd)
2
Oh, I must. I simply must. I abhor those plastic slices of near food. Now cheddar's a different story. I don't think I could live someplace without an ample supply of cheddar available.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 09:11 AM (IOwam)
3
Discusting,nasty,a humilliation to the word "cheese" and have I mentioned yet that people who eat that crap and actually call it "cheese" (including the makers) are INSANE?
The word KRAFT just gives me the creeps.
Yuck,yuck and MORE YUCK!
Posted by: LW at January 23, 2004 10:21 AM (fkewd)
4
I was going to say that, being the cheesefreak I am, I will eat any kind of cheese and that I would probably eat grass clippings if they were labeled "cheese" but then I realized this is just opening the door for the GM1 to rename Mr. Happy "The Big Cheese" and I don't need that kind of pressure. Nor the TMJ.
So I say nothing at all.
(Yay spray cheese!)
Posted by: LeeAnn at January 23, 2004 12:29 PM (HxCeX)
5
Dude, spray meat could bring BILLIONS! Not sure about the spray bread, though...although, I put spray "cheese" on crackers rather than bread, and spray crackers may be do-able...
Posted by: Susie at January 23, 2004 01:39 PM (0+cMc)
6
speaking about graas clippings..you know...I used to live in The Netherlands and there they have a cheese called "grass cheese".I think I might order some of off the ducth store now......
Posted by: LW at January 23, 2004 01:41 PM (fkewd)
7
Grass cheese? Oh, I hope you're joking. That's nothing like head cheese, is it? [spew]
I don't know if spray crackers could work. They're supposed to be crispy. Bread can be soft so I was thinking that would be possible. Spray it out into the desired shape and then the outside layer gets a firm film while the inside gets bubbly like spray insulation.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 01:46 PM (IOwam)
8
No,nothing like that at all.Its a typ of cheese that is seasonal.The cows eat special,fresh,new,young grass and that gives the cheese a special taste.Its very mild,smooth,soft...better then young Gouda.Its very yummy.:-)
Posted by: LW at January 23, 2004 01:58 PM (fkewd)
9
Phew! In that case, order away.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 02:06 PM (IOwam)
10
Dopple-G is a commie, right?
Posted by: Victor at January 24, 2004 12:24 PM (16A49)
11
Victor - Only as it pertains to dairy products.
Posted by: Jim at January 25, 2004 05:00 AM (fkewd)
12
i'm from england and we don't have spray cheese. sounds like we're missing out..
Posted by: lotty at December 02, 2004 11:34 AM (SgQqe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 20, 2004
First impressions can be oh so very wrong.
So, y'all know about our new puppy (Kota, short for Dakota) and how we took the calm, affectionate one instead of the hyperactive, psychotic one. By way of explaining our current situation I'll share with you the meaning of "Dakota", which I've just discovered after many hours of searching. The original Indian doesn't come over to English exactly but a loose translation is
"Oh, you thought I was the calm one? You are in such terrible shit that I would pity you if only I could sit still long enough to do so".
Apparently her original calm demeanor was the result of a heavy barbituate overdose. She has now self medicated with mescaline to compensate. I must, for the sake of the family's continued sanity (okay, the adults' continued sanity), find her stash.
It just came to me that the pet-style animals in the household now outnumber the humans. 2 dogs, 2 cats, 2 birds vs 5 bipeds. Thank god for opposable thumbs. Still, if they ever figure out basic mathematics we might be in for some trouble. If you ever come to the site and the entries are all "woof grrr woof" (and badly spelled) please send Snausages.
Posted by: Jim at
02:40 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 215 words, total size 1 kb.
1
quibble just for fun: wouldn't the birds be bipeds too?
Posted by: frances at January 20, 2004 05:17 PM (DrNMU)
2
Technically yes, but who can count on a bird? Last mistake you'll ever make.
Posted by: Jim at January 20, 2004 05:53 PM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 16, 2004
Entrapment
The Scene: Dopple-G and I are on the way home from work. It's a beatiful sunny Atlanta day, traffic is light, spirits are high.
Me: So, any plans for next Saturday?
Dopple-G: I plan on not doing any work. Period. No construction. No cleaning. No moving things about. Nothing.
Me: Easy, killer. I'm not trying to get you to do work.
Dopple-G: Yes you are. Any time you have something fun in mind you say "Hey, do you want to do this fun thing next Saturday?" When you are trying to get me to do work you say "So, any plans for next Saturday?" and then I either have to lie and say I've got plans or make up something really quick because as soon as I say that I don't have any plans you'll say "Great, then you can help me do somethingorother" and somethingorother is always work.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
08:17 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 699 words, total size 4 kb.
1
The ultimate cousin-trap.Always works.
Posted by: LW at January 16, 2004 08:31 AM (fkewd)
2
Heh heh, this is why I'm glad nobody trusts me to be semi responsible for their kids... of the two I'd go for Brother Bear. I saw it with a couple of similarly aged friedns and we all enjoyed it
Posted by: Robert at January 16, 2004 08:38 AM (kXZI6)
3
Brother Bear was pretty good. I saw that a couple weeks back with Bacon (child #2). Some of the parents are probably going to be concerned with the killin' in the beginning of the movie though so I'm thinking we'll end up with Looney Tunes.
Posted by: Jim at January 16, 2004 09:01 AM (IOwam)
4
really? i figured it'd have big kid jokes in it...
Posted by: pylorns at January 16, 2004 10:42 AM (FQQ7F)
5
Yeah but we are dealing with some kids from PBS-only homes.Know what I mean?
Posted by: LW at January 16, 2004 10:45 AM (fkewd)
6
The setup for the central plot involves one of three brothers dying in a bear attack and then the youngest brother hunting down and killing that bear. It was a good movie and my 3 year old enjoyed it but he's a lot like me when it comes to scary stuff. I know that the big guy (4 yrs) would have a problem with it.
The last thing I want is a half dozen 4 year olds who can't get to sleep 'cause they're scared a bear will get them. Heh.
Posted by: Jim at January 16, 2004 10:47 AM (IOwam)
7
OK, so I'm one of the 5 or 6 people who liked LXG. *sigh*
On the other hand, the movie named after this post... even Catherine Zeta-Jones' rear couldn't save it.
Posted by: Jon at January 16, 2004 03:20 PM (B9rRW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 09, 2004
Learning to speak
Bacon has a hard time with the "V" sound and he tends to avoid it or substitute different sounds for it. Instead of "vanilla" he uses "Tamilla" (the "N" changes to an "M" because, let's face it, "tamilla" just sounds better than "tanilla"). I expect that if he ever tried to go for "Veritable" it would come out like "Terrible" and I don't even want to think what he'd do to "Vertiginous" or "Versimilitude". But give the kid a break, he's only 3.
I myself had problems mastering some phonemes when I was a lad. Specifically I couldn't do the "TR" sound as in "Strum" or "Triangle". Those came out as "Fum" and "Fangle" respectively as I tended to substitute an "F" for the "TR" and whatever might come before it.
You see where this is going? Of course you do.
It was a bit of an embarassment to Mom when we were in a fairly nice restaurant, seated by a window and enjoying a fine meal, when my small but eagle-keen eyes spotted quite the cool lorry driving by. This was a car carrier and my little brain was very excited over the large vehicle carrying an assortment of autos.
"Momma! Fuck! Momma! Fuck!" I cried joyously as I pointed out of the window.
"James Robert! Stop that this instant" replied my less than thrilled mother.
"No, look Momma! Fuck! Fuck! Fuck!" my small but increasingly voluble voice rang out. I stood up on my chair pointing excitedly as the truck motored out of sight, belting out ever more strident yells of "Fuck! Fuck! Fuck!"
"James Robert Peacock! You sit down this instant! Oh, my sweet Lord!" The last part was somewhat muffled as her face had lowered into her hands by this time.
As the truck had passed from view I obliged her, trailing off with one last "You see fuck?" as I reclaimed my seat. Mom didn't finish her dinner that night if I recall correctly.
I'm sure you can see now why I'm not overly concerned with Bacon's "V" thing.
Posted by: Jim at
01:57 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 350 words, total size 2 kb.
1
See,the same embarassing thing happend to me at Toy's R Us when Bear (then somehwere arround or close to 2) claimed that he saw a green "fuck".Meaning a FROG of course (how come only I knew what he ment??).And of course EVERYONE in that darn store looked at me,discussted if I may add,while I tried to explain but then gave up,simply hit the road and didn't return to that store for the next century.
Now I know whom he has it from!
But let me tell you....when Burger lets out his famous cry for an BLairPain,the situation doesn't look any better for me.For some reason NOONE EVER looks up (eventhough Burger points up in the air).I bet they all think we gave him some kind of PAIN (keep in mind that the answer to "did mommy/daddy hurt you again?ALWAYS is YES!).
Kids...who need them??:-)
Posted by: LW at January 09, 2004 02:11 PM (fkewd)
2
I forgot about the frog incident. Oh, that was a good one. hehe
Lately Burger has dropped the "airplane" in favor of just "plane" which isn't exactly an improvement as the somewhat confusing "BlairPain!" is now the very clear "Pain!"
I understand why some parents keep their kids in the cellar.
Posted by: Jim at January 09, 2004 02:43 PM (IOwam)
3
And don't forget about the case of nice J(then about 5 or so)which btw wasn't luck of knowledge on how to put letters together,who had the actuall guts to sit at the table with THREE adults and say "fucking shit".NOOOOOO,said Nana,noway she said that because her dad would split her head open.Welllll,Nana had to admit a week later that J did SO say it because J actually said it to het Mother.Who then,had her swollow soap and WE all got instructions to NEVER mention it to her dad because he INDEED would have split her head open (or most likely just given her a big ole spanking).
Point is:children are wired but parents are just as nuts on occation!LOL
Posted by: LW at January 09, 2004 03:01 PM (fkewd)
4
excuse me while I interrupt this family discussion....
I too had a F sound for the TR. One day in a landromat with mom a dump truck went by....
"mommy, look. a dum fuck"
Posted by: MojoMark at January 09, 2004 05:21 PM (E+LQu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
One More Time For Folks Slow On The Uptake
No I do NOT hate you, your religion, your race, your sexual disposition, your nationality (except those misfortunate enough to be French) or any other minority slice you lay claim to.
Actually the French comment above is especially topical here as the email I'm responding to was indeed from a froggy. Why do we Americans, particularly this American, hate the French? The short answer is "We don't" or at a bare minimum "I don't". The somewhat longer answer is "Because you are cheese eating surrender monkeys" but that is way overused so I'm not going to go there.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
08:36 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1109 words, total size 6 kb.
1
Veuillez m'excuser. Je m'engagerai maintenant dans la satisfaction autoerotic tout en rêvant des aisselles galliques velues. Euuuhhhh!!! TMI!
Actually you had it right the first time. They're just a bunch of cheese eating surrender monkeys. No sense of right or wrong and absolutely no dignity. And to top it all off - completely irrelevant to the rest of the world.
Message to the french. If you want the world to respect you again, stop being a bunch of pussies.
Posted by: Clancy at January 09, 2004 09:08 AM (EGVPL)
2
I have NEVER met a french person that I liked.Therefore I guess I am allowed to generalize my dislike for THE French.
Their food is good,their country oh so nice but it is TOO expensive there,concidering what a bunch of CHEAP bastards they are!
Viva la France????Don't make me puke....
Posted by: LW at January 09, 2004 11:19 AM (fkewd)
3
i woked with a guy this summer that was a missionary to france for most of his ife. He and his family moved back here because they just couldnt stand it anymore. The best part though was that whenever he screwed up his only apology was "I'm french, can't help it."
Posted by: tommy at January 09, 2004 01:06 PM (SCijv)
4
This just makes me think of something my dad likes to say:
"If negative stereotypes against whatever group you're part of sicken you so much, quit living up to them all the time."
This means, darling French people, that you should (1) start wearing deodorant, (2) admit that existentialism was just a dumb joke to fool other nationalities into thinking you were clever, and (3) poke fun at yourselves more often. Because if you keep leaving us to do it, believe me, we'll find no shortage of comic material.
Posted by: ilyka at January 09, 2004 04:36 PM (q0xDW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 07, 2004
Lord of the Rings, Part 0 - The Prequel
With the unprecedented success of the 3 Lord of the Rings movies it was pretty much a no-brainer that director Peter Jackson would get the chance to make the prequel to the LOTR storyline,
The Hobbit. What isn't well known is Jackson's concerns over making
The Hobbit, the movie.
As readers of the books can easily attest, The Hobbit is by far the weakest of the four books. This will put the pressure on Jackson to create a movie on par with the 3 already completed. He is going to have to do it with a greatly reduced budget as well. The special effects that were such a grand part of the blockbuster movies will not be much of a factor in the rather pedantic Hobbit storyline and the movie is budgeted accordingly.
Added to this is the problem of characters. Both the Bilbo Baggins (played by Ian Holm)and Gandalf (played by Ian McKellen) characters appear in The Hobbit but that storyline occurs many years before the time of the other movies. Jackson has resolved this issue by recasting the parts. Leonard Nimoy has been cast to play the younger Gandalf. At the time of this writing it is unknown who will play the lead roll of Bilbo Baggins.
Despite his difficulties and concerns, Jackson remains upbeat and optimistic over his new movie project.
I'm happy that Peter Jackson remains optimistic but if you're a fan of the first three movies and you've seen The Hobbit advanced teaser trailer you might agree with me that there is some definite cause for concern. If you haven't seen it yet you should probably take a minute to do so and form your own opinion.
Posted by: Jim at
08:17 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 300 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Whatever you think of Peter Jackson, please DON'T watch "Meet The Feebles." My GF (Gorgeous Fiancé) has it in her movie collection and I accidentally watched it a couple of weekends ago.
I was really hard to go see the third movie after that. All the time I kept thinking – “This guy made Meet The Feebles?” “How did he possibly get the Film Studio to back him for this epic after that?” It was the worst movie I have ever seen. So bad in fact you want to watch it again just to be sure...
Posted by: Clancy at January 07, 2004 10:34 AM (EGVPL)
2
I'll put that right next to
Master of Disguise in the category of "Movies that are so bad there is no need to see them just to be sure if the people who said they were so bad were right about how bad they are".
Posted by: Jim at January 07, 2004 10:38 AM (IOwam)
3
That "trailer" is so funny. You really had more for a second. Dan "WTF?" Nimoy "Bilbo Baggins!" Dan- runs around screaming. Pat yourself on the back por favor.
Posted by: Dan O'Leary at January 07, 2004 04:00 PM (/8FxX)
4
No, no, no, no, no,
The Hobbit is
NOT the weakest of the four books, it is the
strongest. The LOTR trilogy is long and boring and lacks a sense of humour. It has glaring plot errors (like, it takes Frodo and Sam three freaking books to reach Mount Doom in Mordor, and then once the ring has been disposed of, they are taken back to safety in
under a chapter by the eagles, making you wonder WHERE THE HELL WERE THOSE EAGLES WHEN YOU NEEDED THEM?)
I prefer
The Hobbit, which is complete in itself, which manages to pack more into 200 pages than the LOTR manages to pack in 1000 pages, and which doesn't make so much fuss and bother over a little invisibility ring (in
The Hobbit, it's just an ingenious plot device; in the LOTR, it's taken out of all proportion). I mean, sure, nice bits in LOTR, some good characters and decent ideas and all that, but The Hobbit is much better, I reckon. Sorry, guys, but that's how I feel!
Posted by: TimT at January 07, 2004 06:57 PM (IhGTH)
5
Okay. I knew it couldn't possibly be a real trailer. I knew it would be something funny.
But you have to die for putting that awful, awful tune and image in my head.
Die. Quickly, but painfully.
Posted by: Meryl Yourish at January 08, 2004 05:40 PM (Zfbho)
6
I'm one step closer to hell for making this post, aren't I? At a minimum I've put a serious hit on my karma. I better go out and adopt a kitten real quick.
Posted by: Jim at January 08, 2004 08:03 PM (fkewd)
7
"a little invisibility ring"? Ooookay, TimT. Whatever.
Posted by: Andrea Harris at January 11, 2004 01:20 AM (vrEHD)
8
Can't. Stop. Watching.
I'll get you, my little pretty.
And your little kitten, TOO!
Posted by: margi at January 11, 2004 02:27 AM (4jrV0)
9
I would like to see Peter Jackson do the Simillarion instead of The Hobbit. The Hobbit is a precursor for the ring, but The Simmillarion opens the story to the trilogy.
Posted by: Annie at February 09, 2004 10:28 AM (iIX8e)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 06, 2004
Oops, She Did it Again
Washington (Reuters) - Britney Joins the Nation of Islam
Pop sensation Britney Spears has become the most recent celebrity to join the ranks of the african-american-centric Nation of Islam. Spear's conversion to Islam follows on the heels of her two day long marriage and subsequent annulment to childhood pal Jason Alexander.
The black separatist religious organization has a longstanding policy of accepting only non-white members. In a prepared statement, spokesman Louis Farrakhan explained the exception was made for Ms.Spears "Cause the girl gots soul. We're talkin' Aretha Franklin soul."
Spears was unavailable for comment but her press agent Schreck Menteur explained that "It was a joke that just went too far. Britney will be getting an annulment...that is, Britney will be getting rebabtized in the Christian faith...as soon as the churches open on Sunday."
Menteur stronly denied that this was yet another publicity grabbing stunt intended to cast some sort of attention on the flagging pop star's career. An insider to the Spear's camp confirms this, saying that it is merely the next in a series of "Britney thinks it's a joke" jokes. Having completed the "Britney thinks marriage is a joke" and "Britney thinks Islam is a joke" stunts, the anonymous insider says that Spears is now planning "Britney thinks pregnancy is a joke" and "Britney thinks terrorism is a joke" gags.
Posted by: Jim at
07:49 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 233 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Is any one else sick of hearing about this girl?
Jeesh...
Posted by: Tiffani at January 06, 2004 09:18 AM (0i1dP)
Posted by: LW at January 06, 2004 09:34 AM (fkewd)
3
Sick of hearing from her? Yes. But apparently soon she'll be spreading for Playboy so Hef can pop a few viagra and choke his chicken in her general direction.
And I'm far, far more sick of Christina, who is just a skank.
Posted by: Johnny Huh? at January 09, 2004 05:50 PM (AyewP)
4
if ALLAH wills then sh will accept islam and M me .
Posted by: shan at April 14, 2004 09:53 AM (vHKs/)
5
Im sick of her & her stupid publicity stunts just to boost her fading, worthless so called career. She's always saying "y cant u ppl just let me be". More like, y the doesnt she just let us be .
Posted by: tk at December 13, 2004 07:48 AM (OJrUX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
66kb generated in CPU 0.0454, elapsed 0.0648 seconds.
32 queries taking 0.0316 seconds, 120 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.