February 05, 2004
The Butt Game
The Scene: Dopple-G and I are eating lunch and discussing the 7 year old who was suspended for saying 'hell'.
Dopple-G: You've got to be a little nervous about stuff like this, right? I mean, Bear's about to enter the vaunted public school system.
Me: Yeah, it's a definite concern.
Dopple-G: But he doesn't have a potty mouth, right?
Me: Nah. In fact, he does a good job keeping Lovely Wife and I straight. He does play The Butt Game with me though.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
11:38 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 363 words, total size 2 kb.
1
i realize the new templates been up for a while now, but i just wanted to say how excited i am you picked this one. i was secretly hoping you would back when you had all three up to choose from. Yay!
Posted by: jay at February 05, 2004 11:52 PM (vV+gc)
2
I AM CORHOLIO! I come from Lake Titicaca. My people - they have no bunghole....
ARE YOU THREATENING ME?!? Are you threatening my BUNGHOLIO?!?!
Posted by: Mike the Marine at February 06, 2004 09:02 AM (Zw7Hl)
3
The Butt game is cool, but not nearly as fun as the faahrt game.
Sheew wee honey, you rotten - I wanna divorce.
Posted by: Clancy at February 06, 2004 11:43 AM (EGVPL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 04, 2004
My Sophisticated Lovely Wife
The Scene: A summer barbeque at our house. The sun is down and the rugrats are abed. Dopple-G, his wife, my own Lovely Wife and I are relaxing on the veranda with beers and cigars. Lovely Wife goes into the house to get a glass of wine. She returns with a bottle in one hand and a glass in the other. The bottle has about a half inch of wine in it.
Dopple-G: Why bother with a glass? There's barely a swig left in that bottle.
Lovely Wife: Because wine is drunk from glasses. Perhaps it's acceptable for Americans to drink from the bottle but I am European. I'm naturally more sophisticated.
At this point Lovely Wife is faced with a conundrum. Both hands have something in them. There are no flat surfaces ready at hand to put her glass upon. She solves the problem by biting the cork and spending considerable effort and no small amount of time to worry it out of the bottle. She then spits the cork across the veranda and prepares to pour the wine.
Dopple-G: (laughing) Oh, yeah. You're definitely more sophisticated. I probably would have used an armpit or something to get that out. And there's no way I could have spit that far for distance. Nowhere near sophisticated enough.
Lovely Wife realizes what she just did and starts laughing so hard that she drops her glass in the dirt. At this point she gives up and finishes off the wine with one good pull from the bottle.
So now you know why I call her Lovely Wife and not Sophisticated Wife.
Posted by: Jim at
10:23 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 277 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I should sue you for exposion!!!!:-P
Posted by: LW at February 04, 2004 11:34 AM (fkewd)
2
You can't! Public knowledge. hehehehe
Besides, you're the one who reminded me of that little adventure. I remember everything! ;-)
Posted by: Jim at February 04, 2004 11:36 AM (IOwam)
3
YOU told me to send you an email to remind you,over a week ago.I "forgot" to do that...so how the hell you remember ANYTHING without MY reminders??????:-P
NOW...call the insurance!!!HA
Posted by: LW at February 04, 2004 11:40 AM (fkewd)
4
Wow, she sounds like a hottie. Is she married?
Oh, wait, nevermind. I am.
Posted by: Brian Jones at February 05, 2004 10:46 AM (E4NcZ)
5
Ever heard of an "open" relationship?
;-)
Posted by: LW at February 05, 2004 11:26 AM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Just follow my nose
It always knows.
The flavor of fruit.
Just follow my snoot!
This little ditty is lodged firmly in my head this morning. I have no idea where it came from. As far as I know this jingle was retired many, many years ago. I also haven't actually seen Toucan Sam in I don't know how long.
So why do I have this bloody annoying Fruit Loops jingle bouncing around my grey matter? What synapse misfired to bring this annoying stuff out of cranial retirement? Is it a warning sign of some grand mental problem lurking just beneath the surface?
Of course some people would clarify that as another grand mental problem lurking just beneath the surface. Because they're all out to get me and they do stuff like that. What was that noise?!
[mumble mumble mumble]
Posted by: Jim at
09:22 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 141 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I wish I could fix that problem but it's out of my hands. It has to do with the way the weblogs hosted by mu.nu are set up with a shared comments directory.
Posted by: Jim at February 04, 2004 03:11 PM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 30, 2004
Open Letter To Everybody At The Office
Dear Y'all:
The group mailing address that sends email to everybody in the company is a feature that should be used sparringly. Its purpose is to allow a simple way for people like the President, CFO, and Bob to tell us when people are fired, when our W-2 forms will be ready, and when the gas leak is fixed, respectively. Occassional use by other people is okay, but only when they have an actual message imparting information that applies to the entire company. For example, it's okay when the receptionist sends out an email that the car wash guy is here. It's okay for someone to send an email when they put homemade cookies in the break room.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
03:54 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 935 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Well, at least you are not a state agency. When my mom worked for the state of NC (and you havent been here, btw, oh what you are missing). Their "reply all" or "send all" went to every e-mail address in the state. For the first year after the system was established they would get a mass personal e-mail every couple of weeks or so, and boy you always knew who the new guy in the office was. Any office. Anywhere in the state. We all just thought that was funny, ot anoying, though, and it taught the offender a lesson.
Tommy.
Posted by: tommy at January 30, 2004 04:39 PM (MhJXW)
2
It's worse in the military. Trust me.
The problem is: the nozzles who NEED to read and heed this missive will scan it and forward it to everyone in their distribution list.
*sigh*
You did your best, Jim.
Posted by: margi at February 02, 2004 07:22 PM (kpNlZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The most amazing thing
The most absolutely amazing thing about
this picture of Lovely Wife with Nicki (pup #1) is not the teasing swell of hip, so rounded and shapely that even the big droopy shirt can't hide it. It isn't the seductive "come hither" look in her eye. It isn't that she's lying down with a dog who's exposing his genitals. It's not even the gargantuan size of the graphic due to me not realizing how big it was as I uploaded it and being far too lazy to edit and upload another picture.
No, my friends. The most amazing thing is that Lovely Wife gave me verbal permission to take the photo. That's right. Actual permission. "You can take a picture if you want" will forever be scored upon my forebrain. She even told me where the camera was when i couldn't find it.
This is big, y'all. Is Lovely Wife losing her abject hatred of being photographed? Is she coming to appreciate the camera's lecherous stare?
Or perhaps I should be off to the shed to look for empty pods.
Posted by: Jim at
06:23 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 187 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ahum.....Now I hate it even more because you EXPOSED me!!:-P
Posted by: LW at January 30, 2004 08:21 AM (fkewd)
2
Hey, at least I didn't put up any of the nudies. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at January 30, 2004 08:46 AM (IOwam)
3
Well, I think both photograph subjects look cute and well-rested!
Posted by: Helen at January 30, 2004 09:50 AM (mjzOu)
4
Cute picture....Love the sock in the background!
Posted by: Tiffani at January 30, 2004 09:53 AM (0i1dP)
5
Tiffani, I don't think that's a sock. Looks like a waistband, and you can kinda make out the letters...
A-I-N-E-S.... Haines. oh shit.
Jim didn't have any underwear on while he was taking the photograph!
No wonder LW looks half asleep.
Posted by: MojoMark at January 30, 2004 12:30 PM (E+LQu)
6
H-A-N-E-S. No "I". :-P
Everybody in my household takes their socks off at any random time throughout the day. You can find them on the couches, the floor, the fireplace, the dog food bowl...you name it. I don't even have a visual recognition factor for them any longer. They are effectively invisible to me.
Regarding underwear, it's far easier to pick out the times that I
am wearing a ball control device that the times that I'm not.
Do your balls hang low?
Do they wiggle to and fro?
Can you tie 'em in a knot?
Can you tie 'em in a bow?
Do you wear 'em on your shoulder,
Like a continental soldier?
Do your balls hang low?
Posted by: Jim at January 30, 2004 01:22 PM (IOwam)
7
2 things..
1. IF and that's a big if - Jim was naked where's the cow? I thought she was major part of his sex life.
2. Please God tell me you don't wear tighty whitey's. Jim say it aint so....
Posted by: Tiffani at January 30, 2004 01:26 PM (0i1dP)
8
Tiffani figured it out. As there's no cow in the picture I am obviously clothed.
I have both tighty-whiteys as well as boxers in the drawer. Depending on the pants worn I'll favor one style over the other. With shorts I'll generally wear whiteys to prevent peek-a-boo effect. Right now I'm in boxers.
Posted by: Jim at January 30, 2004 02:05 PM (IOwam)
Posted by: annika at January 30, 2004 02:09 PM (zAOEU)
10
If the spousal unit is authorizing photos in this new fashion, I suggest you call Mulder & Skully... She's been switched!
Posted by: Nate at January 30, 2004 05:00 PM (l/r8N)
11
Rule number 1 of dog photos is any human in a dog photo looks fine as said dog is the focus of the photo.
Now you have to count the days until someone stops LW in the street and starts with "I was on this website the other day..."
Posted by: Simon at February 02, 2004 05:09 AM (FUPxT)
12
She is beautiful (LW, not the dog), but I notice no ring on her finger.....????
Posted by: me at February 07, 2004 11:26 AM (ulInj)
13
That's correct, me. And no, I'm not telling you where it is.
Posted by: Jim at February 07, 2004 05:08 PM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 29, 2004
It's too quiet in here
This morning in the shower I was accosted by an unnatural sensation. No kids yelling. No dog barking. No cat attempting to dig to China via the litter box. Just the delicate sound of the water sluicing off my naked body. The silence was unnerving.
I did the only thing a rational person with absolutely no singing ability could do in this situation. I made sound effects.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
10:05 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 408 words, total size 2 kb.
January 28, 2004
And they call it puppy love
The other day, Bacon walked by the puppy and gave her a kick. Not a mean kick, just a little "Hey there, I'm kicking you, what are you going to do about it?" type of kick.
Lovely Wife was the first to react as she yelled out ''Why did you do that!?" and he replied with only a look, head cocked just so and a facial expression that clearly said ''I haven't the foggiest idea what you are talking about". She rephrased her query ''Why did you kick the puppy?" He shrugged his shoulders and uttered the classic ''I dunno" that all parents are infinitely familiar with but his look clearly still indicated that he was clueless as to the subject under discussion.
So yesterday I was reading a story to little Burger. Kota was laying next to me, hoping for some petting action. The other two were sitting around having their brains sucked out by the evil glowing box in the corner. Kota got bored waiting for me to pay her attention and got up to find our other dog, Nicki. As she passed by Bacon, she calmly and casually turned her head to bite him as she passed. Not a mean bite, just a playful puppy bite. A bite that said "I bit you. Do something about it."
I yelled out "Kota! No! Why did you do that?" (animals can understand complex questions as long as you are angry when you ask them.) She sat down and looked at me, head cocked just a little bit and wearing an expression that said ''I haven't the foggiest idea what you are talking about." I didn't bother rephrasing the question.
We're in trouble.
Posted by: Jim at
06:30 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 295 words, total size 2 kb.
1
No, you are definitely not in trouble; you've just taken a giant step in learning about parenting! The raising of young of almost all mammals has striking similarities, regardless of specie.
Posted by: MommaBear at January 28, 2004 09:25 AM (TDtey)
2
So again and in short:
We ARE in trouble!
Posted by: LW at January 28, 2004 09:57 AM (fkewd)
3
Take heart, all is not lost. Just keep thinking on those cute little baby animals in the "cutesy-poo" documentaries about how the "Animal Kingdom" raises its young, including the ocassional swipe of a maternal paw to the head or rump of a young-un, and then the licks of caring given afterwards. Just stay two steps ahead of them and all will end well.
Yeah, it's work, but worth the effort, all the same!!
Posted by: MommaBear at January 28, 2004 01:33 PM (TDtey)
4
Two steps
ahead? I've got to catch up first! ;-)
Posted by: Jim at January 28, 2004 01:41 PM (IOwam)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 27, 2004
Basic Economics
The Scene: Lovely Wife is in the supermarket with the spawn children. They spy an unnecessary but not out of bounds pricewise item that they covet.
Bear: Momma, can we get that unnecessary but not out of bounds pricewise item that I covet?
Lovely Wife: No, Bear. I don't have the money for it right now.
Bear: You can use your card!
more...
Posted by: Jim at
09:59 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 326 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I didn't think you'd remember.You seemed asleep when I told you!!
Posted by: LW at January 27, 2004 10:08 AM (fkewd)
2
I remember everything! ;-)
Posted by: Jim at January 27, 2004 10:11 AM (IOwam)
3
Kind of makes you wonder what kind of commercials they are playing on Nickelodean these days...
Posted by: Susie at January 27, 2004 01:51 PM (0+cMc)
4
Actually this one they probably saw on another station (those ocations mother gets to see the news for once).Nickelodeon however has alot of irritating,sugar containing commercials.LOL
Posted by: LW at January 27, 2004 02:37 PM (fkewd)
5
That's funny and slightly disturbing all at the same time.
Of course the solution is to give the kids their own credit cards. They can experience the joy of purchasing, the dread of the bill, the horror of repaying and crippling interest payments before the repo men appear. A good life lesson and better than what they'll learn from Nemo, which seems to teach that fish escaping fish tanks is a good idea.
Posted by: Simon at January 27, 2004 08:57 PM (UKqGy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 23, 2004
You Want Pasteurized Processed American Cheese Flavored Product On That?
The Scene: Dopple-G and I are sitting down to lunch. He is eating naked burgers with cheese slices on top.
Background: Dopple-G actually enjoys American cheese singles and considers them to be actual cheese. I am a cheese snob where this pseudo-food is concerned.
Dopple-G: I've got "real cheese" today.
Me: That is not real cheese. It is "processed cheese food product".
Dopple-G: Why are you so anti-American?
Me: I'm not anti-American, I'm anti-cheese impersonation.
Dopple-G: American cheese is real cheese.
Me: Real cheese does not have partially dehydrogenated soy bean oil as an ingredient.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
06:04 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 540 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Velveeta.
Don't knock it till you go to a country where it's illegal.
Posted by: Helen at January 23, 2004 09:01 AM (I9OSd)
2
Oh, I must. I simply must. I abhor those plastic slices of near food. Now cheddar's a different story. I don't think I could live someplace without an ample supply of cheddar available.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 09:11 AM (IOwam)
3
Discusting,nasty,a humilliation to the word "cheese" and have I mentioned yet that people who eat that crap and actually call it "cheese" (including the makers) are INSANE?
The word KRAFT just gives me the creeps.
Yuck,yuck and MORE YUCK!
Posted by: LW at January 23, 2004 10:21 AM (fkewd)
4
I was going to say that, being the cheesefreak I am, I will eat any kind of cheese and that I would probably eat grass clippings if they were labeled "cheese" but then I realized this is just opening the door for the GM1 to rename Mr. Happy "The Big Cheese" and I don't need that kind of pressure. Nor the TMJ.
So I say nothing at all.
(Yay spray cheese!)
Posted by: LeeAnn at January 23, 2004 12:29 PM (HxCeX)
5
Dude, spray meat could bring BILLIONS! Not sure about the spray bread, though...although, I put spray "cheese" on crackers rather than bread, and spray crackers may be do-able...
Posted by: Susie at January 23, 2004 01:39 PM (0+cMc)
6
speaking about graas clippings..you know...I used to live in The Netherlands and there they have a cheese called "grass cheese".I think I might order some of off the ducth store now......
Posted by: LW at January 23, 2004 01:41 PM (fkewd)
7
Grass cheese? Oh, I hope you're joking. That's nothing like head cheese, is it? [spew]
I don't know if spray crackers could work. They're supposed to be crispy. Bread can be soft so I was thinking that would be possible. Spray it out into the desired shape and then the outside layer gets a firm film while the inside gets bubbly like spray insulation.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 01:46 PM (IOwam)
8
No,nothing like that at all.Its a typ of cheese that is seasonal.The cows eat special,fresh,new,young grass and that gives the cheese a special taste.Its very mild,smooth,soft...better then young Gouda.Its very yummy.:-)
Posted by: LW at January 23, 2004 01:58 PM (fkewd)
9
Phew! In that case, order away.
Posted by: Jim at January 23, 2004 02:06 PM (IOwam)
10
Dopple-G is a commie, right?
Posted by: Victor at January 24, 2004 12:24 PM (16A49)
11
Victor - Only as it pertains to dairy products.
Posted by: Jim at January 25, 2004 05:00 AM (fkewd)
12
i'm from england and we don't have spray cheese. sounds like we're missing out..
Posted by: lotty at December 02, 2004 11:34 AM (SgQqe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 20, 2004
First impressions can be oh so very wrong.
So, y'all know about our new puppy (Kota, short for Dakota) and how we took the calm, affectionate one instead of the hyperactive, psychotic one. By way of explaining our current situation I'll share with you the meaning of "Dakota", which I've just discovered after many hours of searching. The original Indian doesn't come over to English exactly but a loose translation is
"Oh, you thought I was the calm one? You are in such terrible shit that I would pity you if only I could sit still long enough to do so".
Apparently her original calm demeanor was the result of a heavy barbituate overdose. She has now self medicated with mescaline to compensate. I must, for the sake of the family's continued sanity (okay, the adults' continued sanity), find her stash.
It just came to me that the pet-style animals in the household now outnumber the humans. 2 dogs, 2 cats, 2 birds vs 5 bipeds. Thank god for opposable thumbs. Still, if they ever figure out basic mathematics we might be in for some trouble. If you ever come to the site and the entries are all "woof grrr woof" (and badly spelled) please send Snausages.
Posted by: Jim at
02:40 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 215 words, total size 1 kb.
1
quibble just for fun: wouldn't the birds be bipeds too?
Posted by: frances at January 20, 2004 05:17 PM (DrNMU)
2
Technically yes, but who can count on a bird? Last mistake you'll ever make.
Posted by: Jim at January 20, 2004 05:53 PM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 16, 2004
Entrapment
The Scene: Dopple-G and I are on the way home from work. It's a beatiful sunny Atlanta day, traffic is light, spirits are high.
Me: So, any plans for next Saturday?
Dopple-G: I plan on not doing any work. Period. No construction. No cleaning. No moving things about. Nothing.
Me: Easy, killer. I'm not trying to get you to do work.
Dopple-G: Yes you are. Any time you have something fun in mind you say "Hey, do you want to do this fun thing next Saturday?" When you are trying to get me to do work you say "So, any plans for next Saturday?" and then I either have to lie and say I've got plans or make up something really quick because as soon as I say that I don't have any plans you'll say "Great, then you can help me do somethingorother" and somethingorother is always work.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
08:17 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 699 words, total size 4 kb.
1
The ultimate cousin-trap.Always works.
Posted by: LW at January 16, 2004 08:31 AM (fkewd)
2
Heh heh, this is why I'm glad nobody trusts me to be semi responsible for their kids... of the two I'd go for Brother Bear. I saw it with a couple of similarly aged friedns and we all enjoyed it
Posted by: Robert at January 16, 2004 08:38 AM (kXZI6)
3
Brother Bear was pretty good. I saw that a couple weeks back with Bacon (child #2). Some of the parents are probably going to be concerned with the killin' in the beginning of the movie though so I'm thinking we'll end up with Looney Tunes.
Posted by: Jim at January 16, 2004 09:01 AM (IOwam)
4
really? i figured it'd have big kid jokes in it...
Posted by: pylorns at January 16, 2004 10:42 AM (FQQ7F)
5
Yeah but we are dealing with some kids from PBS-only homes.Know what I mean?
Posted by: LW at January 16, 2004 10:45 AM (fkewd)
6
The setup for the central plot involves one of three brothers dying in a bear attack and then the youngest brother hunting down and killing that bear. It was a good movie and my 3 year old enjoyed it but he's a lot like me when it comes to scary stuff. I know that the big guy (4 yrs) would have a problem with it.
The last thing I want is a half dozen 4 year olds who can't get to sleep 'cause they're scared a bear will get them. Heh.
Posted by: Jim at January 16, 2004 10:47 AM (IOwam)
7
OK, so I'm one of the 5 or 6 people who liked LXG. *sigh*
On the other hand, the movie named after this post... even Catherine Zeta-Jones' rear couldn't save it.
Posted by: Jon at January 16, 2004 03:20 PM (B9rRW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 09, 2004
Learning to speak
Bacon has a hard time with the "V" sound and he tends to avoid it or substitute different sounds for it. Instead of "vanilla" he uses "Tamilla" (the "N" changes to an "M" because, let's face it, "tamilla" just sounds better than "tanilla"). I expect that if he ever tried to go for "Veritable" it would come out like "Terrible" and I don't even want to think what he'd do to "Vertiginous" or "Versimilitude". But give the kid a break, he's only 3.
I myself had problems mastering some phonemes when I was a lad. Specifically I couldn't do the "TR" sound as in "Strum" or "Triangle". Those came out as "Fum" and "Fangle" respectively as I tended to substitute an "F" for the "TR" and whatever might come before it.
You see where this is going? Of course you do.
It was a bit of an embarassment to Mom when we were in a fairly nice restaurant, seated by a window and enjoying a fine meal, when my small but eagle-keen eyes spotted quite the cool lorry driving by. This was a car carrier and my little brain was very excited over the large vehicle carrying an assortment of autos.
"Momma! Fuck! Momma! Fuck!" I cried joyously as I pointed out of the window.
"James Robert! Stop that this instant" replied my less than thrilled mother.
"No, look Momma! Fuck! Fuck! Fuck!" my small but increasingly voluble voice rang out. I stood up on my chair pointing excitedly as the truck motored out of sight, belting out ever more strident yells of "Fuck! Fuck! Fuck!"
"James Robert Peacock! You sit down this instant! Oh, my sweet Lord!" The last part was somewhat muffled as her face had lowered into her hands by this time.
As the truck had passed from view I obliged her, trailing off with one last "You see fuck?" as I reclaimed my seat. Mom didn't finish her dinner that night if I recall correctly.
I'm sure you can see now why I'm not overly concerned with Bacon's "V" thing.
Posted by: Jim at
01:57 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 350 words, total size 2 kb.
1
See,the same embarassing thing happend to me at Toy's R Us when Bear (then somehwere arround or close to 2) claimed that he saw a green "fuck".Meaning a FROG of course (how come only I knew what he ment??).And of course EVERYONE in that darn store looked at me,discussted if I may add,while I tried to explain but then gave up,simply hit the road and didn't return to that store for the next century.
Now I know whom he has it from!
But let me tell you....when Burger lets out his famous cry for an BLairPain,the situation doesn't look any better for me.For some reason NOONE EVER looks up (eventhough Burger points up in the air).I bet they all think we gave him some kind of PAIN (keep in mind that the answer to "did mommy/daddy hurt you again?ALWAYS is YES!).
Kids...who need them??:-)
Posted by: LW at January 09, 2004 02:11 PM (fkewd)
2
I forgot about the frog incident. Oh, that was a good one. hehe
Lately Burger has dropped the "airplane" in favor of just "plane" which isn't exactly an improvement as the somewhat confusing "BlairPain!" is now the very clear "Pain!"
I understand why some parents keep their kids in the cellar.
Posted by: Jim at January 09, 2004 02:43 PM (IOwam)
3
And don't forget about the case of nice J(then about 5 or so)which btw wasn't luck of knowledge on how to put letters together,who had the actuall guts to sit at the table with THREE adults and say "fucking shit".NOOOOOO,said Nana,noway she said that because her dad would split her head open.Welllll,Nana had to admit a week later that J did SO say it because J actually said it to het Mother.Who then,had her swollow soap and WE all got instructions to NEVER mention it to her dad because he INDEED would have split her head open (or most likely just given her a big ole spanking).
Point is:children are wired but parents are just as nuts on occation!LOL
Posted by: LW at January 09, 2004 03:01 PM (fkewd)
4
excuse me while I interrupt this family discussion....
I too had a F sound for the TR. One day in a landromat with mom a dump truck went by....
"mommy, look. a dum fuck"
Posted by: MojoMark at January 09, 2004 05:21 PM (E+LQu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
One More Time For Folks Slow On The Uptake
No I do NOT hate you, your religion, your race, your sexual disposition, your nationality (except those misfortunate enough to be French) or any other minority slice you lay claim to.
Actually the French comment above is especially topical here as the email I'm responding to was indeed from a froggy. Why do we Americans, particularly this American, hate the French? The short answer is "We don't" or at a bare minimum "I don't". The somewhat longer answer is "Because you are cheese eating surrender monkeys" but that is way overused so I'm not going to go there.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
08:36 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1109 words, total size 6 kb.
1
Veuillez m'excuser. Je m'engagerai maintenant dans la satisfaction autoerotic tout en rêvant des aisselles galliques velues. Euuuhhhh!!! TMI!
Actually you had it right the first time. They're just a bunch of cheese eating surrender monkeys. No sense of right or wrong and absolutely no dignity. And to top it all off - completely irrelevant to the rest of the world.
Message to the french. If you want the world to respect you again, stop being a bunch of pussies.
Posted by: Clancy at January 09, 2004 09:08 AM (EGVPL)
2
I have NEVER met a french person that I liked.Therefore I guess I am allowed to generalize my dislike for THE French.
Their food is good,their country oh so nice but it is TOO expensive there,concidering what a bunch of CHEAP bastards they are!
Viva la France????Don't make me puke....
Posted by: LW at January 09, 2004 11:19 AM (fkewd)
3
i woked with a guy this summer that was a missionary to france for most of his ife. He and his family moved back here because they just couldnt stand it anymore. The best part though was that whenever he screwed up his only apology was "I'm french, can't help it."
Posted by: tommy at January 09, 2004 01:06 PM (SCijv)
4
This just makes me think of something my dad likes to say:
"If negative stereotypes against whatever group you're part of sicken you so much, quit living up to them all the time."
This means, darling French people, that you should (1) start wearing deodorant, (2) admit that existentialism was just a dumb joke to fool other nationalities into thinking you were clever, and (3) poke fun at yourselves more often. Because if you keep leaving us to do it, believe me, we'll find no shortage of comic material.
Posted by: ilyka at January 09, 2004 04:36 PM (q0xDW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 07, 2004
Lord of the Rings, Part 0 - The Prequel
With the unprecedented success of the 3 Lord of the Rings movies it was pretty much a no-brainer that director Peter Jackson would get the chance to make the prequel to the LOTR storyline,
The Hobbit. What isn't well known is Jackson's concerns over making
The Hobbit, the movie.
As readers of the books can easily attest, The Hobbit is by far the weakest of the four books. This will put the pressure on Jackson to create a movie on par with the 3 already completed. He is going to have to do it with a greatly reduced budget as well. The special effects that were such a grand part of the blockbuster movies will not be much of a factor in the rather pedantic Hobbit storyline and the movie is budgeted accordingly.
Added to this is the problem of characters. Both the Bilbo Baggins (played by Ian Holm)and Gandalf (played by Ian McKellen) characters appear in The Hobbit but that storyline occurs many years before the time of the other movies. Jackson has resolved this issue by recasting the parts. Leonard Nimoy has been cast to play the younger Gandalf. At the time of this writing it is unknown who will play the lead roll of Bilbo Baggins.
Despite his difficulties and concerns, Jackson remains upbeat and optimistic over his new movie project.
I'm happy that Peter Jackson remains optimistic but if you're a fan of the first three movies and you've seen The Hobbit advanced teaser trailer you might agree with me that there is some definite cause for concern. If you haven't seen it yet you should probably take a minute to do so and form your own opinion.
Posted by: Jim at
08:17 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 300 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Whatever you think of Peter Jackson, please DON'T watch "Meet The Feebles." My GF (Gorgeous Fiancé) has it in her movie collection and I accidentally watched it a couple of weekends ago.
I was really hard to go see the third movie after that. All the time I kept thinking – “This guy made Meet The Feebles?” “How did he possibly get the Film Studio to back him for this epic after that?” It was the worst movie I have ever seen. So bad in fact you want to watch it again just to be sure...
Posted by: Clancy at January 07, 2004 10:34 AM (EGVPL)
2
I'll put that right next to
Master of Disguise in the category of "Movies that are so bad there is no need to see them just to be sure if the people who said they were so bad were right about how bad they are".
Posted by: Jim at January 07, 2004 10:38 AM (IOwam)
3
That "trailer" is so funny. You really had more for a second. Dan "WTF?" Nimoy "Bilbo Baggins!" Dan- runs around screaming. Pat yourself on the back por favor.
Posted by: Dan O'Leary at January 07, 2004 04:00 PM (/8FxX)
4
No, no, no, no, no,
The Hobbit is
NOT the weakest of the four books, it is the
strongest. The LOTR trilogy is long and boring and lacks a sense of humour. It has glaring plot errors (like, it takes Frodo and Sam three freaking books to reach Mount Doom in Mordor, and then once the ring has been disposed of, they are taken back to safety in
under a chapter by the eagles, making you wonder WHERE THE HELL WERE THOSE EAGLES WHEN YOU NEEDED THEM?)
I prefer
The Hobbit, which is complete in itself, which manages to pack more into 200 pages than the LOTR manages to pack in 1000 pages, and which doesn't make so much fuss and bother over a little invisibility ring (in
The Hobbit, it's just an ingenious plot device; in the LOTR, it's taken out of all proportion). I mean, sure, nice bits in LOTR, some good characters and decent ideas and all that, but The Hobbit is much better, I reckon. Sorry, guys, but that's how I feel!
Posted by: TimT at January 07, 2004 06:57 PM (IhGTH)
5
Okay. I knew it couldn't possibly be a real trailer. I knew it would be something funny.
But you have to die for putting that awful, awful tune and image in my head.
Die. Quickly, but painfully.
Posted by: Meryl Yourish at January 08, 2004 05:40 PM (Zfbho)
6
I'm one step closer to hell for making this post, aren't I? At a minimum I've put a serious hit on my karma. I better go out and adopt a kitten real quick.
Posted by: Jim at January 08, 2004 08:03 PM (fkewd)
7
"a little invisibility ring"? Ooookay, TimT. Whatever.
Posted by: Andrea Harris at January 11, 2004 01:20 AM (vrEHD)
8
Can't. Stop. Watching.
I'll get you, my little pretty.
And your little kitten, TOO!
Posted by: margi at January 11, 2004 02:27 AM (4jrV0)
9
I would like to see Peter Jackson do the Simillarion instead of The Hobbit. The Hobbit is a precursor for the ring, but The Simmillarion opens the story to the trilogy.
Posted by: Annie at February 09, 2004 10:28 AM (iIX8e)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 06, 2004
Oops, She Did it Again
Washington (Reuters) - Britney Joins the Nation of Islam
Pop sensation Britney Spears has become the most recent celebrity to join the ranks of the african-american-centric Nation of Islam. Spear's conversion to Islam follows on the heels of her two day long marriage and subsequent annulment to childhood pal Jason Alexander.
The black separatist religious organization has a longstanding policy of accepting only non-white members. In a prepared statement, spokesman Louis Farrakhan explained the exception was made for Ms.Spears "Cause the girl gots soul. We're talkin' Aretha Franklin soul."
Spears was unavailable for comment but her press agent Schreck Menteur explained that "It was a joke that just went too far. Britney will be getting an annulment...that is, Britney will be getting rebabtized in the Christian faith...as soon as the churches open on Sunday."
Menteur stronly denied that this was yet another publicity grabbing stunt intended to cast some sort of attention on the flagging pop star's career. An insider to the Spear's camp confirms this, saying that it is merely the next in a series of "Britney thinks it's a joke" jokes. Having completed the "Britney thinks marriage is a joke" and "Britney thinks Islam is a joke" stunts, the anonymous insider says that Spears is now planning "Britney thinks pregnancy is a joke" and "Britney thinks terrorism is a joke" gags.
Posted by: Jim at
07:49 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 233 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Is any one else sick of hearing about this girl?
Jeesh...
Posted by: Tiffani at January 06, 2004 09:18 AM (0i1dP)
Posted by: LW at January 06, 2004 09:34 AM (fkewd)
3
Sick of hearing from her? Yes. But apparently soon she'll be spreading for Playboy so Hef can pop a few viagra and choke his chicken in her general direction.
And I'm far, far more sick of Christina, who is just a skank.
Posted by: Johnny Huh? at January 09, 2004 05:50 PM (AyewP)
4
if ALLAH wills then sh will accept islam and M me .
Posted by: shan at April 14, 2004 09:53 AM (vHKs/)
5
Im sick of her & her stupid publicity stunts just to boost her fading, worthless so called career. She's always saying "y cant u ppl just let me be". More like, y the doesnt she just let us be .
Posted by: tk at December 13, 2004 07:48 AM (OJrUX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 31, 2003
The plus side of a household plague
In a word...revenge.
Young kids do not understand the concept of conservation of energy. They go flat out until they are out of juice and then they collapse wherever they are. When they've got the flu this can happen at the drop of a hat since their little bodies are already running low on go stuff and they tend to get knocked out by the flu medicine.
Yesterday at around 5:30 Lovely Wife noticed a sudden shift in the ambient noise level. I was on the love seat making hideous Magna-Doodle drawings for Burger and she was in the dining room. She called out "Is Bacon asleep?" Sure enough he was passed out on the couch.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
02:15 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 534 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I'm curious as to who you think it is...
I cheated and did the searchy-searchy thing and I found this:
Pierre Ambroise Francois Choderios de LaClos (1741-1803). He originally said it in French in his 1782 book Les Liasons Dangereuses: "La vengeance est un plat qui se mange froid"
I found something else that alluded that it may have been a Sicilian proverb too. (Which is much more believable than it having a french origin - I mean come on - the french! What does a surrender monkey need with revenge?)
Posted by: Clancy at December 31, 2003 03:04 PM (EGVPL)
2
hey! I saw that quote just the other day on a "Kill Bill" movie poster. I haven't seen the film yet, but I saw it and remembered your post.
Posted by: MojoMark at January 04, 2004 12:57 AM (FXawF)
3
Actually it was "Hamlet" that I was thinking of. After further review (and a reread of said volume) it ain't in there. Oh there's loads of revenge stuff from the mad Dane but that particular quip is lacking from the play. It looks like the original source is indeed from the book
Dangerous Liasons, from a genuine Frenchman.
No points for Clancy of course, since he Googled it. By the way, Clancy - It's a work of fiction, that's why something as testosterone laden as revenge is a subject of a French writer. They dream about stuff like that all the time.
Posted by: Jim at January 04, 2004 10:12 AM (fkewd)
4
I remember it from Star Trek II, Wrath of Khan, as an "old Klingon proverb," but I doubt that is the origin...
Posted by: Dave at March 02, 2004 03:44 PM (EYkly)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 16, 2003
Attention Atlanta Drivers
During this hectic holiday season there are a few things that we need to go over to insure my sanity and your continued good health.
- Shopping on your lunch break is fine but the sense of urgency this creates for you is not the “life or death” type of thing that will get you out of a traffic ticket.
- No matter how late you are getting back to the office, the laws of physics still say that you cannot go faster than the car in front of you.
- That three feet of space you normally leave between my back bumper and your front bumper is sacred and should not be sacrificed no matter how desperate you are to get to Borders.
- Stay the hell away from Pleasant Hill Road.
- Those lanes that turn into forced right turns are still there even when they are full of traffic. If you donÂ’t want to turn right you need to get into another lane before you get into the intersection.
- If you find yourself in the intersection turning right even though you don't want to, go ahead and turn right anyway. Sitting in your turn lane waiting for a break in the lane of traffic full of cars that got out of that right turn only lane in time will get your ass totaled by the Excursion carrying one very stressed mom and 3 screaming kids that is coming up behind you. The people behind her will cheer your destruction.
- Do NOT match your vehicle speed to the ambient temperature.
- When the left turn arrow turns red this means you are not supposed to enter the intersection. They picked that color because it is exactly the fucking same as a red light. If you are in the intersection when the red arrow makes its appearance you may continue out of the intersection. If you are not yet into the intersection then stay right the hell where you are.
- If you are the fifth or succeeding car to blow through the red arrow by playing choo-choo train with the car in front of you I will shoot you dead.
Did I miss any?
Posted by: Jim at
02:31 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 365 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Here's one:
When driving in a lane posted with a "Keep Moving" sign, heed the sign an KEEP FUCKING MOVING!!!
(e.g. when exiting I-85 NB and turning right onto Pleasant Hill -- had a run-in with some illiterate moron there just a couple of hours ago)
Posted by: Joey at December 16, 2003 03:13 PM (Jq6q/)
2
And another:
If I am at an intersection, the light is green, and I cannot get all the way through the intersection (i.e. traffic is backed up on the other side of the intersection), I will not venture into the intersection and further block it, precipitating gridlock. If you are behind me and choose to honk your horn, I will get out of my truck and throttle you mercilessly.
Happened Saturday in front of Perimeter Mall. Except for the throttling bit -- it was too cold.
Posted by: Joey at December 16, 2003 03:22 PM (Jq6q/)
3
How about this one: Do not change lanes to block me when I change lanes to pass you. That makes me want to bust a cap or cut you.
In other news: Mayor Shirley Franklin and the city council reach their only unananymous decision by declaring stop light running the official sport of Atlanta.
Posted by: Trey Givens at December 16, 2003 09:15 PM (9c74f)
4
I've got one, which I observed while facing the life-altering terror that is Atlanta driving:
The breakdown lane? It's not really a lane, per se. It's more like a gentle guidance for those who stupidly got a flat tire. So please don't drive there and expect me to let you in. Because at the end of the day, I pay my insurance on time, and I love a good game of breakdown lane chicken.
Posted by: Helen at December 17, 2003 07:56 AM (DbywB)
5
Can't believe I forgot about the "Keep Moving" lanes. Worst offender area ever for these is the I85 exit to Pleasant Hill going toward the mall. First you have the normal run of the mill morons who don't understand that "Keep Moving" means you have to keep moving and then you have the specific assholes who stop and wait for traffic to clear so they can get over 3 lanes to make a left on Venture.
AAAARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHH!!!
Posted by: Jim at December 17, 2003 09:04 AM (IOwam)
6
Another thing that erks me is when people are in the "exit only lane" and wait until the last minute to move over. It makes no sense.
Posted by: Bryant at March 30, 2004 07:25 AM (MpGBn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 12, 2003
Car-nage
Bacon: I peed my pants.
(Bacon is a card carrying member of the CAP Society. That's Children Against Parents. Their methods are nefarious, devious and purely evil.)
Lovely Wife: What? You just went potty before we got in the car! Why did you pee your pants?
(Lovely Wife has recently joined POTLaN, better known as Parents On Their Last Nerve.)
Bacon: I don't know.
(CAP members are highly trained to withstand the fiercest interrogation.)
Bear: Because we don't have a bathroom in here!
(As the CAP Team Leader, Bear launches a flanking attack to support his troops.)
Lovely Wife: Gah!
(Bear's flanking attack is successful. Lovely Wife's adult thought processes cannot switch gears fast enough to counter his devious non sequitir.)
Bear and Bacon smile, content in their victory as Lovely Wife and I devolve into a laughing fit.
Posted by: Jim at
07:24 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 141 words, total size 1 kb.
December 06, 2003
It had to be New York
The family had to be based in freaking New York. Upright, uptight Atlantic state New York, a place of unbridled acceptance of general morality. My life could have been so much cooler if my family was from West Virginia. It's warmer, which is something I've really come to appreciate since moving to Georgia. Lots more scenery and nice mountains. Western New York has no mountains. They even frown upon hills there. And most importantly, in West Virginia they let you boff your cousins.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
10:41 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 349 words, total size 2 kb.
1
My hot cousins live in New Mexico... bah...
Posted by: pylorns at December 07, 2003 08:15 AM (06ggV)
2
Hey, *I'm* from West Virginia and I never ever humped a close family member.
As far as I know, that is. We had a good bootlegger, so there are a lot of memory gaps.
Posted by: LeeAnn at December 07, 2003 08:19 PM (HxCeX)
3
As your wife, I knew you were wierd but THIS beats the odds of any "normalism" by a VERY long shot.I met one of your cousins.....
Posted by: LW at December 08, 2003 08:36 AM (fkewd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 25, 2003
The worst job ever
No, I'm not talking about the infamous
Singaporean animal masturbator, any of the worthies on
WorstJob.com or even
the guy who collects worms from cattle intestines. I'm talking about the poor S.O.B. who has to squeegee clean the holodecks on the Enterprise at the end of the day.
more...
Posted by: Jim at
02:47 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 397 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I thought I was the only sick F to harbor those thoughts. What a relief to know I'm not alone!
And hey, it's like hundreds of years from now - surely someone would have invented a Excreta-Sucker 'bot.
Besides, the redshirts need to be available in case somebody needs to die in a hurry. Can't keep 'em tied up with a mop.
Posted by: rick at November 25, 2003 05:12 PM (oA/Vb)
2
maybe they have a way to clean that up... i mean, there is water in the holodeck and you can get wet and dry off.. remeber on one of the star trek movies (generations) I think, they are on a ship and worf falls into the water...
Posted by: pylorns at November 25, 2003 05:33 PM (oMGhn)
3
Or maybe they use the transporter? Beam that spunk right off the ship. Or better yet - into a photon torpedo war head. Maybe that's what Worf means when he always recommends "a
full spread of photon torpedos".
Posted by: Jim at November 25, 2003 09:06 PM (fkewd)
4
The GM1 mentioned that to me back when Next Gen first showed up and I mentioned I'd like to just live in a holodeck. He said I'd have to wear big rubber boots.
Posted by: LeeAnn at November 26, 2003 08:15 AM (HxCeX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
93kb generated in CPU 0.7243, elapsed 0.8424 seconds.
103 queries taking 0.6188 seconds, 323 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.